Plasticity and transient binding are key ingredients of the periplasmic chaperone network

A team of chaperones play to win in the bacterial periplasm

The survival and virulence of Gram-negative bacteria require proper biogenesis and maintenance of the outer membrane (OM), which is densely packed with β-barrel OM proteins (OMPs). Before reaching the OM, precursor unfolded OMPs (uOMPs) must cross the whole cell envelope. A network of periplasmic chaperones and proteases maintains unfolded but folding-competent conformations of these membrane proteins in the aqueous periplasm while simultaneously preventing off-pathway aggregation. These periplasmic proteins utilize different strategies, including conformational heterogeneity, oligomerization, multivalency, and kinetic partitioning, to perform and regulate their functions. Redundant and unique characteristics of the individual periplasmic players synergize to create a protein quality control team capable responding to changing environmental stresses.

ATP-independent assembly machinery of bacterial outer membranes: BAM complex structure and function set the stage for next-generation therapeutics

Diderm bacteria employ β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) as their first line of communication with their environment. These OMPs are assembled efficiently in the asymmetric outer membrane by the β-Barrel Assembly Machinery (BAM). The multi-subunit BAM complex comprises the transmembrane OMP BamA as its functional subunit, with associated lipoproteins (e.g., BamB/C/D/E/F, RmpM) varying across phyla and performing different regulatory roles. The ability of BAM complex to recognize and fold OM β-barrels of diverse sizes, and reproducibly execute their membrane insertion, is independent of electrochemical energy. Recent atomic structures, which captured BAM-substrate complexes, show the assembly function of BamA can be tailored, with different substrate types exhibiting different folding mechanisms. Here, we highlight common and unique features of its interactome. We discuss how this conserved protein complex has evolved the ability to effectively achieve the directed assembly of diverse OMPs of wide-ranging sizes (8-36 β-stranded monomers). Additionally, we discuss how darobactin-the first natural membrane protein inhibitor of Gram-negative bacteria identified in over five decades-selectively targets and specifically inhibits BamA. We conclude by deliberating how a detailed deduction of BAM complex-associated regulation of OMP biogenesis and OM remodeling will open avenues for the identification and development of effective next-generation therapeutics against Gram-negative pathogens.

Dynamic interplay between the periplasmic chaperone SurA and the BAM complex in outer membrane protein folding

Correct folding of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) into the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria depends on delivery of unfolded OMPs to the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM). How unfolded substrates are presented to BAM remains elusive, but the major OMP chaperone SurA is proposed to play a key role. Here, we have used hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS), crosslinking, in vitro folding and binding assays and computational modelling to show that the core domain of SurA and one of its two PPIase domains are key to the SurA-BAM interaction and are required for maximal catalysis of OMP folding. We reveal that binding causes changes in BAM and SurA conformation and/or dynamics distal to the sites of binding, including at the BamA β1-β16 seam. We propose a model for OMP biogenesis in which SurA plays a crucial role in OMP delivery and primes BAM to accept substrates for folding.

Interaction of the outer membrane protein (OMP) chaperone SurA and the OMP folding catalyst BAM results in changes in the conformational ensembles of both species, suggesting a mechanism for delivery of OMPs to BAM in Gram-negative bacteria.

Chaperones Skp and SurA dynamically expand unfolded OmpX and synergistically disassemble oligomeric aggregates

Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) are crucial for the survival of bacteria. The two chaperones 17-kilodalton protein (Skp) and survival factor A (SurA) play key roles in OMP maturation by keeping unfolded OMP proteins soluble in the periplasm. However, their functionalities are incompletely understood. Here, we establish connections between structural and energetic features employed by the two chaperones when interacting with unfolded OmpX. We find that expansion, accompanied with fast polypeptide chain reconfiguration, prevents unfolded OmpX from misfolding and aggregating. Moreover, chaperone interaction with unfolded OmpX is thermodynamically calibrated, allowing for a fine-tuned association of chaperones with OMPs in the adenosine triphosphate-depleted periplasm. We further discovered that Skp and SurA act together as disaggregases and are able to disassemble oligomeric OMP aggregates, revealing remarkable functionalities of this periplasmic chaperone system.

