Validation of patient specific surgical guides in total hip arthroplasty

A Novel Technique for Autograft Preparation Using Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) Assistance in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia of Hip (DDH)

Due to the change in the structure of the proximal femur and acetabulum in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, total hip arthroplasty (THA) was difficult to perform for surgeons. To elevate the acetabular coverage rate, we developed a technique in the use of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) graft in patients with developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) undergoing surgery. This study aims to evaluate the peri-operative outcomes of THA with PSI graft in patients with DDH. This study recruited 6 patients suffering from Crowe I DDH with secondary Grade IV osteoarthritis. All the patients underwent THA with PSI graft performed by a well-experienced surgeon. Perioperative outcomes included surgical procedures, blood loss during operation, the volume of blood transfusion, length of hospitalization, complications, and the mean difference in hemoglobin levels before and after surgery. All the outcomes analyzed were assessed by mean and standard deviation. The average duration of the surgical procedure was found to be 221.17 min, with an SD of 19.65 min. The mean blood loss during the operation was 733.33 mL, with an SD of 355.90 mL. The mean length of hospital stay was calculated to be 6 days, with an SD of 0.89 days. Furthermore, the mean difference between the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels was 2.15, with an SD of 0.99. A total of three patients received 2 units of leukocyte-poor red blood cells (LPR) as an accepted blood transfusion. There were no reported complications observed during the admission and one month after the operation. This study reported the peri-operative outcomes in the patients with DDH who underwent THA with PSI graft. We found that THA with PSI graft would provide a safe procedure without significant complications. We assumed that the PSI graft in THA may increase the coverage rate of the acetabulum, which may increase the graft union rates. Further cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were needed to confirm our findings.

3D printed patient specific customised surgical jig for reverse shoulder arthroplasty, a cost effective and accurate solution

INTRODUCTION

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a common orthopaedic procedure, where placement of the initial guiding wire is paramount to the implant instrumentation and position. To improve the position of the guiding wire, navigation and patient specific instrumentation have been used. These are however expensive and lengthy with many logistical issues.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We utilised in house 3D printing to create a surgical guide to help with positioning of the central guiding wire. Pre and post op CT scans were utilised to determine positioning of the central screw.

RESULTS

Position of the screw tip was a mean of 3.3 mm away from the central point of the thickest portion of bone in the scapula with good bony purchase. There were no complications reported.

DISCUSSION

We report our experience in creation of the 3D printed surgical jig and the pearls of its creation, detailing from CT scan image acquisition to creation of surgical guide to intraoperative usage. 3D printing is a cost effective and accurate solution for the positioning of orthopaedic instrumentation. This can be easily applied to other operations in our institution, even with a low start up cost.

3D Printed Patient-Specific Acetabular Jig for Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular cup placement is an important modifiable factor determining complication rates like aseptic loosening and hip dislocation related to faulty cup placement, which by standard method is largely dependent upon eyeballing and surgeon's judgment. We evaluated a self-designed, low-cost, patient-specific acetabular jig to guide cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in comparison to conventional technique.

METHODS

It was a prospective randomized control study. Thirty-six patients were categorized into group-A & group-B. In group-A, virtually designed acetabular jig was 3 Dimensional (3D) printed and used intra-operatively to guide cup placement. In group-B, the standard method of cup placement was used. Acetabular cup placement was evaluated on post-operative x-rays and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

In group-A, angle of anteversion were significantly in centre of range of safe zone as compared to group B in which hip is maximally stable with more precision in creating hip centre as compared to group-B without any significant(p = 0.325) increase in surgical time or blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography (CT) scan based virtual pre-operative templating and cup placement guided by virtually designed, patient-specific acetabular jig is a low-cost tool with a short learning curve which can be designed and made available easily. It is a useful tool in decreasing chances of malpositioning of cup and recreates hip centre close to anatomical one especially in cases where anatomy has been distorted such as bony ankylosis and developmental dysplasia of hip.

Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants

There are numerous orthopaedic applications of three-dimensional (3D) printing for the pelvis and acetabulum. The authors reviewed recently published articles and summarized their experience. 3D printed anatomical models are particularly useful in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery for planning, implant templating and for anatomical assessment of pathologies such as CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement and rare deformities. Custom-made metal 3D printed patient-specific implants and instruments are increasingly being studied for pelvic oncologic resection and reconstruction of resected defects as well as for revision hip arthroplasties with favourable results. This article also discusses cost-effectiveness considerations when preparing pelvic 3D printed models from a hospital 3D printing centre.

Patient-specific guides improve hip arthroplasty surgical accuracy

The role of patient-specific (PS) technology in total hip arthroplasty remains relatively unexplored. We asked whether PS guides: (1) Reduced average surgical errors? (2) Reduced outlier error frequencies? (3) Could predict the size of implants used? A single surgeon implanted femurs using either standard or PS guides and was blinded to the pre-operative plans. There were significant differences in median leg length errors between standard (3.3 mm) and PS groups (1.4 mm), U = 110, z = -2.3, p = 0.02. In contrast to the PS group, the standard group had significantly more outlier errors and frequently undersized implants. PS guides improve hip arthroplasty surgical accuracy.Abbreviations: PS: patient specific; THA: total hip arthroplasty; LLD: leg length discrepancies; HRA: hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Patient-Specific Surgical Guide for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Three-dimensional printing technique has been adapted for orthopedic surgery, and a patient-specific surgical guide (PSG) has been introduced as a convenient surgical instrument and implicated in the ideal positioning of the components, including acetabular and femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). PSG is designed and manufactured based on preoperative imaging data, mainly computed tomography (CT) data. PSGs for implantation in THA are classified into three types: PSG for guidewire insertion, PSG for bone cutting, and PSG for bone reaming and implant fixation. PSG positioning accuracy depends on the PSG design and surgical preparation in contact area on the bone surface. PSGs for the acetabular component, for the conventional femoral component, and for the resurfacing femoral component have been clinically used. To achieve precise implantation, precise PSG setting needs and careful surgical preparation of soft tissues are important.

