Mapping the interactions of adenoviral E1A proteins with the p160 nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain of CBP

Structural and interaction analysis of human lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase with the poorly water-soluble drug NBQX

Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase (L-PGDS) is a secretory lipid-transporter protein that was shown to bind a wide variety of hydrophobic ligands in vitro. Exploiting this function, we previously examined the feasibility of using L-PGDS as a novel delivery vehicle for poorly water-soluble drugs. However, the mechanism by which human L-PGDS binds to poorly water-soluble drugs is unclear. In this study, we determined the solution structure of human L-PGDS and investigated the mechanism of L-PGDS binding to 6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxalin-2,3-dione (NBQX), an α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptor antagonist. NMR experiments showed that human L-PGDS has an eight-stranded antiparallel β-barrel structure that forms a central cavity, a short 310 -helix and two α-helices. Titration with NBQX was monitored using 1 H-15 N HSQC spectroscopy. At higher NBQX concentrations, some cross-peaks of the protein exhibited fast-exchanging shifts with a curvature, indicating at least two binding sites. These residues were located in the upper portion of the cavity. Singular value decomposition analysis revealed that human L-PGDS has two NBQX binding sites. Large chemical shift changes were observed in the H2-helix and A-, B-, C-, D-, H- and I-strands and H2-helix upon NBQX binding. Calorimetric experiments revealed that human L-PGDS binds two NBQX molecules with dissociation constants of 46.7 μm for primary binding and 185.0 μm for secondary binding. Molecular docking simulations indicated that these NBQX binding sites are located within the β-barrel. These results provide new insights into the interaction between poorly water-soluble drugs and human L-PGDS as a drug carrier.

Vital for Viruses: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Viruses infect all kingdoms of life; their genomes vary from DNA to RNA and in size from 2kB to 1 MB or more. Viruses frequently employ disordered proteins, that is, protein products of virus genes that do not themselves fold into independent three-dimensional structures, but rather, constitute a versatile molecular toolkit to accomplish a range of functions necessary for viral infection, assembly, and proliferation. Interestingly, disordered proteins have been discovered in almost all viruses so far studied, whether the viral genome consists of DNA or RNA, and whatever the configuration of the viral capsid or other outer covering. In this review, I present a wide-ranging set of stories illustrating the range of functions of IDPs in viruses. The field is rapidly expanding, and I have not tried to include everything. What is included is meant to be a survey of the variety of tasks that viruses accomplish using disordered proteins.

Multilayered allosteric modulation of coupled folding and binding by phosphorylation, peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerization, and diversity of interaction partners

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) play key roles in cellular regulation, including signal transduction, transcription, and cell-cycle control. Accordingly, IDPs can commonly interact with numerous different target proteins, and their interaction networks are expected to be highly regulated. However, many of the underlying regulatory mechanisms have remained unclear. Here, we examine the representative case of the nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) of the large multidomain protein CBP, a hub in transcriptional regulation, and the interaction with several of its binding partners. Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer measurements show that phosphorylation of NCBD reduces its binding affinity, with effects that vary depending on the binding partner and the site and number of modifications. The complexity of the interaction is further increased by the dependence of the affinities on peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerization in NCBD. Overall, our results reveal the potential for allosteric regulation on at least three levels: the different affinities of NCBD for its different binding partners, the differential modulation of these affinities by phosphorylation, and the effect of peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerization on binding.

