Determination of paclitaxel in human plasma following the administration of Genaxol or Genetaxyl by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus are an underserved population for evidence-based cancer treatment. Paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCb) is an active regimen against a variety of solid tumors, including several seen in excess in patients with HIV infection. We performed a pilot trial to evaluate the safety of full-dose PCb in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients, stratified by concurrent antiretroviral therapy (ART) that included CYP3A4 inhibitors or not, received paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) in combination with carboplatin (target AUC 6) intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles.

Results

Sixteen evaluable patients received 64 cycles of PCb, including 6 patients treated with CYP3A4 inhibiting ART (ritonavir). The adverse event profile was consistent with the known toxicity profile of PCb, with no differences between the 2 strata. There were 4 partial responses (25%, 95% CI: 7%-52%), and overall, CD4+ lymphocyte count was similar after completion of therapy (median: 310/μL) compared with baseline values (median: 389/μL). Pharmacokinetic studies in 6 patients revealed no significant differences in C_max or AUC_inf for paclitaxel between the 2 cohorts.

Conclusion

Full doses of PCb chemotherapy are tolerable when given concurrently with ART in people living with human immunodeficiency virus with cancer, including patients receiving CYP3A4 inhibitors.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT01249443.

A new high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of paclitaxel and 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel in human plasma: Development, validation and application in a clinical pharmacokinetic study

Paclitaxel belongs to the taxanes family and it is used, alone or in multidrug regimens, for the therapy of several solid tumours, such as breast-, lung-, head and neck-, and ovarian cancer. Standard dosing of chemotherapy does not take into account the many inter-patient differences that make drug exposure highly variable, thus leading to the insurgence of severe toxicity. This is particularly true for paclitaxel considering that a relationship between haematological toxicity and plasma exposure was found. Therefore, in order to treat patients with the correct dose of paclitaxel, improving the overall benefit–risk ratio, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is necessary. In order to quantify paclitaxel and its main metabolite, 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel, in patients’ plasma, we developed a new, sensitive and specific HPLC–MS/MS method applicable to all paclitaxel dosages used in clinical routine. The developed method used a small volume of plasma sample and is based on quick protein precipitation. The chromatographic separation of the analytes was achieved with a SunFire^™ C18 column (3.5 μM, 92 Å, 2,1 x 150 mm); the mobile phases were 0.1% formic acid/bidistilled water and 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile. The electrospray ionization source worked in positive ion mode and the mass spectrometer operated in selected reaction monitoring mode. Our bioanalytical method was successfully validated according to the FDA-EMA guidelines on bioanalytical method validation. The calibration curves resulted linear (R² ≥0.9948) over the concentration ranges (1–10000 ng/mL for paclitaxel and 1–1000 ng/mL for 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel) and were characterized by a good accuracy and precision. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were determined on three quality control concentrations for paclitaxel and 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel and resulted respectively <9.9% and within 91.1–114.8%. In addition, to further verify the assay reproducibility, we tested this method by re-analysing the incurred samples. This bioanalytical method was employed with success to a genotype-guided phase Ib study of weekly paclitaxel in ovarian cancer patients treated with a wide range of drug’s dosages.

Mass spectrometry in the pharmacokinetic studies of anticancer natural products

In the history of medicine, nature has represented the main source of medical products. Indeed, the therapeutic use of plants certainly goes back to the Sumerian and Hippocrates and nowadays nature still represents the major source for new drugs discovery. Moreover, in the cancer treatment, drugs are either natural compounds or have been developed from naturally occurring parent compounds firstly isolated from plants and microbes from terrestrial and marine environment. A critical element of an anticancer drug is represented by its severe toxicities and, after administration, the drug concentrations have to remain in an appropriate range to be effective. Anyway, the drug dosage defined during the clinical studies could be inappropriate for an individual patient due to differences in drug absorption, metabolism and excretion. For this reason, personalized medicine, based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), represents one of most important challenges in cancer therapy. Mass spectrometry sensitivity, specificity and fastness lead to elect this technique as the Golden Standard for pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism studies therefore for TDM. This review focuses on the mass spectrometry-based methods developed for pharmacokinetic quantification in human plasma of anticancer drugs derived from natural sources and already used in clinical practice. Particular emphasis was placed both on the pre-analytical and analytical steps, such as: sample preparation procedures, sample size required by the analysis and the limit of quantification of drugs and metabolites to give some insights on the clinical practice applicability. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev. 36:213-251, 2017.

