Does inflammation play a role in kava hepatotoxicity?

The integrated use of in silico methods for the hepatotoxicity potential of Piper methysticum

Herbal products as supplements and therapeutic intervention have been used for centuries. However, their toxicities are not completely evaluated and the mechanisms are not clearly understood. Dried rhizome of the plant kava (Piper methysticum) is used for its anxiolytic, and sedative effects. The drug is also known for its hepatotoxicity potential. Major constituents of the plant were identified as kavalactones, alkaloids and chalcones in previous studies. Kava hepatotoxicity mechanism and the constituent that causes the toxicity have been debated for decades. In this paper, we illustrated the use of computational tools for the hepatotoxicity of kava constituents. The proposed mechanisms and major constituents that are most probably responsible for the toxicity have been scrutinized. According to the experimental and prediction results, the kava constituents play a substantial role in hepatotoxicity by some means or other via glutathione depletion, CYP inhibition, reactive metabolite formation, mitochondrial toxicity and cyclooxygenase activity. Some of the constituents, which have not been tested yet, were predicted to involve mitochondrial membrane potential, caspase-3 stimulation, and AhR activity. Since Nrf2 activation could be favorable for prevention of hepatotoxicity, we also suggest that these compounds should undergo testing given that they were predicted not to be activating Nrf2. Among the major constituents, alkaloids appear to be the least studied and the least toxic group in general. The outcomes of the study could help to appreciate the mechanisms and to prioritize the kava constituents for further testing.

Hepatotoxicity Induced by "the 3Ks": Kava, Kratom and Khat

The 3Ks (kava, kratom and khat) are herbals that can potentially induce liver injuries. On the one hand, growing controversial data have been reported about the hepatotoxicity of kratom, while, on the other hand, even though kava and khat hepatotoxicity has been investigated, the hepatotoxic effects are still not clear. Chronic recreational use of kratom has been associated with rare instances of acute liver injury. Several studies and case reports have suggested that khat is hepatotoxic, leading to deranged liver enzymes and also histopathological evidence of acute hepatocellular degeneration. Numerous reports of severe hepatotoxicity potentially induced by kava have also been highlighted, both in the USA and Europe. The aim of this review is to focus on the different patterns and the mechanisms of hepatotoxicity induced by “the 3Ks”, while trying to clarify the numerous aspects that still need to be addressed.

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity of select herbal therapies

The use of herbal botanicals and dietary supplements to treat and alleviate disease symptoms has increased over the past decades, and as a result, more research has been done to study the potential damaging effects of herbal products on the liver and other organs. Although reporting rates vary, cases have been published describing liver damage following herbal therapy. Studies have proposed multiple mechanisms of injury for these herbal preparations, and several potential risk factors have been identified including age, gender, polypharmacy, alcohol consumption, and genetic variability. Ingredients and other constituents often differ among products, and lack of standardization in manufacturing of these formulations makes it difficult to determine causality. The potential for drug-induced liver injury is often not known until the postmarketing period due to less rigorous safety testing and regulations.

Measuring the chemical and cytotoxic variability of commercially available kava (Piper methysticum G. Forster)

Formerly used world-wide as a popular botanical medicine to reduce anxiety, reports of hepatotoxicity linked to consuming kava extracts in the late 1990s have resulted in global restrictions on kava use and have hindered kava-related research. Despite its presence on the United States Food and Drug Administration consumer advisory list for the past decade, export data from kava producing countries implies that US kava imports, which are not publicly reported, are both increasing and of a fairly high volume. We have measured the variability in extract chemical composition and cytotoxicity towards human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cancer cells of 25 commercially available kava products. Results reveal a high level of variation in chemical content and cytotoxicity of currently available kava products. As public interest and use of kava products continues to increase in the United States, efforts to characterize products and expedite research of this potentially useful botanical medicine are necessary.

Are mould hepatotoxins responsible for kava hepatotoxicity?

