1
|
Hersh AM, Davidar DA, Theodore N. Letter: What is the Marginal Cost of Using Robot Assistance or Navigation for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01242. [PMID: 38920387 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Hersh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore , Maryland , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidar AD, Jiang K, Weber-Levine C, Bhimreddy M, Theodore N. Advancements in Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:263-272. [PMID: 38423742 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Applications and workflows around spinal robotics have evolved since these systems were first introduced in 2004. Initially approved for lumbar pedicle screw placement, the scope of robotics has expanded to instrumentation across different regions. Additionally, precise navigation can aid in tumor resection or spinal lesion ablation. Robot-assisted surgery can improve accuracy while decreasing radiation exposure, length of hospital stay, complication, and revision rates. Disadvantages include increased operative time, dependence on preoperative imaging among others. The future of robotic spine surgery includes automated surgery, telerobotic surgery, and the inclusion of machine learning or artificial intelligence in preoperative planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Daniel Davidar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carly Weber-Levine
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meghana Bhimreddy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas Theodore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Orthopaedic Surgery & Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heard JC, Lee YA, D’Antonio ND, Narayanan R, Lambrechts MJ, Bodnar J, Purtill C, Pezzulo JD, Farronato D, Fitzgerald P, Canseco JA, Kaye ID, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Schroeder GD. The impact of robotic assistance for lumbar fusion surgery on 90-day surgical outcomes and 1-year revisions. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2024; 15:15-20. [PMID: 38644906 PMCID: PMC11029112 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_145_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the (1) 90-day surgical outcomes and (2) 1-year revision rate of robotic versus nonrobotic lumbar fusion surgery. Methods Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery at our institution were identified and propensity-matched in a 1:1 fashion based on robotic assistance during surgery. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes, including 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revisions, were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed. Significance was set to P < 0.05. Results Four hundred and fifteen patients were identified as having robotic lumbar fusion and were matched to a control group. Bivariant analysis revealed no significant difference in total 90-day surgical complications (P = 0.193) or 1-year revisions (P = 0.178). The operative duration was longer in robotic surgery (287 + 123 vs. 205 + 88.3, P ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic fusion was not a significant predictor of 90-day surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76 [0.32-1.67], P = 0.499) or 1-year revisions (OR = 0.58 [0.28-1.18], P = 0.142). Other variables identified as the positive predictors of 1-year revisions included levels fused (OR = 1.26 [1.08-1.48], P = 0.004) and current smokers (OR = 3.51 [1.46-8.15], P = 0.004). Conclusion Our study suggests that robotic-assisted and nonrobotic-assisted lumbar fusions are associated with a similar risk of 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revision rates; however, robotic surgery does increase time under anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C. Heard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yunsoo A. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas D. D’Antonio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark J. Lambrechts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Bodnar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caroline Purtill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D. Pezzulo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dominic Farronato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pat Fitzgerald
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jose A. Canseco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alan S. Hilibrand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander R. Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher K. Kepler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory D. Schroeder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Molle F, Savastano MC, Giannuzzi F, Fossataro C, Brando D, Molle A, Rebecchi MT, Falsini B, Mattei R, Mirisola G, Poretti E, Cestrone V, D'Agostino E, Bassi P, Scambia G, Rizzo S. 3D Da Vinci robotic surgery: is it a risk to the surgeon's eye health? J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1995-2000. [PMID: 37103772 PMCID: PMC10492867 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01604-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Da Vinci three-dimensional (3D) system has been increasingly used in customary surgical settings, gaining fundamental relevance for abdominal, urological, and gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this research is to evaluate the degree of discomfort and potential changes in the binocular vision and ocular motility of surgical operators, who employ 3D vision systems during Da Vinci robotic surgery. Twenty-four surgeons were enrolled in the study, including twelve who typically use the 3D Da Vinci system and twelve who routinely employ 2D system. Routine general ophthalmological and orthoptic examinations were conducted at baseline (T0), the day before surgery, and 30 min after the 3D or 2D surgery (T1). In addition, surgeons were interviewed using a questionnaire of 18 symptoms, with each item containing three questions regarding the frequency, severity, and bothersomeness of the symptoms, in order to evaluate the degree of discomfort. Mean age at evaluation was 45.28 ± 8.71 years (range 33-63 years). Cover test, uncover test, and fusional amplitude showed no statistically significant difference. After surgery, no statistical difference was observed in the Da Vinci group on the TNO stereotest (p > 0.9999). However, the difference in the 2D group resulted statistically significant (p = 0.0156). Comparing participants (p 0.0001) and time (T0-T1; p = 0.0137), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Surgeons using 2D systems reported more discomfort than those using 3D systems. The absence of short-term consequences following surgery with the Da Vinci 3D system is a promising conclusion, considering the numerous advantages of this technology. Nonetheless, multicenter investigations and more studies are required to verify and interpret our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Molle
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Savastano
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Giannuzzi
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Claudia Fossataro
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Brando
