Developing a new scoring scheme for the Hemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1

Emicizumab prophylaxis in infants with hemophilia A (HAVEN 7): primary analysis of a phase 3b open-label trial

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous emicizumab enables prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A (HA) from birth, potentially reducing risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). HAVEN 7 (NCT04431726) is the first clinical trial of emicizumab dedicated to infants, designed to investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of emicizumab in those aged ≤12 months with severe HA without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. Participants in this phase 3b trial received emicizumab 3 mg/kg maintenance dose every 2 weeks for 52 weeks and are continuing emicizumab during the 7-year long-term follow-up. Efficacy end points included annualized bleed rate (ABR): treated, all, treated spontaneous, and treated joint bleeds. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), thromboembolic events (TEs), thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), and immunogenicity (anti-emicizumab antibodies [ADAs] and FVIII inhibitors). At primary analysis, 55 male participants had received emicizumab (median treatment duration: 100.3; range, 52-118 weeks). Median age at informed consent was 4.0 months (range, 9 days to 11 months 30 days). Model-based ABR for treated bleeds was 0.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.63), with 54.5% of participants (n = 30) having zero treated bleeds. No ICH occurred. All 42 treated bleeds in 25 participants (45.5%) were traumatic. Nine participants (16.4%) had ≥1 emicizumab-related AE (all grade 1 injection-site reactions). No AE led to treatment changes. No deaths, TEs, or TMAs occurred. No participant tested positive for ADAs. Two participants were confirmed positive for FVIII inhibitors. This primary analysis of HAVEN 7 indicates that emicizumab is efficacious and well tolerated in infants with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

Noninterventional study assessing joint health in persons with hemophilia A after switching to turoctocog alfa pegol: design of pathfinderReal

Background

Joint damage affects the quality of life of persons with hemophilia A. The long-term safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A has been investigated in pivotal phase 3 trials in children, adolescents, and adults (pathfinder program). However, there is a lack of data on joint health in adult persons with hemophilia A treated with N8-GP.

Objectives

To describe the design of the ongoing pathfinderReal study investigating the joint health status in adult persons with hemophilia A after switching to N8-GP.

Methods

pathfinderReal is a multicountry, noninterventional, single-arm study (NCT05621746) of joint health in adult (≥18 years) male persons with hemophilia A who have switched to N8-GP. Patients enrolled in other interventional studies and those who have previously terminated N8-GP treatment will be excluded. Approximately 124 adults with hemophilia A will be enrolled and followed up for a maximum of 24 months. Data from routine clinical assessments of patients' joint health will be collected. The primary endpoint is change in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (defined as a change in total score of ≤2) from initiation of N8-GP treatment until the end of the study. Secondary endpoints include number of bleeding episodes, number and resolution of target joints, patient-reported outcomes of problem joint score, pain score, and change in physical function levels. An exploratory endpoint is included to measure the number of patients achieving improved Hemophilia Joint Health Score from the initiation of N8-GP until the end of the study.

Conclusion

The pathfinderReal study will provide insights regarding the impact of N8-GP on joint health in persons with hemophilia A in a real-world setting.

Emicizumab in people with moderate or mild haemophilia A (HAVEN 6): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial data are scarce for the use of prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A. The HAVEN 6 study aims to assess safety and efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors.

