Neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus

Stimulation of neutralizing antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in three strains of mice immunized with a 22 amino acid peptide of gp41 expressed on the surface of a plant virus

A plant virus, cowpea mosaic virus, expressing a 22 amino acid peptide 731-752 of the gp41 glycoprotein of human immunodeficency virus type 1 (HIV-1 IIIB), was shown previously to stimulate HIV-1 cross reactive neutralizing antibodies in adult C57/BL6 mice. Here some parameters concerning the stimulation of HIV-1-specific neutralizing and ELISA antibody have been determined in adult C57/BL6, C3H/He-mg and BALB/c mice. Two injections per mouse of all CPMV-HIV/1 doses tested (100, 10 and 1 microgram chimera which contained, respectively, 1700, 170 and 17 ng HIV peptide per injection) stimulated a strong serum neutralizing antibody response in all mice. One hundred micrograms or 10 micrograms CPMV-HIV/1 per injection gave 99% neutralization of HIV-1 IIIB in C8166 cells at a serum dilution of 1/200, whereas sera from mice immunized with 1 microgram per injection neutralized virus to 97%, 79% and 63% at a 1/200 dilution of serum from C3H/He-mg, C57/BL6 and BALB/c mice, respectively. Restimulation of these mice with the same immunogen dose marginally increased the neutralization titres. The longevity of the neutralizing antibody response increased as the immunogen dose decreased, and was dependent on the strain of mouse, in the order C57/BL6C3H/He-mg BALB/c. Re-immunization with a third injection improved the longevity of the antibody response. All mice immunized with 100 micrograms CPMV-HIV/1 responded with ELISA antibody to the gp41 peptide bound in solid phase. Ten micrograms stimulated ELISA antibody in some but not all mice, while mice immunized with 1 microgram had no detectable ELISA antibody. This synthesis of ELISA antibody decreased > or = 230-fold over the range of immunogen doses tested but, in the same mice, the neutralizing antibody response decreased only twofold, showing an unusual bias to production of the latter. Neutralizing antibodies were thus stimulated at a lower immunogen dose than ELISA antibodies. Antibody which was affinity purified using the free gp41 peptide gave a good ELISA titre but did not neutralize HIV-1, suggesting that the neutralizing antibody is recognizing a conformational epitope on the gp41 oligomer.

Serum neutralization of feline immunodeficiency virus is markedly dependent on passage history of the virus and host system

Sera from feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)-infected cats exhibited extremely low levels of neutralizing antibodies against virus passaged a few times in vitro (low passage), when residual infectivity was assayed in the CD3+ CD4- CD8- MBM lymphoid cell line or mitogen-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. By sharp contrast, elevated titers of highly efficient neutralizing activity against FIV were measured, by use of high-passage virus, in assays on either the fibroblastoid CrFK or MBM cell line. However, high-passage virus behaved the same as low-passage virus after one in vivo passage in a specific-pathogen-free cat and reisolation. Subneutralizing concentrations of infected cat sera enhanced the production of low-passage virus by MBM cells, an effect not seen with high-passage virus in CrFK cells. These qualitative and quantitative discrepancies could not be attributed to differences in the amount of immunoreactive viral material, to the amount of infectious virus present in the viral stocks, or to the presence of anti-cell antibodies. The observed effects were most likely due to the different passage history of the viral preparations used. The observation that neutralizing antibodies detected with high-passage virus were broadly cross-reactive in assays with CrFK cells but isolate specific in MBM cells suggests also that the cell substrate can influence the result of FIV neutralization assays. This possibility could not be tested directly because FIV adapted to grow in CrFK cells had little infectivity for lymphoid cells and vice versa. In vitro exposure to infected cat sera had little or no effect on the ability of in vivo-passaged FIV to infect cats. These data reveal no obvious relationship between titers against high-passage virus and ability to block infectivity of FIV in cats and suggest caution in the use of such assays to measure vaccine efficacy. In conclusion, by contrast with what has been previously reported for the use of CrFK cells and high-passage virus, both natural and experimental infections of cats with FIV generate poor neutralizing antibody responses with regard to in vivo protection.

Production of long-lived neutralizing antibodies to HIV-1 IIIB in mice with a vaccinia recombinant virus-infected cell vaccine expressing gp160

A formaldehyde-fixed cell vaccine in adjuvant (syngeneic cells infected with a vaccinia virus recombinant expressing gp160: vacc-gp160) stimulated only nonneutralizing antibody when used on its own in four strains of mice, but a similar nonfixed cell vaccine stimulated neutralizing antibodies up to a titer of 1/320 in C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice previously infected with live vacc-gp160. Synthesis of ELISA antibodies to rgp120 or rgp160 did not correspond closely to the synthesis of neutralizing antibodies and should not therefore be used to monitor the production of neutralizing antibody. The ELISA antibody response produced by boosting with the cell vaccine made with the vaccinia virus expressing gp160 under the control of a T7 promoter (vacc-gp160-PT7) was as high as that in mice given an approximately 10-fold higher dose of purified rgp160. The ELISA antibody response to the cell vaccine made with vacc-gp160-PT7 was better than that in which gp160 was expressed under the vaccinia early/late promoter (vacc-gp160-P7.5). Nearly all mice (92%; 11 of 12) primed by infection with vacc-gp160 produced comparable levels of neutralizing antibodies after a single boost with rgp160, vacc-gp160-PT7-infected cells, or vacc-gp160-P7.5-infected cells. Neutralization titers peaked at around day 22 after boost, and declined by day 29. A second boost with the same vacc-gp160-infected cells gave increased neutralizing titers in all (eight of eight) mice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)