Methyltransferase CheR binds to its chemoreceptor substrates independent of their signaling conformation yet modifies them differentially

Chemoreceptors in Sinorhizobium meliloti require minimal pentapeptide tethers to provide adaptational assistance

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by posttranslational modifications of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli, the adaptation proteins CheR and CheB tether to a conserved C-terminal receptor pentapeptide. Here,we investigated the function of the pentapeptide motif (N/D)WE(E/N)F in Sinorhizobium meliloti chemotaxis. Isothermal titration calorimetry revealed stronger affinity of the pentapeptides to CheR and activated CheB relative to unmodified CheB. Strains with mutations of the conserved tryptophan in one or all four MCP pentapeptides resulted in a significant decrease or loss of chemotaxis to glycine betaine, lysine, and acetate, chemoattractants sensed by pentapeptide-bearing McpX and pentapeptide-lacking McpU and McpV, respectively. Importantly, we discovered that the pentapeptide mediates chemotaxis when fused to the C-terminus of pentapeptide-lacking chemoreceptors via a flexible linker. We propose that adaptational assistance and a threshold number of available sites enable the efficient docking of adaptation proteins to the chemosensory array. Altogether, these results demonstrate that S. meliloti effectively utilizes a pentapeptide-dependent adaptation system with a minimal number of tethering units to assist pentapeptide-lacking chemoreceptors and hypothesize that the higher abundance of CheR and CheB in S. meliloti compared to E. coli allows for ample recruitment of adaptation proteins to the chemosensory array.

Tethered particle motion of the adaptation enzyme CheR in bacterial chemotaxis

Bacteria perform chemotactic adaptation by sequential modification of multiple modifiable sites on chemoreceptors through stochastic action of tethered adaptation enzymes (CheR and CheB). To study the molecular kinetics of this process, we measured the response to different concentrations of MeAsp for the Tar-only Escherichia coli strain. We found a strong dependence of the methylation rate on the methylation level and established a new mechanism of adaptation kinetics due to tethered particle motion of the methylation enzyme CheR. Experiments with various lengths of the C-terminal flexible chain in the Tar receptor further validated this mechanism. The tethered particle motion resulted in a CheR concentration gradient that ensures encounter-rate matching of the sequential modifiable sites. An analytical model of multisite catalytic reaction showed that this enables robustness of methylation to fluctuations in receptor activity or cell-to-cell variations in the expression of adaptation enzymes and reduces the variation in methylation level among individual receptors.

Methylation-Independent Chemotaxis Systems Are the Norm for Gastric-Colonizing Helicobacter Species

Many bacteria and archaea rely on chemotaxis signal transduction systems for optimal fitness. These complex, multiprotein signaling systems have core components found in all chemotactic microbes, as well as variable proteins found in only some species. We do not yet understand why these variations exist or whether there are specific niches that favor particular chemotaxis signaling organization. One variation is in the presence/absence of the chemotaxis methylation adaptation enzymes CheB and CheR. Genes for CheB and CheR are missing in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori but present in related Helicobacter that colonize the liver or intestine. In this work, we asked whether there was a general pattern of CheB/CheR across multiple Helicobacter species. Helicobacter spp. all possess chemotactic behavior, based on the presence of genes for core signaling proteins CheA, CheW, and chemoreceptors. Genes for the CheB and CheR proteins, in contrast, were variably present. Niche mapping supported the idea that these genes were present in enterohepatic Helicobacter species and absent in gastric ones. We then analyzed whether there were differences between gastric and enterohepatic species in the CheB/CheR chemoreceptor target methylation sites. Indeed, these sites were less conserved in gastric species that lack CheB/CheR. Lastly, we determined that cheB and cheR could serve as markers to indicate whether an unknown Helicobacter species was of enterohepatic or gastric origin. Overall, these findings suggest the interesting idea that methylation-based adaptation is not required in specific environments, particularly the stomach. IMPORTANCE Chemotaxis signal transduction systems are common in the archaeal and bacterial world, but not all systems contain the same components. The rationale for this system variation remains unknown. In this report, comparative genomics analysis showed that the presence/absence of CheR and CheB is one main variation within the Helicobacter genus, and it is strongly associated with the niche of Helicobacter species: gastric Helicobacter species, which infect animal stomachs, have lost their CheB and CheR, while enterohepatic Helicobacter species, which infect the liver and intestine, retain them. This study not only provides an example that a chemotaxis system variant is associated with particular niches but also proposes that CheB and CheR are new markers distinguishing gastric from enterohepatic Helicobacter species.

