Measurement precision and accuracy of high artificial enrichment 15 N and 13 C tracer samples

A study on the simultaneous determination of nitrogen content and 15N isotope abundance in plants using peak height intensities at m/z 28 and 29

A method for simultaneous determination of nitrogen content and 15N isotope abundance in plants was established by Elemental analysis-gas isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Taking poplar leaves and l-glutamic acid as standards, nitrogen content was determined using the standard curve established by weighted least squares regression between the mass of nitrogen element and the total peak height intensity at m/z 28 and 29. Then the 15N isotope abundance was calculated with the peak height intensity at m/z 28 and 29. Through the comparison of several sets of experiments, the impact of mass discrimination effect, tin capsule consumables, isotope memory effect, and the quality of nitrogen on the results were assessed. The results showed that with a weight of 1/x2, the standard curve has a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9996. Compared to the traditional Kjeldahl method, the measured nitrogen content deviated less than 0.2 %, and the standard deviation (SD) was less than 0.2 %. Compared to the sodium hypobromite method, the 15N isotopic abundances differed less than 0.2 atom%15N, and the SD was less than 0.2 atom% 15N. The established method offers the advantages of being fast, simple, accurate, and high throughput, providing a novel approach for the simultaneous determination of nitrogen content and 15N isotope abundance in plant samples.

Challenges in measuring nitrogen isotope signatures in inorganic nitrogen forms: An interlaboratory comparison of three common measurement approaches

RATIONALE

Stable isotope approaches are increasingly applied to better understand the cycling of inorganic nitrogen (Ni ) forms, key limiting nutrients in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. A systematic comparison of the accuracy and precision of the most commonly used methods to analyze δ15 N in NO3 - and NH4 + and interlaboratory comparison tests to evaluate the comparability of isotope results between laboratories are, however, still lacking.

METHODS

Here, we conducted an interlaboratory comparison involving 10 European laboratories to compare different methods and laboratory performance to measure δ15 N in NO3 - and NH4 + . The approaches tested were (a) microdiffusion (MD), (b) chemical conversion (CM), which transforms Ni to either N2 O (CM-N2 O) or N2 (CM-N2 ), and (c) the denitrifier (DN) methods.

RESULTS

The study showed that standards in their single forms were reasonably replicated by the different methods and laboratories, with laboratories applying CM-N2 O performing superior for both NO3 - and NH4 + , followed by DN. Laboratories using MD significantly underestimated the "true" values due to incomplete recovery and also those using CM-N2 showed issues with isotope fractionation. Most methods and laboratories underestimated the at%15 N of Ni of labeled standards in their single forms, but relative errors were within maximal 6% deviation from the real value and therefore acceptable. The results showed further that MD is strongly biased by nonspecificity. The results of the environmental samples were generally highly variable, with standard deviations (SD) of up to ± 8.4‰ for NO3 - and ± 32.9‰ for NH4 + ; SDs within laboratories were found to be considerably lower (on average 3.1‰). The variability could not be connected to any single factor but next to errors due to blank contamination, isotope normalization, and fractionation, and also matrix effects and analytical errors have to be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The inconsistency among all methods and laboratories raises concern about reported δ15 N values particularly from environmental samples.