1
|
Anuradha P, E MS, Priyanka M, Emaiya R, Karthik P, Suganthi A, Krishnamoorthy SV. Determination of chlorantraniliprole for managing Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura in cotton ecosystem. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 239:117301. [PMID: 37805183 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Cotton bollworm incidence and damages are high in India. In addition, it causes considerable yield loss. A new insecticide formulation Chlorantraniliprole 600 g/L SC was used along with recommended insecticides for managing Spodoptera litura and Helicoverpa armigera in two consecutive experimental trials during the period October 2021 to September 2022. Two foliar applications of Chlorantraniliprole (40 and 30 g a. i/ha) at ten days interval period reduced significantly the larval populations of H. armigera, S. litura without any phytotoxic symptoms in cotton. Chlorantraniliprole application in open field condition was found to be harmless to natural enemy (coccinellids and spiders). Even though, a temporary lessening of natural enemy populations was noticed after spray, progressively the population was increased within a week time. Cotton yield was high in chlorantraniliprole @ 40 g a. i/ha treated plot (22.66, 22.12 q/ha) when compared to untreated control. Similar effect was also noticed in the dose at 30 g a. i/ha (22.35, 21.81 q/ha) and it was statistically on par in both experiments. Residue analysis results confirming that, cotton lint, cotton seed and soil samples collected from treated (30 and 60 g a. i/ha) and untreated samples during harvest were free from chlorantraniliprole residues (below detectable levels of 0.008 μg/g).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Anuradha
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
| | - Madhu Sudhanan E
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
| | - M Priyanka
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
| | - R Emaiya
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
| | - P Karthik
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
| | - A Suganthi
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
| | - S V Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith J, Crow WD, Catchot AL, Cook D, Gore J. Determination of Residual Control and Concentration of Chlorantraniliprole in Soybean. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2023; 116:472-477. [PMID: 36752772 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Studies were conducted in 2020 and 2021 at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS to determine concentrations of chlorantraniliprole (Prevathon, FMC Corporation, Philadelphia, PA) in soybean (Glycine max L.) leaves and florets. Chlorantraniliprole was applied as a foliar spray at four rates (0.028, 0.053, 0.078, 0.103 kg ai ha-1) for leaves and two rates (0.053, 0.078 kg ai ha-1) for florets. Leaf bioassays with corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), were conducted concurrently to determine mortality within three plant zones to evaluate chlorantraniliprole distribution throughout the canopy. For the leaf study, plants were partitioned into three zones consisting of a top (18th node), middle (13th node), and bottom (9th node) zone. Leaf samples from each zone were analyzed for chemical concentrations and bioassays were conducted at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Floret samples were analyzed at 4, 7, 10, and 14 DAT. Concentrations of chlorantraniliprole, though variable, provided >71% control through all sampling dates, application rates, and canopy zones tested. Chlorantraniliprole was viable up to 28 DAT. Results from the soybean floret study suggested chlorantraniliprole was detected in florets up to 14 DAT. An additional leaf bioassay was conducted using concentrations detected in the floret study. Concentrations in florets provided mortality of corn earworm up to 48% out to 14 DAT. With a long residual expected, chlorantraniliprole applications should continue to be used to control corn earworm infestations in soybean and some additional control could be expected in florets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Smith
- Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| | - W D Crow
- Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| | - A L Catchot
- Mississippi State University, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA
| | - D Cook
- Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| | - J Gore
- Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reisig D, Buntin GD, Greene JK, Paula-Moraes SV, Reay-Jones F, Roberts P, Smith R, Taylor SV. Magnitude and Extent of Helicoverpa zea Resistance Levels to Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 across the Southeastern USA. INSECTS 2023; 14:262. [PMID: 36975947 PMCID: PMC10058025 DOI: 10.3390/insects14030262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
After resistance is first detected, continued resistance monitoring can inform decisions on how to effectively manage resistant populations. We monitored for resistance to Cry1Ac (2018 and 2019) and Cry2Ab2 (2019) from southeastern USA populations of Helicoverpa zea. We collected larvae from various plant hosts, sib-mated the adults, and tested neonates using diet-overlay bioassays and compared them to susceptible populations for resistance estimates. We also compared LC50 values with larval survival, weight and larval inhibition at the highest dose tested using regression, and found that LC50 values were negatively correlated with survival for both proteins. Finally, we compared resistance rations between Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 during 2019. Some populations were resistant to Cry1Ac, and most were resistant to CryAb2; Cry1Ac resistance ratios were lower than Cry2Ab2 during 2019. Survival was positively correlated with larval weight inhibition for Cry2Ab. This contrasts with other studies in both the mid-southern and southeastern USA, where resistance to Cry1Ac, Cry1A.105, and Cry2Ab2 increased over time and was found in a majority of populations. This indicates that cotton expressing Cry proteins in the southeastern USA was at variable risk for damage in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Reisig
