Atrial fibrillation in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: Magnitude of the problem and new approach to oral anticoagulation

Cardioprotective effect of intradialytic exercise on left atrial mechanics

Left atrial (LA) function plays a pivotal role in cardiac performance by modulating left ventricular (LV) function. Impairments in LV function are commonly reported during hemodialysis (HD), but available data describing changes in LA function are limited. There is growing evidence of the cardioprotective effect of intradialytic exercise (IDE) on LV function, but studies analyzing its effect on LA function are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate whether IDE can limit the severity of HD-induced impairment in LA myocardial function. In this prospective, open-label, two-center randomized crossover trial, 56 stable individuals receiving HD participated in 2 HD sessions in random order: standard HD and a session incorporating 30 min of aerobic exercise. LA and LV global longitudinal strains (GLSs) were obtained before and at peak stress of HD (i.e., 30 min before the HD ending). IDE totally eradicated the decline in LA reservoir strain observed during HD (estimated difference: 3.1%, 95% confidence interval: 0.4/5.8, P = 0.02), whereas it did not affect the other components of LA mechanics. A similar result favoring IDE intervention was also demonstrated on GLS changes over the HD procedure (P < 0.001). Between-session differences of changes in GLS and LA reservoir strain were correlated (r = -0.32, P = 0.03). The cardioprotective effect of IDE disappeared in patients with LA enlargement (i.e., LA volume index >34 mL/m2). In conclusion, even a short duration of IDE at moderate intensity is effective in preventing HD-associated decline in LA reservoir function. Further research is needed to explore the long-term benefits of IDE on LA function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A single bout of intradialytic exercise (IDE) at moderate intensity can prevent the hemodialysis-associated decline in left atrial (LA) function. This was partially explained by the relative preservation of left ventricular systolic function with IDE. Benefits of IDE on LA function were lost in patients with LA dilation. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms behind IDE-induced cardioprotection and evaluate the clinical impacts of the repetitive cardioprotective effects of IDE on LA function.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and stage 5 chronic kidney disease under dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and normal or slightly impaired renal function, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is preferable to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the efficacy, and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs are still unknown.

PURPOSE

To review current evidence about the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to VKAs, in patients with AF and chronic kidney disease under hemodialysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for RCTs comparing DOACs with VKAs for anticoagulation in patients with AF on dialysis therapy. Outcomes of interest were: (1) stroke; (2) major bleeding; (3) cardiovascular mortality; and (4) all-cause mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.7 and heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials were included, comprising a total of 383 patients. Of these, 218 received DOACs (130 received apixaban; 88 received rivaroxaban), and 165 were treated with VKAs (116 received warfarin; 49 received phenprocoumon). The incidence of stroke was significantly lower in patients treated with DOACs (4.7%) compared with those using VKAs (9.5%) (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.97; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%). However, the difference was not statistically significant in the case of ischemic stroke specifically (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.17-1.04; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%). As for the major bleeding outcome, the DOAC group (11%) had fewer events than the VKA group (13.9%) but without statistical significance (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.45-1.28; p = 0.29; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference between groups regarding cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.23; 95% CI 0.66-2.29; p = 0.52; I2 = 13%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.77-1.24; p = 0.84; I2 = 16%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that in patients with AF on dialysis, the use of DOACs was associated with a significant reduction in stroke, and a numerical trend of less incidence of major bleeding compared with VKAs, but in this case with no statistical significance. Results may be limited by a small sample size or insufficient statistical power.

Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists

Background

Only small randomized trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and end-stage kidney disease.

Objectives

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anticoagulation with DOACs to VKAs in patients with NVAF undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

Methods

A systematic search using Medline, Web of Science, and Embase was performed. All randomized trials comparing DOACs with VKAs in patients with NVAF undergoing chronic hemodialysis were included. As primary endpoint, we analyzed all-cause mortality. As secondary endpoints, we investigated total bleeding events, life-threatening or major bleeding events, and thromboembolic events or stroke. We used the odds ratio as outcome measure and fitted a random-effects model due to the expected heterogeneity.

Results

Three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria comprising 383 patients (218 on apixaban or rivaroxaban, 165 on VKA). No significant difference between DOACs and VKAs regarding death (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.55-1.63; p = .84), total bleedings (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.63-1.54; p = .96) and life-threatening or major bleeding (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.32-1.33, p = .24) was detected. There was a trend toward a reduction of thromboembolic events or stroke in patients receiving DOACs (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14-1.05; p = .06).

