Managing surgery in hemophilia with recombinant factor VIII Fc and factor IX Fc: Data on safety and effectiveness from phase 3 pivotal studies

Invasive procedures and surgery following etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy in people with hemophilia B

BACKGROUND

Little information regarding the management of invasive procedures in people with hemophilia B (HB) after undergoing gene therapy is available. Here, we report the management of invasive procedures in people with severe or moderately severe HB who had previously been treated with etranacogene dezaparvovec in the phase 2b and phase 3 Health Outcomes with Padua Gene; Evaluation in Hemophilia B clinical trials (NCT03489291 and NCT03569891).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to describe the use of exogenous FIX, endogenous FIX activity prior to invasive procedures, and peri- and postoperative bleeds in participants who underwent invasive procedures after receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included invasive procedures performed within 3 and 2 years following a single infusion of 2 × 1013 gc/kg of etranacogene dezaparvovec in participants in the phase 2b and Health Outcomes with Padua Gene; Evaluation in Hemophilia B trials, respectively. Data for factor (F)IX dosing, duration of postoperative FIX use, FIX activity prior to invasive procedures, and postoperative bleeds were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 64 procedures in 29 participants: 9 major surgeries, 24 minor surgeries, 11 endoscopies, 3 endoscopies with biopsy/polypectomy, and 17 dental procedures. Uncontaminated endogenous FIX activity corresponded to mild hemophilia or normal levels prior to 98% of all procedures, with a median endogenous FIX activity of 43.8 IU/dL (range, 3.1-113 IU/dL). All major surgeries were managed with exogenous FIX, 67% with ≤4 days of FIX infusion. Most minor surgeries (88%), endoscopies (82%), and dental procedures (94%) were managed with no or a single FIX infusion. Postoperative bleeds occurred after 1 minor surgery and 4 dental procedures. There were no symptomatic thrombotic events or FIX inhibitor developments.

CONCLUSION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec has the potential to facilitate perioperative management in people with HB by reducing the need for perioperative exogenous FIX and its associated risks.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

Rates of venous thromboembolism and use of thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery in patients with congenital hemophilia A or B: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized complication after total joint replacement (TJR). Persons with hemophilia A or B are considered at low postoperative VTE risk due to their coagulation factor deficiencies, and administering pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is often considered contraindicated. However, using factor replacement therapy could increase the postoperative VTE risk.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze best available evidences of VTE rates in persons with hemophilia A or B undergoing lower limb TJR and the use of postoperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

We systematically screened 4 online biomedical databases to identify studies reporting VTE rates in patients with hemophilia after TJR. Case reports and case series with less than 10 patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-six observational studies were included in this systematic review, reporting 1181 TJRs in patients with hemophilia A or B. Eight studies had VTE rates as the primary outcome. Five studies reported screen-detected VTE, while 21 reported symptomatic VTE events. Overall, 17 VTE events were reported (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.9%-2.3%), including 10 (6.6%) after 151 surgeries with postoperative VTE screening and 7 (0.7%) after 1080 surgeries without postoperative screening. Thromboprophylaxis protocols were specified in 21 studies; postoperative thromboprophylaxis was used in 15 (1.3%) surgeries. This information was not available for 29.0% of the analyzed population.

CONCLUSION

Despite the low thromboprophylaxis use in patients with hemophilia, rates of symptomatic VTE after TJR appeared to be low. We also highlighted the need to better report the thrombotic outcome in persons with hemophilia to face the ongoing changes in the hemophilia landscape.

Comparison of one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII assays to tailor the dose of recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, efmoroctocog alfa) in adult patients with haemophilia A: Single-centre, real-world experience of surgery

BACKGROUND

Efmoroctocog alfa (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life FVIII used notably in surgery for patients with haemophilia A. More information is needed of its usage in real-life.

METHODS

Adult patients with HA followed at the Lyon Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center who underwent a surgery with rFVIIIFc were included in this retrospective analysis. The pharmacokinetics of rFVIIIFc was assessed by plasma factor VIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) using both one-stage (OSA) and chromogenic substrate (CSA) assays.

RESULTS

A total of 39 major and 31 minor surgeries were performed in 49 patients treated with rFVIIIFc. The median dose of rFVIIIFc infused before major and minor surgeries respectively was 67.5 ((interquartile range [IQR] 52.6-76.9) and 48.0 (38.5-51.8) IU/kg. For major surgeries, during the first postoperative week, the median residual FVIII:C was 78 (64.5-101.5) IU/dL with OSA and 99 (71-118) IU/dL with CSA (p < .0001). After surgery, rFVIIIFc doses were adjusted according to CSA results. This led to a significant decrease of rFVIIIFc consumption compared to what would have been proposed according to the OSA assay, without unusual bleeding or appearance of inhibitor. Considering the high price of the molecule, this was also associated with a significant cost reduction.

CONCLUSION

Dose adjustment of rFVIIIFc according to FVIII: C measured by CSA is effective, safe and well tolerated in patients with haemophilia A undergoing invasive surgery.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for major surgery in hemophilia B: factor IX plasma activity levels and effective hemostasis

Background

Major surgical procedures are associated with significant bleeding risk and infectious complications in patients with hemophilia, which may be minimized by factor replacement. Monitoring perioperative factor levels guides dosing to maintain adequate levels for hemostatic control.

Objectives

We report prospectively collected post hoc surgical data in patients with hemophilia B who underwent major surgery with extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in phase 3 studies (B-LONG/Kids B-LONG and B-YOND).

Methods

Achieved FIX plasma levels were described for those who underwent major surgeries with ≥1 peak and/or predose FIX assessment available on the day of surgery (Day 0 [D0]) from the central laboratory. Dosing, injection frequency, adverse events, and hemostatic responses were assessed. Two representative cases were described further including blood loss, transfusions, and concomitant medication assessment.

Results

Of 35 major surgeries, 17 (N = 16 subjects) with sufficient FIX measurements were included in this analysis; 13 of 17 surgeries were orthopedic. On D0, a median loading (preoperative) dose of 101.1 International Units (IU)/kg/injection achieved a median peak FIX of 103.3 IU/dL. Across postoperative Days 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 14, the median predose levels were 75.1 IU/dL with 1 injection/d, 71.6 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, and 43.2 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, respectively. Hemostasis was rated excellent (14 of 16) or good (2 of 16) across surgeries. Both case studies (knee arthroscopy and ankle fusion) illustrate measured FIX levels with rFIXFc.

Conclusion

The aggregate analysis and representative cases of major surgeries demonstrate that rFIXFc can achieve FIX levels for effective hemostasis during invasive high-risk procedures.

Eftrenonacog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia B

Eftrenonacog alfa (Alprolix^®) is an extended half-life recombinant factor IX (rFIX)-Fc fusion protein (hereafter referred to as rFIXFc). Administered as an intravenous bolus, it is approved for prophylactic use and the treatment of bleeding in patients with haemophilia B in various countries worldwide, including those of the EU, as well as the USA. In multinational, phase III trials, rFIXFc was effective for the prophylaxis, perioperative management or on-demand treatment of bleeding in male patients with severe haemophilia B regardless of age and irrespective of whether or not they had been previously treated with FIX replacement products. Prophylactic efficacy was maintained over the longer term (up to 5 years) in previously treated patients. rFIXFc effectiveness in the real-world setting is supported by results of prospective studies, as well as the outcomes of several retrospective trials. rFIXFc was well tolerated in clinical trials in previously treated and untreated children, adolescents and/or adults with severe haemophilia B. Thus, rFIXFc continues to represent a useful treatment option among the haemophilia B patient population.