1
|
Christoffer C, Harini K, Archit G, Kihara D. Assembly of Protein Complexes in and on the Membrane with Predicted Spatial Arrangement Constraints. J Mol Biol 2024; 436:168486. [PMID: 38336197 PMCID: PMC10942765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Membrane proteins play crucial roles in various cellular processes, and their interactions with other proteins in and on the membrane are essential for their proper functioning. While an increasing number of structures of more membrane proteins are being determined, the available structure data is still sparse. To gain insights into the mechanisms of membrane protein complexes, computational docking methods are necessary due to the challenge of experimental determination. Here, we introduce Mem-LZerD, a rigid-body membrane docking algorithm designed to take advantage of modern membrane modeling and protein docking techniques to facilitate the docking of membrane protein complexes. Mem-LZerD is based on the LZerD protein docking algorithm, which has been constantly among the top servers in many rounds of CAPRI protein docking assessment. By employing a combination of geometric hashing, newly constrained by the predicted membrane height and tilt angle, and model scoring accounting for the energy of membrane insertion, we demonstrate the capability of Mem-LZerD to model diverse membrane protein-protein complexes. Mem-LZerD successfully performed unbound docking on 13 of 21 (61.9%) transmembrane complexes in an established benchmark, more than shown by previous approaches. It was additionally tested on new datasets of 44 transmembrane complexes and 92 peripheral membrane protein complexes, of which it successfully modeled 35 (79.5%) and 15 (16.3%) complexes respectively. When non-blind orientations of peripheral targets were included, the number of successes increased to 54 (58.7%). We further demonstrate that Mem-LZerD produces complex models which are suitable for molecular dynamics simulation. Mem-LZerD is made available at https://lzerd.kiharalab.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Kannan Harini
- Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Gupta Archit
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christoffer C, Harini K, Archit G, Kihara D. Assembly of Protein Complexes In and On the Membrane with Predicted Spatial Arrangement Constraints. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.20.563303. [PMID: 37961264 PMCID: PMC10634698 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.20.563303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Membrane proteins play crucial roles in various cellular processes, and their interactions with other proteins in and on the membrane are essential for their proper functioning. While an increasing number of structures of more membrane proteins are being determined, the available structure data is still sparse. To gain insights into the mechanisms of membrane protein complexes, computational docking methods are necessary due to the challenge of experimental determination. Here, we introduce Mem-LZerD, a rigid-body membrane docking algorithm designed to take advantage of modern membrane modeling and protein docking techniques to facilitate the docking of membrane protein complexes. Mem-LZerD is based on the LZerD protein docking algorithm, which has been constantly among the top servers in many rounds of CAPRI protein docking assessment. By employing a combination of geometric hashing, newly constrained by the predicted membrane height and tilt angle, and model scoring accounting for the energy of membrane insertion, we demonstrate the capability of Mem-LZerD to model diverse membrane protein-protein complexes. Mem-LZerD successfully performed unbound docking on 13 of 21 (61.9%) transmembrane complexes in an established benchmark, more than shown by previous approaches. It was additionally tested on new datasets of 44 transmembrane complexes and 92 peripheral membrane protein complexes, of which it successfully modeled 35 (79.5%) and 15 (16.3%) complexes respectively. When non-blind orientations of peripheral targets were included, the number of successes increased to 54 (58.7%). We further demonstrate that Mem-LZerD produces complex models which are suitable for molecular dynamics simulation. Mem-LZerD is made available at https://lzerd.kiharalab.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Kannan Harini
- Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Gupta Archit
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Department of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christoffer C, Kihara D. Modeling protein-nucleic acid complexes with extremely large conformational changes using Flex-LZerD. Proteomics 2023; 23:e2200322. [PMID: 36529945 PMCID: PMC10448949 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202200322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Proteins and nucleic acids are key components in many processes in living cells, and interactions between proteins and nucleic acids are often crucial pathway components. In many cases, large flexibility of proteins as they interact with nucleic acids is key to their function. To understand the mechanisms of these processes, it is necessary to consider the 3D atomic structures of such protein-nucleic acid complexes. When such structures are not yet experimentally determined, protein docking can be used to computationally generate useful structure models. However, such docking has long had the limitation that the consideration of flexibility is usually limited to small movements or to small structures. We previously developed a method of flexible protein docking which could model ordered proteins which undergo large-scale conformational changes, which we also showed was compatible with nucleic acids. Here, we elaborate on the ability of that pipeline, Flex-LZerD, to model specifically interactions between proteins and nucleic acids, and demonstrate that Flex-LZerD can model more interactions and types of conformational change than previously shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Christoffer C, Kihara D. Domain-Based Protein Docking with Extremely Large Conformational Changes. J Mol Biol 2022; 434:167820. [PMID: 36089054 PMCID: PMC9992458 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Proteins are key components in many processes in living cells, and physical interactions with other proteins and nucleic acids often form key parts of their