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Molle
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Rebecchi
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetto Falsini
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Mattei
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Mirisola
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Poretti
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Cestrone
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena D'Agostino
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Bassi
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
- Urology Department, Sacro Cuore Catholic University, A. Gemelli University Hospital, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
- Department of Woman, Child, and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Stanislao Rizzo
- Ophthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marchegiani F, Siragusa L, Zadoroznyj A, Laterza V, Mangana O, Schena CA, Ammendola M, Memeo R, Bianchi PP, Spinoglio G, Gavriilidis P, de'Angelis N. New Robotic Platforms in General Surgery: What's the Current Clinical Scenario? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1264. [PMID: 37512075 PMCID: PMC10386395 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Robotic surgery has been widely adopted in general surgery worldwide but access to this technology is still limited to a few hospitals. With the recent introduction of new robotic platforms, several studies reported the feasibility of different surgical procedures. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the current clinical practice with the new robotic platforms in general surgery. Materials and Methods: A grey literature search was performed on the Internet to identify the available robotic systems. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was conducted for all English articles up to 10 February 2023 searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Clinical outcomes, training process, operating surgeon background, cost-analysis, and specific registries were evaluated. Results: A total of 103 studies were included for qualitative synthesis after the full-text screening. Of the fifteen robotic platforms identified, only seven were adopted in a clinical environment. Out of 4053 patients, 2819 were operated on with a new robotic device. Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery specialty performed the majority of procedures, and the most performed procedure was cholecystectomy. Globally, 109 emergency surgeries were reported. Concerning the training process, only 45 papers reported the background of the operating surgeon, and only 28 papers described the training process on the surgical platform. Only one cost-analysis compared a new robot to the existing reference. Two manufacturers promoted a specific registry to collect clinical outcomes. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the feasibility of most surgical procedures in general surgery using the new robotic platforms. Adoption of these new devices in general surgery is constantly growing with the extension of regulatory approvals. Standardization of the training process and the assessment of skills' transferability is still lacking. Further studies are required to better understand the real clinical and economical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Marchegiani
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Alizée Zadoroznyj
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France
| | - Vito Laterza
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France
| | - Orsalia Mangana
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France
| | - Michele Ammendola
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University "Magna Graecia" Medical School, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Department of Surgery, Saint Helena General Hospital, Jamestown, Saint Helena STHL 1ZZ, South Atlantic Ocean, UK
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee NJ, Zuckerman SL, Buchanan IA, Boddapati V, Mathew J, Marciano G, Robertson D, Lakomkin N, Park PJ, Leung E, Lombardi JM, Lehman RA. Is There a Difference in Screw Accuracy, Robot Time Per Screw, Robot Abandonment, and Radiation Exposure Between the Mazor X and the Renaissance? A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 1179 Robot-Assisted Screws. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1286-1292. [PMID: 34235996 PMCID: PMC10416583 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211029867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective single-cohort analysis. OBJECTIVES To compare the outcomes/complications of 2 robotic systems for spine surgery. METHODS Adult patients (≥18-years-old) who underwent robot-assisted spine surgery from 2016-2019 were assessed. A propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to match Mazor X to Renaissance cases. Preoperative CT scan for planning and an intraoperative O-arm for screw evaluation were preformed. Outcomes included screw accuracy, robot time/screw, robot abandonment, and radiation. Screw accuracy was measured using Vitrea Core software by 2 orthopedic surgeons. Screw breach was measured according to the Gertzbein/Robbins classification. RESULTS After PSA, a total of 65 patients (Renaissance: 22 vs. X: 43) were included. Patient/operative factors were similar between robot systems (P > .05). The pedicle screw accuracy was similar between robots (Renaissance: 1.1%% vs. X: 1.3%, P = .786); however, the S2AI screw breach rate was significantly lower for the X (Renaissance: 9.5% vs. X: 1.2%, P = .025). Robot time per screw was not statistically different (Renaissance: 4.6 minutes vs. X: 3.9 minutes, P = .246). The X was more reliable with an abandonment rate of 2.3% vs. Renaissance:22.7%, P = .007. Radiation exposure were not different between robot systems. Non-robot related complications including dural tear, loss of motor/sensory function, and blood transfusion were similar between robot systems. CONCLUSION This is the first comparative analyses of screw accuracy, robot time/screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the Mazor X and Renaissance systems. There are substantial improvements in the X robot, particularly in the perioperative planning processes, which likely contribute to the X's superiority in S2AI screw accuracy by nearly 8-fold and robot reliability by nearly 10-fold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan J. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott L. Zuckerman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ian A. Buchanan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Venkat Boddapati
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin Mathew
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gerard Marciano
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Djani Robertson
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul J. Park
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph M. Lombardi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald A. Lehman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sica GS, Vinci D, Siragusa L, Sensi B, Guida AM, Bellato V, García-Granero Á, Pellino G. Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:846-861. [PMID: 36097099 PMCID: PMC9944740 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation. METHODS PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques. RESULTS Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique. CONCLUSIONS The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe S Sica
