Expression of high molecular weight cytokeratin-A novel feature of aggressive and innate hormone-refractory prostatic adenocarcinoma

Aggressive prostatic adenocarcinoma with urothelial-like morphology, with frequent CK7/CK20/HMWK expression and occasional diffuse neuroendocrine features: A clinicopathologic study of 12 cases

INTRODUCTION

Prostatic adenocarcinoma can occasionally display urothelial carcinoma morphology, which prompts immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies to determine its lineage. Typically, prostate cancer is characterized by the lack of cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20 and high molecular weight keratin (HMWK) expression, as opposed to bladder cancer.

METHODS

We report a series of 12 prostatic adenocarcinoma cases with unusual urothelial-like morphology, diagnosed at two academic institutions in Toronto between 2018 and 2023, and analyzed by immunohistochemistry for prostatic, urothelial, and neuroendocrine marker expression. We collected patient age, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) status, tumour site, histomorphology, Grade group (GG) and results of genetic testing.

RESULTS

The median age of the 12 patients included in this case series was 75.5 years (range 41-85). A history of prostatic cancer was noted in 7/12 (58%) patients. Five of nine (56%) patients had elevated serum PSA level at diagnosis. Six of eleven (55%) patients had prior ADT. Tumour sites were prostate (n = 6), bladder (n = 3), liver metastases (n = 2), and lung metastasis (n = 1). GGs of the primary tumours were GG3 (n = 1) and GG5 (n = 8). The observed urothelial-like morphology was diffuse in ten cases, and focal in two cases. CK7 was strong/diffuse in 8/11 tested cases, and focal weak in one case. CK20, HMWK, p63 and GATA3 were patchy/focal/weak/moderate in 3/6, 4/7, 4/8 and 2/9 cases, respectively. Ten (83%) cases were positive for at least one prostatic marker; eight (67%) cases had loss/weak staining of at least one prostatic marker. AR loss was seen in 2/7 (29%) cases. Seven of ten (70%) cases had diffuse/strong expression of at least one neuroendocrine marker. No trend was evident between prior ADT/AR status and any IHC result. Molecular analyses for DNA damage repair (DDR) genes (n = 6) demonstrated one ATM deletion (bladder). In addition, one TMPRSS2:ERG fusion (lung metastasis) was identified.

CONCLUSION

This series comprises high-grade and/or metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma cases with distinctive urothelial-like morphology and frequent aberrant CK7/CK20/HMWK expression. Their histomorphology, highly suggestive of an urothelial origin, represents a diagnostic pitfall that can lead to considerable management repercussions. The fact that a high proportion of the reported cases had loss/weak expression of at least one of the tested prostatic-specific markers, and occasionally a diffuse positivity for neuroendocrine markers highlights the importance of (1) clinical history and (2) utilization of broad IHC panels to correctly diagnose such unusual prostate cancer cases.

Microfluidic-based human prostate-cancer-on-chip

Lack of adequate models significantly hinders advances in prostate cancer treatment, where resistance to androgen-deprivation therapies and bone metastasis remain as major challenges. Current in vitro models fail to faithfully mimic the complex prostate physiology. In vivo animal models can shed light on the oncogenes involved in prostate cancer development and progression; however, the animal prostate gland is fundamentally different from that of human, and the underlying genetic mechanisms are different. To address this problem, we developed the first in vitro microfluidic human Prostate-Cancer-on-Chip (PCoC) model, where human prostate cancer and stromal fibroblast cells were co-cultivated in two channels separated by a porous membrane under culture medium flow. The established microenvironment enables soluble signaling factors secreted by each culture to locally diffuse through the membrane pores affecting the neighboring culture. We particularly explored the conversion of the stromal fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) due to the interaction between the 2 cell types. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that tumor cells induced CAF biomarkers, αSMA and COL1A1, in stromal fibroblasts. The stromal CAF conversion level was observed to increase along the flow direction in response to diffusion agents, consistent with simulations of solute concentration gradients. The tumor cells also downregulated androgen receptor (AR) expression in stromal fibroblasts, while an adequate level of stromal AR expression is maintained in normal prostate homeostasis. We further investigated tumor invasion into the stroma, an early step in the metastatic cascade, in devices featuring a serpentine channel with orthogonal channel segments overlaying a straight channel and separated by an 8 µm-pore membrane. Both tumor cells and stromal CAFs were observed to cross over into their neighboring channel, and the stroma's role seemed to be proactive in promoting cell invasion. As control, normal epithelial cells neither induced CAF conversion nor promoted cell invasion. In summary, the developed PCoC model allows spatiotemporal analysis of the tumor-stroma dynamic interactions, due to bi-directional signaling and physical contact, recapitulating tissue-level multicellular responses associated with prostate cancer in vivo. Hence, it can serve as an in vitro model to dissect mechanisms in human prostate cancer development and seek advanced therapeutic strategies.