METHODS

HAVEN 6 is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study taking place in 22 specialty clinics and hospitals in Europe, North America, and South Africa. Eligible participants were people of all ages weighing at least 3 kg with a diagnosis of moderate (FVIII activity ≥1%-≤5%) or mild (FVIII >5%-<40%) haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors requiring prophylaxis as assessed by the treating physician. Participants received subcutaneous emicizumab 3 mg/kg of bodyweight once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by the participant's choice of maintenance dose: 1·5 mg/kg once weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Safety was the primary objective of the study. Safety endpoints included adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of special interest including thromboembolic events and thrombotic microangiopathies. The primary efficacy endpoint was the annualised bleed rate for treated bleeds. Analyses were done for participants who received at least one dose of emicizumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04158648, and is active but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 10, 2020, and Aug 31, 2021, we assigned 73 people to treatment. 72 participants received at least one dose of emicizumab (51 moderate [71%]; 21 mild [29%]; 69 male [96%]; three female [4%]; and 61 White [85%]). Median age was 23·5 years (IQR 12·0-36·0); median follow-up was 55·6 weeks (IQR 52·3-61·6) weeks. At baseline, 24 participants (33%) had target joints and 37 (51%) were receiving FVIII prophylaxis. 60 participants (83%) had at least one adverse event; the most common adverse events were headache (in 12 participants [17%]), injection-site reaction (12 [17%]), and arthralgia (11 [15%]). 15 (21%) had at least one emicizumab-related adverse event; no adverse events led to treatment withdrawal, modification, or interruption. Eight participants (11%) reported ten serious adverse events in total, none emicizumab-related. There were no deaths or thrombotic microangiopathies. One participant had grade 1 thrombosed haemorrhoids (classified as a thromboembolic event), unrelated to emicizumab. The annualised bleed rate was 0·9 (95% CI 0·55-1·52) for treated bleeds. 48 participants (67%) had no treated bleeds. All-bleed annualised bleed rates were 10·1 (95% CI 6·93-14·76) from 24 weeks pre-study and 2·3 (1·67-3·12) on-study after a median follow-up of 55·6 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

These data show efficacy and a favourable safety profile of emicizumab in people with non-severe haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors who warrant prophylaxis, confirming emicizumab as a valuable treatment option in this population.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

The evolution of physiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of persons with haemophilia (PWH): A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia is a rare congenital bleeding disorder, and the most common manifestation is spontaneous bleeding in muscles and joints. Despite the benefits linked to recent and dramatic pharmacological advances at least in high income setting, many patients still develop musculoskeletal dysfunctions during their lifetime, which must be managed by physiotherapists in the frame of a multidisciplinary team. The aim of the scoping review is to map the available evidence by providing an overview on the past and present physiotherapy scenario in persons with haemophilia (PWH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was conducted according to the guidelines of the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Scientific articles on physiotherapy and sport interventions for PWH published from 1960 up to September 2021 have been included. Search was conducted on the e-databases PubMed and PEDro without restrictions for the study design.

RESULTS

Sixty eight articles were included, 52 related to rehabilitation and preventive physiotherapy, 16 to sport. The results have been reported in chronological order and divided into two categories: (1) rehabilitation and preventive physiotherapy; (2) sport activities.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first scoping review on physiotherapy in haemophilia, based on the existing evidence on this topic which allowed us to underline how the role of the physiotherapist changed over time. Historically this specialist did intervene only after an acute bleed or surgical operation, but now he has a pivotal role in the multidisciplinary team that acts to improve from birth the quality of life of the PWH. His activity is also closely intertwined with sport promotion and supervision.

Effectiveness of myofascial therapy on hemophilic arthropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Background

Recurrent hemarthrosis is one of the major complications affecting joint functions, and causing chronic pain in hemophilia patients.

Objective

To summarize the existing evidence of the effects of myofascial therapy (MFT) on joint status, joint pain, and hemarthrosis in hemophilic arthropathy.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was done according to PRISMA checklist. Finally, four clinical trials included and were pooled using STATA 13. Standardized mean difference (SMD) considered as the effect size.

Results

All patients in the case group received 3 interventions of MFT over a 3-week period and were evaluated for 1-5 months. Joint pain with and without load was significantly decreased after three weeks in the intervention group compared to controls (SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -1.02, -0.21 and 0.58, 95% CI: -0.88, -0.28 respectively). Also, joint status significantly improved three weeks later in patients with MFT compared to controls. (SMD: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.79, -0.19) and this improvement remained until the end of the follow-up period (SMD: -0.54, 95% CI: -0.84, -0.24).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that MFT can be an effective intervention improving the joint status and decreasing pain perception in patients with hemophilic arthropathy. Consequently, it can play an important role in achieving higher functionality and quality of life in these patients. However, due to the small number of studies and other limitations, further well-designed trials and updated meta-analysis are needed for more accurate results and interpretation.