A Selective Tether Recruits Activated Response Regulator CheB to Its Chemoreceptor Substrate

Methylesterase/deamidase CheB is a key component of bacterial chemotaxis systems. It is also a prominent example of a two-component response regulator in which the effector domain is an enzyme. Like other response regulators, CheB is activated by phosphorylation of an aspartyl residue in its regulatory domain, creating an open conformation between its two domains. Studies of CheB in Escherichia coli and related organisms have shown that its enzymatic action is also enhanced by a pentapeptide-binding site for the enzyme at the chemoreceptor carboxyl terminus. Related carboxyl-terminal pentapeptides are found on >25,000 chemoreceptor sequences distributed across 11 bacterial phyla and many bacterial species, in which they presumably play similar roles. Yet, little is known about the interrelationship of CheB phosphorylation, pentapeptide binding, and interactions with its substrate methylesters and amides on the body of the chemoreceptor. We investigated by characterizing the binding kinetics of CheB to Nanodisc-inserted chemoreceptor dimers. The resulting kinetic and thermodynamic constants revealed a synergy between CheB phosphorylation and pentapeptide binding in which a phosphorylation mimic enhanced pentapeptide binding, and the pentapeptide served not only as a high-affinity tether for CheB but also selected the activated conformation of the enzyme. The basis of this selection was revealed by molecular modeling that predicted a pentapeptide-binding site on CheB which existed only in the open, activated enzyme. Recruitment of activated enzyme by selective tethering represents a previously unappreciated strategy for regulating response regulator action, one that may well occur in other two-component systems.

Evidence for Pentapeptide-Dependent and Independent CheB Methylesterases

Many bacteria possess multiple chemosensory pathways that are composed of homologous signaling proteins. These pathways appear to be functionally insulated from each other, but little information is available on the corresponding molecular basis. We report here a novel mechanism that contributes to pathway insulation. We show that, of the four CheB paralogs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, only CheB₂ recognizes a pentapeptide at the C-terminal extension of the McpB (Aer2) chemoreceptor (K_D = 93 µM). McpB is the sole chemoreceptor that stimulates the Che2 pathway, and CheB₂ is the methylesterase of this pathway. Pectobacterium atrosepticum SCRI1043 has a single CheB, CheB_Pec, and 19 of its 36 chemoreceptors contain a C-terminal pentapeptide. The deletion of cheB_Pec abolished chemotaxis, but, surprisingly, none of the pentapeptides bound to CheB_Pec. To determine the corresponding structural basis, we solved the 3D structure of CheB_Pec. Its structure aligned well with that of the pentapeptide-dependent enzyme from Salmonella enterica. However, no electron density was observed in the CheB_Pec region corresponding to the pentapeptide-binding site in the Escherichia coli CheB. We hypothesize that this structural disorder is associated with the failure to bind pentapeptides. Combined data show that CheB methylesterases can be divided into pentapeptide-dependent and independent enzymes.

