1
|
Chen S, Wang X, Li Z, Li X, Han G, Tao Z, Li Z, Zhang P, Zhu H, Yang K, Li X. Minimally invasive versus open ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty: comparative outcomes and 5-year experience. BMC Urol 2024; 24:118. [PMID: 38858691 PMCID: PMC11163719 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01509-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared. RESULTS The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC. CONCLUSION IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silu Chen
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Guanpeng Han
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Tao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenyu Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjian Zhu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kochkin A, Kalfountzos C, Gallyamov E, Biktimirov R, Sanzharov A, Sergeev V, Popov S, Dal Moro F, Tokas T, Gözen AS. Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement: multi-institutional data from 102 patients. MINIM INVASIV THER 2024; 33:140-146. [PMID: 38265869 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2302889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present long-term results of our laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement (LIUR) cohort, including more complex cases of laparoscopic ileocalycostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected records of patients undergoing LIUR. Follow-up included a chemical profile and urine cultures. Imaging consisted of renal ultrasonography, excretory urography, cystography, and computer tomographic or magnetic resonance urography. RESULTS One hundred and two patients were included. Stricture location was left (46.1%), right (39.2%), or bilateral (14.7%). No open conversion was performed. Seventy-four patients (72.5%) underwent a total ureteral unit removal. The mean operative time was 289.4 (120 - 680) minutes. The estimated blood loss was 185.2 (10-400) mL. Three patients had intraoperative complications, and fifteen had early postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.2 (7-35) days. The mean follow-up duration period was 37.7 (12-162) months. Most patients' follow-up was uneventful (88%), and seven patients presented with Grade 2 late complications. CONCLUSIONS Intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement in cases of extensive ureteral lesions offers optimal long-term outcomes and a low complication rate. Ileocalycostomy constitutes a viable option in the small group of patients with long proximal ureteral strictures and intrarenal pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Kochkin
- Department of Urology, Urological Center of Russian Railways Hospital, Privolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Christos Kalfountzos
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eduard Gallyamov
- Department of Common Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Rafael Biktimirov
- Department of Urology, Federal Clinical Center of High Medical Technology of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Sanzharov
- Department of Urology, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Methods of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir Sergeev
- Department of Urology, Russian State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Popov
- Department of Urology, I.I. Mechkikov North - Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Urology, Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li Z, Han G, Zhang L, Li X, Yang K, Wang B, Zhang P, Huang C, Liu J, Zhu H, Zhou L, Zhang K, Li X. Minimal-invasive ileal ureter replacement for the management of multiple ureteral polyps: the initial experience. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1919-1926. [PMID: 38200364 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03850-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present our initial experience in the management of multiple ureteral polyps with robotic or laparoscopic ileal ureter replacement (IUR). METHODS Eight consecutive patients diagnosed with multiple ureteral polyps underwent robotic or laparoscopic IUR between July 2019 and November 2022. Unilateral IUR was performed in 5 patients with polyps in the left (n = 3) or right (n = 2) side, and 3 patients with bilateral multiple polyps underwent bilateral IUR. Demographic characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were prospectively collected. RESULTS A cohort of 5 male and 3 female patients (11 ureters) with a mean age of 32.8 ± 11.3 years were included. Among these patients, 5 presented with recurrent flank pain, 1 had hematuria, and 2 were asymptomatic. Four patients experienced prior failed surgical interventions. The mean length of diseased ureter was 11.9 ± 4.7 cm, with more than 10 cm in eight sides. All procedures were performed successfully. The mean operation time was 319 ± 87.6 min with 3 patients who simultaneously underwent intraoperative ureteroscopy. The mean length of ileal graft was 23.8 ± 5.8 cm. During the mean follow-up of 20.4 ± 12.8 months, one major complication, specifically incision infection, and four minor complications, including urinary infection (n = 3) and metabolic acidosis (n = 1), were observed. All patients presented symptom-free, with improved/stabilized hydronephrosis and no signs of restenosis. CONCLUSION Robotic or laparoscopic IUR is a feasible, safe, and effective surgical option for patients with long ureteral defects caused by multiple polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yiming Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jilong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Guanpeng Han