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. .,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danilo Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea M Guida
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Ospedale IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Álvaro García-Granero
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain.,Applied Surgical Anatomy Unit, Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Islas Baleares, Palma, Spain
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beyer RS, Nguyen A, Brown NJ, Gendreau JL, Hatter MJ, Pooladzandi O, Pham MH. Spinal robotics in cervical spine surgery: a systematic review with key concepts and technical considerations. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:66-74. [PMID: 36087333 DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.spine22473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spinal robotics for thoracolumbar procedures, predominantly employed for the insertion of pedicle screws, is currently an emerging topic in the literature. The use of robotics in instrumentation of the cervical spine has not been broadly explored. In this review, the authors aimed to coherently synthesize the existing literature of intraoperative robotic use in the cervical spine and explore considerations for future directions and developments in cervical spinal robotics. METHODS A literature search in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases was performed for the purpose of retrieving all articles reporting on cervical spine surgery with the use of robotics. For the purposes of this study, randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, retrospective case series, and individual case reports were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess risk of bias of the studies included in the review. To present and synthesize results, data were extracted from the included articles and analyzed using the PyMARE library for effect-size meta-analysis. RESULTS On careful review, 6 articles published between 2016 and 2022 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 nonrandomized controlled trial, 2 case series, and 2 case reports. These studies featured a total of 110 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (mean age 53.9 years, range 29-77 years; 64.5% males). A total of 482 cervical screws were placed with the use of a surgical robot, which yielded an average screw deviation of 0.95 mm. Cervical pedicle screws were the primary screw type used, at a rate of 78.6%. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, 97.7% of screws in this review achieved a clinically acceptable grade. The average duration of surgery, blood loss, and postoperative length of stay were all decreased in minimally invasive robotic surgery relative to open procedures. Only 1 (0.9%) postoperative complication was reported, which was a surgical site infection, and the mean length of follow-up was 2.7 months. No mortality was reported. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted cervical screw placement is associated with acceptable rates of clinical grading, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications-all of which are equal to or improved relative to the metrics seen in the conventional use of fluoroscopy or computer-assisted navigation for cervical screw placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Beyer
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego
| | - Nolan J Brown
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Julian L Gendreau
- 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew J Hatter
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Omead Pooladzandi
- 3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Martin H Pham
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang Y, Peng Q, Sun C, Kang X, Hu M, Zhao W, Liu X, Meng B, Yang S, Feng X, Zhang L. Robot Versus Fluoroscopy-Assisted Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 166:120-129. [PMID: 35922006 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical results and complications of robot-assisted (RA) versus fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, web of science, and core journals of China National Knowledge Infrastructure were performed to identify related studies reporting the clinical results and complications of RA versus FA-assisted PVA in the treatment of OVCFs. The rate of bone cement leakage was used to assess the complications. After the surgery, the clinical findings were analyzed using the Visual Analog Scale scores and the Oswestry Disability Index scores. The surgical time, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and x-ray exposure duration were used to evaluate the perioperative results. Forest plots were constructed to investigate the results. RESULTS RA-PVA had a significantly lower bone cement leakage rate, shorter fluoroscopy frequency, and shorter radiation exposure time of doctors compared with FA-PVA. However, no significant differences were found between RA-PVA and FA-PVA in operative time and radiation exposure time of patients. Furthermore, no statistically differences were found between the 2 groups in Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis showed that RA-PVA can reduce bone cement leakage rate, fluoroscopy frequency, and doctors' radiation exposure time. With the advancement of RA technology, we anticipate more high-quality randomized controlled trials of RA versus FA-PVA in the future to validate and update the results of this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Qing Peng
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Chenhao Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohe Kang
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Man Hu
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Wenjie Zhao
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Bo Meng
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Sheng Yang
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xinmin Feng
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Abstract
Because of the increasing use of laparoscopic surgeries, robotic technologies have been developed to overcome the challenges these surgeries impose on surgeons. This paper presents an overview of the current state of surgical robots used in laparoscopic surgeries. Four main categories were discussed: handheld laparoscopic devices, laparoscope positioning robots, master–slave teleoperated systems with dedicated consoles, and robotic training systems. A generalized control block diagram is developed to demonstrate the general control scheme for each category of surgical robots. In order to review these robotic technologies, related published works were investigated and discussed. Detailed discussions and comparison tables are presented to compare their effectiveness in laparoscopic surgeries. Each of these technologies has proved to be beneficial in laparoscopic surgeries.