Evolution of SLiM-mediated hijack functions in intrinsically disordered viral proteins

Viruses and their hosts are involved in an ‘arms race’ where they continually evolve mechanisms to overcome each other. It has long been proposed that intrinsic disorder provides a substrate for the evolution of viral hijack functions and that short linear motifs (SLiMs) are important players in this process. Here, we review evidence in support of this tenet from two model systems: the papillomavirus E7 protein and the adenovirus E1A protein. Phylogenetic reconstructions reveal that SLiMs appear and disappear multiple times across evolution, providing evidence of convergent evolution within individual viral phylogenies. Multiple functionally related SLiMs show strong coevolution signals that persist across long distances in the primary sequence and occur in unrelated viral proteins. Moreover, changes in SLiMs are associated with changes in phenotypic traits such as host range and tropism. Tracking viral evolutionary events reveals that host switch events are associated with the loss of several SLiMs, suggesting that SLiMs are under functional selection and that changes in SLiMs support viral adaptation. Fine-tuning of viral SLiM sequences can improve affinity, allowing them to outcompete host counterparts. However, viral SLiMs are not always competitive by themselves, and tethering of two suboptimal SLiMs by a disordered linker may instead enable viral hijack. Coevolution between the SLiMs and the linker indicates that the evolution of disordered regions may be more constrained than previously thought. In summary, experimental and computational studies support a role for SLiMs and intrinsic disorder in viral hijack functions and in viral adaptive evolution.

Conformational buffering underlies functional selection in intrinsically disordered protein regions

Many disordered proteins conserve essential functions in the face of extensive sequence variation, making it challenging to identify the mechanisms responsible for functional selection. Here we identify the molecular mechanism of functional selection for the disordered adenovirus early gene 1A (E1A) protein. E1A competes with host factors to bind the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, subverting cell cycle regulation. We show that two binding motifs tethered by a hypervariable disordered linker drive picomolar affinity Rb binding and host factor displacement. Compensatory changes in amino acid sequence composition and sequence length lead to conservation of optimal tethering across a large family of E1A linkers. We refer to this compensatory mechanism as conformational buffering. We also detect coevolution of the motifs and linker, which can preserve or eliminate the tethering mechanism. Conformational buffering and motif-linker coevolution explain robust functional encoding within hypervariable disordered linkers and could underlie functional selection of many disordered protein regions.

Host diversification is concurrent with linear motif evolution in a Mastadenovirus hub protein

Over one hundred Mastadenovirus types infect seven orders of mammals. Virus-host coevolution may involve cospeciation, duplication, host switch and partial extinction events. We reconstruct Mastadenovirus diversification, finding that while cospeciation is dominant, the other three events are also common in Mastadenovirus evolution. Linear motifs are fast-evolving protein functional elements and key mediators of virus-host interactions, thus likely to partake in adaptive viral evolution. We study the evolution of eleven linear motifs in the Mastadenovirus E1A protein, a hub of virus-host protein-protein interactions, in the context of host diversification. The reconstruction of linear motif gain and loss events shows fast linear motif turnover, corresponding a virus-host protein-protein interaction turnover orders of magnitude faster than in model host proteomes. Evolution of E1A linear motifs is coupled, indicating functional coordination at the protein scale, yet presents motif-specific patterns suggestive of convergent evolution. We report a pervasive association between Mastadenovirus host diversification events and the evolution of E1A linear motifs. Eight of 17 host switches associate with the gain of one linear motif and the loss of four different linear motifs, while five of nine partial extinctions associate with the loss of one linear motif. The specific changes in E1A linear motifs during a host switch or a partial extinction suggest that changes in the host molecular environment lead to modulation of the interactions with the retinoblastoma protein and host transcriptional regulators. Altogether, changes in the linear motif repertoire of a viral hub protein are associated with adaptive evolution events during Mastadenovirus evolution.

Synergies of Single Molecule Fluorescence and NMR for the Study of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Single molecule fluorescence and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) are two very powerful techniques for the analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Both techniques have individually made major contributions to deciphering the complex properties of IDPs and their interactions, and it has become evident that they can provide very complementary views on the distance-dynamics relationships of IDP systems. We now review the first approaches using both NMR and single molecule fluorescence to decipher the molecular properties of IDPs and their interactions. We shed light on how these two techniques were employed synergistically for multidomain proteins harboring intrinsically disordered linkers, for veritable IDPs, but also for liquid–liquid phase separated systems. Additionally, we provide insights into the first approaches to use single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and NMR for the description of multiconformational models of IDPs.

