Clinical significance of unfavorable findings in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients for predicting treatment outcomes after contemporary, dose-escalated multimodal radiotherapy

Clinical characteristics of secondary bladder cancer developing after low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy to treat localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To explore correlations between the clinical attributes of secondary bladder cancer and brachytherapy, we retrospectively reviewed our institutional database on patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

From October 2003 to December 2014, 2551 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated at our institution. Of these, data on 2163 were available (LDR-BT alone: n = 953; LDR-TB with EBRT: n = 181; HDR-BT with EBRT: n = 283; RP without EBRT: n = 746). The times of secondary bladder cancer development subsequent to radical treatment, and their clinical characteristics, were studied.

RESULTS

Age-adjusted Cox's regression analyses indicated that brachytherapy did not significantly impact the incidence of secondary bladder cancer. However, the pathological characteristics of such cancer differed between patients treated via brachytherapy and RP without EBRT; invasive bladder cancer was more common in such patients.

CONCLUSION

The risk for secondary bladder cancer was not significantly increased after brachytherapy compared to non-irradiation therapy. However, brachytherapy patients exhibited a higher incidence of invasive bladder cancer. Therefore, meticulous follow-up is crucial for early detection and treatment of bladder cancer in such patients.

Comparison of outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although brachytherapy is a standard treatment option for patients with high-risk prostate cancer, only a few studies have compared low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). We applied propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare oncological outcomes for LDR-BT and HDR-BT.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed prognosis in 392 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer who had undergone brachytherapy plus external beam radiation. IPTW was applied to adjust the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, with the goal of minimizing bias from patient background.

RESULTS

The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no statistically significant differences for time to biochemical recurrence, clinical progression, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or death from any cause. The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses also showed that the modality of brachytherapy was not an independent factor in these oncological outcomes. Notably, the two groups differed regarding complications; LDR-BT was associated with a higher rate of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity, and late grade 3 toxicity was noted only in HDR-BT.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of long-term outcomes in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer shows no significant differences in oncological outcomes between LDR-BT and HDR-BT, but some differences in toxicity, and offers patients and clinicians useful information in deciding management strategies for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Propensity score matched comparison

PURPOSE

To compare long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) using propensity score-matched analysis in patients with clinically localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Between October 2003 and March 2014, our institution treated 1241 patients with intermediate-risk PCa (RP: n = 531; LDR-BT: n = 710). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 0.2 ng/ml or greater for RP, and as PSA nadir plus 2 ng/ml or higher (Phoenix definition) for LDR-BT. We calculated propensity scores by multivariate logistic regression based on covariates that included age, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason grade, the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC), and clinical T stage.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 108 months for RP and 99 months for LDR-BT. After propensity score adjustment, a total of 642 (321 each) patients remained for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.99). LDR-BT was associated with improved BCR-free survival and salvage therapy-free survival  compared to RP (p < 0.001), and RP was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (MFS, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BCR cannot be a surrogate for survival comparison, primarily due to differences between treatment modalities in how this term was defined post-therapy. Long-term follow-up showed that RP was associated with lower MFS in intermediate-risk PCa. However, this has not yet translated into superior OS.