1
|
Pokharel SS, Yu H, Fang W, Parajulee MN, Chen F. Intercropping Cover Crops for a Vital Ecosystem Service: A Review of the Biocontrol of Insect Pests in Tea Agroecosystems. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:2361. [PMID: 37375986 DOI: 10.3390/plants12122361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
The intercropping of cover crops has been adopted in several agroecosystems, including tea agroecosystems, which promotes ecological intensification. Prior studies have shown that growing cover crops in tea plantations provided different ecological services, including the biocontrol of pests. Cover crops enrich soil nutrients, reduce soil erosion, suppress weeds and insect pests, and increase the abundance of natural enemies (predators and parasitoids). We have reviewed the potential cover crops that can be incorporated into the tea agroecosystem, particularly emphasizing the ecological services of cover crops in pest control. Cover crops were categorized into cereals (buckwheat, sorghum), legumes (guar, cowpea, tephrosia, hairy indigo, and sunn hemp), aromatic plants (lavender, marigold, basil, and semen cassiae), and others (maize, mountain pepper, white clover, round-leaf cassia, and creeping indigo). Legumes and aromatic plants are the most potent cover crop species that can be intercropped in monoculture tea plantations due to their exceptional benefits. These cover crop species improve crop diversity and help with atmospheric nitrogen fixation, including with the emission of functional plant volatiles, which enhances the diversity and abundance of natural enemies, thereby assisting in the biocontrol of tea insect pests. The vital ecological services rendered by cover crops to monoculture tea plantations, including regarding the prevalent natural enemies and their pivotal role in the biocontrol of insect pests in the tea plantation, have also been reviewed. Climate-resilient crops (sorghum, cowpea) and volatile blends emitting aromatic plants (semen cassiae, marigold, flemingia) are recommended as cover crops that can be intercropped in tea plantations. These recommended cover crop species attract diverse natural enemies and suppress major tea pests (tea green leaf hopper, white flies, tea aphids, and mirid bugs). It is presumed that the incorporation of cover crops within the rows of tea plantations will be a promising strategy for mitigating pest attacks via the conservation biological control, thereby increasing tea yield and conserving agrobiodiversity. Furthermore, a cropping system with intercropped cover crop species would be environmentally benign and offer the opportunity to increase natural enemy abundance, delaying pest colonization and/or preventing pest outbreaks for pest management sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabin Saurav Pokharel
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Han Yu
- Department of Forest Genetics and Breeding, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
| | - Wanping Fang
- Department of Tea Science, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Megha N Parajulee
- Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, 1102 East Drew Street, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA
| | - Fajun Chen
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Combining Cultural Tactics and Insecticides for the Management of the Sweetpotato Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci MEAM1, and Viruses in Yellow Squash. HORTICULTURAE 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8040341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), and the complex of viruses it transmits are major limiting factors to squash production in the southeastern United States. At this time, insecticides are extensively relied upon for the management of whiteflies and, indirectly, whitefly-transmitted viruses. The development of a multi-faceted, integrated pest management (IPM) program is needed to increase the sustainability and profitability of squash production. Experiments in 2018 and 2019 evaluated the effects of insect exclusion netting (IEN) in combination with selected pesticides on whitefly population dynamics and virus incidence in greenhouse-grown squash seedlings. Field experiments from 2018 to 2021 evaluated the effects of mulch type (UV-reflective mulch, live mulch, and white plastic mulch), row covers, and insecticides on whitefly population dynamics, silver leaf disorder (SSL) intensity, virus symptom severity, and marketable yield. IEN significantly reduced whiteflies and virus incidence on squash seedlings in the greenhouse study. In the field mulch study, lower whitefly abundance and SSL intensity, as well as reduced virus symptom severity, were observed in plots with reflective mulch compared with white plastic or live mulch. In the insecticide/row cover study, whitefly abundance, SSL intensity, and virus symptom severity were lowest in the row cover and cyantraniliprole- and flupyradifurone-treated plots. Field plots with row covers and those with UV-reflective mulch consistently produced the greatest marketable yields. These findings demonstrate that growers can reduce whitefly and virus pressure and preserve yields in squash production in the southeastern United States by combining cultural and chemical tactics, including row covers, UV-reflective mulch, and select insecticides.