1
|
Ko FS. Comparisons of a multi-regional trial for four or five regions by fixed effect model and random effect model about allocating sample size rationally into individual regions for a multi-regional trial. COMMUN STAT-THEOR M 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2065019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-shou Ko
- KF Statistical Consulting Company, Kaohsiung, Taiwan R.O.C
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang W, Jiang Z, Qiu J, Xia J, Guo X. A nested group sequential framework for regional evaluation in global drug development program. J Biopharm Stat 2017; 27:945-962. [PMID: 28323515 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1293079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The primary objective of a multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) is to assess the efficacy of all participating regions and evaluate the probability of applying the overall results to a specific region. The consistency assessment of the target region with the overall results is the most common way of evaluating the efficacy in a specific region. Recently, Huang et al. (2012) proposed an additional trial in the target region to an MRCT to evaluate the efficacy in the target ethnic (TE) population under the framework of simultaneous global drug development program (SGDDP). However, the operating characteristics of this statistical framework were not well considered. Therefore, a nested group sequential program for regional efficacy evaluation is proposed in this paper. It is an extension of Huang's SGDDP framework and allows interim analysis after MRCT and in the course of local clinical trial (LCT) phase. It is able to well control the family-wise type I error in the program level and enhances the flexibility of the program. In LCT sample size estimation, we introduce virtual trial, which is transformed from the original program by using discounting factor, and an iteration method is employed to calculate the sample size and stopping boundaries of interim analyses. The proposed sample size estimation method is validated in the simulations and the effect of varied weight, effect size of TE population, and design setting is explored. Examples with normal end point, binary end point, and survival end point are shown to illustrate the application of the proposed nested group sequential program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Wang
- a Biostatistics and Research Decision Science , Merck Research Laboratory, Merck & Co., Inc ., Beijing , China
| | - Zhiwei Jiang
- a Biostatistics and Research Decision Science , Merck Research Laboratory, Merck & Co., Inc ., Beijing , China.,b Department of Health Statistics , School of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Jingjun Qiu
- a Biostatistics and Research Decision Science , Merck Research Laboratory, Merck & Co., Inc ., Beijing , China.,b Department of Health Statistics , School of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Jielai Xia
- b Department of Health Statistics , School of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Xiang Guo
- a Biostatistics and Research Decision Science , Merck Research Laboratory, Merck & Co., Inc ., Beijing , China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teng Z, Chen YF, Chang M. Unified additional requirement in consideration of regional approval for multiregional clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 2017; 27:903-917. [PMID: 28287339 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1289942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
To speed up the process of bringing a new drug to the market, more and more clinical trials are being conducted simultaneously in multiple regions. After demonstrating the overall drug's efficacy across regions, the regulatory and drug sponsor may also want to assess the drug's effect in specific region(s). Most of the recent approaches imposed a uniform criterion to assess the consistency of treatment effects between the interested region(s) and the entire study population regardless of the number of regions in multiregional clinical trials (MRCT). As a result, the needed sample size to achieve the desired probability of satisfying the regional requirement could be huge and implausible for the trial sponsors to implement. In this paper, we propose a unified additional requirement for regional approval by differing the parameters in the additional requirement depending on the number of planned regions. In particular, the values of the parameters are determined by a reasonable sample size increase with the desired probability satisfying the additional requirement. Considering the practicality of the global trial or sample size increase, we recommend specific values of the parameters for a different number of planned regions. We also introduce the assurance probability curve to evaluate the performance of different regional requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyang Teng
- a Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Yeh-Fong Chen
- b Division of Biometrics III, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration , Silver Spring , Maryland , USA
| | - Mark Chang
