Addressing opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hypersensitivity: Recent developments and future therapeutic strategies

A multi-target ligand (JM-20) prevents morphine-induced hyperalgesia in naïve and neuropathic rats

The present study examines the possible inhibitory effect of JM-20, a multi-target neuroprotective compound, on the development of morphine-induced hyperalgesia in Male Sprague-Dawley naïve rats. Additionally, the impact of JM-20 on chronic constriction injury (CCI) rats under chronic morphine exposure was investigated, and its efficacy in reducing mechanical hypersensitivity and histopathological changes in the sciatic nerve was assessed. JM-20 (20 mg/kg, per os [p.o.]), administered 60 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily at 12 h intervals) for ten days, significantly inhibited the development of morphine-induced hyperalgesia assessed using an electronic pressure-meter paw test, hot-plate, and formalin test, as well as the appearance of spontaneous withdrawal somatic symptoms in rats. Furthermore, JM-20 decreases spinal pro-inflammatory interleukin-1β and restores glutathione to close physiological concentrations, biomarkers directly related to the intensity of mechanical hypernociception. After CCI and sham surgery, co-treatment with JM-20 (10 mg/kg, p.o.) for five days decreased morphine increased-mechanical hypersensitivity, even 12 days after its discontinuation. Continued morphine treatment imposed a neuroinflammatory challenge in CCI animals, further increasing cellularity (>75% immune cell infiltration) with lymphocytes and macrophages. However, JM-20 co-treatment still reduced the presence of cellular infiltrates (51-75%) with a predominance of lymphocytes. Even in the absence of nerve injury, JM-20 attenuated the peripheral neuroinflammatory response observed in morphine-treated sham-operated animals (0% vs. 1-25%). These findings suggest that JM-20 could prevent morphine-induced hyperalgesia by anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms.

A pH-sensitive opioid does not exhibit analgesic tolerance in a mouse model of colonic inflammation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tolerance to the analgesic effects of opioids and resultant dose escalation is associated with worsening of side effects and greater addiction risk. Here, we compare the development of tolerance to the conventional opioid fentanyl with a novel pH-sensitive μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist, (±)-N-(3-fluoro-1-phenethylpiperidine-4-yl)-N-phenyl propionamide (NFEPP) that is active only in acidic inflammatory microenvironments.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

An opioid tolerance model was developed in male C57BL/6 mice, with and without dextran sulphate sodium colitis, using increasing doses of either fentanyl or NFEPP over 5 days. Visceral nociception was assessed in vivo by measuring visceromotor responses (VMRs) to noxious colorectal distensions and in vitro measuring colonic afferent nerve activity of mesenteric nerves and performing patch-clamp recordings from isolated dorsal root ganglia neurons. Somatic thermal nociception was tested using a tail immersion assay. Cardiorespiratory effects were analysed by pulse oximeter experiments.

KEY RESULTS

VMRs and tail immersion tests demonstrated tolerance to fentanyl, but not to NFEPP in colitis mice. Cross-tolerance also occurred to fentanyl, but not to NFEPP. The MOR agonist DAMGO inhibited colonic afferent nerve activity in colitis mice exposed to chronic NFEPP, but not those from fentanyl-treated mice. Similarly, in patch-clamp recordings from isolated dorsal root ganglia neurons, DAMGO inhibited neurons from NFEPP-, but not fentanyl-treated mice.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

NFEPP did not exhibit tolerance in an inflammatory pain model, unlike fentanyl. Consequently, dose escalation to maintain analgesia during an evolving inflammation could be avoided, mitigating the potential risk of side effects.

Neuropsychiatric Effects Associated with Opioid-Based Management for Palliative Care Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The abundance of opioids administered in the palliative care setting that was once considered a standard of care is at present necessitating that providers evaluate patients for unintentional and deleterious symptomology related to aberrant opioid use and addiction. Polypharmacy with opioids is dynamic in affecting patients neurologically, and increased amounts of prescriptions have had inimical effects, not only for the individual, but also for their families and healthcare providers. The purpose of this review is to widen the perspective of opioid consequences and bring awareness to the numerous neuropsychiatric effects associated with the most commonly prescribed opioids for patients receiving palliative care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous clinical and research studies have found evidence in support for increased incidence of opioid usage and abuse as well as undesirable neurological outcomes. The most common and concerning effects of opioid usage in this setting are delirium and problematic drug-related behavioral changes such as deceitful behavior towards family and physicians, anger outbursts, overtaking of medications, and early prescription refill requests. Other neuropsychiatric effects detailed by recent studies include drug-seeking behavior, tolerance, dependence, addictive disorder, anxiety, substance use disorder, emotional distress, continuation of opioids to avoid opioid withdrawal syndrome, depression, and suicidal ideation. Opioid usage has detrimental and confounding effects that have been overlooked for many years by palliative care providers and patients receiving palliative care. It is necessary, even lifesaving, to be cognizant of potential neuropsychiatric effects that opioids can have on an individual, especially for those under palliative care. By having an increased understanding and awareness of potential opioid neuropsychiatric effects, patient quality of life can be improved, healthcare system costs can be decreased, and patient outcomes can be met and exceeded.

