Silicone pneumonitis after gluteal filler: a case report and literature review

Silicone Embolism Syndrome Causing Altered Mental Status and Respiratory Failure After an Unlicensed Gluteal Silicone Injection: A Case Report

Introduction

Unlicensed cosmetic procedures, which come at increased risk of infection and potential surgical complications, have introduced new challenges in healthcare. Physicians should be aware of presentations that may arise secondary to these procedures.

Case Report

We describe a case in which a previously healthy, 28-year-old female presented with new-onset seizures and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the setting of a recent cosmetic procedure with silicone injections to the gluteal region. The patient's hospital course was complicated by altered mental status, respiratory failure, rapid hemodynamic compromise, and eventual death.

Conclusion

In rare cases, one possible complication of cosmetic procedures is silicone embolism syndrome, which is characterized by pneumonitis, alveolar hemorrhage, and ARDS. The patient described in this report also experienced neurologic symptoms including seizure and altered mental status. This is a clinical diagnosis that relies upon thorough history-taking and detailed physical exam. Documentation on this phenomenon is limited, and medical management has not yet been standardized for this condition. Morbidity and mortality remain high.

A hypoxic young lady in an acute confusional state

Patients presenting with respiratory and neurological symptoms after a breast filler injection should alert the clinician to this potential diagnosis https://bit.ly/3OodFQA.

Fatal pulmonary embolism following injectable gluteal filler usage: a case report

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that injectable filler usage in the gluteal region has not been recommended in formal medical institutions, illegal procedures are performed in many clinics and beauty centers across Egypt. This case report illustrates the illegal practice culminating in a fatal complication.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 26-year-old female with no relevant medical history presented to the ER with acute onset shortness of breath. The complaint started 16 h before, with a rapidly progressive course, shortly after undergoing a gluteal filler injection at a center in Cairo. At ER, the patient was severely distressed, yet fully conscious and oriented. She was shocked (BP 70/40 mmHg), tachycardic (130 BPM), and tachypneic (30/min) with normal temperature. She had congested pulsating neck veins with positive Kussmaul sign. Chest auscultation revealed normal vesicular breathing with equal air entry and no adventitious sounds. Her O2 saturation was 60% on room air that improved to 85% on O2 mask. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. Echocardiography showed dilated right side, D-shaped septum with systolic flattening, dilated IVC, mild tricuspid regurgitation and estimated RV systolic pressure 53 mmHg. Her ABG showed compensated metabolic acidosis with elevated lactate level. At the ICU, CVP was 18 mmHg. Saline infusion was continued along with noradrenaline infusion initiation. A provisional diagnosis of high-risk pulmonary embolism was made, though CT pulmonary angiography was not available. Accordingly, thrombolytic therapy was initiated with alteplase (100 mg) over 2 h. Also, a dose of pulse steroids (methylprednisolone 200 mg) was given. Chest X-ray showed bilateral heterogenous opacity and ABG showed deteriorating hypoxia and combined metabolic and respiratory acidosis. The patient was intubated upon deterioration of conscious level and was put on mechanical ventilation. Her ET tube showed frequent blood-tinged secretions. Echocardiography showed more right-side dilatation that was consistent with deterioration of clinical status. Three hours after admission the patient developed cardiac arrest and died 2 h later.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report highlights the dangers associated with injectable filler usage in the gluteal region. Physicians and patients should be aware of the possible complications and how to avoid it.

Safety and Efficiency of Minimally Invasive Buttock Augmentation: A Review

BACKGROUND

Volume restoration and enhancement of the gluteal region appearance has become nowadays a popular concern in particular for many women. Several options are available, none however are without complications and side effects. Volume enhancement with soft tissue fillers of the gluteal region is emerging as a highly attractive minimally invasive modality. It has led unfortunately to more unlicensed, nonmedical practitioners administering illicitly injections for buttock augmentation at relatively low costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To determine safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of mostly used soft-tissue fillers for buttock augmentation, a systematic literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase was conducted to identify the mostly used fillers for gluteal augmentation. It was complemented by searching for each of the identified filler material separately to retrieve any missed reports. References of clinical studies and trials, reviews, and consensus reports were reviewed as well for the same objective.

RESULTS

In the final analysis 12, mostly strongly biased clinical reports providing a low level of evidence, were identified for inclusion in the review. Two studies involved Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), 5 Poly-L-lactic acid, 1 Calcium hydroxyapatite and 4 hyaluronic acid filler injection. No studies were identified involving liquid silicone or Polyacrylamide hydrogel. The little available evidence provided by this review indicates that a specific brand of PMMA in Brazil has a demonstrable relatively good safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness record superior to surgical alloplastic gluteal augmentation or to lipofilling only when injected by experts.

CONCLUSION

Gluteal augmentation with soft tissue fillers is not as simple and innocuous as advertised. Serious complications may occur. Moreover, optimal buttock contouring entails not only volume augmentation but also volume removal; thus, volume augmentation with soft tissue fillers may not be ideal. Popularizing this modality must also be approached with great care. Serious complications do occur; they become inevitable when performed illegally by non-specialized, non-authorized, and unscrupulous practitioners in non-accredited facilities. Patients must be warned that adherence to regulations is critical and that only well-trained certified experts practicing legally in accredited facilities can address safely and efficiently their concerns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

COVID-19 Infection or Buttock Injections? The Dangers of Aesthetics and Socializing During a Pandemic

Introduction

Silicone (polydimethylsiloxane) injections are used for cosmetic augmentation. Their use is associated with life-threatening complications such as acute pneumonitis, alveolar hemorrhage, and acute respiratory distress among others [1,2]. We report a case of a Hispanic woman who developed severe respiratory distress syndrome after gluteal silicone injections.

Case Presentation

A 44-year-old Hispanic female presented to the Emergency Department complaining of progressive dyspnea on exertion for two weeks. Chest imaging revealed patchy bibasilar airspace opacities of peripheral distribution. Labs were significant for leukocytosis, elevated PT, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, and fibrinogen, concerning for COVID-19, however SARS-CoV-2 testing was negative multiple times. The patient later became encephalopathic, hypoxemic, and eventually required intubation. Further history uncovered that the patient had received illicit gluteal silicone injections a few days prior to her onset of symptoms. The patient was diagnosed with silicone embolism syndrome (SES) and initiated on high dose intravenous methylprednisolone [1].

Case Discussion

Patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds utilize illicit services to receive silicone injections at minimal costs. This leads to dangerous outcomes. The serology and imaging findings observed in our case have similarities to the typical presentation of COVID-19 pneumonia making the initial diagnosis difficult. This case serves as a cautionary tale of the importance of thorough history taking in patients with concern for COVID-19.

A Rare Case of Pulmonary Restrictive Syndrome after Liquid Silicone Injection: The Role of the Plastic Surgeon

Despite being especially used in its solid form, silicone is still injected as a liquid filler for breast contouring in many countries. Here, we present a rare case of a woman with silicone pneumonitis and extended breast scarring after breast silicone injection. Because of evidence of a restrictive syndrome due to the thoracic extensive scarring tissue and the high demand of oxygen therapy, as jointly agreed with the pulmonologists, we decided to perform a surgical asportation of the scarring tissue and covering with microsurgical flap. We chose the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap mainly because of the large amount of skin that is possible to use, the good skin texture matching, and the possibility of double team working without changing patient’s position.