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Lianghao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Bing Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, No. 29 Xibahenanli St, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Chen Huang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, No. 6 Rufuli St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, No. 6 Rufuli St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Hongjian Zhu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, No. 6 Rufuli St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggarwal D, Kalra S, Dorairajan LN, Sreerag KS, Thakor P. Robotic reconstruction of necrosed ileal ureter: Technical challenges, intra-operative difficulty, and learning points. Indian J Urol 2024; 40:136-137. [PMID: 38725900 PMCID: PMC11078442 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_492_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This video explores the challenges faced during a re-do robotic intra-corporeal ileal ureter reconstruction in a previously operated case. A 24-year-old woman presented with a 12-cm long stricture after robotic ileal ureter replacement surgery. A proper preoperative evaluation in the form of ureteroscopy and a nephrostogram is essential and the key steps include adhesiolysis, identification of the necrotic ileal ureter, and meticulous dissection. A 13-cm long segment of the ileum was isolated and was anastomosed to the renal pelvis and the bladder. The surgery lasted for 420 min with 300 ml of blood loss. Post-operatively, the patient recovered well and had a normal drainage with no complications at 1-year of follow-up. The factors such as a broad mesentery, a tension-free anastomosis, and avoiding the twisting of the pedicle are crucial for success of robotic ileal ureter replacement surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepanshu Aggarwal
- Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Sidhartha Kalra
- Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | | | - K S Sreerag
- Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Poojan Thakor
- Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang K, Wang X, Xu C, Li Z, Han G, Fan S, Chen S, Li X, Zhu H, Zhou L, Li X. Totally Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Unilateral or Bilateral Ileal Ureter Replacement for the Treatment of Ureteral Strictures: Technique and Outcomes from a Single Center. Eur Urol 2023; 84:561-570. [PMID: 37225525 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies on totally intracorporeal robot-assisted ileal ureter replacement (RA-IUR) have been reported. OBJECTIVE To report our technique and the outcomes of totally intracorporeal RA-IUR for unilateral or bilateral ureteral reconstruction, involving performing cystoplasty simultaneously. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Fifteen patients underwent totally intracorporeal RA-IUR from April 2021 to July 2022 at a single center. The perioperative variables were prospectively collected, and the outcomes were assessed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE The surgical procedure included dissection of the proximal end of the ureteral stricture or renal pelvis, harvesting of the ileal ureter, rebuilding of intestinal continuity, upper anastomosis of the ileum to the renal pelvis or the ureteral end, and lower anastomosis of the ileum to the bladder. All operations were performed intracorporeally. MEASUREMENTS Patient demographics and perioperative results were prospectively collected and analyzed for perioperative complications and success rates. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS All patients successfully underwent totally intracorporeal RA-IUR without open conversion. Seven patients received unilateral RA-IUR and eight received bilateral RA-IUR. The mean (range) length of the harvested ileal segment was 28.3 (15-40) cm, the operative duration was 261.8 (183-381) min, the estimated blood loss was 64.7 (30-100) ml, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization was 10.5 (7-17) d. At a median (range) follow-up of 14 (8-22) mo, the subjective and functional success rates were 100% and 86.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that totally intracorporeal unilateral or bilateral RA-IUR (even with ileocystoplasty) can be performed safely and efficiently with acceptable minor complications and a high success rate. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study indicates that totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement surgery is safe and feasible for ureteral reconstruction, even with ileocystoplasty. The postoperative complications are acceptable. At a median follow-up of 14 (8-22) mo, the subjective and functional success rates were 100% and 86.7%, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chunru Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Guanpen Han
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Shubo Fan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Silu Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | | | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yuan C, Li Z, Wang J, Zhang P, Meng C, Li D, Gao J, Guan H, Zhu W, Lu B, Zhang Z, Feng N, Yang K, Li X, Zhou L. Ileal ureteral replacement for the management of ureteral avulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case series. BMC Surg 2022; 22:262. [PMID: 35799183 PMCID: PMC9264655 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01690-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To describe our initial experience with ileal ureteral replacement (IUR) for the management of ureteral avulsion (UA) during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. METHODS Between September 2010 and April 2021, ten patients received ileal ureteral replacement for ureteral avulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Anterograde urography and computed tomography urography (CTU) were applied to evaluate the lesion. Follow-up was performed with magnetic resonance urography and renal ultrasound as well as clinical assessment of symptoms. We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of ten patients treated with ileal ureteral replacement for the treatment of ureteral avulsion. RESULTS Four patients underwent open ileal ureteral replacement, two underwent laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement, and four underwent robotic-assisted ileal ureteral replacement. The mean operative time (OT) was 310 min (range 191-530). