Doping control analysis of GW1516 in equine plasma using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization Q-Exactive high-resolution mass spectrometry

Analytical advances in horseracing medication and doping control from 2018 to 2023

The analytical approaches taken by laboratories to implement robust and efficient regulation of horseracing medication and doping control are complex and constantly evolving. Each laboratory's approach will be dictated by differences in regulatory, economic and scientific drivers specific to their local environment. However, in general, laboratories will all be undertaking developments and improvements to their screening strategies in order to meet new and emerging threats as well as provide improved service to their customers. In this paper, the published analytical advances in horseracing medication and doping control since the 22nd International Conference of Racing Analysts and Veterinarians will be reviewed. Due to the unprecedented impact of COVID-19 on the worldwide economy, the normal 2-year period of this review was extended to over 5 years. As such, there was considerable ground to cover, resulting in an increase in the number of relevant publications included from 107 to 307. Major trends in publications will be summarised and possible future directions highlighted. This will cover developments in the detection of 'small' and 'large' molecule drugs, sample preparation procedures and the use of alternative matrices, instrumental advances/applications, drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, the detection and prevalence of 'endogenous' compounds and biomarker and OMICs approaches. Particular emphasis will be given to research into the potential threat of gene doping, which is a significant area of new and continued research for many laboratories. Furthermore, developments in analytical instrumentation relevant to equine medication and doping control will be discussed.

Pharmacokinetic study of osilodrostat and identification of mono-hydroxylated metabolite in equine plasma for the purpose of doping control

RATIONALE

Osilodrostat is an inhibitor of 11-beta-hydroxylase (CYP11B) and is used for the treatment of Cushing's disease but also categorized as an anabolic agent. The use of osilodrostat is prohibited in horseracing and equestrian sports. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first metabolic study of osilodrostat in equine plasma.

METHODS

Potential metabolites of osilodrostat were identified by differential analysis using data acquired from pre- and post-administration plasma samples after protein precipitation with liquid chromatography electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-HRMS). [Correction added on 27 January 2023, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, "C-HRMS" was changed to "LC/ESI-HRMS" in this version.] For quantification of osilodrostat, a strong cation exchange solid-phase extraction was employed, and the extracts were analyzed using LC/ESI-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-QqQ-MS/MS) to establish its elimination profile. Such extracts were further analyzed using LC/ESI-HRMS to investigate the detectability of osilodrostat and its identified mono-hydroxylated metabolite over a 2-week sampling period.

RESULTS

Mono-hydroxylated osilodrostat was identified based on the differential analysis and mass spectrometric interpretations, and it was found to be the most abundant metabolite in plasma. Elimination profile of osilodrostat in plasma was successfully established over the 24-h post-administration period. Both osilodrostat and its mono-hydroxylated metabolite were detected up to the last sampling point at 2 weeks using HRMS, and osilodrostat could be confirmed up to 8-day post-administration with its reference material using HRMS as well.

CONCLUSIONS

For doping control, screening of both the parent drug osilodrostat and its mono-hydroxylated metabolite in equine plasma would be recommended due to their extended detection windows of up to 2 weeks. Given the availability of reference material for potential confirmation in forensic samples, osilodrostat is considered the most appropriate monitoring target.

Segmental analysis and long-term monitoring of vadadustat in equine hair for the purpose of doping control

Vadadustat is a newly launched hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizer with anti-anemia and erythropoietic effects; however, its use in horses is expressly forbidden in both racing and equestrian competitions. Following our previous report on the pharmacokinetic study of vadadustat in horse plasma and urine, a long-term longitudinal analysis of vadadustat in horse hair after nasoesophageal administration (3 g/day for 3 days) to three thoroughbred mares is described in this study. Our main objective is to further extend the detection period of vadadustat for the purpose of doping control. Three bunches of mane hair from each horse were collected at 0 (pre), 1, 2, 3 and 6 month(s) post-administration. These hair samples were each cut into 2-cm segments and pulverized after decontamination of hair samples. The analyte in the powdered hair samples was extracted with liquid-liquid extraction followed by further purification by solid-phase extraction with strong anion exchange columns. The amount of vadadustat incorporated into the hair was quantified with a newly developed and validated method using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Our results show that vadadustat was confirmed in all post-administration hair samples, but its metabolites were not present. Thus, the detection window for vadadustat could be successfully extended up to 6 months post-administration. Interestingly, the 2-cm segmental analysis revealed that the tip of the drug band in the hair shifted along with the hair shafts in correspondence with the average hair growth rate (∼2.5 cm/month) but gradually diffused more widely from 2 cm at 1 month post-administration to up to 14 cm at 6 months post-administration. However, the loss in the total amount of vadadustat in hair over time was observed to most likely be due to the degradation of vadadustat. These findings will be useful for the control of abuse and/or misuse of vadadustat and the interpretation of positive doping cases.