NMR illuminates intrinsic disorder

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has long been instrumental in the characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). This method continues to offer rich insights into the nature of IDPs in solution, especially in combination with other biophysical methods such as small-angle scattering, single-molecule fluorescence, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and mass spectrometry. Substantial advances have been made in recent years in studies of proteins containing both ordered and disordered domains and in the characterization of problematic sequences containing repeated tracts of a single or a few amino acids. These sequences are relevant to disease states such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases, where disordered proteins misfold into harmful amyloid. Innovative applications of NMR are providing novel insights into mechanisms of protein aggregation and the complexity of IDP interactions with their targets. As a basis for understanding the solution structural ensembles, dynamic behavior, and functional mechanisms of IDPs and IDRs, NMR continues to prove invaluable.

αα-Hub domains and intrinsically disordered proteins: A decisive combo

Hub proteins are central nodes in protein-protein interaction networks with critical importance to all living organisms. Recently, a new group of folded hub domains, the αα-hubs, was defined based on a shared αα-hairpin supersecondary structural foundation. The members PAH, RST, TAFH, NCBD, and HHD are found in large proteins such as Sin3, RCD1, TAF4, CBP, and harmonin, which organize disordered transcriptional regulators and membrane scaffolds in interactomes of importance to human diseases and plant quality. In this review, studies of structures, functions, and complexes across the αα-hubs are described and compared to provide a unified description of the group. This analysis expands the associated molecular concepts of "one domain-one binding site", motif-based ligand binding, and coupled folding and binding of intrinsically disordered ligands to additional concepts of importance to signal fidelity. These include context, motif reversibility, multivalency, complex heterogeneity, synergistic αα-hub:ligand folding, accessory binding sites, and supramodules. We propose that these multifaceted protein-protein interaction properties are made possible by the characteristics of the αα-hub fold, including supersite properties, dynamics, variable topologies, accessory helices, and malleability and abetted by adaptability of the disordered ligands. Critically, these features provide additional filters for specificity. With the presentations of new concepts, this review opens for new research questions addressing properties across the group, which are driven from concepts discovered in studies of the individual members. Combined, the members of the αα-hubs are ideal models for deconvoluting signal fidelity maintained by folded hubs and their interactions with intrinsically disordered ligands.

Adenoviral E1A Exploits Flexibility and Disorder to Target Cellular Proteins

Direct interaction between intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is often difficult to characterize hampering the elucidation of their binding mechanism. Particularly challenging is the study of fuzzy complexes, in which the intrinsically disordered proteins or regions retain conformational freedom within the assembly. To date, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has proven to be one of the most powerful techniques to characterize at the atomic level intrinsically disordered proteins and their interactions, including those cases where the formed complexes are highly dynamic. Here, we present the characterization of the interaction between a viral protein, the Early region 1A protein from Adenovirus (E1A), and a disordered region of the human CREB-binding protein, namely the fourth intrinsically disordered linker CBP-ID4. E1A was widely studied as a prototypical viral oncogene. Its interaction with two folded domains of CBP was mapped, providing hints for understanding some functional aspects of the interaction with this transcriptional coactivator. However, the role of the flexible linker connecting these two globular domains of CBP in this interaction was never explored before.

