Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy

A case control study of vNOTES hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system and conventional vNOTES hysterectomy

The aim of the case control study was to compare surgical outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system (dVSS) and conventional vNOTES. A case control study was performed on 25 cases in our hospital. Patients (n = 8) who underwent vNOTES hysterectomy with dVSS were selected to compare with the control group (n = 17) consisted of patients who underwent conventional vNOTES. Patients in the 2 groups underwent different operations respectively, and no case was transferred to transabdominal laparoscopy. In the conventional vNOTES group, 1 patient happened intraoperative hemorrhage of about 1000 mL, and was treated with blood transfusion, and the other one of vNOTES hysterectomy with dVSS had poor incision healing within 1 month after surgery. The other patients had no intraoperative and postoperative complications. The difference of pain scores on the first day (P = .006) and the third day (P = .045) after the 2 surgical methods differed significantly. No statistical differences were observed in operation time, median hospital stay, blood loss, decreased hemoglobin 3 days after surgery, and postoperative white blood cell count. vNOTES hysterectomy with dVSS is safe and feasible, and can achieve the same effect as the conventional vNOTES hysterectomy. And this method may alleviate the pain of patients.

The learning curve of introduced robotic-assisted hysterectomy versus skilled laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases

AIM

This study aimed to compare introduced robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) and skilled total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the treatment of benign gynecological diseases.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RAH or TLH by two surgeons at the Tottori University Hospital between January 2018 and May 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients with 100-300 g of uterine weight. The exclusion criteria were patients with stage IV endometriosis. Mean operative time and learning curve were compared among the first-half RAH, second-half RAH, and TLH groups.

RESULTS

There were 40 eligible cases (first-half RAH: 20 cases, second-half RAH: 20 cases) in the RAH group and 44 cases in the TLH group. The total operative time (TOT) of the second half of RAH was significantly shorter than that of the first half of RAH (p = 0.021) and was comparable to that of the TLH group. The operative time (OT) of the second half of RAH was shorter than that of TLH (p = 0.023). The preparation time of TLH was shorter than that of the RAH group (p < 0.01). The learning curve of the TOT in RAH crossed that of TLH on the 31st case of RAH. In contrast, both curves of the OT crossed on the 11th case of RAH.

CONCLUSION

The TOT of the introduced RAH was equivalent to that of skilled TLH in approximately 30 cases since the first RAH. Furthermore, the OT of RAH was comparable to that of TLH in approximately 10 cases of surgery since the first RAH.

Obvious advantage of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy against total laparoscopic hysterectomy in small uterus patients and the future prospects at a regional core institution: A retrospective study

Objective

Owing to the combination of benefits, including permanent visual guidance and no abdominal skin incision, vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy (vNOTES-H) is currently widely used. However, the introduction of vNOTES-H has been delayed in many Japanese regional core hospitals because of its specific device and skill requirements. Therefore, the characteristics and advantages should be explained for the widespread use of this technique.

Study design

We reviewed the medical records of 17 patients with vNOTES-H and 94 patients with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022. In this analysis, to compare the results of vNOTES-H to TLH, we excluded certain patients with a relatively heavy uterus (>255 g) and the presence of abdominal adhesions. In this report, first, the characteristics of the vNOTES-H procedures using a transvaginal access platform are explained by referring to one representative patient. Second, the patient characteristics of the vNOTES-H and TLH groups, including operation time and blood loss amount, were compared. Then, to detect the influence of vNOTES-H on the difficulty of operation among all 111 patients, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the influence of each of 9 factors, including "vNOTES-H", "Advanced age", "High BMI", "3 parity", "Gynaecological operation history", "Adenomyoma", "Large leiomyoma", "Heavy uterus" and "Large uterus", on the two indexes, including "Short time operation" and "Massive blood loss".

Results

In the simple comparison between the groups with vNOTES-H and TLH, the operation time in the former group was significantly shorter than in the latter group, although other factors did not show significant differences, including blood loss amount. Moreover, in the multivariate logistic regression analysis of all 111 patients, the "vNOTES-H" factor showed a significantly high possibility of "short time operation", although no factor, including "vNOTES-H", showed a significant influence on "massive blood loss".

Conclusions

vNOTES-H showed advantages in terms of operation time without increasing blood loss for patients with a relatively small uterus. However, to expand the selection for vNOTES-H, we should accumulate further patients and perform more analyses.

Comparison of postoperative analgesia use between robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Although robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomies are widely used as minimally invasive procedures, consensus on which is superior regarding lesser postoperative pain is lacking. This study determines whether there is a difference in the proportion of postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen between robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomies. This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic total hysterectomy for uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 at a hospital between July 2016 and November 2021. The outcome was postoperative analgesics (i.e., NSAIDs or acetaminophen) use. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the procedure and outcome. Adjusted variables were age, body mass index, surgeon's laparoscopic technique certification, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and wound local anesthesia. Of 127 patients, 3 were excluded, and 124 were included. Robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed in 38 and 86 patients, respectively. Postoperative analgesics were administered to 10 (26.3%) and 52 (60.5%) patients in the robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis showed significantly more frequent analgesics use in the laparoscopy group (odds ratio [OR] 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-9.93; p < 0.01). Adjusted logistic regression analysis did not detect significant differences (OR 2.62; 95% CI 0.91-7.56; p = 0.07). No significant difference in the proportion of postoperative analgesia was observed between robotic total hysterectomy and laparoscopy. Future studies must include larger sample sizes and aligned intraoperative and postoperative analgesic management.

Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy to total laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of operational complications at a regional institution: A retrospective study

Objective

With the increased use of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) has increased due to its technical advantages. On the other hand, RALH has some disadvantages, including its high cost, which includes not only the purchase price of robotic technology systems but also the running cost and long preparation time for setting assistant robots. Therefore, an overall understanding of the characteristics of RALH is needed.

Study design

We reviewed the medical records of 432 patients with TLH and 93 patients with RALH from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. In this analysis, we excluded certain cases with concomitant laparoscopic cystectomy (LC) and a heavy uterus (> 400 g). First, the patient characteristics of the TLH and RALH groups, including operation time and blood loss amount, were compared. Then, among these cases, we sought to predict difficult cases for TLH and RALH by identifying risk factors related to each of the following three categories of operational complications: "long operation time", "massive blood loss" and "other complications". For this purpose, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the influence of each of 7 representative factors, namely, "advanced age", "high body mass index (BMI)", "nulliparity", "concomitant pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA)", "heavy uterus", "abdominal adhesion", and "large leiomyoma".

Results

In the simple comparison without various factors, there was an advantage of RALH in both the average operation time and blood loss amount. However, in the multivariate logistic regression analyses, a significant risk was detected in the following relationships: 1) between "long-term operation" and "abdominal adhesion" and 2) between "other complications" and "heavy uterus".

Conclusions

RALH has sufficient advantages over TLH regarding at least in terms of blood loss amount; however, since RALH may have potential weaknesses in the context of complex cases, additional cases and analyses are needed.

Role of laparoscopic hysterectomy in cervical and endometrial cancer: a narrative review

Endometrial cancer is the most common carcinoma of the female genital organs and cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role of laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer in this period, and analyze the outcome of hysterectomy in terms of survival. Moreover, we present the historical background, new techniques, the anatomical features, and surgical steps of radical hysterectomy. According to new evidence, minimally invasive surgery in patients with cervical cancer is associated with higher rates of recurrence and mortality compared to the open approach. Despite the numerous explanations offered for this phenomenon, the reasons for these results are unclear. Additional large trials have been launched to reevaluate the above-mentioned data. On contrary, the laparoscopic approach provides surgical outcomes and similar survival rates as open surgery in patients with early endometrial carcinoma. Furthermore, the radicality of hysterectomy does not influence local recurrence rates or overall survival in cases with complete surgical removal of the tumor. A laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is no longer an option in patients with cervical cancer. When minimally invasive surgery is offered, the patients must be counseled in detail about the current debate.

Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Introduction

Da-Vinci-Xi is the most recent device used in gynecologic robotic surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term satisfaction of patients who had undergone conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using the Da-Vinci-Xi surgical system.

Methods

All hysterectomies performed at the University Hospital of Luebeck from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between women who had undergone total hysterectomy with da Vinci Xi (n = 42) or conventional laparoscopy (n = 97). Postoperative outcomes included pain, elimination of complaints after surgery, bladder function, sexual function, satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome, positive experiences after robotic surgery, and satisfaction with the surgeon’s preoperative explanation. Obese patients were evaluated separately in a subgroup analysis.

Results

Both groups had similar baseline characteristics and complication rates. Preoperative complaints subsided after surgery in a little more than 90% of patients. No significant differences were noted between groups in this regard (p = 0.262), or with reference to postoperative pain after one week (p = 0.866) and one month (p = 0.580), stress incontinence (p = 0.343), sexual function (p = 0.766) and the cosmetic outcome of the abdominal incisions (p = 0.273). The majority of patients who had undergone robotic surgery (96.8%) would be willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary. The subgroup analysis of obese patients revealed no significant differences.

Conclusion

The Da-Vinci-Xi device did not improve the long-term surgical satisfaction of normal-weight or obese patients who underwent hysterectomy compared with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review

Almost all gynecological and general-surgical operations are - or can be - performed laparoscopically. In comparison to an abdominal approach, the minimally invasive access offers several advantages; however, laparoscopy (both conventional and robotic-assisted) can be associated with a number of approach-specific complications. Although the majority of them are related to the laparoscopic entry, adverse events may also occur due to the presence of pneumoperitoneum or the use of laparoscopic instruments. Unfortunately, a high proportion of complications (especially affecting the bowel and ureter) remain unrecognized during surgery. This narrative review provides comprehensive up-to-date information about definitions, classifications, risk factors and incidence of surgical complications in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy, with a special focus on gynecology. The topic is discussed from various perspectives, e.g. in the context of stage of surgery, injured organs, involved instruments, and in relation to malpractice claims.