- c Department of Biostatistics, Boston University , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.,d Veristat, Southborough , Massachusetts , USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hirakawa A, Kinoshita F. An Analysis of Japanese Patients Enrolled in Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2017; 51:207-211. [PMID: 30231713 DOI: 10.1177/2168479016672702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The Japanese regulatory agency, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, requires sponsors to enroll a specific number or proportion of Japanese patients in multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) in order to allow for the appropriate statistical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of an investigational drug in the Japanese population. This means the actual proportion of Japanese patients to the total sample size would need to be determined by taking into account the proportion of patients in other regions as well as the appropriate statistical considerations. Determining the proportion of Japanese patients that satisfies the regulatory agency's statistical requirement, along with taking into account the practical limitations of patient enrollment, would be difficult for sponsors. We believe that recent studies about the proportion of Japanese patients enrolled in MRCTs provides sponsors with useful information about partitioning sample size into individual regions for MRCTs in oncology. In this study, we investigated the proportion of Japanese patients in MRCTs and further compared the efficacy results from the overall population to that of the Japanese population. The proportion of Japanese patients averaged approximately 10.9%, but the proportion varied depending on the drug type. The results of the primary endpoints in Japanese patients were similar to those of the overall population, regardless of the proportion of Japanese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Hirakawa
- 1 Statistical Analysis Section, Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Fumie Kinoshita
- 1 Statistical Analysis Section, Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wadsworth I, Hampson LV, Jaki T. Extrapolation of efficacy and other data to support the development of new medicines for children: A systematic review of methods. Stat Methods Med Res 2016; 27:398-413. [PMID: 26994211 DOI: 10.1177/0962280216631359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When developing new medicines for children, the potential to extrapolate from adult data to reduce the experimental burden in children is well recognised. However, significant assumptions about the similarity of adults and children are needed for extrapolations to be biologically plausible. We reviewed the literature to identify statistical methods that could be used to optimise extrapolations in paediatric drug development programmes. METHODS Web of Science was used to identify papers proposing methods relevant for using data from a 'source population' to support inferences for a 'target population'. Four key areas of methods development were targeted: paediatric clinical trials, trials extrapolating efficacy across ethnic groups or geographic regions, the use of historical data in contemporary clinical trials and using short-term endpoints to support inferences about long-term outcomes. RESULTS Searches identified 626 papers of which 52 met our inclusion criteria. From these we identified 102 methods comprising 58 Bayesian and 44 frequentist approaches. Most Bayesian methods (n = 54) sought to use existing data in the source population to create an informative prior distribution for a future clinical trial. Of these, 46 allowed the source data to be down-weighted to account for potential differences between populations. Bayesian and frequentist versions of methods were found for assessing whether key parameters of source and target populations are commensurate (n = 34). Fourteen frequentist methods synthesised data from different populations using a joint model or a weighted test statistic. CONCLUSIONS Several methods were identified as potentially applicable to paediatric drug development. Methods which can accommodate a heterogeneous target population and which allow data from a source population to be down-weighted are preferred. Methods assessing the commensurability of parameters may be used to determine whether it is appropriate to pool data across age groups to estimate treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Wadsworth
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Lisa V Hampson
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li G, Chen J, Quan H, Shentu Y. Consistency assessment with global and bridging development strategies in emerging markets. Contemp Clin Trials 2013; 36:687-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 04/29/2013] [Accepted: 05/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
7
|
Wang SJ, James Hung HM. Ethnic Sensitive or Molecular Sensitive Beyond All Regions Being Equal in Multiregional Clinical Trials. J Biopharm Stat 2012; 22:879-93. [DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2012.701576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sue-Jane Wang
- a Office of Biostatistics, OTS/CDER , Food and Drug Adminstration , Silver Spring , Maryland , USA
| | - H. M. James Hung
- b Division of Biometrics I, OB/OTS/CDER , Food and Drug Adminstration , Silver Spring , Maryland , USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen J, Quan H, Gallo P, Menjoge S, Luo X, Tanaka Y, Li G, Ouyang SP, Binkowitz B, Ibia E, Talerico S, Ikeda K. Consistency of Treatment Effect across Regions in Multiregional Clinical Trials, Part 1: Design Considerations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1177/009286151104500609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
9
|
Gallo P, Chen J, Quan H, Menjoge S, Luo X, Tanaka Y, Li G, Ouyang SP, Binkowitz B, Ibia E, Talerico S, Ikeda K. Consistency of Treatment Effect across Regions in Multiregional Clinical Trials, Part 2: Monitoring, Reporting, and Interpretation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1177/009286151104500610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|