Study Design Selection in Early Clinical Anti-Hyperglycemic Drug Development: A Simulation Study of Glucose Tolerance Tests

Pharmacometrics-Based Considerations for the Design of a Pharmacogenomic Clinical Trial Assessing Irinotecan Safety

PURPOSE

Pharmacometric models provide useful tools to aid the rational design of clinical trials. This study evaluates study design-, drug-, and patient-related features as well as analysis methods for their influence on the power to demonstrate a benefit of pharmacogenomics (PGx)-based dosing regarding myelotoxicity.

METHODS

Two pharmacokinetic and one myelosuppression model were assembled to predict concentrations of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 given different UGT1A1 genotypes (poor metabolizers: CLSN-38: -36%) and neutropenia following conventional versus PGx-based dosing (350 versus 245 mg/m2 (-30%)). Study power was assessed given diverse scenarios (n = 50-400 patients/arm, parallel/crossover, varying magnitude of CLSN-38, exposure-response relationship, inter-individual variability) and using model-based data analysis versus conventional statistical testing.

RESULTS

The magnitude of CLSN-38 reduction in poor metabolizers and the myelosuppressive potency of SN-38 markedly influenced the power to show a difference in grade 4 neutropenia (<0.5·109 cells/L) after PGx-based versus standard dosing. To achieve >80% power with traditional statistical analysis (χ2/McNemar's test, α = 0.05), 220/100 patients per treatment arm/sequence (parallel/crossover study) were required. The model-based analysis resulted in considerably smaller total sample sizes (n = 100/15 given parallel/crossover design) to obtain the same statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented findings may help to avoid unfeasible trials and to rationalize the design of pharmacogenetic studies.

A model-based approach to investigating the relationship between glucose-insulin dynamics and dapagliflozin treatment effect in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To develop a quantitative systems pharmacology model to describe the effect of dapagliflozin (a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 [SGLT2] inhibitor) on glucose-insulin dynamics in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, and to identify key determinants of treatment-mediated glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Glycaemic control during dapagliflozin treatment was mechanistically characterized by integrating components representing dapagliflozin pharmacokinetics (PK), glucose-insulin homeostasis, renal glucose reabsorption, and HbA1c formation. The model was developed using PK variables, glucose, plasma insulin, and urinary glucose excretion (UGE) from a phase IIa dapagliflozin trial in patients with T2DM (NCT00162305). The model was used to predict dapagliflozin-induced HbA1c reduction; model predictions were compared to actual data from phase III trials (NCT00528879, NCT00683878, NCT00680745 and NCT00673231).

RESULTS

The integrated glucose-insulin-dapagliflozin model successfully described plasma glucose and insulin levels, as well as UGE in response to oral glucose tolerance tests and meal intake. HbA1c reduction was also well predicted. The results show that dapagliflozin-mediated glycaemic control is anticorrelated to steady-state insulin concentration and insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed model framework is the first to integrate SGLT2 inhibitor mechanism of action with both short-term glucose-insulin dynamics and long-term glucose control (HbA1c). The results suggest that dapagliflozin treatment is beneficial in patients with inadequate glycaemic control from insulin alone and this benefit increases as insulin control diminishes.

Oral Azelaic Acid Ester Decreases Markers of Insulin Resistance in Overweight Human Male Subjects

BACKGROUND/AIM

Insulin resistance (IR) is linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer. We examined safety and efficacy of the natural product diethyl azelate (DEA) in overweight males with a varying degree of IR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen subjects [age 18-42, hemoglobin A1c (A1c) of 5.2-6.2%] received orally 1 mg/kg DEA daily for 21 days. Blood plasma glucose, insulin and lipid levels were assessed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

DEA was well tolerated without hypoglycemia or adverse effects except transient diarrhea (n=1). DEA significantly reduced fasting glucose by 6.06 mg/dl (n=8) and insulin by 37.8% (n=8) in subjects with IR and/or A1c ≥5.6%. Furthermore, it improved cholesterol/HDL, LDL/HDL, and non-cholesterol HDL/HDL by 5.4, 6.5, and 6.6%, respectively in all subjects, and by 8.0, 9.8, and 9.8%, respectively in 9 subjects with A1c ≥5.6%.

CONCLUSION

DEA efficacy correlates with the degree of IR. DEA holds promise as a novel treatment for the management of IR.

Translation Between Two Models; Application with Integrated Glucose Homeostasis Models

PURPOSE

For some biological systems, there exist several models with somewhat different features and perspectives. We propose an evaluation method for NLME models by analyzing real and simulated data from the model of main interest using a structurally different, but similar, NLME model. We showcase this method using the Integrated Glucose Insulin (IGI) model and the Integrated Minimal Model (IMM). Additionally, we try to map parameters carrying similar information between the two models.

METHODS

A bootstrap of real data and simulated datasets from both the IMM and IGI models were analyzed with the two models. Important parameters of the IMM were mapped to IGI parameters using a large IMM simulated dataset analyzed under the IGI model.

RESULTS

Comparison of the parameters estimated from real data and data simulated with the IMM and analyzed with the IGI model demonstrated differences between real and IMM-simulated data. Comparison of the parameters estimated from real data and data simulated with the IGI model and analyzed with the IMM also demonstrated differences but to a lower extent. The strongest parameter correlations were found for: insulin-dependent glucose clearance (IGI) ~ insulin sensitivity (IMM); insulin-independent glucose clearance (IGI) ~ glucose effectiveness (IMM); and insulin effect parameter (IGI) ~ insulin action (IMM).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a new approach to investigate models' ability to simulate real-life-like data, and the information captured in each model in comparison to real data, and the IMM clinically used parameters were successfully mapped to their corresponding IGI parameters.

Model-Based Conditional Weighted Residuals Analysis for Structural Model Assessment

Nonlinear mixed effects models are widely used to describe longitudinal data to improve the efficiency of drug development process or increase the understanding of the studied disease. In such settings, the appropriateness of the modeling assumptions is critical in order to draw correct conclusions and must be carefully assessed for any substantial violations. Here, we propose a new method for structure model assessment, based on assessment of bias in conditional weighted residuals (CWRES). We illustrate this method by assessing prediction bias in two integrated models for glucose homeostasis, the integrated glucose-insulin (IGI) model, and the integrated minimal model (IMM). One dataset was simulated from each model then analyzed with the two models. CWRES outputted from each model fitting were modeled to capture systematic trends in CWRES as well as the magnitude of structural model misspecifications in terms of difference in objective function values (ΔOFV_Bias). The estimates of CWRES bias were used to calculate the corresponding bias in conditional predictions by the inversion of first-order conditional estimation method’s covariance equation. Time, glucose, and insulin concentration predictions were the investigated independent variables. The new method identified correctly the bias in glucose sub-model of the integrated minimal model (IMM), when this bias occurred, and calculated the absolute and proportional magnitude of the resulting bias. CWRES bias versus the independent variables agreed well with the true trends of misspecification. This method is fast easily automated diagnostic tool for model development/evaluation process, and it is already implemented as part of the Perl-speaks-NONMEM software.