Periplasmic chaperones 17-kilodalton protein (Skp) and survival factor A (SurA) are essential players in outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis. They prevent unfolded OMPs from misfolding during their passage through the periplasmic space and aid in the disassembly of OMP aggregates under cellular stress conditions. However, functionally important links between interaction mechanisms, structural dynamics, and energetics that underpin both Skp and SurA associations with OMPs have remained largely unresolved. Here, using single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy, we dissect the conformational dynamics and thermodynamics of Skp and SurA binding to unfolded OmpX and explore their disaggregase activities. We show that both chaperones expand unfolded OmpX distinctly and induce microsecond chain reconfigurations in the client OMP structure. We further reveal that Skp and SurA bind their substrate in a fine-tuned thermodynamic process via enthalpy–entropy compensation. Finally, we observed synergistic activity of both chaperones in the disaggregation of oligomeric OmpX aggregates. Our findings provide an intimate view into the multifaceted functionalities of Skp and SurA and the fine-tuned balance between conformational flexibility and underlying energetics in aiding chaperone action during OMP biogenesis.

How do Chaperones Bind (Partly) Unfolded Client Proteins?

Molecular chaperones are central to cellular protein homeostasis. Dynamic disorder is a key feature of the complexes of molecular chaperones and their client proteins, and it facilitates the client release towards a folded state or the handover to downstream components. The dynamic nature also implies that a given chaperone can interact with many different client proteins, based on physico-chemical sequence properties rather than on structural complementarity of their (folded) 3D structure. Yet, the balance between this promiscuity and some degree of client specificity is poorly understood. Here, we review recent atomic-level descriptions of chaperones with client proteins, including chaperones in complex with intrinsically disordered proteins, with membrane-protein precursors, or partially folded client proteins. We focus hereby on chaperone-client interactions that are independent of ATP. The picture emerging from these studies highlights the importance of dynamics in these complexes, whereby several interaction types, not only hydrophobic ones, contribute to the complex formation. We discuss these features of chaperone-client complexes and possible factors that may contribute to this balance of promiscuity and specificity.

The Carbapenemase BKC-1 from Klebsiella pneumoniae Is Adapted for Translocation by Both the Tat and Sec Translocons

The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria consists of two membranes surrounding the periplasm and peptidoglycan layer. β-Lactam antibiotics target the periplasmic penicillin-binding proteins that synthesize peptidoglycan, resulting in cell death. The primary means by which bacterial species resist the effects of β-lactam drugs is to populate the periplasmic space with β-lactamases. Resistance to β-lactam drugs is spread by lateral transfer of genes encoding β-lactamases from one species of bacteria to another. However, the resistance phenotype depends in turn on these “alien” protein sequences being recognized and exported across the cytoplasmic membrane by either the Sec or Tat protein translocation machinery of the new bacterial host. Here, we examine BKC-1, a carbapenemase from an unknown bacterial source that has been identified in a single clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae. BKC-1 was shown to be located in the periplasm, and functional in both K. pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of an unusual signal peptide with a twin arginine motif and a duplicated hydrophobic region. Biochemical assays showed this signal peptide directs BKC-1 for translocation by both Sec and Tat translocons. This is one of the few descriptions of a periplasmic protein that is functionally translocated by both export pathways in the same organism, and we suggest it represents a snapshot of evolution for a β-lactamase adapting to functionality in a new host.

The Dynamic SecYEG Translocon

The spatial and temporal coordination of protein transport is an essential cornerstone of the bacterial adaptation to different environmental conditions. By adjusting the protein composition of extra-cytosolic compartments, like the inner and outer membranes or the periplasmic space, protein transport mechanisms help shaping protein homeostasis in response to various metabolic cues. The universally conserved SecYEG translocon acts at the center of bacterial protein transport and mediates the translocation of newly synthesized proteins into and across the cytoplasmic membrane. The ability of the SecYEG translocon to transport an enormous variety of different substrates is in part determined by its ability to interact with multiple targeting factors, chaperones and accessory proteins. These interactions are crucial for the assisted passage of newly synthesized proteins from the cytosol into the different bacterial compartments. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about SecYEG-mediated protein transport, primarily in the model organism Escherichia coli, and describe the dynamic interaction of the SecYEG translocon with its multiple partner proteins. We furthermore highlight how protein transport is regulated and explore recent developments in using the SecYEG translocon as an antimicrobial target.