Quantification of taxanes in biological matrices: a review of bioanalytical assays and recommendations for development of new assays

Since the isolation of paclitaxel and its approval for the treatment of breast cancer, various taxanes and taxane formulations have been developed. To date, almost 100 bioanalytical assays have been published with the method development and optimization often extensively discussed by the authors. This Review presents an overview of assays published between January 1970 and September 2013 that described method development and validation of assays used to quantify taxanes in biological matrices such as plasma, urine, feces and tissue samples. For liquid chromatography assays, sample pretreatment, chromatographic separation and assay performance are compared. Since this Review discusses the limitations of previously developed liquid chromatography assays and gives recommendations for future assay development, it can be used as a reference for future development of liquid chromatography assays for the quantification of taxanes in various biological matrices to support preclinical and clinical studies.

Highly selective and sensitive assay for paclitaxel accumulation by tumor cells based on selective solid phase extraction and micro-flow liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry

The taxanes are among the most important cancer chemotherapy drugs approved for clinical use in the last two decades. Paclitaxel is used as first-line therapy for a variety of cancers, and numerous drug delivery approaches are under investigation to enhance its selectivity and effectiveness against tumors. One strategy is to produce sustained, low drug levels within the tumor to enhance apoptosis and inhibit angiogenesis. The interest in altering drug concentration/time exposure profiles to improve therapeutic outcomes creates the necessity to quantify low concentrations of paclitaxel in cells or tissues. Here, a selective solid phase extraction (SPE) method, coupled with a capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (microLC-MS/MS) method, was developed to quantify low, therapeutically relevant concentrations of paclitaxel that could not be analyzed using conventional LC-MS/MS. Under optimized SPE wash and elution conditions, paclitaxel was selectively extracted from biological samples, and most matrix components were removed. A 150 x 0.5 mm ID ODS capillary column was used for microLC separation and the flow rate was 12 microL min(-1). Sample extracts were focused at the front of the microLC column and then eluted with a gradient. The lower limits of detection and quantification were 5 and 20 pg mL(-1), respectively, permitting quantification of paclitaxel in small tissue samples or in cultured cells exposed to low drug concentrations. The quantitative linear range was 20-20 000 pg mL(-1). The ability to quantify these low concentrations of paclitaxel provides an important tool to study the concentration-dependent pharmacological effects of this important drug.

Oral bioavailability of a novel paclitaxel formulation (Genetaxyl) administered with cyclosporin A in cancer patients

The formulation excipient Cremophor EL (CrEL) is known to limit the absorption of oral paclitaxel given together with cyclosporin A. We hypothesized that the use of oral Genetaxyl, a paclitaxel formulation containing only 20% CrEL would have an improved oral bioavailability. Cohorts of six patients were treated with oral Genetaxyl at a dose of 60, 120, or 180 mg/m2 and 10 mg/kg of oral cyclosporin A in cycle 1. In cycle 2, patients received intravenous (i.v.) Genetaxyl (175 mg/m2, 3-h infusion). Three additional patients received one dose of generic i.v. paclitaxel (Genaxol, containing 50% CrEL; 175mg/m2, 3-h infusion). The median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak concentration of total paclitaxel following i.v. Genetaxyl were lower than those for i.v. Genaxol, as a result of significantly increased clearance (P = 0.017), and the AUC ratio for unbound to total paclitaxel for i.v. Genetaxyl was about two times higher than that for i.v. Genaxol (P = 0.0077). After oral administration of Genetaxyl at doses of 60, 120, and 180 mg/m2, the median total paclitaxel AUCs were 1.29, 1.60, and 1.85 microg x h/ml, respectively, suggesting a less than proportional increase in systemic exposure with increasing doses. The corresponding median values for the apparent bioavailability of oral Genetaxyl were similar when compared with i.v. Genetaxyl, when calculated either on the basis of data for total paclitaxel (30.1%) or unbound paclitaxel (30.6%).

Quantitative determination of total and unbound paclitaxel in human plasma following Abraxane treatment

A simple, rapid liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed and validated for the quantification of both unbound and total paclitaxel in plasma following treatment with Abraxane (ABI-007) or Taxol. Accurate and reproducible analysis of ABI-007, an albumin nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel could not be achieved using previously published methodology designed for Taxol. The final validated method involved protein precipitation followed by vacuum filtration, in a 96-well format for rapid processing. The 4min run employed gradient elution on a Waters SymmetryShield C8 (2.1mmx50mm, 3.5microm) column, followed by tandem mass spectrometric detection, in electrospray positive mode. Calibrator samples were prepared daily with paclitaxel and analyzed with both ABI-007 and paclitaxel quality control samples. To measure unbound drug, sample preparation was preceded by ultrafiltration. The assay was linear over the range of 10-2500ng/mL, with dilution providing measurement up to 50,000ng/mL. Within-run and between-run precision for all QC samples was less than 5.0% and 10.4%, respectively. Accuracy was high, with deviation of less than 6.1% for all QCs. Measurement of unbound paclitaxel was precise (BRP and WRP <10%).