Differentiating between the sequence of structural events on alternative pathways of folding of a heterodimeric protein

Understanding the heterogeneity intrinsic to protein folding

Relating the native fold of a protein to its amino acid sequence remains a fundamental problem in biology. While computer algorithms have demonstrated recently their prowess in predicting what structure a particular amino acid sequence will fold to, an understanding of how and why a specific protein fold is achieved remains elusive. A major challenge is to define the role of conformational heterogeneity during protein folding. Recent experimental studies, utilizing time-resolved FRET, hydrogen-exchange coupled to mass spectrometry, and single-molecule force spectroscopy, often in conjunction with simulation, have begun to reveal how conformational heterogeneity evolves during folding, and whether an intermediate ensemble of defined free energy consists of different sub-populations of molecules that may differ significantly in conformation, energy and entropy.

Replacement of the native cis prolines by alanine leads to simplification of the complex folding mechanism of a small globular protein

The folding mechanism of MNEI, a single-chain variant of naturally occurring double-chain monellin, is complex, with multiple parallel refolding channels. To determine whether its folding energy landscape could be simplified, the two native cis-prolines, Pro41 and Pro93, were mutated, singly and together, to Ala. The stability of P93A was the same as that of the wild-type protein, pWT; however, P41A and P41AP93A were destabilized by ∼0.9 kcal mol-1. The effects of the mutations on the very fast, fast, slow, and very slow phases of folding were studied. They showed that heterogeneity in the unfolded state arises due to cis to trans isomerization of the Gly92-Pro93 peptide bond. The Pro41 to Ala mutation abolished the very slow phase of folding, whereas surprisingly, the Pro93 to Ala mutation abolished the very fast phase of folding. Double-jump, interrupted folding experiments indicated that two sequential trans to cis proline isomerization steps, of the Gly92-Pro93 peptide bond followed by the Arg40-Pro41 peptide bond, lead to the formation of the native state. They also revealed the accumulation of a late native-like intermediate, N∗, which differs from the native state in the isomeric status of the Arg40-Pro41 bond, as well as in a few tertiary contacts as monitored by near-UV CD measurements. The Pro to Ala mutations not only eliminated the cis to trans Pro isomerization reaction in the unfolded state, but also the two trans to cis Pro isomerization reactions during folding. By doing so, and by differentially affecting the relative stabilities of folding intermediates, the mutations resulted in a simplification of the folding mechanism. The two Pro to Ala mutations together accelerate folding to such an extent that the native state forms more than 1000-fold faster than in the case of pWT.

Differentiating between the sequence of structural events on alternative pathways of folding of a heterodimeric protein

Distinguishing between competing pathways of folding of a protein, on the basis of how they differ in their progress of structure acquisition, remains an important challenge in protein folding studies. A previous study had shown that the heterodimeric protein, double chain monellin (dcMN) switches between alternative folding pathways upon a change in guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) concentration. In the current study, the folding of dcMN has been characterized by the pulsed hydrogen exchange (HX) labeling methodology used in conjunction with mass spectrometry. Quantification of the extent to which folding intermediates accumulate and then disappear with time of folding at both low and high GdnHCl concentrations, where the folding pathways are known to be different, shows that the folding mechanism is describable by a triangular three-state mechanism. Structural characterization of the productive folding intermediates populated on the alternative pathways has enabled the pathways to be differentiated on the basis of the progress of structure acquisition that occurs on them. The intermediates on the two pathways differ in the extent to which the α-helix and the rest of the β-sheet have acquired structure that is protective against HX. The major difference is, however, that β2 has not acquired any protective structure in the intermediate formed on one pathway, but it has acquired significant protective structure in the intermediate formed on the alternative pathway. Hence, the sequence of structural events is different on the two alternative pathways.