functions. In many cases, large flexibility of proteins as they interact is key to their function. To understand the mechanisms of these processes, it is necessary to consider the 3D structures of such protein complexes. When such structures are not yet experimentally determined, protein docking has long been present to computationally generate useful structure models. However, protein docking has long had the limitation that the consideration of flexibility is usually limited to very small movements or very small structures. Methods have been developed which handle minor flexibility via normal mode or other structure sampling, but new methods are required to model ordered proteins which undergo large-scale conformational changes to elucidate their function at the molecular level. Here, we present Flex-LZerD, a framework for docking such complexes. Via partial assembly multidomain docking and an iterative normal mode analysis admitting curvilinear motions, we demonstrate the ability to model the assembly of a variety of protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Christoffer C, Bharadwaj V, Luu R, Kihara D. LZerD Protein-Protein Docking Webserver Enhanced With de novo Structure Prediction. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:724947. [PMID: 34466411 PMCID: PMC8403062 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.724947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Protein-protein docking is a useful tool for modeling the structures of protein complexes that have yet to be experimentally determined. Understanding the structures of protein complexes is a key component for formulating hypotheses in biophysics regarding the functional mechanisms of complexes. Protein-protein docking is an established technique for cases where the structures of the subunits have been determined. While the number of known structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank is increasing, there are still many cases where the structures of individual proteins that users want to dock are not determined yet. Here, we have integrated the AttentiveDist method for protein structure prediction into our LZerD webserver for protein-protein docking, which enables users to simply submit protein sequences and obtain full-complex atomic models, without having to supply any structure themselves. We have further extended the LZerD docking interface with a symmetrical homodimer mode. The LZerD server is available at https://lzerd.kiharalab.org/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Vijay Bharadwaj
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Ryan Luu
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.,Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanyal A, Zbornik EA, Watson BG, Christoffer C, Ma J, Kihara D, Mattoo S. Kinetic and structural parameters governing Fic-mediated adenylylation/AMPylation of the Hsp70 chaperone, BiP/GRP78. Cell Stress Chaperones 2021; 26:639-656. [PMID: 33942205 PMCID: PMC8275707 DOI: 10.1007/s12192-021-01208-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Fic (filamentation induced by cAMP) proteins regulate diverse cell signaling events by post-translationally modifying their protein targets, predominantly by the addition of an AMP (adenosine monophosphate). This modification is called Fic-mediated adenylylation or AMPylation. We previously reported that the human Fic protein, HYPE/FicD, is a novel regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) that maintains homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in response to stress from misfolded proteins. Specifically, HYPE regulates UPR by adenylylating the ER chaperone, BiP/GRP78, which serves as a sentinel for UPR activation. Maintaining ER homeostasis is critical for determining cell fate, thus highlighting the importance of the HYPE-BiP interaction. Here, we study the kinetic and structural parameters that determine the HYPE-BiP interaction. By measuring the binding and kinetic efficiencies of HYPE in its activated (Adenylylation-competent) and wild type (de-AMPylation-competent) forms for BiP in its wild type and ATP-bound conformations, we determine that HYPE displays a nearly identical preference for the wild type and ATP-bound forms of BiP in vitro and preferentially de-AMPylates the wild type form of adenylylated BiP. We also show that AMPylation at BiP's Thr366 versus Thr518 sites differentially affect its ATPase activity, and that HYPE does not adenylylate UPR accessory proteins like J-protein ERdJ6. Using molecular docking models, we explain how HYPE is able to adenylylate Thr366 and Thr518 sites in vitro. While a physiological role for AMPylation at both the Thr366 and Thr518 sites has been reported, our molecular docking model supports Thr518 as the structurally preferred modification site. This is the first such analysis of the HYPE-BiP interaction and offers critical insights into substrate specificity and target recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwesha Sanyal
- From the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., LILY G-227, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Erica A Zbornik
- From the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., LILY G-227, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Ben G Watson
- From the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., LILY G-227, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Jia Ma
- Bindley Biosciences Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- From the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., LILY G-227, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Seema Mattoo
- From the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., LILY G-227, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Biologists are increasingly aware of the importance of protein structure in revealing function. The computational tools now exist which allow researchers to model unknown proteins simply on the basis of their primary sequence. However, for the non-specialist bioinformatician, there is a dazzling array of terminology, acronyms, and competing computer software available for this process. This review is intended to highlight the key stages of computational protein structure prediction, as well as explain the reasons behind some of the procedures and list some established workarounds for common pitfalls. Thereafter follows a review of five one-stop servers for start-to-finish structure prediction.