Generic approach for the discovery of drug metabolites in horses based on data-dependent acquisition by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry and its applications to pharmacokinetic study of daprodustat

In drug metabolism studies in horses, non-targeted analysis by means of liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry with data-dependent acquisition (DDA) has recently become increasingly popular for rapid identification of potential biomarkers in post-administration biological samples. However, the most commonly encountered problem is the presence of highly abundant interfering components that co-elute with the target substances, especially if the concentrations of these substances are relatively low. In this study, we evaluated the possibility of expanding DDA coverage for the identification of drug metabolites by applying intelligently generated exclusion lists (ELs) consisting of a set of chemical backgrounds and endogenous substances. Daprodustat was used as a model compound because of its relatively lower administration dose (100 mg) compared to other hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers and the high demand in the detection sensitivity of its metabolites at the anticipated lower concentrations. It was found that the entire DDA process could efficiently identify both major and minor metabolites (flagged beyond the pre-set DDA threshold) in a single run after applying the ELs to exclude 67.7-99.0% of the interfering peaks, resulting in a much higher chance of triggering DDA to cover the analytes of interest. This approach successfully identified 21 metabolites of daprodustat and then established the metabolic pathway. It was concluded that the use of this generic intelligent "DDA + EL" approach for non-targeted analysis is a powerful tool for the discovery of unknown metabolites, even in complex plasma and urine matrices in the context of doping control.

Pharmacokinetic Study of Vadadustat and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Characterization of its Novel Metabolites in Equines for the Purpose of Doping Control

BACKGROUND

Vadadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PHD) inhibitor, is a substance which carries a lifetime ban in both horse racing and equestrian competition. A comprehensive metabolic study of vadadustat in horses has not been previously reported.

OBJECTIVE

Metabolism and elimination profiles of vadadustat in equine plasma and urine were studied for the purpose of doping control.

METHODS

A nasoesophageal administration of vadadustat (3 g/day for 3 days) was conducted on three thoroughbred mares. Potential metabolites were comprehensively detected by differential analysis of full-scan mass spectral data obtained from both in vitro studies with liver homogenates and post-administration samples using liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. The identities of metabolites were further substantiated by product ion scans. Quantification methods were developed and validated for the establishment of the excretion profiles of the total vadadustat (free and conjugates) in plasma and urine.

RESULTS

A total of 23 in vivo and 14 in vitro metabolites (12 in common) were identified after comprehensive analysis. We found that vadadustat was mainly excreted into urine as the parent drug together with some minor conjugated metabolites. The elimination profiles of total vadadustat in post-administration plasma and urine were successfully established by using quantification methods equipped with alkaline hydrolysis for cleavage of conjugates such as methylated vadadustat, vadadustat glucuronide, and vadadustat glucoside.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study, for effective control of the misuse or abuse of vadadustat in horses, total vadadustat could successfully be detected for up to two weeks after administration in plasma and urine.

Development of an analytical method to determine E7130 concentration in mouse plasma by micro-sampling using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry

E7130 is a novel microtubule inhibitor and a promising tumor microenvironment ameliorator. Since the amount of the administration in preclinical study is very small due to the high potency of E7130, this study aimed to establish a sensitive analytical method to measure E7130 concentration in mouse plasma samples obtained via microsampling. A sensitive and validated method was developed based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm (2.1 × 50 mm) column. Mobile phase A comprised 0.1% formic acid and 10 mM ammonium formate in water, and mobile phase B was methanol. A gradient elution was applied at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The calibration curve drawn was linear in the 0.2-100 ng/mL E7130 concentration range for mouse plasma microsamples (10 µL). Analytical results demonstrated good precision (<6.7%) and accuracy (88.5%-100.0%) in E7130 quantitation, indicating that UHPLC-HRMS is a useful method for pharmacokinetic analysis and a valuable approach for the quantitation of hardly fragmented compounds.

