Clinical significance of subsegmental pulmonary embolism: An ongoing controversy

Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism

Subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) is increasingly diagnosed with the growing use and technological advancements of multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Its diagnosis is challenging, and some presumed SSPE may actually represent imaging artifacts. Indirect evidence and results from small observational studies suggest that SSPE may be more benign than more proximal pulmonary embolism, and may thus not always require treatment. Therefore, guidelines suggest to consider a management strategy without anticoagulation in selected patients with SSPE at low risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), in whom proximal deep vein thrombosis is excluded. Recently, a large prospective study among low-risk patients with SSPE who were left untreated showed a higher VTE recurrence risk than initially deemed acceptable by the investigators, and thus was prematurely interrupted after recruitment of 97% of the target population. However, the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation for low-risk patients with SSPE remains unclear, and results from randomized trials are needed to answer the question about their optimal management.

Risk for Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism Managed Without Anticoagulation : A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pulmonary embolism has been increasing, but its case-fatality rate is decreasing, suggesting a lesser severity of illness. The clinical importance of patients with pulmonary embolism isolated to the subsegmental vessels is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with subsegmental pulmonary embolism managed without anticoagulation.

DESIGN

Multicenter prospective cohort study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01455818).

SETTING

Eighteen sites between February 2011 and February 2021.

PATIENTS

Patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism.

INTERVENTION

At diagnosis, patients underwent bilateral lower-extremity venous ultrasonography, which was repeated 1 week later if results were negative. Patients without deep venous thrombosis did not receive anticoagulant therapy.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was recurrent venous thromboembolism during the 90-day follow-up period.

RESULTS

Recruitment was stopped prematurely because the predefined stopping rule was met after 292 of a projected 300 patients were enrolled. Of the 266 patients included in the primary analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 8 patients, for a cumulative incidence of 3.1% (95% CI, 1.6% to 6.1%) over the 90-day follow-up. The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism was 2.1% (CI, 0.8% to 5.5%) and 5.7% (CI, 2.2% to 14.4%) over the 90-day follow-up in patients with single and multiple isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism, respectively. No patients had a fatal recurrent pulmonary embolism.

LIMITATION

The study was restricted to patients with low-risk subsegmental pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients with subsegmental pulmonary embolism who did not have proximal deep venous thrombosis had a higher-than-expected rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and French Ministry of Health Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.

Challenges in Managing Isolated Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism

This commentary explores the clinical conundrums arising when caring for patients with acute pulmonary embolism isolated to the subsegmental pulmonary arteries. We discuss ways to confirm the radiologic diagnosis, how to distinguish patients for whom anticoagulation is indicated from those who are eligible for structured surveillance without anticoagulation, what surveillance entails, and why ensuring continuity of care matters. We report a case from our own experience that illustrates these decision-making crossroads and highlights the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. Because the evidence in the literature is currently weak and indirect, we draw on expert opinion in US and European guidelines, a recent statement from a multidisciplinary consensus panel, and several ongoing well-designed clinical trials. This discussion will help clinicians better manage the spectrum of patients who present with isolated subsegmental embolism.

Ventilation-Perfusion Scan: A Primer for Practicing Radiologists

Lung scintigraphy, or ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan, is one of the commonly performed studies in nuclear medicine. Owing to variability in clinical applications and different departmental workflows, many trainees are not comfortable interpreting the results of this study. This article provides a simplified overview of V/Q imaging, including a review of its technique, interpretation methods, and established and emerging clinical applications. The authors review the role of V/Q imaging in evaluation of acute and chronic pulmonary embolism, including the role of SPECT/CT and comparing V/Q scan with CT angiography. In addition, a variety of other applications of pulmonary scintigraphy are discussed, including congenital heart disease, pretreatment planning for lung cancer and emphysema, posttransplant imaging for bronchiolitis obliterans, and less common vascular and nonvascular pathologic conditions that may be detected with V/Q scan. This article will help radiologists and residents interpret the results of V/Q scans and understand the various potential clinical applications of this study. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.