Unexpected specificity within dynamic transcriptional protein-protein complexes

A key functional event in eukaryotic gene activation is the formation of dynamic protein-protein interaction networks between transcriptional activators and transcriptional coactivators. Seemingly incongruent with the tight regulation of transcription, many biochemical and biophysical studies suggest that activators use nonspecific hydrophobic and/or electrostatic interactions to bind to coactivators, with few if any specific contacts. Here a mechanistic dissection of a set of representative dynamic activator•coactivator complexes, comprised of the ETV/PEA3 family of activators and the coactivator Med25, reveals a different molecular recognition model. The data demonstrate that small sequence variations within an activator family significantly redistribute the conformational ensemble of the complex while not affecting overall affinity, and distal residues within the activator-not often considered as contributing to binding-play a key role in mediating conformational redistribution. The ETV/PEA3•Med25 ensembles are directed by specific contacts between the disordered activator and the Med25 interface, which is facilitated by structural shifts of the coactivator binding surface. Taken together, these data highlight the critical role coactivator plasticity plays in recognition of disordered activators and indicate that molecular recognition models of disordered proteins must consider the ability of the binding partners to mediate specificity.

Structural Determinants within the Adenovirus Early Region 1A Protein Spacer Region Necessary for Tumorigenesis

It has long been established that group A human adenoviruses (HAdV-A12, -A18, and -A31) can cause tumors in newborn rodents, with tumorigenicity related to the presence of a unique spacer region located between conserved regions 2 and 3 within the HAdV-A12 early region 1A (E1A) protein. Group B adenoviruses are weakly oncogenic, whereas most of the remaining human adenoviruses are nononcogenic. In an attempt to understand better the relationship between the structure of the AdE1A spacer region and oncogenicity of HAdVs, the structures of synthetic peptides identical or very similar to the adenovirus 12 E1A spacer region were determined and found to be α-helical using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This contrasts significantly with some previous suggestions that this region is unstructured. Using available predictive algorithms, the structures of spacer regions from other E1As were also examined, and the extent of the predicted α-helix was found to correlate reasonably well with the tumorigenicity of the respective virus. We suggest that this may represent an as-yet-unknown binding site for a partner protein required for tumorigenesis.IMPORTANCE This research analyzed small peptides equivalent to a region within the human adenovirus early region 1A protein that confers, in part, tumor-inducing properties to various degrees on several viral strains in rats and mice. The oncogenic spacer region is α-helical, which contrasts with previous suggestions that this region is unstructured. The helix is characterized by a stretch of amino acids rich in alanine residues that are organized into a hydrophobic, or "water-hating," surface that is considered to form a major site of interaction with cellular protein targets that mediate tumor formation. The extent of α-helix in E1A from other adenovirus species can be correlated to a limited degree to the tumorigenicity of that virus. Some serotypes show significant differences in predicted structural propensity, suggesting that the amino acid type and physicochemical properties are also of importance.

Multiple domains in the 50 kDa form of E4F1 regulate promoter-specific repression and E1A trans-activation

The 50 kDa N-terminal product of the cellular transcription factor E4F1 (p50E4F1) mediates E1A289R trans-activation of the adenovirus E4 gene, and suppresses E1A-mediated transformation by sensitizing cells to cell death. This report shows that while both E1A289R and E1A243R stimulate p50E4F1 DNA binding activity, E1A289R trans-activation, as measured using GAL-p50E4F1 fusion proteins, involves a p50E4F1 transcription regulatory (TR) region that must be promoter-bound and is dependent upon E1A CR3, CR1 and N-terminal domains. Trans-activation is promoter-specific, as GAL-p50E4F1 did not stimulate commonly used artificial promoters and was strongly repressive when competing against GAL-VP16. p50E4F1 and E1A289R stably associate in vivo using the p50E4F1 TR region and E1A CR3, although their association in vitro is indirect and paradoxically disrupted by MAP kinase phosphorylation of E1A289R, which stimulates E4 trans-activation in vivo. Multiple cellular proteins, including TBP, bind the p50E4F1 TR region in vitro. The mechanistic implications for p50E4F1 function are discussed.