Conclusion

Orally administered activated factor X inhibitors carried a similar risk of bleeding and death when compared with VKAs in patients with NVAF undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Moreover, there was a trend towards a reduction of thromboembolic events or stroke in patients receiving DOACs.

Long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and end stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), oral anticoagulants are contraindicated, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative treatment. However, the efficacy of thromboembolic prevention using LAAO in these patients has rarely been reported in Asian populations. To our knowledge, this is the first long-term LAAO study in patients with AF undergoing dialysis in Asia.

METHODS

In this study, 310 patients (179 men) with a mean age of 71.3 ± 9.6 years and mean CHA2DS2-VASc 4.2 ± 1.8 were consecutively enrolled at multiple centers in Taiwan. The outcomes of 29 patients with AF and ESRD undergoing dialysis who underwent LAAO were compared to those without ESRD. The primary composite outcomes were stroke, systemic embolization, or death.

RESULTS

No difference in mean CHADS-VASc score was noted between patients with versus without ESRD (4.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.453). After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 16 months, the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 5.12 [1.4-18.6]; p = 0.013) than in those without ESRD after LAAO therapy. Mortality was also higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 6.6 [1.1-39.7]; p = 0.038). The stroke rate was numerically higher in patients with versus without ESRD, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 3.2 [0.6-17.7]; p = 0.183). Additionally, ESRD was associated with device-related thrombosis (odds ratio, 6.15; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes of LAAO therapy may be less favorable in patients with AF undergoing dialysis, possibly because of the poor condition of patients with ESRD.

Association between Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients on Hemodialysis

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the association between hypertension (HTN) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. A chart review-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on HD patients who had received HD for at least 6 months. Demographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data were retrieved from the BestCare system, and the main outcomes were blood pressure before and after dialysis, and the presence of AF. Our sample consisted of 304 HD patients; 162 (53%) were male, and the mean age was 63 ± 18 years. Sixty-eight (20%) had AF, of whom 44 (64.7%) were male, with a mean age of 73 ± 12 years. The risk of AF increased by 0.4 [odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.06; P <0.001] for every year of age. Almost the entire sample (66.45%, n = 202) was hypertensive, and those patients had a mean age of 64 ± 17 years, and nearly one-third had a body mass index in the obese category (28.7%, n = 58). In addition, with every increase in the Charlson comorbidity index score by two points, there was a 40% increased risk of developing HTN (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.17-5.18; P = 0.017). The risk factors for the development of HTN and AF in HD patients were found to be increasing age for AF and female sex for HTN. The presence of HTN and diabetes increased the risk of developing AF seven-fold after HD.

Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease: Insights of Cardiologists and Nephrologists From India

Introduction Patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Diligent anticoagulant therapy that prevents major bleeding is essential for stroke prevention. There is a dearth of evidence and guidance on anticoagulation in this patient subset. Methods A validated questionnaire was sent to 500 physicians across India. Anonymized responses from 353 consenting physicians (275 cardiologists and 78 nephrologists) were analyzed. Results Most physicians opined that the risk of progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2-4 to ESRD was 1-5%, and that >10% of patients with ESRD had concomitant AF. Most physicians perceived that the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mortality was 30-40%, <15%, and >40% respectively in patients with concomitant AF and ESRD. The first critical goal for the management of these patients was 'reduction of thrombotic risk', followed by 'prevention of bleeding' and finally 'prevention of ESRD progression' (72.0%, 68.0%, and 67.1% participants, respectively). Most participating physicians (93.8%) preferred non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin for stroke prevention, and most of the participating physicians (94.9%) preferred an adjusted dose rather than the standard dose of the NOAC. Most of the responses were similar between cardiologists and nephrologists. Conclusion According to the survey response, patients with concomitant AF and ESRD have an increased risk of thrombosis, bleeding, and mortality. NOACs with dose adjustment are the preferred modality for stroke prevention among cardiologists and nephrologists in India, with the primary goal of preventing thrombotic events.