Outcome of Joint Aspiration in Acute Knee Haemarthrosis in a Haemophilic Joint: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial in 120 Patients in a Tertiary Haemophilia Care Centre

Background

Bleeding into the joints cause major morbidity in haemophilia patients. The clinical hallmark of haemophilia is haemarthrosis especially in knee, ankle and elbow joint. Current literature suggests that aspiration of an acute haemarthrosis in haemophilia may lead to further bleeding and prevent tamponade effect. But the rehabilitation gets delayed, leading to joint stiffness and the function gets deteriorated. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of joint aspiration in the management of acute knee haemarthrosis, with regard to pain relief and functional outcome.

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective, randomised controlled trial in a tertiary care haemophilia treatment centre comprising 120 haemophilic patients with unilateral acute knee haemarthrosis. Factor level was checked and appropriate factor replacement [40%] was done. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: Group A and Group B, each consisting of 60 patients. All patients received ice application, limb immobilisation, analgesics, physiotherapy and compression bandage as the routine primary management. In addition, study Group A also received therapeutic aspiration of the knee joint at initial presentation, after the first factor infusion. All patients were clinically evaluated for pain in terms of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS score) and function in terms of Haemophilic Joint Health Score [HJHS], before and at 4 h, 48 h and 7 days after initial factor administration.

Results

All patients showed therapeutic improvement in terms of a declining trend in VAS and HJHS scores. Pain relief (VAS Score) in Group A, was found to be significantly better compared to Group B at the end of 4 h [4.80 ± 0.49 vs 6.54 ± 1.05; p < 0.001], 48 h [2.48 ± 0.50 vs 3.30 ± 0.46; p < 0.001] and 7 days [1.16 ± 0.37 vs 1.70 ± 0.46; p < 0.001]. Functional improvement (HJHS Score) in Group A, was found to be significantly better compared to Group B as well at the end of 4 h [11.24 ± 0.77 vs 14.52 ± 0.61; p < 0.001], 48 h [7.24 ± 0.65 vs 11.28 ± 0.64; p < 0.001] and 7 days [2.36 ± 0.48 vs 5.52 ± 0.67; p < 0.001].

Conclusion

Our study recommends the use of joint aspiration as a therapeutic tool in the holistic management of acute knee haemarthrosis in addition to usual treatment of ice application, immobilization and oral tranexamic acid. Early factor replacement along with therapeutic joint aspiration is a key for better pain relief and a better functional outcome.

The Limitations and Unmet Needs of the Five Cornerstones to Guarantee Lifelong Optimization of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients

Prophylaxis to prevent bleeding is highly recommended for hemophilia patients. The development of new drugs and tools for modeling personalized prophylaxis provides the means for people with hemophilia to lead active lives with a quality of life comparable to that of nonhemophilic individuals. The choice of regimens must be made on a highly individual basis. Unfortunately, reference guides neither always concur in their recommendations nor provide directions to cover all possible scenarios. In this review, a group of experts identify the significant limitations and unmet needs of prophylaxis, taking advantage of their clinical experience in the disease, and supported by a rigorous literature update. To perform a more systematic and comprehensive search for gaps, the main cornerstones that influence decisions regarding prophylactic patterns were first identified.

Bleeding phenotype, joint status, physical activity, pharmacokinetics/medication properties, and adherence to treatment were considered as the primary mainstays that should allow physicians guiding prophylaxis to secure the best outcomes. Several challenges identified within each of these topics require urgent attention and agreement. The scores to assess severity of bleeding are not reliable, and lead to no consensus definition of severe bleeding phenotype. The joint status is to be redefined in light of new, more efficient treatments with an agreement to establish one scale as the unique reference for joint health. Further discussion is needed to establish the appropriateness of high-intensity physical activities according to patient profiles, especially because sustaining trough factor levels within the safe range is not always warranted for long periods. Importantly, many physicians do not benefit from the advantages provided by the programs based on population pharmacokinetic models to guide individualized prophylaxis through more efficient and cost-saving strategies. Finally, ensuring correct adherence to long-term treatments may be time-consuming for practitioners, who often have to encourage patients and review complex questionnaires.

