The lived experience of women with a bleeding disorder: A systematic review

Proactive systematic hemophilia carrier screening: a step toward gender equity in hemophilia care

ABSTRACT

Despite numerous efforts to raise awareness, many hemophilia carriers and female persons with hemophilia (PWHs) remain undiagnosed. Between May 2021 and April 2023, we identified potential and obligate carriers of hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB) by updating pedigrees of all PWHs followed at the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels. Retrospective data on previously screened females were collected, including bleeding history, coagulation factor levels, and testing for the proband's pathogenic variant. In addition, a proactive approach involved sending 125 invitation letters to unscreened or incompletely screened individuals, through related PWHs. In pedigrees of 287 male PWHs (226 HA and 61 HB) and 7 female index patients from 236 families (184 HA and 52 HB), a total of 900 female individuals were identified. Of those, 454 were obligate and/or genetically proven carriers, and 118 were noncarriers. Genetic testing was conducted in 133 obligate, 237 potential, and 4 sporadic carriers, with 190 obligate and 328 potential carriers remaining untested. Among carriers with known factor levels (261/454), 42 HA (23.0%) and 23 HB carriers (29.5%) had a factor level <40 IU/dL. Carriers with a factor deficiency were screened on average 6 years earlier than other females (P = .034). This study, to our knowledge, represents the first systematic effort to identify potential carriers among families of all PWHs within a single center, emphasizing the challenges in comprehensive screening for female individuals genetically linked to one or more PWHs. Such initiatives are vital for achieving equitable access to hemophilia care for all potentially affected individuals, irrespective of gender. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT05217992.

Differences and similarities in patient-reported outcomes among men and women with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Both men and women can be diagnosed with haemophilia and the experience with haemophilia may be different between men and women.

AIM

This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes in men versus women with haemophilia.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study is a post-hoc analysis of data collected as part of the Haemophilia-related Distress Questionnaire validation study. Adults aged ≥18 years with haemophilia A or B were recruited from one of two haemophilia treatment centres between July 2017 and December 2019. Outcomes included quality of life, measures of mental and physical health, and overall health. Unadjusted and multivariable linear regression models were used to examine potential mediators of sex-based differences in outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 139 study participants included (21 women, 118 men), the mean age was 36.9 years and most (89.2%) had haemophilia A. Approximately 85.7% and 26.3% of women and men had mild haemophilia, respectively.  PHQ-9 depression and PROMIS-29 Profile anxiety and fatigue scores were significantly higher in women than men in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. There were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with haemophilia are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and fatigue than men with haemophilia. This study highlights the need for mental health services to be integrated into the care of women with haemophilia. Future research is needed to understand whether women with haemophilia are more or less likely to experience depression, anxiety, and fatigue than women without haemophilia as well as determine the impact of reduced mental health on clinical outcomes.

Gender equity in hemophilia: need for healthcare, familial, and societal advocacy

Hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder caused by a genetic defect on chromosome X. It is inherited as an X-linked trait, and hence, it is more frequently diagnosed in males, whereas women have been traditionally considered only as carriers of the disease. However, the role of women in families of patients with hemophilia is pivotal. As mothers, sisters, daughters, and female partners of patients with hemophilia, they play a central role in the management of the patient, considering healthcare, social, and familial aspects, but they might be affected by the disease as well, particularly in regions where consanguinity is frequent. This paper aims to explore the involvement of women in hemophilia, including their carrier status, bleeding symptoms, treatment challenges, and psychosocial impact not only related to male patients, but also as patients affected with hemophilia themselves. We advocate health equity, equal access to healthcare for men and women with hemophilia and dedicated resources to improve the unique needs of the women dealing with hemophilia, ultimately leading to improved care and quality of life.