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kheirodin A, Simmons AM, Legaspi JC, Grabarczyk EE, Toews MD, Roberts PM, Chong JH, Snyder WE, Schmidt JM. Can Generalist Predators Control Bemisia tabaci? INSECTS 2020; 11:insects11110823. [PMID: 33238485 PMCID: PMC7700500 DOI: 10.3390/insects11110823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Whiteflies are major insect pests on a global scale. The use of insecticides is the primary tool for controlling them, but there are many problems relying on this strategy. However, natural enemies like predators and parasitic insects that attack whiteflies can help provide a sustainable pest management approach. This paper focuses on predators that feed on whiteflies as well as other insect pests and are called generalist predators. We provide a comprehensive view of generalist predator contributions and review the currently recognized generalist predators of whiteflies. There are many generalist predators in agricultural cropping systems that help control whiteflies. We highlight the need for conservation biological control programs through habitat management strategies and the use of selective insecticides, with an aim for more sustainable management of whiteflies in crops. Abstract The whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, has developed resistance to many insecticides, renewing interest in the biological control of this global pest. Generalist predators might contribute to whitefly suppression if they commonly occur in infested fields and generally complement rather than interfere with specialized natural enemies. Here, we review literature from the last 20 years, across US cropping systems, which considers the impacts of generalist predators on B. tabaci. Laboratory feeding trials and molecular gut content analysis suggest that at least 30 different generalist predator species willingly and/or regularly feed on these whiteflies. Nine of these predators appear to be particularly impactful, and a higher abundance of a few of these predator species has been shown to correlate with greater B. tabaci predation in the field. Predator species often occupy complementary feeding niches, which would be expected to strengthen biocontrol, although intraguild predation is also common and might be disruptive. Overall, our review suggests that a bio-diverse community of generalist predators commonly attacks B. tabaci, with the potential to exert substantial control in the field. The key challenge will be to develop reduced-spray plans so that generalist predators, and other more specialized natural enemies, are abundant enough that their biocontrol potential is realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Kheirodin
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA; (A.K.); (M.D.T.); (P.M.R.)
| | - Alvin M. Simmons
- U.S. Vegetable Research, USDA-ARS, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414, USA;
| | - Jesusa C. Legaspi
- USDA-Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Research, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA;
| | - Erin E. Grabarczyk
- Southeast Watershed Research, USDA-ARS, 2316 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA;
| | - Michael D. Toews
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA; (A.K.); (M.D.T.); (P.M.R.)
| | - Phillip M. Roberts
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA; (A.K.); (M.D.T.); (P.M.R.)
| | - Juang-Horng Chong
- Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA;
| | - William E. Snyder
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA;
| | - Jason M. Schmidt
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA; (A.K.); (M.D.T.); (P.M.R.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Compatibility of the Predatory Beetle, Delphastus catalinae, with an Entomopathogenic Fungus, Cordyceps fumosorosea, for Biocontrol of Invasive Pepper Whitefly, Aleurothrixus trachoides, in Florida. INSECTS 2020; 11:insects11090590. [PMID: 32882941 PMCID: PMC7565525 DOI: 10.3390/insects11090590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary The solanum whitefly, Aleurothrixus trachoides, is a polyphagous pest known to attack > 70 crops worldwide. Endemic to the Neotropical region, in the past few years, it has emerged as a significant pest of several horticultural crops including pepper in the United States. To develop an eco-friendly sustainable management strategy for this pest, in this study, we evaluated the efficacy and compatibility of two commercially available biological control agents, predatory beetle Delphastus catalinae (Dc) and entomopathogenic fungi Cordyceps fumosorosea (Cfr) under laboratory conditions. Results showed both Cfr, treatments (alone or in combination with Dc) were efficacious, and Cfr did not negatively impact the beetle longevity. This study’s outcome is important not only for organic horticultural growers, but also for conventional growers as it offers a low-risk alternative tool for solanum whitefly integrated pest management in Florida and other affected regions. Abstract Aleurothrixus (formerly known as Aleurotrachelus) trachoides Back (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), commonly known as pepper or solanum whitefly, is a new emerging whitefly pest of several horticultural crops in the United States. During the preliminary survey for pepper whitefly infestation in Florida, a whitefly-specific predatory beetle Delphastus catalinae Horn (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) was observed associated with this pest in the natural ecosystem. The current study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of this naturally occurring predator, D. catalinae, and an entomopathogenic fungus, Cordyceps (formerly known as Isaria) fumosorosea (Cfr) (Wize) (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae), alone or in combination, under controlled laboratory conditions. Whitefly mortality for Cfr (88%), beetle (100%) and Cfr + beetle (100%) treatments were similar and significantly higher compared to control. In the combination treatment, Cfr did not impact D. catalinae longevity and daily food intake, indicating a neutral interaction between the two treatments. Results showed that both of these natural biological control agents could potentially offer an effective alternative in the battle against invasive whiteflies such as pepper whitefly in U.S. horticulture production, either as a stand-alone strategy or in an integrated approach. Although these findings are promising, compatibility of the two treatments needs to be evaluated further under greenhouse and semi-field conditions before recommending to commercial growers.