3D-printed Patient-specific Guides for Hip Arthroplasty

Surgeons and engineers constantly search for methods to improve the surgical positioning of implants used for joint arthroplasty. Rapid prototyping is being used to develop patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and has already been successfully translated into large-scale clinical use for knee arthroplasty. PSI has been used in shoulder arthroplasty; however, it is not yet known whether PSI provides improved accuracy and outcomes compared with conventional methods in either shoulder arthroplasty or knee arthroplasty. In the hip, PSI has been limited to the positioning of custom-manufactured implants and a small number of surgeons testing the emerging solutions from different manufacturers. Early results indicate consistent accurate positioning of implants with the use of PSI in hip arthroplasty but with added costs and uncertain effect on clinical outcomes.

Validation of patient-specific surgical guides for femoral neck cutting in total hip arthroplasty through the anterolateral approach

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to validate the effectiveness of neck-cut patient-specific surgical guides (PSGs) for femoral component implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the anterolateral approach compared with that without PSG.

METHODS

A total of 32 fresh cadaveric hips were included. Anatomical stem implantation with wide-base-contact PSG (AWP group) and without PSG (control group) were compared. The absolute errors between preoperative planning and PSG setting (E1), as well as those between preoperative planning and postoperative component implantation (E2) were evaluated using CT.

RESULTS

The E1/E2 values of AWP were 0.9±0.3°/0.6±0.6° in the coronal plane, and 1.7±0.8°/1.0±0.9° in the sagittal plane, and 1.0±0.6 mm/1.0±1.1 mm for the medial height. The E2 value in the sagittal plane (P=0.037) and the medial height (P=0.011) of AWP were significantly smaller than those of control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The neck-cut PSG through the anterolateral approach is effective for femoral component implantation.

Accuracy of Computer-Aided Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery: How Can It Be Defined, Measured Experimentally, and Analyzed from a Clinical Perspective?

Surgical accuracy is multifactorial. Therefore, it is crucial to consider all influencing factors when investigating the accuracy of a surgical procedure, such as the surgeon's experience, the assistive technologies that may be used by the surgeon, and the patient factors associated with the specific anatomical site. For in vitro preclinical investigations, accuracy should be linked to the concepts of trueness (e.g., distance from the surgical target) and precision (e.g., variability in relation to the surgical target) to gather preclinical, quantitative, objective data on the accuracy of completed surgical procedures that have been performed with assistive technologies. The clinical relevance of improvements in accuracy that have been observed experimentally may be evaluated by analyzing the impact on the risk of failure and by taking into account the level of tolerance in relation to the surgical target (e.g., the extent of the safety zone). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) methodology enables preclinical testing of new assistive technologies to quantify improvements in accuracy and assess the benefits in terms of reducing the risk of failure and achieving surgical targets with tighter tolerances before the testing of clinical outcomes.

The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures

PURPOSE

An accurate fit of a patient-specific instrument guide during an intervention is one of the critical factors affecting accuracy of the surgical procedure. In this study, we investigated how well osteophytes, which are abnormal bone growths that form along joints, are depicted in clinical preoperative CT scans and estimated the influence of such depiction errors on the intraoperative accuracy of the guide.

METHODS

In 34 hip resurfacing patients, 227 osteophyte surface points on the anterior aspect of the femoral neck were collected intraoperatively, using an optoelectronic navigation system. These points were registered to a preoperative CT scan of the patient, and distances between collected points and segmented virtual bone surface, as well as Hounsfield units for these points, were determined. We simulated the registration error of a patient-specific guide, using a modified registration algorithm, to test placement on the anterior aspect of the femoral neck without removing any osteophytes. This error was then applied to the surgical plan of the femoral central-pin position and orientation for evaluation.

RESULTS

The average distance between the collected points and the segmented surface was 2.6 mm. We estimated the average error for the entrance point of the central-pin to be 0.7 mm in the distal direction and 3.2 mm in the anterior direction. The average orientation error was 2.8° in anteversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The depiction of osteophytes in clinical preoperative CT scans for proximal femurs can be unreliable and can possibly result in significant intraoperative instrument alignment errors during image-guided surgeries.

Computer-Assisted Planning and Patient-Specific Instruments for Bone Tumor Resection within the Pelvis: A Series of 11 Patients

Pelvic bone tumor resection is challenging due to complex geometry, limited visibility, and restricted workspace. Accurate resection including a safe margin is required to decrease the risk of local recurrence. This clinical study reports 11 cases of pelvic bone tumor resected by using patient-specific instruments. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to delineate the tumor and computerized tomography to localize it in 3D. Resection planning consisted in desired cutting planes around the tumor including a safe margin. The instruments were designed to fit into unique position on the bony structure and to indicate the desired resection planes. Intraoperatively, instruments were positioned freehand by the surgeon and bone cutting was performed with an oscillating saw. Histopathological analysis of resected specimens showed tumor-free bone resection margins for all cases. Available postoperative computed tomography was registered to preoperative computed tomography to measure location accuracy (minimal distance between an achieved and desired cut planes) and errors on safe margin (minimal distance between the achieved cut planes and the tumor boundary). The location accuracy averaged 2.5 mm. Errors in safe margin averaged −0.8 mm. Instruments described in this study may improve bone tumor surgery within the pelvis by providing good cutting accuracy and clinically acceptable margins.