New and emerging therapies for women, girls, and people with the potential to menstruate with VWD

Innovation in therapies for patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) has lagged far behind that for hemophilia, creating inequity in the bleeding disorder community. Although currently existing treatments of antifibrinolytics, desmopressin, and plasma-derived von Willebrand factor replacement are considered effective, multiple studies report poor quality of life in patients with VWD, especially those with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). This disconnect underscores the need for novel therapies that are safe and effective and that consider a patient's specific contraceptive and reproductive needs. Recombinant von Willebrand factor is the most recent new therapy for VWD; the data specific to women are reviewed. We also present emerging data on emicizumab for the treatment of VWD, BT200 (rondoraptivon pegol), generalized hemostatic therapies (VGA039 and HMB-011), as well as treatments based on nanotechnology (platelet-inspired nanoparticles and KB-V13A12). We are optimistic as we move toward pivotal clinical trials for these elegant and innovative treatments.

Patient-centered care in von Willebrand disease: are we there yet?

INTRODUCTION

Von Willebrand Disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Paradoxically, affected individuals are often misdiagnosed and experience substantial diagnostic delay. There are sex-specific health disparities in VWD rooted in the stigmatization of vaginal bleeding, which leads to symptom dismissal, lack of timely access to care and lower health-related quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Following the core elements of patient-centered care - respect for patient preferences, values, and needs, we describe the current state of VWD care. Challenges of diagnostic delay, serial misrecognition of abnormal bleeding, and symptom dismissal are barriers that disproportionately affect women with VWD. These negative effects are further amplified in individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We describe the importance of coordinated multidisciplinary care, as well as the need for patient education and empowered self-advocacy.

EXPERT OPINION

While tremendous work has been done to improve the diagnosis and management of VWD, timely and high-quality research is urgently needed to address care gaps. Systemic changes such as resource investment, dedicated research funding for novel treatment modalities, and effective knowledge translation strategies to address structural barriers are needed to facilitate effective patient-centered care for VWD.

An expert consensus to define how higher standards of equitable care for von Willebrand disease can be achieved in the UK and Republic of Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. However, recognition of the disease by both the public and healthcare professionals lags behind that of other bleeding disorders, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment for patients. Updated national guidelines are needed to highlight an appropriate pathway for managing VWD patients in a timelier manner.

AIM

To identify ways in which care for VWD can be achieved on a more equitable basis.

METHODS

Using a modified Delphi approach, a panel of VWD experts developed 29 statements across five key themes. These were used to form an online survey that was distributed to healthcare professionals involved in VWD care across the UK and Republic of Ireland (ROI). Stopping criteria comprised 50 responses received, a 3-month window for response (February-April 2022) and 90% of statements passing consensus threshold. Threshold for consensus for each statement was agreed at 75%.

RESULTS

A total of 66 responses were analysed with 29/29 statements achieving consensus of which 27 attained ≥90% agreement. From the high degree of consensus, eight recommendations were derived regarding how detection and management of VWD can be improved to provide equity of care between men and women.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of these eight recommendations across the VWD pathway has the potential to raise the standard of care for patients in the UK and ROI by reducing delays to diagnosis and treatment initiation.

What have we learned about the patient's experience of von Willebrand disease? A focus on women

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder (IBD), disproportionately affects females, given the hemostatic challenges they may encounter throughout their lifetimes. Despite this, research about VWD remains grossly underrepresented, particularly compared to hemophilia, which is historically diagnosed in males. Structural sexism, stigmatization of menstrual bleeding, delayed diagnosis, and a lack of timely access to care result in an increased frequency of bleeding events, iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and a decreased quality of life. However, we are only beginning to recognize and acknowledge the magnitude of the burden of this disease. With an increasing number of studies documenting the experiences of women with IBDs and recent international guidelines suggesting changes to optimal management, a paradigm shift in recognition and treatment is taking place. Here, we present a fictional patient case to illustrate one woman's history of bleeding. We review the evidence describing the impact of VWD on quality of life, normalization of vaginal bleeding, diagnostic delays, and the importance of access to multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, we discuss considerations around reproductive decision-making and the intergenerational nature of bleeding, which often renders patients as caregivers. Through incorporating the patient perspective, we argue for an equitable and compassionate path to overcome decades of silence, misrecognition, and dismissal. This path moves toward destigmatization, open dialogue, and timely access to specialized care.