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu Y, Liu M, Lei Y, Zhang H, Xie J, Zhu S, Jiang J, Li J, Yi B. Evaluation of effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical technology on genitourinary function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Surg 2022; 104:106800. [PMID: 35934282 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Because the recovery of genitourinary function after total mesorectal excision (TME) is affected by multiple factors, the role of robot-assisted TME technology in postoperative function in previous studies is still controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of robotic technology on the recovery of genitourinary function after TME for rectal cancer by analysing the correlations between influencing factors of genitourinary function and robotic surgery. METHODS Between January 2017 and January 2020, patients with rectal cancer (cT1-3NxM0) were registered. Genitourinary function was assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) test, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and urodynamic examination before surgery and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Genitourinary function was compared between the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME) and robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) groups, and the correlative factors associated with postoperative genitourinary function were analysed using the generalized estimated equation (GEE). RESULTS Compared with L-TME, R-TME showed a superior IPSS, voiding volume, residual urine volume and IIEF score during the early postoperative period. According to the GEE analysis, postoperative genitourinary function was positively correlated with laparoscopic anterior resection/abdomen perineal resection (LAR/APR) but negatively correlated with tumour size, tumour distance to anus, TNM, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, complete TME, circumferential resection margin (CRM), blood loss, diverting stoma, conversion, and anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION Due to the important role of robotic surgical technology on the influential factors of postoperative genitourinary function and the superiority of identifying and preserving autonomic nerves, robotic technology is conducive to the early recovery of postoperative urogenital function while adhering to oncological dissection principles. No significant difference was found between the da Vinci R-TME and MicroHand R-TME groups.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee NJ, Zuckerman SL, Buchanan IA, Boddapati V, Mathew J, Leung E, Park PJ, Pham MH, Buchholz AL, Khan A, Pollina J, Mullin JP, Jazini E, Haines C, Schuler TC, Good CR, Lombardi JM, Lehman RA. Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients. Spine J 2021; 21:1504-1512. [PMID: 34022461 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Robot-assisted spine surgery continues to rapidly develop as evidenced by the growing literature in recent years. In addition to demonstrating excellent pedicle screw accuracy, early studies have explored the impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on reducing radiation time, length of hospital stay, operative time, and perioperative complications in comparison to conventional freehand technique. Recently, the Mazor X Stealth Edition was introduced in 2018. This robotic system integrates Medtronic's Stealth navigation technology into the Mazor X platform, which was introduced in 2016. It is unclear what the impact of these advancements have made on clinical outcomes. PURPOSE To compare the outcomes and complications between the most recent iterations of the Mazor Robot systems: Mazor X and Mazor X Stealth Edition. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Among four different institutions, we included adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent robot-assisted spine surgery with either the Mazor X (non-navigated robot) or Stealth (navigated robot) platforms. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes included robot time per screw, fluoroscopic radiation time, screw accuracy, robot abandonment, and clinical outcomes with a minimum 90 day follow up. METHODS A one-to-one propensity-score matching algorithm based on perioperative factors (e.g. demographics, comorbidities, primary diagnosis, open vs. percutaneous instrumentation, prior spine surgery, instrumented levels, pelvic fixation, interbody fusion, number of planned robot screws) was employed to control for the potential selection bias between the two robotic systems. Chi-square/fisher exact test and t-test/ANOVA were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS From a total of 646 patients, a total of 372 adult patients were included in this study (X: 186, Stealth: 186) after propensity score matching. The mean number of instrumented levels was 4.3. The mean number of planned robot screws was 7.8. Similar total operative time and robot time per screw occurred between cohorts (p>0.05). However, Stealth achieved significantly shorter fluoroscopic radiation time per screw (Stealth: 7.2 seconds vs. X: 10.4 seconds, p<.001) than X. The screw accuracy for both robots was excellent (Stealth: 99.6% vs. X: 99.1%, p=0.120). In addition, Stealth achieved a significantly lower robot abandonment rate (Stealth: 0% vs. X: 2.2%, p=0.044). Furthermore, a lower blood transfusion rate was observed for Stealth than X (Stealth: 4.3% vs. X: 10.8%, p=0.018). Non-robot related complications such as dura tear, motor/sensory deficits, return to the operating room during same admission, and length of stay was similar between robots (p>0.05). The 90-day complication rates were low and similar between robot cohorts (Stealth: 5.4% vs. X: 3.8%, p=0.456). CONCLUSION In this multicenter study, both robot systems achieved excellent screw accuracy and low robot time per screw. However, using Stealth led to significantly less fluoroscopic radiation time, lower robot abandonment rates, and reduced blood transfusion rates than Mazor X. Other factors including length of stay, and 90-day complications were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan J Lee
