Proportional rates model for recurrent event data with intermittent gaps and a terminal event

Recurrent events are common in medical practice or epidemiologic studies when each subject experiences a particular event repeatedly over time. In some long-term observations of recurrent events, a terminal event such as death may exist in recurrent event data. Meanwhile, some inspected subjects will withdraw from a study for some time for various reasons and then resume, which may happen more than once. The period between the subject leaving and returning to the study is called an intermittent gap. One naive method typically ignores gaps and treats the events as usual recurrent events, which could result in misleading estimation results. In this article, we consider a semiparametric proportional rates model for recurrent event data with intermittent gaps and a terminal event. An estimation procedure is developed for the model parameters, and the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators are established. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed estimators perform satisfactorily compared to the naive method that ignores gaps. A diabetes study further shows the utility of the proposed method.

Evaluating dynamic and predictive discrimination for recurrent event models: use of a time-dependent C-index

Interest in analyzing recurrent event data has increased over the past few decades. One essential aspect of a risk prediction model for recurrent event data is to accurately distinguish individuals with different risks of developing a recurrent event. Although the concordance index (C-index) effectively evaluates the overall discriminative ability of a regression model for recurrent event data, a local measure is also desirable to capture dynamic performance of the regression model over time. Therefore, in this study, we propose a time-dependent C-index measure for inferring the model's discriminative ability locally. We formulated the C-index as a function of time using a flexible parametric model and constructed a concordance-based likelihood for estimation and inference. We adapted a perturbation-resampling procedure for variance estimation. Extensive simulations were conducted to investigate the proposed time-dependent C-index's finite-sample performance and estimation procedure. We applied the time-dependent C-index to three regression models of a study of re-hospitalization in patients with colorectal cancer to evaluate the models' discriminative capability.

Evaluating response-adaptive randomization procedures for recurrent events and terminal event data using a composite endpoint

Recurrent event and terminal event data commonly arise in clinical and observational studies. To evaluate the efficacy of a treatment effect for both types of events, a composite endpoint has been used as a possible assessment, particularly when faced with high costs and a longer follow-up study. To model recurrent event processes complicated by the existence of a terminal event, joint frailty modeling has been typically employed. In this study, the objective was to develop some target-driven response adaptive randomization strategies using a composite endpoint based on joint frailty modeling. We first implemented a balanced randomized design and then investigated the response adaptive randomization. The former is intuitively first adopted while the latter is expected to be desirable and ethical in terms of allocating more subjects to the more effective treatment. The results show that the proposed procedures using a composite endpoint are capable of reducing the number of trial participants who receive inferior treatment while simultaneously reaching a desired optimal target as compared to a balanced randomized design. The R shiny application for calculating the sample size and allocation probabilities is also available. Finally, two clinical trials were used as pilot datasets to introduce the proposed procedures.

Response-adaptive treatment allocation for clinical studies with recurrent event and terminal event data

In long-term clinical studies, recurrent event data are frequently collected to contrast the efficacy of two different treatments. However, the recurrent event process can be stopped by a terminal event, such as death. For analyzing recurrent event and terminal event data, joint frailty modeling has recently received considerable attention because it makes it possible to study the joint evolution over time of both recurrent and terminal event processes and gives consistent and efficient parameters. For a two-arm clinical trial design based on these data sets, there has been limited research on investigating the balanced design, let alone adaptive treatment allocation. Although equal sample size allocation obtained for both treatments is intuitively first adopted in a trial design, if one treatment is expected to be superior, it may be desirable to allocate more subjects to the effective treatment. In this article, we calculate the required sample size based on restricted randomization and then propose a target response-adaptive randomization procedure for recurrent and terminal event outcomes based on the joint frailty model. A randomization procedure, the doubly adaptive biased coin design that targets some optimal allocations, is implemented. The proposed adaptive treatment allocation schemes have been shown to be capable of reducing the number of trial participants who receive inferior treatment while simultaneously reaching an optimal target, as well as retaining a comparable test power as compared to a restricted randomization design. Finally, two clinical studies, the COAPT trial and the A-HeFT trial, are used to illustrate the advantages of adopting the proposed procedure.

Sample size calculation for recurrent event data with additive rates models

This paper discusses the design of clinical trials where the primary endpoint is a recurrent event with the focus on the sample size calculation. For the problem, a few methods have been proposed but most of them assume a multiplicative treatment effect on the rate or mean number of recurrent events. In practice, sometimes the additive treatment effect may be preferred or more appealing because of its intuitive clinical meaning and straightforward interpretation compared to a multiplicative relationship. In this paper, new methods are presented and investigated for the sample size calculation based on the additive rates model for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence trials. They allow for flexible baseline rate function, staggered entry, random dropout, and overdispersion in event numbers, and simulation studies show that the proposed methods perform well in a variety of settings. We also illustrate how to use the proposed methods to design a clinical trial based on real data.