Inhibition of human experimental prostate cancers by a targeted cytotoxic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog AN-207

Cancer-targeted delivery systems based on peptides

There is a growing interest for the discovery of new cancer-targeted delivery systems for drug delivery and diagnosis. A synopsis of the bibliographic data will be presented on bombesin, neurotensin, octreotide, Arg-Gly-Asp, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and other peptides. Many of them have reached the clinics for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, and have been utilized as carriers of known cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cisplatin, methotrexate or dyes and radioisotopes. In our article, recent advances in the development of peptides as carriers of cytotoxic drugs or radiometals will be analyzed.

New therapies for relapsed castration-resistant prostate cancer based on peptide analogs of hypothalamic hormones

It is a pleasure to contribute our presentation at the International Prostate Forum of the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) to this special issue of the Asian Journal of Andrology.

Elevated GnRH receptor expression plus GnRH agonist treatment inhibits the growth of a subset of papillomavirus 18-immortalized human prostate cells

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Human metastatic prostate cancer cell growth can be inhibited by GnRH analogs but effects on virus-immortalized prostate cells have not been investigated.

METHODS

Virus-immortalized prostate cells were stably transfected with rat GnRH receptor cDNA and levels of GnRH binding were correlated with GnRH effects on signaling, cell cycle, growth, exosome production, and apoptosis.

RESULTS

High levels of cell surface GnRH receptor occurred in transfected papillomavirus-immortalized WPE-1-NB26 epithelial cells but not in non-tumourigenic RWPE-1, myoepithelial WPMY-1 cells, or SV40-immortalized PNT1A. Endogenous cell surface GnRH receptor was undetectable in non-transfected cells or cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC3, and DU145. GnRH receptor levels correlated with induction of inositol phosphates, elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) , cytoskeletal actin reorganization, modulation of ERK activation and cell growth-inhibition with GnRH agonists. Hoechst 33342 DNA staining-cell sorting indicated accumulation of cells in G2 following agonist treatment. Release of exosomes from transfected WPE-1-NB26 was unaffected by agonists, unlike induction observed in HEK293([SCL60]) cells. Increased PARP cleavage and apoptotic body production were undetectable during growth-inhibition in WPE-1-NB26 cells, contrasting with HEK293([SCL60]) . EGF receptor activation inhibited GnRH-induced ERK activation in WPE-1-NB26 but growth-inhibition was not rescued by EGF or PKC inhibitor Ro320432. Growth of cells expressing low levels of GnRH receptor was not affected by agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

Engineered high-level GnRH receptor activation inhibits growth of a subset of papillomavirus-immortalized prostate cells. Elucidating mechanisms leading to clone-specific differences in cell surface GnRH receptor levels is a valuable next step in developing strategies to exploit prostate cell anti-proliferation using GnRH agonists.

Serially heterotransplanted human prostate tumours as an experimental model

* Introduction * Serially heterotransplanted human tumours in immunosuppressed mice: similarity to the tumour of origin - Cytological and histological analysis - Karyotype - Marker expression - Other PC markers - Tumour cell proliferation and frequency of mitosis - Vasculature - Stromal compartment - Heterotransplant hormone dependency - Androgen dependent - Partially androgen dependent - Androgen independent - Metastases * Conclusions Preclinical research on prostate cancer (PC) therapies uses several models to represent the human disease accurately. A common model uses patient prostate tumour biopsies to develop a cell line by serially passaging and subsequent implantation, in immunodeficient mice. An alternative model is direct implantation of patient prostate tumour biopsies into immunodeficient mice, followed by serial passage in vivo. The purpose of this review is to compile data from the more than 30 years of human PC serial heterotransplantation research. Serially heterotransplanted tumours are characterized by evaluating the histopathology of the resulting heterotransplants, including cellular differentiation, karyotype, marker expression, hormone sensitivity, cellular proliferation, metastatic potential and stromal and vascular components. These data are compared with the initial patient tumour specimen and, depending on available information, the patient's clinical outcome was compared with the heterotransplanted tumour. The heterotansplant model is a more accurate preclinical model than older generation serially passaged or genetic models to investigate current and newly developed androgen-deprivation agents, antitumour compounds, anti-angiogenic drugs and positron emission tomography radiotracers, as well as new therapeutic regimens for the treatment of PC.