Detection and longitudinal distribution of GW1516 and its metabolites in equine hair for doping control using liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

GW1516 is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ (PPAR-δ) agonist that is banned in horseracing and equestrian sports. Long-term detection and longitudinal distribution of GW1516 in the mane of a horse are reported for the first time and this hair analysis could prolong the detection window of GW1516 for doping control.

METHODS

Mane hairs were divided into three segments (0-7, 7-15, and >15 cm from the cut end) and completely pulverized and homogenized for analysis. The pulverized hair samples were extracted with methanol followed by further purification and the extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-HRMS) using a Q-Exactive instrument. This method was successfully validated and applied to post-administration samples to confirm the presence of GW1516 and its metabolites and estimate the uptake amounts of GW1516.

RESULTS

After administration of 150 mg of GW1516 to a thoroughbred mare, GW1516 was detected in one of two segments of all mane hairs, and four metabolites, namely GW1516 sulfoxide, GW1516 sulfone, 5-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methyl-2-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)thiazole (HMTT), and 4-methyl-2-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxylic acid (MTTC), were also identified. The longitudinal distribution analysis results showed that the maximum uptake of GW1516 into hair (approximately 0.05 pg/mg) was observed at around 13 weeks post-administration and GW1516 could be detected and confirmed up to 6 months post-administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The parent drug GW1516 was identified as the most appropriate monitoring target in equine hair for controlling its misuse in horses. The use of hair analysis could extend the detection time of GW1516 to at least 6 months after the administration of 150 mg of GW1516 to a thoroughbred mare.

Metabolic study of GW1516 in equine urine using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization Q-Exactive high-resolution mass spectrometry for doping control

RATIONALE

The use of GW1516, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPAR δ) agonist, is strictly prohibited in both horseracing and equestrian competitions. However, little is known about its metabolic fate in horses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported metabolic study of GW1516 in equine urine.

METHODS

Urine samples obtained from a thoroughbred after nasoesophageal administration with GW1516 were protein-precipitated and the supernatants were subsequently analyzed by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-HRMS) with a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer. Monoisotopic ions of GW1516 and its metabolites were monitored from the full-scan mass spectral data of pre- and post-administration samples. A quantification method was developed and validated to establish the excretion profiles of GW1516, its sulfoxide, and its sulfone in equine urine.

RESULTS

GW1516 and its nine metabolites [including GW1516 sulfoxide, GW1516 sulfone, 5-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methyl-2-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)thiazole (HMTT), methyl 4-methyl-2-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxylate (MMTC), 4-methyl-2-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxylic acid (MTTC), and M1 to M4] were detected in post-administration urine samples. GW1516 sulfoxide and GW1516 sulfone showed the longest detection times in post-administration urine samples and were therefore recommended as potential screening targets for doping control purposes. Quantitative analysis was also conducted to establish the excretion profiles of GW1516 sulfoxide and GW1516 sulfone in urine.

CONCLUSIONS

For the purposes of doping control of GW1516, the GW1516 sulfoxide and GW1516 sulfone metabolites are recommended as the target analytes to be monitored in equine urine due to their high specificities, long detection times (1 and 4 weeks, respectively), and the ready availability of their reference materials.

Comprehensive characterization of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-δ agonist GW501516 for horse doping control analysis

According to international sport institutions, the use of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-δ agonists is forbidden at any time in athlete career due to their capabilities to increase physical and endurance performances. The (PPAR)-δ agonist GW501516 is prohibited for sale but is easily available on internet and can be used by cheaters. In the context of doping control, urine is the preferred matrix because of the non-invasive nature of sampling and providing broader exposure detection times to forbidden molecules but often not detected under its native form due to the organism's metabolism. Even if urinary metabolism of G501516 has been extensively studied in human subjects, knowledge on GW501516 metabolism in horses remains limited. To fight against doping practices in horses' races, GW501516 metabolism has to be studied in horse urine to identify and characterize the most relevant target metabolites to ensure an efficient doping control. In this article, in vitro and in vivo experiments have been conducted using horse S9 liver microsome fractions and horse oral administration route, respectively. These investigations determined that the detection of GW501516 must be performed in urine on its metabolites because the parent molecule was extremely metabolized. To maximize analytical method sensitivity, the extraction conditions have been optimized. In accordance with these results, a qualitative analytical method was validated to detect the abuse of GW501516 based on its most relevant metabolites in urine. This work enabled the Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques (LCH) to highlight two cases of illicit administration of this forbidden molecule in post-race samples.