How do opioids control pain circuits in the brainstem during opioid-induced disorders and in chronic pain? Implications for the treatment of chronic pain

ABSTRACT

Brainstem areas involved in descending pain modulation are crucial for the analgesic actions of opioids. However, the role of opioids in these areas during tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), and in chronic pain settings remains underappreciated. We conducted a revision of the recent studies performed in the main brainstem areas devoted to descending pain modulation with a special focus on the medullary dorsal reticular nucleus (DRt), as a distinctive pain facilitatory area and a key player in the diffuse noxious inhibitory control paradigm. We show that maladaptive processes within the signaling of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), which entail desensitization and a switch to excitatory signaling, occur in the brainstem, contributing to tolerance and OIH. In the context of chronic pain, the alterations found are complex and depend on the area and model of chronic pain. For example, the downregulation of MOR and δ-opioid receptor (DOR) in some areas, including the DRt, during neuropathic pain likely contributes to the inefficacy of opioids. However, the upregulation of MOR and DOR, at the rostral ventromedial medulla, in inflammatory pain models, suggests therapeutic avenues to explore. Mechanistically, the rationale for the diversity and complexity of alterations in the brainstem is likely provided by the alternative splicing of opioid receptors and the heteromerization of MOR. In conclusion, this review emphasizes how important it is to consider the effects of opioids at these circuits when using opioids for the treatment of chronic pain and for the development of safer and effective opioids.

Postoperative Pain Control Following Shoulder Arthroplasty: Rethinking the Need for Opioids

The use of opioid pain medication regimens to control perioperative pain has led to significant patient and societal consequences. There are several alternative, opioid-sparing and opioid-minimizing pain regimens that have been shown to provide equal, if not superior, pain relief with fewer secondary consequences. This article provides an in-depth review of the current evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and feasibility of a perioperative opioid-sparing clinical pathway for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

The Burden of Metastatic Cancer-Induced Bone Pain: A Narrative Review

Bone pain is one of the most common forms of pain reported by cancer patients with metastatic disease. We conducted a review of oncology literature to further understand the epidemiology of and treatment approaches for metastatic cancer–induced bone pain and the effect of treatment of painful bone metastases on the patient’s quality of life. Two-thirds of patients with advanced, metastatic, or terminal cancer worldwide experience pain. Cancer pain due to bone metastases is the most common form of pain in patients with advanced disease and has been shown to significantly reduce patients’ quality of life. Treatment options for cancer pain due to bone metastases include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, palliative radiation, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and opioids. Therapies including palliative radiation and opioids have strong evidence supporting their efficacy treating cancer pain due to bone metastases; other therapies, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, do not. There is sufficient evidence that patients who experience pain relief after radiation therapy have improved quality of life; however, a substantial proportion are nonresponders. For those still requiring pain management, even with available analgesics, many patients are undertreated for cancer pain due to bone metastases, indicating an unmet need. The studies in this review were not designed to determine why cancer pain due to bone metastases was undertreated. Studies specifically addressing cancer pain due to bone metastases, rather than general cancer pain, are limited. Additional research is needed to determine patient preferences and physician attitudes regarding choice of analgesic for moderate to severe cancer pain due to bone metastases.

Opioid-sparing pain management protocol after shoulder arthroplasty results in less opioid consumption and higher satisfaction: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic has become a central focus in health care. In an effort to reduce opioid use, orthopedic surgeons use multimodal strategies to control postoperative pain. However, no clear consensus exists on ideal pain management strategies after shoulder arthroplasty, and most protocols are opioid-driven. This study sought to determine if patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty using a postoperative opioid-sparing pain-control regimen would have equivalent pain scores and satisfaction as patients using a traditional opioid-based regimen.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized into an opioid-sparing (OS) or a traditional opioid-based (OB) postoperative pain protocol. Both groups received opioid education, periarticular injection with liposomal bupivacaine, and preoperative and postoperative multimodal management (acetaminophen, celecoxib, and gabapentin). The OB group was discharged with 40 oxycodone tablets and standard icing, whereas the OS group received ketorolac during admission, continuous cryotherapy, and discharged with 10 oxycodone tablets for rescue. Patients were queried regarding levels of pain and opioid consumption at days 1-7 and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was recorded at 1, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were recorded.