Role of Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Low-Risk Population Having Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Over the last few years, there has been a rising incidence of atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease cases. Stroke is the major complication seen in such patients. The combination of both diseases makes patient management more tedious. PubMed and Google Scholar underwent screening with keywords and a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) combination. The words were "atrial fibrillation," "chronic kidney disease/chronic renal insufficiency," "anticoagulation," "efficacy," and "left atrial appendage occlusion." Articles had screening and appraisal. With the English language as a filter, papers from 2002 to 2022 are part of this review. We reviewed studies including male patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease under 65 years to see their risk-benefit from anticoagulation. In addition, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is also compared. A total of eight articles are part of this systematic review. Age plays a more prominent role than gender regarding the impact of drugs on stroke prevention. LAAO also shows a better outcome than oral anticoagulation, provided people agree to undergo surgery. More studies must be done for this target population, especially comparing results with LAAO and oral anticoagulation.

The use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in dialysis patients-A systematic review

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for prevention of thromboembolic events, but their use in dialysis patients is debatable. This study investigated the available evidence for the use of NOACs in dialysis patients. Online databases were systematically searched for eligible studies including pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, cohort studies, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NOAC with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or no anticoagulant treatment. Newcastle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of bias tool were used for quality assessment. Twenty studies were identified (nine PK studies, two RCTs, and nine cohort studies). Most of the studies investigated apixaban or rivaroxaban. In dialysis patients, less accumulation was reported with apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to dabigatran and edoxaban. PK studies indicate that high dose apixaban or rivaroxaban should be avoided. The two RCTs (rivaroxaban/apixaban vs. VKA) were small and underpowered regarding stroke and bleeding outcomes. Most cohort studies found apixaban superior to VKA, whereas comparison of rivaroxaban with VKA yielded conflicting results. Cohort studies comparing apixaban high dose (5 mg) with low dose (2.5 mg) twice daily suggest a lower risk of stroke with high dose but also a higher risk of bleeding with high dose. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation was compared in one cohort study and did not lower the risk of stroke compared with non-treated regardless of apixaban dosage. Widespread use of NOACs in dialysis patients is limited by adequately sized RCTs. Available evidence suggests a potential for use of apixaban and rivaroxaban in reduced dose.

The impact on renal function after long-term use of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients

OBJECTIVE

Long-term oral anticoagulant should be considered or recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 1 for stroke prevention. Warfarin and different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are metabolized differently by the kidney. The impact on renal function after long-term use of anticoagulants in the patients with AF remains unclear. This study aimed to compare DOACs and warfarin's impact on the decline in renal function from a large cohort with AF.

METHODS

This study included patients with nonvalvular AF from 2000 to 2018, mainly through the medical history (ICD code) of the Chang Gung Research Database. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), follow-up eGFR and the change in eGFR between 2-year eGFR and baseline eGFR were compared between different DOACs and warfarin after propensity score matching. The primary study endpoint was acute kidney injury (AKI).

RESULTS

3657 patients were enrolled in this study and the mean observation time was 3.3 ± 0.9 years. During the observation period, there was a significantly higher incidence of AKI during follow-up in the warfarin group than in the different DOAC groups before and after propensity score matching (before: warfarin vs. DOAC: 9.2% vs. 5.2%, p <  0.001; after: warfarin vs. DOAC: 8.9% vs. 4.4%, p <  0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of AKI between dabigatran group and anti-factor Xa inhibitor group after propensity score matching. The incidence of AKI was similar among rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban groups after propensity score matching. The change in eGFR between 2-year eGFR and baseline eGFR did not differ between the warfarin and DOAC groups after propensity score matching (warfarin vs. DOAC: - 1.27 ± 20.32 vs. -1.94 ± 17.24 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.461).

CONCLUSIONS

During the mean observation time of 3.3 ± 0.9 years, warfarin was associated with a higher incidence of AKI compared with DOACs. The decline in renal function did not differ among warfarin and different DOAC groups.

Anticoagulation use and the risk of stroke and major bleeding in patients on hemodialysis: From the VIVALDI, a population-based prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting the use of anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke and thromboembolism in patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis (HD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. We prospectively assessed the incidences of stroke and major bleeding, as well as anticoagulation strategies in patients on HD with AF.

METHODS

We recruited 625 prevalent HD patients into a population-based observational cohort study. The primary prospective outcomes were thromboembolic events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism) and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included a composite of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and cardiovascular death to determine net clinical harm.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients (38.1%) had AF, 165 (26.4%) already at baseline and 73 (15.9%) developed AF during a median follow up of 870 days. Forty (6.4%) thromboembolic events and 89 (14.2%) major bleedings occurred. Overall, 256 patients died (41.0%). In AF patients, use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in 61 patients (25.6%) was not significantly associated with reduced risk of the primary thromboembolic outcome (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.41 adjusted for age, sex, congestive heart failure, hypertension, stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism, vascular disease, and diabetes history score and antiplatelet co-medication (95% CI, 0.49-4.07), but with increased risk of major bleeding (SHR: 2.28; 95% CI, 1.09-4.79) compared with AF patients without anticoagulation (N = 139, 58.4%). Use of VKAs was associated with net clinical harm (adjusted SHR: 2.07; 95% CI, 1.25-3.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the nonrandomized nature of the study is prone to bias, anticoagulation with VKAs was not associated with decreased thromboembolic risk, but rather with increased risk of major bleeding and may be net harmful to patients with AF on HD.