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tian M, Xu L, Jiang J, Zhang S, Liu T, Xu Y. Host Plant Species of Bemisia tabaci Affect Orientational Behavior of the Ladybeetle Serangium japonicum and Their Implication for the Biological Control Strategy of Whiteflies. INSECTS 2020; 11:insects11070434. [PMID: 32664559 PMCID: PMC7411814 DOI: 10.3390/insects11070434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Serangium japonicum Chapin (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is a predominant predator with a preference for Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). To date, the orientational behavior of S. japonicum toward B. tabaci-infested plants has seldom been reported. In this study, greenhouse cage experiments and bioassays with wind tunnels, a Y-tube olfactometer and B. tabaci-induced plant volatiles were executed to clarify this behavior. In greenhouse cage experiments, B. tabaci adults significantly preferred eggplant, cucumber and tobacco to cotton and tomato, whereas S. japonicum adults preferred B. tabaci-infested eggplant, cucumber and cotton to tobacco and tomato. In wind tunnel bioassays, B. tabaci showed a clear preference for eggplant, cucumber and tobacco. Compared with B. tabaci-infested eggplant, cucumber or cotton, B. tabaci-infested tobacco was rarely visited by S. japonicum. In Y-tube bioassays, S. japonicum did not distinguish between B. tabaci-infested and uninfested eggplant. Nine common plant volatiles were detected in different plant species, suggesting that these volatiles may play an important role in the process by which S. japonicum looks for prey. In light of the current results, we discuss the implications of our findings and put forward to a new strategy—i.e., an eggplant + B. tabaci + S. japonicum system—to control B. tabaci damage in the integrated management of whitefly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; (M.T.); (L.X.); (J.J.); (T.L.)
| | - Lili Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; (M.T.); (L.X.); (J.J.); (T.L.)
| | - Jun Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; (M.T.); (L.X.); (J.J.); (T.L.)
| | - Shize Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; (M.T.); (L.X.); (J.J.); (T.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-15109266833
| | - Tongxian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; (M.T.); (L.X.); (J.J.); (T.L.)
| | - Yongyu Xu
- College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Razze JM, Liburd OE, Nuessly GS, Samuel-Foo M. Evaluation of Bioinsecticides for Management of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and the Effect on the Whitefly Predator Delphastus catalinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Organic Squash. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2016; 109:1766-1771. [PMID: 27247302 DOI: 10.1093/jee/tow108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Organic zucchini squash is a high-value vegetable crop in Florida and potential exists to expand its production throughout the state. A lack of knowledge on the effectiveness of organic products and their integration with natural enemies is an important constraint to the regulation of pest populations in organic squash production in Florida. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of insecticides labeled for organic production that can be used for management of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotype B, on organically grown squash; and to determine the effects of the most efficient insecticides on a key natural enemy, Delphastus catalinae (Horn). Experiments were conducted in the greenhouse in exclusion cages. The first experiment compared the effects of four bioinsecticides on whitefly densities. Insecticides include 1) AzaSol (azadirachtin), 2) PyGanic EC 1.4 (pyrethrin), 3) M-Pede (insecticidal soap), and 4) Entrust (spinosad). The second experiment investigated the effects of bioinsecticides on D. catalinae Treatment effectiveness was evaluated 1, 3, and 5 d posttreatment. PyGanic and M-Pede were highly effective in controlling whitefly populations on organic squash, while moderate control was provided by AzaSol and there was no control provided by Entrust. PyGanic and M-Pede treatments reduced D. catalinae populations when adults were released 1 d post pesticide application. However, when adults were released 5 d post application, there was no reduction. The importance of using bioinsecticides in combination with natural enemies to regulate pest populations in organic cropping systems is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine M Razze
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Steinmetz Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 (; )
| | - Oscar E Liburd
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Steinmetz Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 (; )
| | - Gregg S Nuessly
- Everglades Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL 33430
| | - Michelle Samuel-Foo
- Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| |
Collapse
|