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 193 mL (range 10-1000). The mean length of the ileal graft was 21 cm (range 12-25). The median postoperative hospital time was 13 days (range 7-19). All surgeries were effectively completed, and no case required open conversion in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries. There was no obvious hydronephrosis according to contrast-enhanced computed tomography 3-dimensional reconstruction images without serious complications or progressive hydronephrosis during a median follow-up duration of 51 months (range 5-131), and the success rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS Our initial results and experience showed that ileal ureteral replacement for the management of ureteral avulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy is safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changwei Yuan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, No. 29, Xibahenanli St, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100028, China
| | - Chang Meng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Dan Li
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jingjing Gao
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Hua Guan
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Weijie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Boyu Lu
- Department of Urology, Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Gem Flower Hospital, No. 26, YingBin St, Xinglongtai District, Panjin, 124010, China
| | - Zhichao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Qinhuangdao Jungong Hospital, No. 15, YuFeng St, Haigang District, 066001, Qinhuangdao, China
| | - Ninghan Feng
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Zhongshan St, Liangxi District, Wuxi, 214001, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Peking University, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhu W, Zhu Z, Li Z, Li X, Zhang J, Xu Y, Wang X, Zhang P, Huang B, Huang C, Zhang D, Zhu H, Li X, Lin J, Zhou L. A ureteral stricture disease score and classification system: correlation with upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery complexity. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:3745-3755. [PMID: 34804818 PMCID: PMC8575562 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To develop an original and standardized ureteral stricture disease (USD) score and classification system for quantifying ureter stricture characteristics, assessing complexity of the minimally invasive upper urinary tract reconstructive (UUTR) surgical procedure, formulating preoperative plans, and offering objective comparisons of surgical techniques between different institutions and surgeons. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a test set of 64 patients and a validation set of 170 patients who underwent minimally invasive UUTR surgery from January 2018 to January 2021. Three factors were selected to be included in the USD score and classification system: (I) stricture etiology (E, 1–2 points); (II) stricture segment (S, 0–3 points); and (III) length of stricture (L, 1–5 points). The UUTR surgery involves low-complex surgeries (cystoscopy with ureteral dilation and stent placement, ureteropyeloplasty, end to end repair, ureteral reimplantation) and high-complex surgeries (onlay repair (buccal mucosae, lingual mucosae, appendix mucosae), Boari flap repair and ileal ureter replacement). Estimated blood loss and operative time were used as surrogate indicators of surgical complexity. Results The interrater reliability of the USD score and classification system was 0.908. A linear relationship between the USD score and estimated blood loss was observed (rs =0.676, P<0.001). The USD score was also correlated with operative time (rs =0.638, P<0.001). A significant difference in USD scores was found between the high and low complexity surgery groups (4 vs. 7, P<0.001). Variability of UUTR surgery is based on USD classification system, but with regularity to conform to. Conclusions The USD score and classification system is a concise, easily applicable, and validated scale to delineate the clinically significant features of ureter stricture that correlate with the complexity of the UUTR surgical procedure. The use of this score and classification system can facilitate preoperative plan and comparison of USD treatments in clinical practice and urological literature. Research with large sample is needed to further examine and modify the use of the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenpeng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Jianye Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Yangyang Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bingwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Huang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dengxiang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjian Zhu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Lin
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|