In summary, we identify five cornerstones that influence prophylaxis and discuss the main conflicting concerns that challenge the proper long-term management of hemophilia. A consensus exercise is warranted to provide reliable guidelines and maximize benefit from recently developed tools that should notably improve patients' quality of life.

Thromboelastography and thrombin generation assessments for pediatric severe hemophilia A patients are highly variable and not predictive of clinical phenotypes

Background

Severe hemophilia A (SHA) patients vary in severity of bleeding, arthropathy, and requirements for replacement factor VIII (FVIII). Baseline hemostatic activity assays using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) and thromboelastography (TEG) may offer insights into the physiological basis of clinical heterogeneity.

Objectives

Use CAT and TEG to measure baseline hemostatic activity in a cohort of 30 pediatric SHA patients with available clinical data. Determine effect of contact activation inhibition with corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI). Assess heterogeneity among patients for baseline hemostatic activity and examine correlations between assay results and clinical parameters including FVIII dosing regimen, von Willebrand factor level, and Pettersson arthropathy score.

Methods

SHA blood after FVIII washout was subjected to TEG, and platelet‐rich (PRP) and platelet‐poor plasma was used for CAT assays. Varying concentrations of tissue factor (TF) were used. Statistical analysis examined relationships between assay results, and clinical parameters.

Results

CTI treatment was required to obtain TEG and CAT results representative of baseline hemostatic activity. Weak activity was observed in assays with low TF concentrations (0.5–2 pM), and most but not all samples approached normal activity levels at high TF concentrations (10–20 pM). A significant positive correlation was observed between results of TEG and CAT‐PRP assays. Correlations were not detected between hemostatic assay results and clinical parameters.

Conclusions

In vitro hemostatic assay results of samples containing platelets showed concordance. Assay results were not predictive of FVIII requirements or correlated with other clinical parameters. SHA patient heterogeneity is influenced by factors other than baseline hemostatic activity.

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 Validation in Adult Patients Study: A multicenter international study

Background

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed and validated to detect arthropathy in children. Additional evidence is required to show validity in adults. We studied the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the HJHS version 2.1(HJHSv2.1) in adults with hemophilia. A secondary aim was to define age‐related normative adult HJHSv2.1 reference values.

Methods

We studied 192 adults with hemophilia, and 120 healthy adults in four age‐matched groups—18 to 29, 30 to 40, 41 to 50, and >50 years—at nine centers. Trained physiotherapists scored the HJHS and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) joint score. Health history, the Functional Independence Scale of Hemophilia (FISH), Hemophilia Activities List (HAL), and Short‐Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ) were also collected.

Results

The median age was 35.0 years. Of participants with hemophilia, 68% had severe, 14% moderate, and 18% mild disease. The HJHS correlated strongly with WFH score (Spearman’s rho [r_s] = .95, P < .001). Moderate correlations were seen between the FISH (r_s = .50, P < .001) and SF‐MPQ Present Pain Intensity (r_s = .50, P < .001), while a modest correlation was found with the HAL (r_s = −.37, P < .001). The HJHS significantly differentiated between age groups (Kruskal‐Wallis T = 35.02, P < .001) and disease severity in participants with hemophilia. The HJHS had high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = .88). We identified duration of swelling as a redundant item in the HJHS.

Conclusions

The HJHS shows evidence of strong convergent and discriminant construct validity to detect arthropathy in adults with hemophilia and is well suited for use in this population.