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Scott L Zuckerman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ian A Buchanan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Venkat Boddapati
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin Mathew
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul J Park
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin H Pham
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of San Diego Health, Sand Diego, CA, USA
| | - Avery L Buchholz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Asham Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - John Pollina
- Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ehsan Jazini
- Department of Orthopaedics, Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Colin Haines
- Department of Orthopaedics, Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Thomas C Schuler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, USA
| | | | - Joseph M Lombardi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald A Lehman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang Y, Kong K, Li J, Wang S. Design and implementation of a hand-held robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical device with enhanced intuitive manipulability and stable grip force. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2286. [PMID: 34022119 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The conventional hand-held minimally invasive surgical devices commonly suffer from non-intuitive manipulability and restricted flexibility for operation. METHODS A hand-held surgical device with enhanced intuitive manipulability and stable grip force was proposed for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The dexterous instrument and isomorphic handle were designed, and the cable transmission structure and model of the instrument were analysed. A modelling method for grip force pre-compensation was proposed to produce stable grip forces under different posture. RESULTS The prototype of the proposed MIS device was developed, and the related experiments were carried out. The maximum opening angle error was 1.2°. Compared with the non-compensation model, the variation of grip force reduced 8 times with the pre-compensation model. The animal vivo experiments verified the feasibility and practicability of the device. CONCLUSIONS The proposed hand-held device could provide intuitive manipulability and stable operation, which contributes to the performance improvement of the MIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingkan Yang
- Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Kang Kong
- Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jianmin Li
- Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuxin Wang
- Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rojas A, Gachabayov M, Abouezzi ZE, Bergamaschi R, Latifi R. Current Robotic Platforms in Surgery and the Road Ahead. Surg Technol Int 2021; 38:39-46. [PMID: 33861861 DOI: 10.52198/21.sti.38.so1419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery has rapidly evolved from the once novel laparoscopic approach to advanced robotic surgery. In the past few decades alone, robotic systems have gone from systems which were significantly limited to full-fledged platforms featuring 3D vision, articulated instruments, integrated ultrasound and fluorescence capabilities, and even the latest wireless connectivity, as is now standard. In this review, we aimed to summarize features of currently commercialized and utilized robotic surgical systems as well as currently unfolding platforms. The pros and cons of different robotic surgical systems were discussed. In addition, we discussed the future perspectives of robotic platforms used in general surgery. In this regard, we emphasized that the market, once dominated by Intuitive Surgical Inc., has become occupied by several worthy competitors with new technological giants such as Google. Eventually, the question facing hospital systems will not be of whether or not to invest in robotic surgery, but instead of how they will strike balance between price, features, and availability when choosing robots from the growing market to best equip their surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aram Rojas
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical, College and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
| | - Mahir Gachabayov
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical, College and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
| | - Ziad E Abouezzi
- Department of Surgery, MidHudson Regional, Hospital, Westchester Medical Center Health Network, Poughkeepsie, New York
| | - Roberto Bergamaschi
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York Medical College and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
| | - Rifat Latifi
- New York Medical College, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center Health, Valhalla, New York
| |
Collapse
|