SWOG-9510: evaluation of topotecan in hormone refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Treatment Options in Hormone-refractory Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma

Prostate cancer represents one of the most important health problems in industrialized countries. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Therapeutic options are different according to the stage of the disease at the diagnosis. Patients with localized disease may be treated with surgery or radiation, whereas the treatment for patients with a metastatic disease is purely palliative. Hormonal treatment represents the standard therapy for stage IV prostate cancer, but patients ultimately become unresponsive to androgen ablation and are classified as hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. The molecular mechanisms involved in progression in hormone resistance are characterized by mutations, down and up-regulation in the androgen receptor gene, mutations in p53 and over-expression of Bcl2 and other alterations in genes and in gene expression. The important thing is that we understand these mechanisms to define potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Conventional options for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer include secondary hormone therapy, radiotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The commonest antineoplastic agents are mitoxantrone, estramustine and taxanes. Despite an improvement In the palliative benefit, none of these agents has demonstrated a beneficial impact on the overall survival of patients. Therefore, there is no standard therapy for these patients, thus we need new approaches which should be studied in clinical trials. The evaluation and incorporation of new agents into current treatment regimens could have a role in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer, but their efficacy has not yet been demonstrated.

Dual action of NSC606985 on cell growth and apoptosis mediated through PKCδ in prostatic cancer cells

Chemotherapy is a vital therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We have previously shown that NSC606985 (NSC), a camptothecin (CPT) analog, induced cell apoptosis via interacting with topoisomerase I (Topo I) in prostate cancer cells. In the present study, the effect and mechanism of CPT analogs in LAPC4 cells were investigated. LAPC-4 cells were treated with NSC, CPT, and topotecan. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, and protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) subcellular activation were measured at different doses and time-points, with or without PKCδ inhibition or knockdown of PKCδ expression. NSC at doses ranging from 10 to 100 nM induced a dose-dependent increase in viable cell number and DNA biosynthesis with mild cell apoptosis, whereas, at doses ranging from 500 nM to 5 mM, NSC produced a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation and DNA biosynthesis with a significant induction of cell apoptosis. Both NSC-induced cell proliferation and apoptosis were blocked by knockdown of PKCδ with a specific RNAi, or by the co-administration of rottlerin, a PKCδ inhibitor. Moreover, NSC produced a dose-dependent subcellular activation of PKCδ. The dose-dependent dual action of NSC is mediated at least in part through the differential subcellular activation of PKCδ in LAPC4 cells. The demonstration of a differential cell response to camptothecin analogs would facilitate the identification of biomarker(s) to CPT sensitivity and promote the personalization of CPT chemotherapy in CRPC.

Targeting androgen-independent pathways: new chances for patients with prostate cancer?

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). Most patients eventually progress to a condition known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), characterized by lack of response to ADT. Although new androgen receptor signaling (ARS) inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents have been introduced to overcome resistance to ADT, many patients progress because of primary or acquired resistance to these agents. This comprehensive review aims at exploring the mechanisms of resistance and progression of PC, with specific focus on alterations which lead to the activation of androgen receptor (AR)-independent pathways of survival. Our work integrates available clinical and preclinical data on agents which target these pathways, assessing their potential clinical implication in specific settings of patients. Given the rising interest of the scientific community in cancer immunotherapy strategies, further attention is dedicated to the role of immune evasion in PC.

Enhanced antitumor activity of low-dose continuous administration schedules of topotecan in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the antitumor effects of alternate dosing schedules of topotecan in prostate cancer.

RESULTS

A concentration-dependent increase in cytotoxicity was observed in PC-3 and LNCaP cells after topotecan treatment using conventional and metronomic protocols. A significant increase in potency (2.4-18 fold, after 72 hr) was observed following metronomic dosing compared to conventional dosing administration in both cell lines. Metronomic dosing also increased the percentage of PC-3 cells in the G2/M, compared to control, but did not alter LNCaP cell cycle distribution. Metronomic dosing increased p21 protein expression in LNCaP and PC-3 cells compared to conventional dosing. The observed in vitro activity was confirmed using an in vivo model of human prostate cancer. Metronomic dosing and continuous infusion decreased tumor volume significantly (p < 0.05) compared to control and conventional topotecan treatment, but had no effect on tumor vascular staining.

METHODS

The cytotoxicity of topotecan after conventional or metronomic dosing was determined by examining cellular morphology, mitochondrial enzymatic activity (MTT), total cellular protein (SRB), annexin V and propidium iodine (PI) staining, cell cycle and western blot analysis in human prostate cancer cell lines (PC-3 and LNCaP) and the effects metronomic or continuous infusion on tumor growth in an in vivo tumor xenograft model.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the hypothesis that low-dose continuous administration of topotecan increases potency compared to conventional dosing in prostate cancer. These data also suggest the novel finding that the enhanced antitumor activity of topotecan following low-dose exposure correlates to alterations in cell cycle and increased p21 expression.