RESULTS

In 78 patients, no difference in VAS pain scores were seen at any time between groups. The OS group consumed less oral morphine equivalents (OME) from inpatient hospitalization to 12 weeks postoperatively (P < .05). Total OME consumption was reduced by 213% for the OS vs. the OB group (112 vs. 239; P < .0001). The OS group consumed fewer opioid pills at all time points (P < .05). A 395% reduction in number of opioid pills consumed in the first 12 weeks postoperatively was seen in the OS vs. the OB group (4.3 vs. 17.0; P < .0001). Significantly more patients in the OS group discontinued opioids by 2 weeks postoperatively (86.1% vs. 58.5%; P = .011), and 94.4% in the OS group discontinued opioids by 6 weeks postoperatively. The OS group was more satisfied with pain management at 1 and 6 weeks (P = .05). No difference in ROM, ASES or SANE scores, complications, readmissions, or reoperations were seen between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a nearly 4-fold reduction in opioid pain pill consumption and earlier cessation of opioids with an OS pain management protocol. Patients also reported higher satisfaction with this pain management strategy.

Opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia: Is TrkB modulation a potential pharmacological solution?

Opioids are widely prescribed for moderate to severe pain in patients with acute illness, cancer pain, and chronic noncancer pain. However, long-term opioid use can cause opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), contributing to the opioid misuse and addiction crisis. Strategies to mitigate opioid tolerance and OIH are needed to reduce opioid use and its sequelae. Currently, there are few effective pharmacological strategies that reduce opioid tolerance and OIH. The intrinsic tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB) ligand, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), has been shown to modulate pain. The BDNF-TrkB signaling plays a role in initiating and sustaining elevated pain sensitivity; however, increasing evidence has shown that BDNF and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (7,8-DHF), a potent blood-brain barrier-permeable ligand to TrkB, exert neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects that may protect against opioid tolerance and OIH. As such, TrkB signaling may be an important therapeutic avenue in opioid tolerance and OIH. Here, we review 1) the mechanisms of pain, opioid analgesia, opioid tolerance, and OIH; 2) the role of BDNF-TrkB in pain modulation; and 3) the neuroprotective effects of 7,8-DHF and their implications for opioid tolerance and OIH.

Machine Learning to Predict Successful Opioid Dose Reduction or Stabilization After Spinal Cord Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) effectively reduces opioid usage in some patients, but preoperatively, there is no objective measure to predict who will most benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To predict successful reduction or stabilization of opioid usage after SCS using machine learning models we developed and to assess if deep learning provides a significant benefit over logistic regression (LR).

METHODS

We used the IBM MarketScan national databases to identify patients undergoing SCS from 2010 to 2015. Our models predict surgical success as defined by opioid dose stability or reduction 1 year after SCS. We incorporated 30 predictors, primarily regarding medication patterns and comorbidities. Two machine learning algorithms were applied: LR with recursive feature elimination and deep neural networks (DNNs). To compare model performances, we used nested 5-fold cross-validation to calculate area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The final cohort included 7022 patients, of whom 66.9% had successful surgery. Our 5-variable LR performed comparably with the full 30-variable version (AUROC difference <0.01). The DNN and 5-variable LR models demonstrated similar AUROCs of 0.740 (95% CI, 0.727-0.753) and 0.737 (95% CI, 0.728-0.746) ( P = .25), respectively. The simplified model can be accessed at SurgicalML.com .

CONCLUSION

We present the first machine learning-based models for predicting reduction or stabilization of opioid usage after SCS. The DNN and 5-variable LR models demonstrated comparable performances, with the latter revealing significant associations with patients' pre-SCS pharmacologic patterns. This simplified, interpretable LR model may augment patient and surgeon decision making regarding SCS.

Practical management of epidermolysis bullosa: consensus clinical position statement from the European Reference Network for Rare Skin Diseases

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises rare disorders that manifest with fragility and blistering of the skin and mucous membranes, with variable clinical severity. Management of EB is challenging due to disease rarity and complexity, the wide range of extracutaneous manifestations and a profound impact on daily life for the patient and family members. Although reference centres providing multidisciplinary care for EB exist in each European country, it is common for healthcare professionals that are not specialized in this rare disorder to treat EB patients. Here, experts of the European Reference Network for Rare and Undiagnosed Skin Diseases (ERN-Skin, https://ern-skin.eu) propose practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of the commonest clinical issues, skin blisters and wounds, oral manifestations, pain and itch.