Resistance to dicyclanil and imidacloprid in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, in Australia

Cross-resistance patterns in field strains of the sheep blowfly following laboratory-based selection pressure with dicyclanil or imidacloprid

Control of the sheep blowfly relies largely on the use of insecticides applied prophylactically in advance of expected fly activity. However, the blowfly has shown an ability to develop resistance to some of these insecticides. Recent reports of the co-occurrence of resistance to both dicyclanil and imidacloprid in in vitro bioassays with field-collected fly strains has raised the possibility that the two resistances may represent cross-resistance linked by a common mechanism. We investigated this by imposing insecticide selection pressure on larvae of two insecticide-resistant field strains over a number of generations using either dicyclanil or imidacloprid and then measuring changes in sensitivity to both the selecting chemical and the alternate chemical. Larvae selected over six generations with each chemical showed significant increases in resistance to the selecting chemical: resistance ratios at the IC50 5.5 - 8.1-fold higher for dicyclanil, and 3.1 - 3.8-fold for imidacloprid. The larvae also showed significant increases in levels of resistance towards the alternate chemical: resistance ratios 2.6 - 3.1-fold higher towards dicyclanil following selection with imidacloprid, and 2.2 - 3.2-fold higher towards imidacloprid following selection with dicyclanil. The increases in resistance to both chemicals after exposure to either suggests a common mechanism of resistance, at least in our laboratory-selected populations. Assays with the cytochrome P450 inhibitor aminobenzotriazole showed that this synergist was able to remove the increased resistance to both compounds in strains selected with either compound, suggesting that cytochrome P450 is responsible for the resistance observed to both chemicals. Our results confirm that cross-resistance exists between dicyclanil and imidacloprid in the sheep blowfly, and hence the two compounds should be considered as related entities in insecticide rotation strategies for flystrike control.

In vitro insecticide resistance patterns in field strains of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina

The control of the sheep blowfly relies on the use of insecticides. There have been several reports of in vitro and in vivo resistance to the most widely-used flystrike control chemical, dicyclanil. A recent report also described in vitro resistance to imidacloprid in a strain collected from a single property over three consecutive seasons that also showed resistance to dicyclanil. The present study aimed to use in vitro assays to examine five field-collected blowfly strains to determine if this co-occurrence of resistance to dicyclanil and imidacloprid was present more widely in field strains and to also measure resistance patterns to the other currently-used flystrike control chemicals. Each of the strains showed significant levels of resistance to both dicyclanil and imidacloprid: resistance factors at the IC50 of 9.1-23.8 for dicyclanil, and 8.7-14.1 for imidacloprid. Resistance factors at the IC95 ranged from 16.5 to 53.7, and 14.6-24.3 for dicyclanil and imidacloprid, respectively. Resistance factors were up to 8.5 for cyromazine at the IC95. Resistance to dicyclanil and imidacloprid was suppressed by co-treatment with the cytochrome P450 inhibitor, aminobenzotriazole, implicating this enzyme system in the observed resistances. We discuss the implications of the co-occurrence of resistance to dicyclanil and imidacloprid on insecticide rotation strategies for blowfly control. We also discuss the roles of insecticide resistance, environmental factors (e.g. rainfall), operational factors (e.g. insecticide application technique) and other animal health issues (e.g. scouring / diarrhoea) that together will impact on the likelihood of flystrike occurring at an earlier time point than expected after insecticide application.

The current status and outlook for insecticide, acaricide and anthelmintic resistances across the Australian ruminant livestock industries: assessing the threat these resistances pose to the livestock sector

The Australian ruminant livestock industries are faced with the need to control parasitic infectious diseases that can seriously impact the health of animals. However, increasing levels of resistance to insecticides, anthelmintics and acaricides are substantially reducing the ability to control some of these parasites. Here we review the current situation with regard to chemical resistances in parasites across the various sectors of the Australian ruminant livestock industries and assess the level of threat that these resistances pose to the sustainability of these sectors in the short to long terms. We also look at the extent to which testing for resistance occurs across the various industry sectors, and hence how well-informed these sectors are of the extent of chemical resistance. We examine on-farm management practices, breeding of parasite-resistant animals, and non-chemical therapeutics that may act as short to long term means to reduce the current reliance on chemicals for parasite control. Finally, we look at the balance between the prevalence and magnitude of current resistances and the availability and adoption rates of management, breeding and therapeutic alternatives in order to assess the parasite control outlook for the various industry sectors.

Reduced synergistic efficacy of piperonyl butoxide in combination with alpha-cypermethrin in vitro in an insecticide-resistant strain of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina

Control of flystrike on sheep relies on the use of insecticides. The present study used in vitro assays to examine the potential for increasing the efficacy of synthetic pyrethroids against sheep blowfly larvae using the synergist piperonyl butoxide (PBO). We examined the potency of alpha-cypermethrin (ACP) / PBO combinations against a reference insecticide-susceptible strain (LS) and a field-derived strain showing resistance to dicyclanil and imidacloprid. Co-treatment of the insecticide-susceptible strain with ACP/PBO resulted in increasing levels of synergism as the PBO concentration was increased, with synergism ratios (SRs) of up to 114-fold. Treatment with PBO/ACP combinations at ratios of 20:1 and 5:1 resulted in significant levels of synergism: SRs of 13.5- and 7.6-fold, respectively. However, the levels of synergism were significantly less for the insecticide-resistant strain: SRs of 4.6- and 2.6-fold for the 20:1 and 5:1 ratios, respectively. The resistant strain showed no resistance to ACP when administered alone, however, was 2-fold less sensitive than the LS strain to the toxic effects of PBO alone. This insensitivity to PBO was removed by co-treatment with the P450 inhibitor aminobenzotriazole, suggesting an increased level of P450-mediated metabolism of the PBO in this strain compared to the LS strain, and hence providing a likely explanation for the reduced synergistic efficacy of PBO on ACP toxicity in the resistant strain. While PBO was able to synergise ACP with both of the blowfly strains examined here, the reduced synergistic efficacy observed with the field-derived insecticide-resistant strain lessens the potential usefulness of such a combination for blowfly control in the field.