The impact of extended half-life factor concentrates on patient reported health outcome measures in persons with hemophilia A and hemophilia B

Adherence and Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B and Von Willebrand Disease: A National Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

New treatments for patients with bleeding disorders (PWB) have emerged, including products with extended half-life and subcutaneous administration. These less frequent treatments can potentially enhance quality of life (QoL), but adherence becomes critically important.

AIM

To investigate adherence and QoL among PWB and explore the correlation between treatment adherence and QoL in adult patients with haemophilia A (HA), haemophilia B (HB) and Von Willebrand disease (vWD) in Denmark.

METHOD

This survey used disease-specific patient-reported questionnaires: Veritas-PRO and Veritas-PRN to measure adherence, and Haemo-A-QoL and VWD-QoL to assess QoL.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 149 patients with HA, 32 with HB and 118 with vWD. Adherence was reported by 87.1% of patients on prophylaxis and 71.2% of patients treated on demand, according to Veritas-PRO and Veritas-PRN cut-off scores. High QoL was generally reported, decreasing with age in HA and HB, but not in vWD.

CONCLUSION

Danish patients with HA, HB and vWD reported high QoL and high adherence to prescribed treatments. There was no correlation between treatment adherence and QoL among the different patient groups. These findings highlight the need for further research to better understand adherence behaviours and identify opportunities to further improve QoL in PWB.

Real-World Amount of Clotting Factor Products and Non-Factor Products Dispensed and Annual Medical Expenditures for Japanese Patients with Haemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Treatment for haemophilia A has expanded from plasma-derived factor VIII (pdFVIII) and standard half-life (SHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) to extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII and non-factor products that mimic FVIII activity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine amounts of clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) and emicizumab dispensed and associated healthcare expenditures in Japanese patients with haemophilia A.

METHODS

This retrospective, non-interventional, observational study analysed data from 2016 to 2020 from a large-scale, hospital-based administrative database. Patients had haemophilia A without inhibitors and ≥ 2 prescriptions of the same CFC or emicizumab.

RESULTS

In total, 974 patients with haemophilia A (median age, 30.0 years; median follow-up, 3.7 years) were included. Outpatient use of EHL rFVIII and emicizumab increased, although pdFVIII/SHL rFVIII were still used over the study. Median annual total healthcare expenditures/patient increased from ¥9,200,230 in 2016 to ¥19,748,221 in 2020. Overall, the median annual drug expenditure/patient increased from ¥8,723,120 in 2016 to ¥18,051,689 in 2020. Drug expenditure was highest with emicizumab, with an increase in median annual expenditure/patient from 2018 (n = 4, ¥26,030,206) to 2020 (n = 107, ¥45,430,408). Overall, 233 patients (23.9%) switched from an SHL to an EHL product. Although amounts of FVIII prescribed increased in the 3 months after switching, overall, there was no noticeable difference before and after switching. Median total healthcare and FVIII product expenditures increased following switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing of EHL products increased over the study and healthcare expenditures increased for patients who switched from SHL to EHL rFVIII products.

Long-term efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis improves perceived pain, mental, and physical health in patients with hemophilia A: post hoc analysis of phase III trials using patient-reported outcomes

Background

Hemophilia-associated bleeding and resultant joint pain and mobility restrictions can predispose patients to poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, efficacy of a treatment needs to address more than just annualized bleed rates.

Objectives

Describe the evolution of HRQoL, pain, and activity in patients with hemophilia A, treated with efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis.

Design

A post hoc analysis from Kids A-LONG (NCT01458106), A-LONG (NCT01181128), and long-term extension study ASPIRE (NCT01454739) assessed change in pain and activity-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

Physical health, pain, and HRQoL were assessed by PROs for a cumulative treatment duration of up to ~6 years. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in EuroQoL (EQ)-5D and Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire (Haem-A-QoL).

Results

118 adult/adolescents and 71 pediatric patients were included. The proportion of adults and adolescents reporting no problem in the EQ-5D analysis of 'pain/discomfort' significantly increased from A-LONG baseline (35.04%; 41/117) to ASPIRE month 30 (44.68%; 21/47; p = 0.024). Mean (standard deviation) Haem-A-QoL subdomain scores for 'feeling' and 'physical health' at A-LONG baseline improved by -3.24 (15.13; p = 0.018) and -3.85 (23.07; p = 0.047), respectively, at study end. Proportion of pediatric patients reporting no problem on the EQ-5D analysis of 'pain/discomfort', significantly increased from A-LONG baseline (75.0%; 42/56) to ASPIRE baseline (95.56%; 43/45; p = 0.046). Satisfaction levels for pediatric patients were high at A-LONG baseline and maintained until study end.