Comprehensive genomic and proteomic profiling reveal Acinetobacter johnsonii JH7 responses to Sb(III) toxicity

Antimony (Sb) pollution poses a severe health threat to ecosystems. However, the toxic effects of Sb on biota are far from being elucidated. One of the unresolved questions is the molecular signal pathways underlying microbial adaptation to excess antimonite or Sb(III) exposure. The response of a Sb(III)-resistant bacterium Acinetobacter. johnsonii JH7 to Sb(III) stress was investigated using genomic and proteomic profiling. Sb(III) induced the formation of reactive oxygen species thereby leading to oxidative stress and the up-regulation of antioxidant enzyme activities. In addition, two important operons (ars and pst) playing critical roles in this cellular response were identified. The ars proteins functioned cooperatively to expel Sb(III) thereby decreasing antimonite toxicity. Downregulation of the phosphate-specific transporter might reduce the uptake of Sb(V) while hindering phosphorus assimilation. Interaction of Sb(III) with JH7 strain cells also affected peptide syntheses and folding, energy conversion, and stability of the cellular envelope. The present study provides for the first time a global map of cellular adaptation to excess Sb(III). Such information is potentially useful to future Sb pollution remediation strategies.

SurA is a cryptically grooved chaperone that expands unfolded outer membrane proteins

The periplasmic chaperone network ensures the biogenesis of bacterial outer membrane proteins (OMPs) and has recently been identified as a promising target for antibiotics. SurA is the most important member of this network, both due to its genetic interaction with the β-barrel assembly machinery complex as well as its ability to prevent unfolded OMP (uOMP) aggregation. Using only binding energy, the mechanism by which SurA carries out these two functions is not well-understood. Here, we use a combination of photo-crosslinking, mass spectrometry, solution scattering, and molecular modeling techniques to elucidate the key structural features that define how SurA solubilizes uOMPs. Our experimental data support a model in which SurA binds uOMPs in a groove formed between the core and P1 domains. This binding event results in a drastic expansion of the rest of the uOMP, which has many biological implications. Using these experimental data as restraints, we adopted an integrative modeling approach to create a sparse ensemble of models of a SurA•uOMP complex. We validated key structural features of the SurA•uOMP ensemble using independent scattering and chemical crosslinking data. Our data suggest that SurA utilizes three distinct binding modes to interact with uOMPs and that more than one SurA can bind a uOMP at a time. This work demonstrates that SurA operates in a distinct fashion compared to other chaperones in the OMP biogenesis network.

Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA

SurA is thought to be the most important periplasmic chaperone for outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis. Its structure is composed of a core region and two peptidylprolyl isomerase domains, termed P1 and P2, connected by flexible linkers. As such these three independent folding units are able to adopt a number of distinct spatial positions with respect to each other. The conformational dynamics of these domains are thought to be functionally important yet are largely unresolved. Here we address this question of the conformational ensemble using sedimentation equilibrium, small-angle neutron scattering, and folding titrations. This combination of orthogonal methods converges on a SurA population that is monomeric at physiological concentrations. The conformation that dominates this population has the P1 and core domains docked to one another, for example, "P1-closed" and the P2 domain extended in solution. We discovered that the distribution of domain orientations is defined by modest and favorable interactions between the core domain and either the P1 or the P2 domains. These two peptidylprolyl domains compete with each other for core-binding but are thermodynamically uncoupled. This arrangement implies two novel insights. Firstly, an open conformation must exist to facilitate P1 and P2 exchange on the core, indicating that the open client-binding conformation is populated at low levels even in the absence of client unfolded OMPs. Secondly, competition between P1 and P2 binding paradoxically occludes the client binding site on the core, which may serve to preserve the reservoir of binding-competent apo-SurA in the periplasm.