Chemoreceptors with C-terminal pentapeptides for CheR and CheB binding are abundant in bacteria that maintain host interactions

Chemosensory pathways represent a major prokaryotic signal transduction mechanism that is based on signal sensing by chemoreceptors. An essential feature of chemosensory pathways is the CheR and CheB mediated control of chemoreceptor methylation causing pathway adaptation. At their C-terminal extension the Tar and Tsr model chemoreceptors contain a pentapeptide that acts as an additional CheR and CheB binding site. The relevance of this pentapeptide is poorly understood since pentapeptide removal from Tar/Tsr causes receptor inactivation, whereas many other chemoreceptors do not require this pentapeptide for correct function. We report here a bioinformatic analysis of pentapeptide containing chemoreceptors. These receptors were detected in 11 bacterial phyla and represent approximately 10% of all chemoreceptors. Pentapeptide containing chemoreceptors are mainly found in Gram-negative bacteria, are of low abundance in Gram-positive species and almost absent from archaea. Almost 50% of TarH (Tar homologue) ligand binding domain containing chemoreceptors possess pentapeptides, whereas chemoreceptor families with other ligand binding domains are devoid of pentapeptides. The abundance of chemoreceptors with C-terminal pentapeptides correlated negatively with the number of chemoreceptor genes per genome. The consensus sequence reveals a negative net charge for many pentapeptides. Pentapeptide containing chemoreceptors are very abundant in the order Enterobacterales, particularly in the families Pectobacterium and Dickeya, where they represent about 50% of the total number. In contrast, bacteria with primarily free living lifestyles have a reduced number of pentapeptides, such as approximately 1% for Pseudomonadales. It is proposed that pentapeptide function is related to mechanisms that permit host interaction.

ATP Binding as a Key Target for Control of the Chemotaxis Kinase

In bacterial chemotaxis, chemoreceptors in signaling complexes modulate the activity of two-component histidine kinase CheA in response to chemical stimuli. CheA catalyzes phosphoryl transfer from ATP to a histidinyl residue of its P1 domain. That phosphoryl group is transferred to two response regulators. Receptor control is almost exclusively at autophosphorylation, but the aspect of enzyme action on which that control acts is unclear. We investigated this by a kinetic analysis of activated kinase in signaling complexes. We found that phosphoryl transfer from ATP to P1 is an ordered sequential reaction in which the binding of ATP to CheA is the necessary first step; the second substrate, the CheA P1 domain, binds only to an ATP-occupied enzyme; and phosphorylated P1 is released prior to the second product, namely, ADP. We confirmed the crucial features of this kinetically deduced ordered mechanism by assaying P1 binding to the enzyme. In the absence of a bound nucleotide, there was no physiologically significant binding, but the enzyme occupied with a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog bound P1. Previous structural and computational analyses indicated that ATP binding creates the P1-binding site by ordering the "ATP lid." This process identifies the structural basis for the ordered kinetic mechanism. Recent mathematical modeling of kinetic data identified ATP binding as a focus of receptor-mediated kinase control. The ordered kinetic mechanism provides the biochemical logic of that control. We conclude that chemoreceptors modulate kinase by controlling ATP binding. Structural similarities among two-component kinases, particularly the ATP lid, suggest that ordered mechanisms and control of ATP binding are general features of two-component signaling.IMPORTANCE Our work provides important new insights into the action of the chemotaxis signaling kinase CheA by identifying the kinetic mechanism of its autophosphorylation as an ordered sequential reaction, in which the required first step is binding of ATP. These insights provide a framework for integrating previous kinetic, mathematical modeling, structural, simulation, and docking observations to conclude that chemoreceptors control the activity of the chemotaxis kinase by regulating binding of the autophosphorylation substrate ATP. Previously observed conformational changes in the ATP lid of the enzyme active site provide a structural basis for the ordered mechanism. Such lids are characteristic of two-component histidine kinases in general, suggesting that ordered sequential mechanisms and regulation by controlling ATP binding are common features of these kinases.