Collapse
|
8
|
Desta IT, Porter KA, Xia B, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Performance and Its Limits in Rigid Body Protein-Protein Docking. Structure 2020; 28:1071-1081.e3. [PMID: 32649857 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 274] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The development of fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithms enabled the sampling of billions of complex conformations and thus revolutionized protein-protein docking. FFT-based methods are now widely available and have been used in hundreds of thousands of docking calculations. Although the methods perform "soft" docking, which allows for some overlap of component proteins, the rigid body assumption clearly introduces limitations on accuracy and reliability. In addition, the method can work only with energy expressions represented by sums of correlation functions. In this paper we use a well-established protein-protein docking benchmark set to evaluate the results of these limitations by focusing on the performance of the docking server ClusPro, which implements one of the best rigid body methods. Furthermore, we explore the theoretical limits of accuracy when using established energy terms for scoring, provide comparison with flexible docking algorithms, and review the historical performance of servers in the CAPRI docking experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel T Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Bing Xia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perthold JW, Oostenbrink C. GroScore: Accurate Scoring of Protein–Protein Binding Poses Using Explicit-Solvent Free-Energy Calculations. J Chem Inf Model 2019; 59:5074-5085. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Walther Perthold
- Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria
| | - Chris Oostenbrink
- Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Christoffer C, Terashi G, Shin WH, Aderinwale T, Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya SR, Peterson L, Verburgt J, Kihara D. Performance and enhancement of the LZerD protein assembly pipeline in CAPRI 38-46. Proteins 2019; 88:948-961. [PMID: 31697428 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
We report the performance of the protein docking prediction pipeline of our group and the results for Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions (CAPRI) rounds 38-46. The pipeline integrates programs developed in our group as well as other existing scoring functions. The core of the pipeline is the LZerD protein-protein docking algorithm. If templates of the target complex are not found in PDB, the first step of our docking prediction pipeline is to run LZerD for a query protein pair. Meanwhile, in the case of human group prediction, we survey the literature to find information that can guide the modeling, such as protein-protein interface information. In addition to any literature information and binding residue prediction, generated docking decoys were selected by a rank aggregation of statistical scoring functions. The top 10 decoys were relaxed by a short molecular dynamics simulation before submission to remove atom clashes and improve side-chain conformations. In these CAPRI rounds, our group, particularly the LZerD server, showed robust performance. On the other hand, there are failed cases where some other groups were successful. To understand weaknesses of our pipeline, we analyzed sources of errors for failed targets. Since we noted that structure refinement is a step that needs improvement, we newly performed a comparative study of several refinement approaches. Finally, we show several examples that illustrate successful and unsuccessful cases by our group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Woong-Hee Shin
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.,Department of Chemistry Education, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Tunde Aderinwale
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | | | - Lenna Peterson
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Jacob Verburgt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.,Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.,Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porter KA, Desta I, Kozakov D, Vajda S. What method to use for protein-protein docking? Curr Opin Struct Biol 2019; 55:1-7. [PMID: 30711743 PMCID: PMC6669123 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
A number of well-established servers perform 'free' docking of proteins of known structures. In contrast, template-based docking can start from sequences if structures are available for complexes that are homologous to the target. On the basis of the results of the CAPRI-CASP structure prediction experiments, template-based methods yield more accurate predictions if good templates can be found, but generally fail without such templates. However, free global docking, or focused docking around even poor quality template-based models, can still generate acceptable docked structures in these cases. In accordance with the analysis of a benchmark set, free docking of heterodimers yields acceptable or better predictions in the top 10 models for around 40% of structures. However, it is likely that a combination of template-based and free docking methods can perform better for targets that have template structures available. Another way of improving the reliability of predictions is adding experimental information as restraints, an option built into several docking servers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, NY, USA; Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, NY, USA.