Synthesis, characterization and stability of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-functionalized poly(amidoamine) dendrimer conjugate

Cancer targeting is crucial for cancer detection, therapy and targeted drug delivery. A dendrimer-peptide conjugate has been synthesized based on poly(amidoamine) dendrimer generation 5 (PAMAM G5) as a platform and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) peptide as a targeting moiety. The synthesized conjugate was fully characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), UV-Vis spectrometry, reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Further stability experiments showed that the synthesized conjugate was stable after 72-h incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 degrees C. The synthesized conjugate may find applications in biomedical targeting, gene delivery and imaging.

New treatment approaches for prostate cancer based on peptide analogues

OBJECTIVES

New therapy modalities for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer based on peptide analogues are reviewed.

RESULTS

Agonists and antagonists of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) lead to androgen deprivation, but direct effects on tumours may also play a role. Radiolabeled somatostatin analogues can be targeted to tumours expressing receptors for somatostatin and have been successfully applied for the localization of these tumours. Tumoural LHRH, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), and bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (BN/GRP) and their receptors appear to be involved in the proliferation of prostate cancer. On the basis of the recent advances in the understanding of the role of neuropeptides in tumour growth and progression, new therapeutic modalities are being developed that are based on antagonists of GHRH and of BN/GRP, which inhibit growth factors or their receptors. Another promising approach for the therapy of prostate cancer consists of the use of cytotoxic analogues of LHRH, bombesin, and somatostatin, which can be targeted to receptors for these peptides in prostate cancers and their metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

New promising forms of hormone therapy and targeted chemotherapy may improve therapy of advanced stage prostate cancer.

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of prostate cancer: A review of their discovery, development, and place in therapy

BACKGROUND

Early identification of the biological activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) paved the way for the synthesis of analogues with enhanced potency and biological properties. Early testing in animal models and humans provided insight into the potential clinical uses of these substances, and, within 10 years, LHRH-agonist therapy had become available for use in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). Over time, the role of LHRH-agonist therapy has expanded to include use as part of multimodal treatment regimens throughout the course of the disease.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews the discovery and development of LHRH agonists and summarizes the clinical evidence for their efficacy in PC.

METHODS

Relevant clinical studies were identified through searches of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE through May 2006. The main search terms were prostate cancer and LHRH agonist.

RESULTS

Results of the initial therapeutic trials of sustained-release depot formulations of LHRH agonists in patients with PC were reported in the mid-1980s, indicating that these agents were effective and well tolerated in improving clinical symptoms and producing medical castration. Longer-term studies and subsequent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials in patients with advanced PC found no significant differences in overall survival when single-therapy androgen suppression was achieved through the use of LHRH-agonist therapy or orchiectomy. Randomized trials have reported significant improvements in disease-free and overall survival in patients with locally advanced or high-grade PC treated with LHRH agonists in addition to radiotherapy. Several prospective randomized trials have reported decreases in rates of positive surgical margins with short-term (6 weeks to 4 months) neoadjuvant LHRH-agonist therapy in patients with stage T1 to T3a PC undergoing prostatectomy. Definitive comparisons of immediate and delayed treatment in patients with biochemical relapse have not been reported. However, the results of several studies suggest that immediate LHRH-agonist therapy (or orchiectomy) may improve the course of disease progression and survival. The risks of long-term treatment (eg, osteoporosis; fracture; anabolic loss of muscle mass, with a tendency toward weight gain) must be considered carefully in patients who are likely to receive chronic LHRH-agonist therapy. Intermittent schedules have been developed to reduce the adverse effects associated with LHRH-agonist therapy; some reports support sparing effects on bone and muscle mass and relative improvements in toxicities during off-therapy periods, whereas others have documented continuing decreases in bone mineral density (BMD), with the rate of bone loss highest during the early cycles of therapy. Bisphosphonate therapy has been shown to increase BMD in patients with PC and may therefore be beneficial when overt symptoms of osteopenia or osteoporosis are present.

CONCLUSIONS

LHRH-agonist therapy has been the mainstay of treatment for advanced PC for >20 years. Clinical evidence supports expanding use of these agents at an earlier stage of disease and as part of multimodal regimens that include radiotherapy. There is a need for further study of the efficacy of adjuvant LHRH-agonist therapy along with prostatectomy, in patients with biochemical failure, in intermittent regimens, and in conjunction with cytotoxic therapies in late-stage disease.