Conclusion

Long-term efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis reduces pain and improves HRQoL in adult and adolescent patients with hemophilia A. In pediatric patients, it reduces perceived pain and maintains satisfaction levels.

Trial registration

NCT01458106, NCT01181128, NCT01454739.

Reduced Volume and Faster Infusion Rate of Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: A Phase 3b/4 Trial in Adults with Hemophilia A with Inhibitors

Background  Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) is indicated for bleed treatment and prevention in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors. The safety and tolerability of intravenous aPCC at a reduced volume and faster infusion rates were evaluated. Methods  This multicenter, open-label trial (NCT02764489) enrolled adults with hemophilia A with inhibitors. In part 1, patients were randomized to receive three infusions of aPCC (85 ± 15 U/kg) at 2 U/kg/min (the approved standard rate at the time of the study), in a regular or 50% reduced volume, and were then crossed over to receive three infusions in the alternative volume. In part 2, patients received three sequential infusions of aPCC in a 50% reduced volume at 4 U/kg/min and then at 10 U/kg/min. Primary outcome measures included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), allergic-type hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs), infusion-site reactions (ISRs), and thromboembolic events. Results  Of the 45 patients enrolled, 33 received aPCC in part 1 and 30 in part 2. In part 1, 24.2 and 23.3% of patients with regular and reduced volumes experienced AEs, respectively; 11 AEs in eight patients were treatment related. AHRs and ISRs occurred in four (12.1%) and two (6.1%) patients, respectively. In part 2, 3.3 and 14.3% of patients with infusion rates of 4 and 10 U/kg/min experienced AEs, respectively; only one AE in one patient was treatment related; no AHRs or ISRs were reported. Most AEs were mild/moderate in severity. Overall, no thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusions  aPCC was well tolerated at a reduced volume and faster infusion rates, with safety profiles comparable to the approved regimen.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

The Evolution of Hemophilia Therapeutics: An Illustrated Review

Hemophilia is a rare genetic bleeding disorder historically associated with high morbidity and mortality. Some individuals with hemophilia suffer associated chronic joint disease, chronic pain, and other physical and mental health challenges. In the last 50 years, a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease has resulted in extraordinary therapeutic advances leading to enhanced quality of life and increased life expectancy. We present an illustrated review of the evolution of hemophilia treatment from the development of non-factor therapies to gene therapy.

Improvement in pain-related quality of life in patients with hemophilia A treated with rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis: post hoc analysis from the A-LONG study

Background:

Pain, a common symptom of hemophilia, begins early in life primarily due to joint bleeding. Recurrent bleeding adversely affects patients’ pain-related physical functioning, which can negatively impact their quality of life (QoL).

Objective:

Post hoc analysis of data from the A-LONG study (NCT01181128), to assess change over time in pain-related QoL in patients with severe hemophilia A treated prophylactically with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc).

Methods:

Patients who completed Haem-A-QoL (17–65 years) and EQ-5D-3L (⩾12–65 years) questionnaires at baseline (BL) and end of study (EoS). Individual-level changes were assessed using three pain-related items of the Haem-A-QoL ‘Physical Health’ domain and the pain/discomfort item of EQ-5D-3L. Distributions of responses (EoS versus BL) were compared using McNemar’s test.

Results:

A significantly greater proportion of patients reported they did not experience painful swellings ( n = 87; 66% versus 46%, p <  0.01) or pain in their joints ( n = 89; 42% versus 27%; p <  0.05) at EoS versus BL. The proportion of patients who did not find it painful to move numerically increased at EoS versus BL ( n = 86; 47% versus 38%; p = NS). A significantly greater proportion of patients reported no pain/discomfort at EoS versus BL ( n = 116; 45% versus 34%; p <  0.05).

Conclusion:

This study reports the effect of FVIII prophylaxis on patient-reported measures of pain over time in patients with severe hemophilia A. The results of this post hoc analysis showed improvements in pain from BL to EoS in patients receiving rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis indicating effective pain management, a key component of patient care.