Previous studies with kava components such as kavalactones, pipermethystine and flavokavain B have demonstrated hepatotoxicity from these constituents. Regardless, there has recently been speculation that adulterants or impurities such as the mould hepatotoxin aflatoxin are a more likely cause of kava hepatotoxicity, despite a paucity of supporting evidence. Although there is limited similarity between acute kava hepatotoxicity and acute aflatoxicosis, and background levels of aflatoxin have been detected in kava samples, unless epidemiological investigations can uncover direct evidence implicating mould hepatotoxins, it remains more likely that chemical constituents of kava are the cause of the hepatotoxicity from kava.

Proposal for a kava quality standardization code

Rare cases of hepatotoxicity emerged with the use of kava drugs and dietary supplements prepared from rhizomes and roots of the South Pacific plant kava (Piper methysticum). Their psychoactive, anxiolytic, relaxing, and recreational ingredients are the kavalactones kavain, dihydrokavain, methysticin, dihydromethysticin, yangonin, and desmethoxyyangonin, but there is little evidence that these kavalactones or the non-kavalactones pipermethystine and flavokavain B are the culprits of the adverse hepatic reactions. It rather appears that poor quality of the kava material was responsible for the liver toxicity. Analysis of existing kava quality standardizations with focus on chemical, agricultural, manufacturing, nutritional, regulatory, and legislation backgrounds showed major shortcomings that could easily explain quality problems. We therefore suggest a uniform, internationally accepted device for kava quality standardizations that are in the interest of the consumers because of safety reasons and will meet the expectations of kava farmers, pharmaceutical manufacturers, regulators of agencies, and legislators. The initial step resides in the establishment of Pan-Pacific kava quality legislation as an important part of the proposed Kava Quality Standardization Code. In conclusion, a sophisticated approach to establish kava quality standardizations is needed for safe human use of kava as relaxing traditional beverages, the anxiolytic drugs, and recreational dietary supplements.

Kava and kava hepatotoxicity: requirements for novel experimental, ethnobotanical and clinical studies based on a review of the evidence

Kava hepatotoxicity is a well described disease entity, yet there is uncertainty as to the culprit(s). In particular, there is so far no clear evidence for a causative role of kavalactones and non-kavalactone constituents, such as pipermethystine and flavokavain B, identified from kava. Therefore, novel enzymatic, analytical, toxicological, ethnobotanical and clinical studies are now required. Studies should focus on the identification of further potential hepatotoxic constituents, considering in particular possible adulterants and impurities with special reference to ochratoxin A and aflatoxins (AFs) producing Aspergillus varieties, which should be urgently assessed and published. At present, Aspergillus and other fungus species producing hepatotoxic mycotoxins have not yet been examined thoroughly as possible contaminants of some kava raw materials. Its occurence may be facilitated by high humidity, poor methods for drying procedures and insufficient storage facilities during the time after harvest. Various experimental studies are recommended using aqueous, acetonic and ethanolic kava extracts derived from different plant parts, such as peeled rhizomes and peeled roots including their peelings, and considering both noble and non-noble kava cultivars. In addition, ethnobotanical studies associated with local expertise and surveillance are required to achieve a good quality of kava as the raw material. In clinical trials of patients with anxiety disorders seeking herbal anxiolytic treatment with kava extracts, long-term safety and efficacy should be tested using traditional aqueous extracts obtained from peeled rhizomes and peeled roots of a noble kava cultivar, such as Borogu, to evaluate the risk: benefit ratio. Concomitantly, more research should be conducted on the bioavailability of kavalactones and non-kavalactones derived from aqueous kava extracts. To be on the side of caution and to ensure lack of liver injury, kava consuming inhabitants of the kava producing or importing South Pacific islands should undergo assessment of their liver function values and serum aflatoxin levels. The primary aim is to achieve a good quality of kava raw material, without the risk of adulterants and impurities including ochratoxin A and AFs, which represent the sum of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2. Although it is known that kava may naturally be contaminated with AFs, there is at present no evidence that kava hepatotoxicity might be due to aflatoxicosis. However, appropriate studies have yet to be done and should be extended to other mould hepatotoxins, with the aim of publishing the obtained results. It is hoped that with the proposed qualifying measures, the safety of individuals consuming kava will substantially be improved.