H3K18Ac as a Marker of Cancer Progression and Potential Target of Anti-Cancer Therapy

Acetylation and deacetylation are posttranslational modifications (PTMs) which affect the regulation of chromatin structure and its remodeling. Acetylation of histone 3 at lysine placed on position 18 (H3K18Ac) plays an important role in driving progression of many types of cancer, including breast, colon, lung, hepatocellular, pancreatic, prostate, and thyroid cancer. The aim of this review is to analyze and discuss the newest findings regarding the role of H3K18Ac and acetylation of other histones in carcinogenesis. We summarize the level of H3K18Ac in different cancer cell lines and analyze its association with patients’ outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Finally, we describe future perspectives of cancer therapeutic strategies based on H3K18 modifications.

Interplay between sequence, structure and linear motifs in the adenovirus E1A hub protein

E1A is the main transforming protein in mastadenoviruses. This work uses bioinformatics to extrapolate experimental knowledge from Human adenovirus serotype 5 and 12 E1A proteins to all known serotypes. A conserved domain architecture with a high degree of intrinsic disorder acts as a scaffold for multiple linear motifs with variable occurrence mediating the interaction with over fifty host proteins. While linear motifs contribute strongly to sequence conservation within intrinsically disordered E1A regions, motif repertoires can deviate significantly from those found in prototypical serotypes. Close to one hundred predicted residue-residue contacts suggest the presence of stable structure in the CR3 domain and of specific conformational ensembles involving both short- and long-range intramolecular interactions. Our computational results suggest that E1A sequence conservation and co-evolution reflect the evolutionary pressure to maintain a mainly disordered, yet non-random conformation harboring a high number of binding motifs that mediate viral hijacking of the cell machinery.

A proline switch explains kinetic heterogeneity in a coupled folding and binding reaction

The interactions of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) with their molecular targets are essential for the regulation of many cellular processes. IDPs can perform their functions while disordered, and they may fold to structured conformations on binding. Here we show that the cis/trans isomerization of peptidyl−prolyl bonds can have a pronounced effect on the interactions of IDPs. By single-molecule spectroscopy, we identify a conserved proline residue in NCBD (the nuclear-coactivator binding domain of CBP) whose cis/trans isomerization in the unbound state modulates the association and dissociation rates with its binding partner, ACTR. As a result, NCBD switches on a time scale of tens of seconds between two populations that differ in their affinities to ACTR by about an order of magnitude. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate as a cause reduced packing of the complex for the cis isomer. Peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerization may be an important previously unidentified mechanism for regulating IDP interactions.

How intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) undergo a coupled folding and binding reaction with their molecular targets remains to be understood. Here authors use single-molecule FRET to assess the contribution of cis/trans isomerization of peptidyl-prolyl bonds in regulating IDP interactions.

Unified understanding of folding and binding mechanisms of globular and intrinsically disordered proteins

Extensive experimental and theoretical studies have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms of folding and binding of globular proteins, and coupled folding and binding of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). The forces responsible for conformational changes and binding are common in both proteins; however, these mechanisms have been separately discussed. Here, we attempt to integrate the mechanisms of coupled folding and binding of IDPs, folding of small and multi-subdomain proteins, folding of multimeric proteins, and ligand binding of globular proteins in terms of conformational selection and induced-fit mechanisms as well as the nucleation–condensation mechanism that is intermediate between them. Accumulating evidence has shown that both the rate of conformational change and apparent rate of binding between interacting elements can determine reaction mechanisms. Coupled folding and binding of IDPs occurs mainly by induced-fit because of the slow folding in the free form, while ligand binding of globular proteins occurs mainly by conformational selection because of rapid conformational change. Protein folding can be regarded as the binding of intramolecular segments accompanied by secondary structure formation. Multi-subdomain proteins fold mainly by the induced-fit (hydrophobic collapse) mechanism, as the connection of interacting segments enhances the binding (compaction) rate. Fewer hydrophobic residues in small proteins reduce the intramolecular binding rate, resulting in the nucleation–condensation mechanism. Thus, the folding and binding of globular proteins and IDPs obey the same general principle, suggesting that the coarse-grained, statistical mechanical model of protein folding is promising for a unified theoretical description of all mechanisms.