Sequential modification of bacterial chemoreceptors is key for achieving both accurate adaptation and high gain

Many regulatory and signaling proteins have multiple modification sites. In bacterial chemotaxis, each chemoreceptor has multiple methylation sites that are responsible for adaptation. However, whether the ordering of the multisite methylation process affects adaptation remains unclear. Furthermore, the benefit of having multiple modification sites is also unclear. Here, we show that sequentially ordered methylation/demethylation is critical for perfect adaptation; adaptation accuracy decreases as randomness in the multisite methylation process increases. A tradeoff between adaptation accuracy and response gain is discovered. We find that this accuracy-gain tradeoff is lifted significantly by having more methylation sites, but only when the multisite modification process is sequential. Our study suggests that having multiple modification sites and a sequential modification process constitute a general strategy to achieve both accurate adaptation and high response gain simultaneously. Our theory agrees with existing data and predictions are made to help identify the molecular mechanism underlying ordered covalent modifications.

Bacterial chemoreceptors have multiple methylation sites, but whether the order of methylation matters is unclear. Here, the authors show that sequentially ordered methylation is critical for perfect adaptation and for attenuating the trade-off between accurate adaptation and high response gain.

The use of isothermal titration calorimetry to unravel chemotactic signalling mechanisms

Chemotaxis is based on the action of chemosensory pathways and is typically initiated by the recognition of chemoeffectors at chemoreceptor ligand-binding domains (LBD). Chemosensory signalling is highly complex; aspect that is not only reflected in the intricate interaction between many signalling proteins but also in the fact that bacteria frequently possess multiple chemosensory pathways and often a large number of chemoreceptors, which are mostly of unknown function. We review here the usefulness of isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to study this complexity. ITC is the gold standard for studying binding processes due to its precision and sensitivity, as well as its capability to determine simultaneously the association equilibrium constant, enthalpy change and stoichiometry of binding. There is now evidence that members of all major LBD families can be produced as individual recombinant proteins that maintain their ligand-binding properties. High-throughput screening of these proteins using thermal shift assays offer interesting initial information on chemoreceptor ligands, providing the basis for microcalorimetric analyses and microbiological experimentation. ITC has permitted the identification and characterization of many chemoreceptors with novel specificities. This ITC-based approach can also be used to identify signal molecules that stimulate members of other families of sensor proteins.

Methyltransferase CheR binds to its chemoreceptor substrates independent of their signaling conformation yet modifies them differentially

Methylation of specific chemoreceptor glutamyl residues by methyltransferase CheR mediates sensory adaptation and gradient sensing in bacterial chemotaxis. Enzyme action is a function of chemoreceptor signaling conformation: kinase-off receptors are more readily methylated than kinase-on, a feature central to adaptational and gradient-sensing mechanisms. Differential enzyme action could reflect differential binding, catalysis or both. We investigated by measuring CheR binding to kinase-off and kinase-on forms of Escherichia coli aspartate receptor Tar deleted of its CheR-tethering, carboxyl terminus pentapeptide. This allowed characterization of the low-affinity binding of enzyme to the substrate receptor body, otherwise masked by high-affinity interaction with pentapeptide. We quantified the low-affinity protein-protein interactions by determining kinetic rate constants of association and dissociation using bio-layer interferometry and from those values calculating equilibrium constants. Whether Tar signaling conformations were shifted by ligand occupancy or adaptational modification, there was little or no difference between the two signaling conformations in kinetic or equilibrium parameters of enzyme-receptor binding. Thus, differential methyltransferase action does not reflect differential binding. Instead, the predominant determinants of binding must be common to different signaling conformations. Characterization of the dependence of association rate constants on Deybe length, a measure of the influence of electrostatics, implicated electrostatic interactions as a common binding determinant. Taken together, our observations indicate that differential action of methyltransferase on kinase-off and kinase-on chemoreceptors is not the result of differential binding and suggest it reflects differential catalytic propensity. Differential catalysis rather than binding could well be central to other enzymes distinguishing alternative conformations of protein substrates.