Molecular biological analysis of the heterogeneous prostate cancer group Gleason score 7

Chromosome 8p deletions and 8q gains are associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Deletions of 8p and gains of 8q belong to the most frequent cytogenetic alterations in prostate cancer. The target genes of these alterations and their biological significance are unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To determine the relationship between chromosome 8 changes, and prostate cancer phenotype and prognosis, a set of 1.954 fully annotated prostate cancers were analyzed in a tissue microarray format by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Both 8p deletions and 8q gains increased in number during different stages of prostate cancer progression. 8p deletions/8q gains were found in 26.1%/4.8% of 1,239 pT(2) cancers, 38.5%/9.8% of 379 pT(3a) cancers, 43.5%/8.9% of 237 pT(3b) cancers, 40.7%/14.8% of 27 pT(4) cancers, 39.1%/34.8% of 23 nodal metastases, 51.9%/33.3% of 27 bone metastases, and 45.5%/59.9% of 22 hormone refractory cancers (P < 0.0001 each). Both 8p deletions and 8q gains were also significantly associated with high Gleason grade and with each other (P < 0.0001 each). In primary tumors, 8p deletions were seen in only 27.3% of 1,882 cancers without 8q gain but in 57.4% of 122 tumors with 8q gain (P < 0.0001). Among cancers treated with radical prostatectomy, 8p deletions (P = 0.003) and 8q gains (P = 0.02) were associated with biochemical tumor recurrence. However, multivariate analysis (including prostate-specific antigen, pT/pN stage, Gleason score, and surgical margin status) did not reveal any statistically independent effect of 8p or 8q alterations on biochemical tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

8p deletions and 8q gains are relatively rare in early stage prostate cancer but often develop during tumor progression. The prognostic effect does not seem to be strong enough to warrant clinical application.

Molecular Pathology of the Genitourinary Tract: Prostate and Bladder

The knowledge of cellular mechanisms in tumors of the prostate and bladder has grown exponentially. Molecular technologies have led to the discovery of TMPRSS2 in prostate cancer and the molecular pathways distinguishing low- and high-grade urothelial neoplasms. UroVysion with fluorescence in situ hybridization is already commonplace as an adjunct to cytologic diagnosis of urothelial neoplasms. This trend portends the future in which classification and diagnosis of tumors of the prostate and bladder through morphologic analysis will be supplemented by molecular information correlating with prognosis and targeted therapy. This article outlines tumor molecular pathology of the prostate and bladder encompassing current genomic, epigenomic, and proteonomic findings.

Genetic profile identification in clinically localized prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

To confirm our previously obtained results, we genetically characterized prostate cancer from patients undergo radical prostatectomy in a retrospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Histological sections were evaluated for 106 patients treated with surgery from 1991 to 2004. With fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, the status of LPL (8p22), c-MYC (8q24) genes and 7, 8, X chromosomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

Chromosomes 7, 8, X aneusomy was demonstrated in 91.5%, 78.3%, and 51.9% of the samples, respectively, whereas LPL deletion and MYC amplification were found in 76.0% and 1.6%. A genetic profile was considered as unfavorable when at least two aneusomic chromosomes and one altered gene were present. Tumors with an adverse genetic profile were more frequently present in patients with higher stages (P = 0.02), biochemical/clinical progression (P = 0.03), and Gleason grade 4 + 3 (P = 0.02). Multiple correspondence analysis identified one tumor group characterized by chromosome 8 aneusomy, X polysomy, LPL gene deletion, Gleason > 7 and 4 + 3 associated with progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we recognized the predictive power of previously identified cytogenetic profiles. Assessment of genetic set may characterize each patient and have influence on postoperative therapeutic strategies.

Statistical recombinant mapping in extended high-risk Utah pedigrees narrows the 8q24 prostate cancer locus to 2.0 Mb

BACKGROUND

Chromosome 8q24 is a region of compelling interest for prostate cancer (PRCA). Linkage, association, and admixture analysis initially indicated the region. Subsequently, several variants at 8q24 have been found to independently associate with PRCA. One compelling hypothesis is allelic heterogeneity, whereby multiple variants affect the regulation of the same gene. In addition to potential allelic heterogeneity, 8q24 exhibits strong linkage disequilibrium over vast distances and is prone to chromosomal aberrations.

METHODS

Allelic heterogeneity and complex chromosomal structure are factors that hinder progress towards gene identification using association. Linkage techniques, however, are robust to allelic heterogeneity and therefore can contribute important localization information. We have used a linkage-based localization technique to perform recombinant mapping in eight high-risk Utah pedigrees.

RESULTS

Using pedigree-based recombinant mapping we identify a 5.7 Mb region at 8q24.21-22, between markers D8S1774 and D8S557. Considering our region with the localization previously presented, we can delimit the 8q24 PRCA locus to a 2.0 Mb consensus interval from 127.5 to 129.5 Mb.

CONCLUSION

We have used a linkage-based, recombinant mapping technique in extended high-risk Utah pedigrees to successfully narrow the 8q24 PRCA locus. The region we present halves the 95% credible interval previously described using admixture analysis and contains only three annotated genes: FAM84B, MYC, and TMEM75. It should be noted that LD stretches far beyond the interval we describe, and hence this region adds important information about where to focus future efforts to isolate the causal variants and underlying gene, whether by linkage or association techniques.