Development of a Tool to Measure the Clinical Response to Biologic Therapy in Uncontrolled Severe Asthma: The FEV1, Exacerbations, Oral Corticosteroids, Symptoms Score

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of tools to quantify the response to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) holistically in severe uncontrolled asthma patients.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a valid score to assist specialists in this clinical context.

METHODS

The score was developed in four subsequent phases: (1) elaboration of the theoretical model of the construct intended to be measured (response to mAbs); (2) definition and selection of items and measurement instruments by Delphi survey; (3) weight assignment of the selected items by multicriteria decision analysis using the Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of All Possible Alternatives methodology using the 1000minds software; and (4) face validity assessment of the obtained score.

RESULTS

Four core items, with different levels of response for each, were selected: severe exacerbations, oral corticosteroid use, symptoms (evaluated by Asthma Control Test), and bronchial obstruction (assessed by FEV₁ percent predicted). Severe exacerbations and oral corticosteroid maintenance dose were weighted most heavily (38% each), followed by symptoms (13%) and FEV₁ (11%). Higher scores in the weighted system indicate a better response and the range of responses runs from 0 (worsening) to 100 (best possible response). Face validity was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

The FEV₁, exacerbations, oral corticosteroids, symptoms score allows clinicians to quantify response in severe uncontrolled asthma patients who are being treated with mAbs.

Evaluating international Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) results combined with expert opinion: Options for a shorter HJHS

Introduction

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed to detect early changes in joint health in children and adolescents with haemophilia. The HJHS is considered by some to be too time consuming for clinical use and this may limit broad adoption.

Aim

This study was a first step to develop a shorter and/or more convenient version of the HJHS for the measurement of joint function in children and young adults with haemophilia, by combining real‐life data and expert opinion.

Methods

A cross‐sectional multicenter secondary analysis on pooled data of published studies using the HJHS (0‐124, optimum score 0) in persons with haemophilia A/B aged 4‐30 was performed. Least informative items, scoring options and/or joints were identified. An expert group of 19 international multidisciplinary experts evaluated the results and voted on suggestions for adaptations in a structured meeting (consensus set at ≥ 80%).

Results

Original data on 499 persons with haemophilia from 7 studies were evaluated. Median age was 15.0 years [range 4.0‐29.9], 83.2% had severe haemophilia and 61.5% received prophylaxis. Median (IQR) HJHS total was 6.0 (1.0‐17.0). The items 'duration swelling' and 'crepitus' were identified as clinically less informative and appointed as candidates for reduction.

Conclusion

Analysis of 499 children and young adults with haemophilia showed that the HJHS is able to discriminate between children and adults and different treatment regimens. Reduction of the items 'duration swelling' and 'crepitus' resulted in the HJHS_short, which had the same discriminative ability. Additional steps are needed to achieve a substantially shorter HJHS assessment.

Complications of hemophilia in the elbow: current management

INTRODUCTION

After the ankle and knee, the elbow is the most commonly impaired joint in patients with hemophilia.

AREAS COVERED

A Cochrane Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) search related to elbow problems in hemophilia was conducted. Early and continuous primary hematological prophylaxis (ideally starting in infancy) is essential, given that the juvenile elbow is highly prone to the musculoskeletal complications of hemophilia. If primary hematological prophylaxis is not administered (due either to lack of affordability or lack of venous access), persistent hemarthrosis can occur in the elbow. Hemarthroses will then require aggressive treatment (through arthrocentesis under factor factor coverage) to prevent progression to synovitis (requiring prompt radiosynovectomy or arthroscopic synovectomy) and ultimately hemophilic arthropathy (requiring rehabilitation and orthopedic surgery). Between the second and fourth decade of life, many patients with hemophilia present elbow joint destruction.

EXPERT OPINION

In the initial stage of joint destruction, rehabilitation and intraarticular injections of hyaluronic acid can relieve the symptoms. In the advanced stage of hemophilic arthropathy, however, surgery is necessary. The main surgical procedures currently available are arthroscopic debridement, radial head resection, and total elbow arthroplasty. Transposition of the ulnar nerve and removal of heterotopic ossifications might also be necessary.