1
|
Levy NS, Arena PJ, Jemielita T, Mt-Isa S, McElwee S, Lenis D, Campbell UB, Jaksa A, Hair GM. Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications. J Comp Eff Res 2024:e240064. [PMID: 39364567 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate how transportability methods are currently used for real-world evidence (RWE) generation to inform good practices and support adoption and acceptance of these methods in the RWE context. Methods: We conducted a targeted literature review to identify studies that transported an effect estimate of the clinical effectiveness or safety of a biomedical exposure to a target real-world population. Records were identified from PubMed-indexed articles published any time before 25 July 2023 (inclusive). Two reviewers screened abstracts/titles and reviewed the full text of candidate studies to identify the final set of articles. Data on the therapeutic area, exposure(s), outcome(s), original and target populations and details of the transportability analysis (e.g., analytic method used, estimate transported, stated assumptions) were abstracted from each article. Results: Of 458 unique records identified, six were retained in the final review. Articles were published during 2021-2023, focused on the US/Canada context, and covered a range of therapeutic areas. Four studies transported an RCT effect estimate, while two transported effect estimates derived from real-world data. Almost all articles used weighting methods to transport estimates. Two studies discussed all transportability assumptions, and one evaluated the likelihood of meeting all assumptions and the impact of potential violations. Conclusion: The use of transportability methods for RWE generation is an emerging and promising area of research to address evidence gaps in settings with limited data and infrastructure. More transparent and rigorous reporting of methods, assumptions and limitations may increase the use and acceptability of transportability for producing robust evidence on treatment effectiveness and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie S Levy
- Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion, Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA
| | - Patrick J Arena
- Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion, Inc., Boston, MA 02109, USA
| | - Thomas Jemielita
- Biostatistics & Research Decision Sciences (BARDS), Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Shahrul Mt-Isa
- Biostatistics & Research Decision Sciences (BARDS), MSD Innovation & Development Hub GmbH, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Zürich, 8058, Switzerland
| | - Shane McElwee
- Science & Delivery, Aetion, Inc., New York, NY10001, USA
| | - David Lenis
- Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion, Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA
| | - Ulka B Campbell
- Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion, Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Ashley Jaksa
- Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion, Inc., Boston, MA 02109, USA
| | - Gleicy M Hair
- Center for Observational & Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yuan W, Chen MH, Zhong J. Bayesian Design of Superiority Trials: Methods and Applications. Stat Biopharm Res 2022; 14:433-443. [PMID: 36968644 PMCID: PMC10035591 DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2022.2090429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we lay out the basic elements of Bayesian sample size determination (SSD) for the Bayesian design of a two-arm superiority clinical trial. We develop a flowchart of the Bayesian SSD that highlights the critical components of a Bayesian design and provides a practically useful roadmap for designing a Bayesian clinical trial in real world applications. We empirically examine the amount of borrowing, the choice of noninformative priors, and the impact of model misspecification on the Bayesian type I error and power. A formal and statistically rigorous formulation of conditional borrowing within the decision rule framework is developed. Moreover, by extending the partial borrowing power priors, a new borrowing-by-parts power prior for incorporating historical data is proposed. Computational algorithms are also developed to calculate the Bayesian type I error and power. Extensive simulation studies are carried out to explore the operating characteristics of the proposed Bayesian design of a superiority trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlin Yuan
- Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut at Storrs, CT 06269
| | - Ming-Hui Chen
- Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut at Storrs, CT 06269
| | - John Zhong
- REGENXBIO Inc., 9804 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850
| |
Collapse
|