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Peterson LX, Shin WH, Kim H, Kihara D. Improved performance in CAPRI round 37 using LZerD docking and template-based modeling with combined scoring functions. Proteins 2018; 86 Suppl 1:311-320. [PMID: 28845596 PMCID: PMC5820220 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We report our group's performance for protein-protein complex structure prediction and scoring in Round 37 of the Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI), an objective assessment of protein-protein complex modeling. We demonstrated noticeable improvement in both prediction and scoring compared to previous rounds of CAPRI, with our human predictor group near the top of the rankings and our server scorer group at the top. This is the first time in CAPRI that a server has been the top scorer group. To predict protein-protein complex structures, we used both multi-chain template-based modeling (TBM) and our protein-protein docking program, LZerD. LZerD represents protein surfaces using 3D Zernike descriptors (3DZD), which are based on a mathematical series expansion of a 3D function. Because 3DZD are a soft representation of the protein surface, LZerD is tolerant to small conformational changes, making it well suited to docking unbound and TBM structures. The key to our improved performance in CAPRI Round 37 was to combine multi-chain TBM and docking. As opposed to our previous strategy of performing docking for all target complexes, we used TBM when multi-chain templates were available and docking otherwise. We also describe the combination of multiple scoring functions used by our server scorer group, which achieved the top rank for the scorer phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lenna X. Peterson
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Woong-Hee Shin
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Hyungrae Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peterson LX, Togawa Y, Esquivel-Rodriguez J, Terashi G, Christoffer C, Roy A, Shin WH, Kihara D. Modeling the assembly order of multimeric heteroprotein complexes. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1005937. [PMID: 29329283 PMCID: PMC5785014 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are the cornerstone of numerous biological processes. Although an increasing number of protein complex structures have been determined using experimental methods, relatively fewer studies have been performed to determine the assembly order of complexes. In addition to the insights into the molecular mechanisms of biological function provided by the structure of a complex, knowing the assembly order is important for understanding the process of complex formation. Assembly order is also practically useful for constructing subcomplexes as a step toward solving the entire complex experimentally, designing artificial protein complexes, and developing drugs that interrupt a critical step in the complex assembly. There are several experimental methods for determining the assembly order of complexes; however, these techniques are resource-intensive. Here, we present a computational method that predicts the assembly order of protein complexes by building the complex structure. The method, named Path-LzerD, uses a multimeric protein docking algorithm that assembles a protein complex structure from individual subunit structures and predicts assembly order by observing the simulated assembly process of the complex. Benchmarked on a dataset of complexes with experimental evidence of assembly order, Path-LZerD was successful in predicting the assembly pathway for the majority of the cases. Moreover, when compared with a simple approach that infers the assembly path from the buried surface area of subunits in the native complex, Path-LZerD has the strong advantage that it can be used for cases where the complex structure is not known. The path prediction accuracy decreased when starting from unbound monomers, particularly for larger complexes of five or more subunits, for which only a part of the assembly path was correctly identified. As the first method of its kind, Path-LZerD opens a new area of computational protein structure modeling and will be an indispensable approach for studying protein complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lenna X. Peterson
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Yoichiro Togawa
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Amitava Roy
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America
| | - Woong-Hee Shin
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nealon JO, Philomina LS, McGuffin LJ. Predictive and Experimental Approaches for Elucidating Protein-Protein Interactions and Quaternary Structures. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:E2623. [PMID: 29206185 PMCID: PMC5751226 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18122623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The elucidation of protein-protein interactions is vital for determining the function and action of quaternary protein structures. Here, we discuss the difficulty and importance of establishing protein quaternary structure and review in vitro and in silico methods for doing so. Determining the interacting partner proteins of predicted protein structures is very time-consuming when using in vitro methods, this can be somewhat alleviated by use of predictive methods. However, developing reliably accurate predictive tools has proved to be difficult. We review the current state of the art in predictive protein interaction software and discuss the problem of scoring and therefore ranking predictions. Current community-based predictive exercises are discussed in relation to the growth of protein interaction prediction as an area within these exercises. We suggest a fusion of experimental and predictive methods that make use of sparse experimental data to determine higher resolution predicted protein interactions as being necessary to drive forward development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Oliver Nealon
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AS, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Peterson LX, Roy A, Christoffer C, Terashi G, Kihara D. Modeling disordered protein interactions from biophysical principles. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005485. [PMID: 28394890 PMCID: PMC5402988 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Disordered protein-protein interactions (PPIs), those involving a folded protein and an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP), are prevalent in the cell, including important signaling and regulatory pathways. IDPs do not adopt a single dominant structure in isolation but often become ordered upon binding. To aid understanding of the molecular mechanisms of disordered PPIs, it is crucial to obtain the tertiary structure of the PPIs. However, experimental methods have difficulty in solving disordered PPIs and existing protein-protein and protein-peptide docking methods are not able to model them. Here we present a novel computational method, IDP-LZerD, which models the conformation of a disordered PPI by considering the biophysical binding mechanism of an IDP to a structured protein, whereby a local segment of the IDP initiates the interaction and subsequently the remaining IDP regions explore and coalesce around the initial binding site. On a dataset of 22 disordered PPIs with IDPs up to 69 amino acids, successful predictions were made for 21 bound and 18 unbound receptors. The successful modeling provides additional support for biophysical principles. Moreover, the new technique significantly expands the capability of protein structure modeling and provides crucial insights into the molecular mechanisms of disordered PPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lenna X. Peterson
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Amitava Roy
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America
| | - Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|