- Department of Entomology, The Vernon James Center, North Carolina State University, Plymouth, NC 27962, USA
| | - G. David Buntin
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA
| | - Jeremy K. Greene
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Blackville, SC 29817, USA
| | | | - Francis Reay-Jones
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Blackville, SC 29817, USA
| | - Phillip Roberts
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA
| | - Ron Smith
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Sally V. Taylor
- Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Suffolk, VA 23437, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith J, Crow WD, Catchot AL, Cook DR, Gore J. Chlorantraniliprole Residual Control and Concentration Determination in Cotton. INSECTS 2023; 14:176. [PMID: 36835745 PMCID: PMC9965247 DOI: 10.3390/insects14020176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Studies were conducted in 2020 and 2021 at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS, to determine the residual concentrations of chlorantraniliprole in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, L.) leaves, as well as the concentrations in petals and anthers that developed after the time of application. Foliar applications of chlorantraniliprole were applied at four rates for leaves and two rates for petals and anthers at the second week of bloom. Additional bioassays were conducted to determine mortality of corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea, Boddie) in anthers. For the leaf study, plants were partitioned into three zones consisting of top, middle, and bottom zones. Leaf samples from each zone were analyzed for chemical concentrations at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Residual concentrations, although variable, persisted through all sampling dates, rates, and zones tested. In this study, chlorantraniliprole remained detectable up to 28 DAT. Results from the cotton flower petal and anther studies detected concentrations of chlorantraniliprole in petals at 4, 7, 10, and 14 DAT, but no concentrations were detected in anthers. Therefore, no mortality of corn earworm was recorded in the anther bioassays. A series of diet-incorporated bioassays were conducted using concentrations previously found in the petal study to determine baseline susceptibilities of corn earworms and predicted mortality. Results from the diet-incorporated bioassays showed similar susceptibility in field and lab colony corn earworms. Concentrations of chlorantraniliprole could provide up to 64% control of corn earworm when feeding occurs on the petals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Smith
- Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| | - Whitney D. Crow
- Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| | - Angus L. Catchot
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
| | - Donald R. Cook
- Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gore
- Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Del Pozo-Valdivia AI, Reisig DD, Braswell L, Greene JK, Roberts P, Taylor SV. Economic Injury Levels for Bt-resistant Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Cotton. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2021; 114:747-756. [PMID: 33615386 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Thresholds for Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) in cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. have been understudied since the widespread adoption of Bt cotton in the United States. Our study was possible due to the widespread presence of H. zea populations with Cry-toxin resistance. We initiated progressive spray timing experiments using three Bt cotton brands (Deltapine, Stoneville, and Phytogen) widely planted across the U.S. Cotton Belt expressing pyramided toxins in the Cry1A, Cry2, and Vip3Aa19 families. We timed foliar insecticide treatments based on week of bloom to manipulate H. zea populations in tandem with crop development during 2017 and 2018. We hypothesized that non-Bt cotton, cotton expressing Cry toxins alone, and cotton expressing Cry and Vip3Aa19 toxins would respond differently to H. zea feeding. We calculated economic injury levels to support the development of economic thresholds from significant responses. Pressure from H. zea was high during both years. Squares and bolls damaged by H. zea had the strongest negative yield associations, followed by larval number on squares. There were fewer yield associations with larval number on bolls and with number of H. zea eggs on the plant. Larval population levels were very low on varieties expressing Vip3Aa19. Yield response varied across experiments and varieties, suggesting that it is difficult to pinpoint precise economic injury levels. Nonetheless, our results generally suggest that current economic thresholds for H. zea in cotton are too high. Economic injury levels from comparisons between non-Bt varieties and those expressing only Cry toxins could inform future thresholds once H. zea evolves resistance to Vip3Aa19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro I Del Pozo-Valdivia
- Department of Entomology, Hampton Roads Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Beach, VA, USA
| | - Dominic D Reisig
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, Plymouth, NC, USA
| | - Lewis Braswell
- Product Biology Division, Syngenta Crop Protection Inc., Greensboro, NC, USA
| | - Jeremy K Greene
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC, USA
| | - Phillip Roberts
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, Tifton, GA, USA
| | - Sally V Taylor
- Department of Entomology, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Suffolk, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|