Anticoagulation in patients with kidney failure on dialysis: factor XI as a therapeutic target

Chronic kidney disease is present in almost 10% of the world population and is associated with excess mortality and morbidity. Reduced glomerular filtration rate and the presence and extent of proteinuria, key domains of chronic kidney disease, have both been shown to be strong and independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis are at highest risk for cardiovascular events (e.g., stroke or myocardial infarction), and of developing chronic cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure. Despite the high burden of cardiovascular disease, there is a paucity of evidence supporting therapies to reduce this risk. Although long-term anticoagulant treatment has the potential to prevent thromboembolism in persons with kidney failure on dialysis, this possibility remains understudied. The limited data available on anticoagulation in patients with kidney failure has focused on vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants that inhibit thrombin or factor (F) Xa. The risk of bleeding is a major concern with these agents. However, FXI is emerging as a potential safer target for new anticoagulants because FXI plays a greater part in thrombosis than in hemostasis. In this article, we (i) explain the rationale for considering anticoagulation therapy in patients with kidney failure to reduce atherothrombotic events, (ii) highlight the limitations of current anticoagulants in this patient population, (iii) explain the potential benefits of FXI inhibitors, and (iv) summarize ongoing studies investigating FXI inhibition in patients with kidney failure on dialysis.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of pulmonary embolism in patients with renal impairment

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with adverse outcomes and substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients with PE often have renal impairment because of shared risk factors and close links between the renal and cardiovascular systems. Furthermore, patients with PE and renal impairment are at increased risk of recurrent thrombosis. Therefore, anticoagulation is crucial to treat the acute event, prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and optimize patient outcomes. However, when treated with an anticoagulant, patients with renal impairment also have an elevated risk of bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first-choice treatment for acute VTE in eligible patients. However, as all DOACs have a degree of renal excretion, the management of anticoagulation therapy can be more complicated in patients with renal impairment. This review provides an overview of the clinical challenges of managing anticoagulation in patients with PE and renal impairment and explores the optimal practice management of this special patient group.

Apixaban anti-Xa level monitoring in treatment of acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis for patient on chronic hemodialysis: a case report

Background

Patients on dialysis are at higher risk of major bleeding and recurrent thrombosis creating acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment challenges. DOACs represent an interesting option but there are concerns of bioaccumulation and increased bleeding risk. Anti-Xa trough levels may be used to monitor for bioaccumulation but there is little data.

Case presentation

We describe a case, a 51 yo female, 36 kg on hemodialysis with a provoked acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in whom body habitus and calciphylaxis contraindicated the use of standard therapy. She received apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. The apixaban anti-Xa trough levels were measured weekly 12 h after the morning dose and ranged from 58 to 84 ng/mL, similar to expected levels with normal renal function. There were no adverse events in the 3 months follow-up.

Conclusions

We saw no evidence of bioaccumulation indicating a potential role for low dose apixaban for acute VTE in dialysis patients.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: Practical Considerations and Remaining Issues

Preventing thromboembolic events, while minimizing bleeding risks, remains challenging when managing patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite large and successful trial programs, several clinical concerns remain which commonly relate to fears of over- or underexposure to drugs and unfavorable outcomes. After a short summary of the main phase III trial findings, this short review discusses the evidence and clinical relevance of common clinical concerns (correct direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC] dosing; DOAC in moderate-to-severe renal impairment; and the relevance of fasting, nasogastric tube feeding, or high body mass index) on DOAC plasma levels. Finally, the need for specific DOAC antidotes will be addressed.

The Prevalence and Independent Risk Factors of Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation Jets in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients With ESRD

Background and Aim

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a frequent complication in various cardiovascular diseases. However, few studies have reported the prevalence of TR especially the moderate to severe or significant TR (ms-TR) maintenance dialysis patients. Thus, we aimed to identify the prevalence of ms-TR and its associated factors.