Assessing outcomes in prostate cancer clinical trials: a twenty-first century tower of Babel

BACKGROUND

Because of the osseous distribution of prostate cancer metastases, progression is more readily identified than response in prostate cancer clinical trials. As a result, there is an increased focus on progression-free survival (PFS) as a phase 2 endpoint. PFS, however, is vulnerable to inter-study design variability. The authors sought to identify and quantify this variability and the resultant error in PFS across prostate cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

The authors reviewed phase 2 clinical trials of cytotoxic agents in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer over 5 years to evaluate the policies determining extent of disease and the definitions of disease progression. A simulation model was created to define the degree of error in estimating PFS in 3 hypothetical cohorts (median PFS of 12, 24, and 36 weeks) when the frequency of outcome assessments varies.

RESULTS

Imaging policies for trial entry were heterogeneous, as were the type, timing, and indications for outcome assessments. In the simulation, error in the reported PFS varied according to the interval between assessments. The difference between the detected and the true PFS could vary as much as 6.4 weeks per cycle, strictly resulting from the variability of assessment schedules tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome assessment policies are highly variable in phase 2 studies of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, despite published guidelines designed to standardize authentication of disease progression. The estimated error in PFS can exceed 6 weeks per cycle, exclusively because of variations in the assessment schedules. Comparisons of PFS times from different studies must be made with circumspection.

Ixabepilone (Epothilone B Analogue BMS-247550) Is Active in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Trial S0111

Purpose

The epothilones are a new class of tubulin-polymerizing agents with activity in taxane-sensitive and resistant tumor models. We evaluated ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

Methods

Eligible patients had chemotherapy-naive metastatic HRPC, a Zubrod performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. All patients received BMS-247550 at 40 mg/m2 over 3 hours every 3 weeks. The primary end point was proportion of patients achieving a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.

Results

Forty-eight patients with metastatic HRPC were registered. Forty-two patients were eligible, with a median age of 73 years and a median PSA level of 111 ng/mL; 78% had bone-only or bone and soft tissue metastases, and 88% had objective radiologic disease progression at registration. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 16 and three patients, respectively. All grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia or leukopenia. The most frequent grade 3 AEs were neuropathy (eight patients), hematologic toxicity (seven patients), flu-like symptoms, and infection (five patients each). There were no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 5 AEs. There were 14 confirmed PSA responses (33%; 95% CI, 20% to 50%); 72% of PSA responders had declines greater than 80%, and two patients achieved an undetectable PSA. The estimated median progression-free survival is 6 months (95% CI, 4 to 8 months), and the median survival is 18 months (95% CI, 13 to 24 months).

Conclusion

Ixabepilone has demonstrated activity in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic HRPC. Major toxicities were neutropenia and neuropathy. Further testing to define its activity relative to standard therapy is warranted.

Determination of chemotherapeutic activity in vivo by luminescent imaging of luciferase-transfected human tumors

Human DU-145 prostate and MCF-7 breast tumor cell lines were stably transfected with plasmid pcDNA3.1-Luc expressing firefly luciferase. Studies were performed with the transfected cell lines to evaluate luminescent imaging for measuring the efficacy of anti-cancer agents. In vitro experiments demonstrated a dose response of both cell lines to topotecan (Hycamtin) with an IC50 of 0.013 microM for MCF-7 Luc cells and 0.002 microM for DU-145 Luc cells. In vivo imaging experiments were performed using athymic nude mice inoculated i.p. with 5 x 10(6) MCF-7 cells or s.c. with 5 x 10(6) DU-145 cells and then treated with topotecan at 2.5 mg/kg body weight. Tumor progression and regression were monitored for 27 days. Animals inoculated s.c. with DU-145 Luc cells and then treated with topotecan demonstrated significant tumor growth and regression as measured with calipers and luminescent imaging. High correlation was observed between caliper and imaging results. The correlation coefficient was 0.75 for the control untreated group and 0.93 for the topotecan-treated group. Similarly, tumor progression and regression were measurable using luminescent imaging for untreated and topotecan-treated mice inoculated i.p. with MCF-7 Luc cells. These data indicate that luminescent imaging is a useful tool for evaluating anti-cancer drugs in vivo and may prove to be particularly useful for the development of novel agents. Luminescent imaging could also be used to locate and harvest residual tumors in drug-treated animals in order to study mechanisms of drug resistance.