The association between serum sex steroid hormone concentrations and intraprostatic inflammation in men without prostate cancer and irrespective of clinical indication for biopsy in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

The Pros and Cons of Estrogens in Prostate Cancer: An Update with a Focus on Phytoestrogens

The role of estrogens in prostate cancer (PCa) is shrouded in mystery, with its actions going from angelic to devilish. The findings by Huggins and Hodges establishing PCa as a hormone-sensitive cancer have provided the basis for using estrogens in therapy. However, despite the clinical efficacy in suppressing tumor growth and the panoply of experimental evidence describing its anticarcinogenic effects, estrogens were abolished from PCa treatment because of the adverse secondary effects. Notwithstanding, research work over the years has continued investigating the effects of estrogens, reporting their pros and cons in prostate carcinogenesis. In contrast with the beneficial therapeutic effects, many reports have implicated estrogens in the disruption of prostate cell fate and tissue homeostasis. On the other hand, epidemiological data demonstrating the lower incidence of PCa in Eastern countries associated with a higher consumption of phytoestrogens support the beneficial role of estrogens in counteracting cancer development. Many studies have investigated the effects of phytoestrogens and the underlying mechanisms of action, which may contribute to developing safe estrogen-based anti-PCa therapies. This review compiles the existing data on the anti- and protumorigenic actions of estrogens and summarizes the anticancer effects of several phytoestrogens, highlighting their promising features in PCa treatment.

Serum Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone and Incidence and Progression of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Results From the REDUCE Study

PURPOSE

Though the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia is unclear, it was previously believed that increasing androgen levels contributed, though not all data support this idea. We tested if elevated serum testosterone or dihydrotestosterone were risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms incidence in asymptomatic men and for lower urinary tract symptoms progression in symptomatic men.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A post hoc analysis of REDUCE was performed in 3009 asymptomatic men and in 2145 symptomatic men. REDUCE was a randomized trial of dutasteride for prostate cancer prevention in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen and negative prestudy biopsy. We estimated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using Cox models to test the association between quintiles of serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone at baseline and lower urinary tract symptoms incidence and progression and tested for interaction by treatment arm (dutasteride vs placebo).

RESULTS

In asymptomatic men, there was no evidence serum testosterone or dihydrotestosterone were related to lower urinary tract symptoms incidence (P = .9, P = .4). In symptomatic men, there was no evidence serum testosterone or dihydrotestosterone were related to lower urinary tract symptoms progression (P = .9, P = .7). Results were similar in both placebo and dutasteride arms (all P interaction ≥ .3).

CONCLUSIONS

In REDUCE, higher serum testosterone and higher serum dihydrotestosterone were not associated with either lower urinary tract symptoms incidence in asymptomatic men or lower urinary tract symptoms progression in symptomatic men. These data do not support the hypothesis that serum androgens in middle-aged men are associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.