Methods

A total of 491 maintenance dialysis patients underwent echocardiographic examinations, while a subgroup (n = 283) also received routine blood tests, renal function examinations, and electrolyte analysis. We first compared the differences in abovementioned parameters among groups with various TR areas (TRAs). Finally, univariate and adjusted regression were also used to identify factors that were independently associated with ms-TR.

Results

The incidence of TR jets was 62.6%, which included a mildly increased TRA (47.8%), moderately increased TRA (10.4%), and severely increased TRA (3.5%). Most of the cardiac structures and functional parameters, such as the end-diastolic internal diameters of the left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LVDD), right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and fractional shortening (FS), were significantly associated with ms-TR. Among serum ions, only total CO₂ (TCO₂; r = −0.141, p = 0.047) was negatively correlated with TRA. After adjusted, only Na⁺ [odds ratio (OR): 0.871 0.888, p = 0.048], RA (OR: 1.370, p < 0.001), and FS (OR: 0.887, p < 0.001) were independently associated with ms-TR.

Conclusion

Tricuspid regurgitation occurs in maintenance hemodialysis patients with ESRD. Na⁺ FS and RA were independently associated with ms-TR, and these parameters may be potential risk factors/predictors for ms-TR.

Ten years of non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: is warfarin obsolete?

Currently, four non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are available for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). These have been in clinical use for up to 10 years now. Besides data of the initial phase III clinical trials, now clinical data, several sub-studies, meta-analyses, and studies in special clinical settings and specific patient populations are available. This review shall give an overview on the history of NOAC development, sum up study data and ‘real-world’ clinical data as well as discuss several special clinical settings like NOAC treatment in patients that require coronary artery stenting or cardioversion (CV). Furthermore, treatment considerations in special patient populations like patients with renal impairment, obesity, or patients requiring NOACs for secondary prevention are discussed. The significance of NOAC treatment will be discussed under consideration of the recently published 2020 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF.

Systematic DOACs oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: the nephrologist's perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and also associated with unfavorable outcome. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstep of management in such patients, aimed at reducing the high risk of systemic thromboembolism and especially of ischemic stroke, which is reportedly associated with increased mortality in CKD patients. Even though new direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) proved to be effective in patients with non valvular chronic AF, and are therefore recommended by recent guidelines for their treatment, warfarin is currently used in more than one-half of subjects needing oral anticoagulation, and only 30% of them are converted from a vitamin K antagonist- to a DOAC-based regimen. The main reason for not prescribing DOACs is often a reduction in renal function, even if mild. Aim of this review was therefore to evaluate the impact of DOAC therapy in the setting of CKD, from a nephrological perspective, by comparing available evidence on the role of DOACs in patients with CKD and AF with that emerging from traditional warfarin-based therapy. Both the pathogenesis of AF in CKD, and available findings of renal, cardiovascular and bone effects of DOACs in CKD are discussed, leading to the conclusion that DOAC therapy should be considered as the first line therapy for non valvular AF in patients with mild and moderate reduction of renal function, and could also be adopted for patients with severe CKD not on hemodialysis treatment, whereas there is insufficient evidence for ESRD patients on dialysis.

Therapeutic strategies for thrombosis: new targets and approaches

Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants are a mainstay for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. However, despite advances in antithrombotic therapy, a fundamental challenge is the side effect of bleeding. Improved understanding of the mechanisms of haemostasis and thrombosis has revealed new targets for attenuating thrombosis with the potential for less bleeding, including glycoprotein VI on platelets and factor XIa of the coagulation system. The efficacy and safety of new agents are currently being evaluated in phase III trials. This Review provides an overview of haemostasis and thrombosis, details the current landscape of antithrombotic agents, addresses challenges with preventing thromboembolic events in patients at high risk and describes the emerging therapeutic strategies that may break the inexorable link between antithrombotic therapy and bleeding risk.

Triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of stroke, recurrent coronary ischemic events, and cardiovascular mortality. The composition of antithrombotic therapy including an oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug(s) should be tailored according to the individual patient's risk profile, to reduce the bleeding risk and maintain antithrombotic effect. There is no single antithrombotic treatment regimen that would fit to all patients with AF and ACS. However, available data promote the use of full-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (dabigatran 150 mg twice daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily in patients with AF and ACS or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). For many patients, a DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor early after ACS and/or PCI would be optimal, whereas a longer course of triple therapy should be used in patients at high thrombotic risk.