Preoperative chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: M.D. Anderson experience

Concomitant intraarterial cisplatin, intravenous 5-flourouracil, and split-course radiation therapy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Puget Sound Oncology Consortium (PSOC-703)

A Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) protocol showed a survival benefit for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma when treated with split-course radiation therapy and bolus intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as compared with survival achieved with radiation alone. In an attempt to improve these results, a phase II trial using intraarterial (i.a.) cisplatin, systemic-infusional 5-FU, and concomitant split-course radiation therapy was conducted. Sixteen previously untreated patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (5 with American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage I-II, 11 with stage III) disease were treated with i.a. cisplatin 100 mg/m2 by selective celiac arteriography followed by i.v. infusional 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day for 4 days, and concomitant split-course external beam photon radiation therapy at 2.0 Gy for 10 days in a 12-day period. After a planned 14-day interval, the identical chemoradiation treatment was repeated; finally, after a second 2-week interval, a third cycle of chemotherapy with a final 10 Gy radiation was administered. All 16 patients were evaluable for response; there were two partial responses (PR: 12%) and five minor responses (31%). Median follow-up period was 77 months. Median time to progression was 6 months (range 1-12 months), and median survival was 9 months (range 4-94 months). Nausea/vomiting was the major toxicity. There were no treatment-related fatalities. This regimen of concomitant i.a. cisplatin, i.v. infusional 5-FU, and split-course external beam photon radiation is well tolerated but has minimal activity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Future combined-modality protocols for this disease should explore alternative chemoradiation schemes.

Molecular diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer using a percutaneous technique

BACKGROUND

The K-ras oncogene is activated by point mutations at codon 12 in most patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer. Mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification can enhance the detection of mutated K-ras. This technique was applied to patients undergoing percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of suspect pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent percutaneous FNA of the pancreas for cytologic and molecular analysis. After preparing cytologic smears, the 22-gauge needle and syringe used for FNA were rinsed in RPMI-1640. The specimen was centrifuged, and DNA was extracted from the supernatant and subjected to mutant-enriched PCR using appropriate mismatched primers that introduce a BstNI restriction endonuclease clevage site at codon 12 of wild-type, but not mutant, K-ras. After digestion with BstNI, the DNA was reamplified. To increase assay sensitivity, the final five PCR cycles were completed incorporating 5 microCi of (alpha-32P)dCTP. The DNA was then redigested and subjected to gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.

RESULTS

The median amount of DNA retrieved per specimen was 3.33 micrograms. Mutant K-ras was detected as a band of 143 bps; residual wild-type DNA was seen as a 114-bp fragment. Twenty-one of 25 specimens demonstrated mutated K-ras DNA. Two patients with nondiagnostic cytology results had mutated K-ras DNA; adenocarcinoma of pancreatic origin was confirmed in both cases after pancreatectomy.

CONCLUSION

The molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer through identifications of mutations in K-ras can be readily performed on specimens obtained by percutaneous FNA. As aggressive multimodality management of this disease becomes more common, pretreatment analysis of molecular determinants may have greater clinical significance.

Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence. Pancreatic Tumor Study Group

OBJECTIVE

Tumor invasion of the superior mesenteric-portal vein (SMPV) confluence is often considered a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with malignant tumors of the pancreas or periampullary region. The authors sought to determine whether pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc resection of the SMPV confluence could be safely performed and whether tumors involving the SMPV confluence were associated with pathologic parameters suggesting poor prognosis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Several centers have reported high rates of retroperitoneal margin positivity after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Positive-margin or incomplete resection is associated with early tumor recurrence and no survival benefit compared with palliative therapy. Tumor adherence to the lateral of posterior wall of the SMPV confluence often represents the only barrier to complete tumor resection at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Data on all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or periampullary region over a 3.5-year period were entered prospectively in a pancreatic tumor database. To be considered for surgery, patients were required to fulfill the following computed tomography criteria for resectability: 1) the absence of extrapancreatic disease, 2) no tumor encasement of the superior mesenteric artery or celiac axis, and 3) a patent SMPV confluence. Tumor adherence to the superior mesenteric vein or SMPV confluence was assessed intraoperatively, and en bloc venous resection was performed when necessary to achieve complete tumor extirpation. Data on operative characteristics, morbidity, mortality, tumor size, nodal metastases, margin positivity, perineural invasion, and tumor DNA content were compared for patients who did and did not receive venous resection.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 36 without venous resection and 23 with en bloc resection of the SMPV confluence. No differences in median hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, tumor size, margin positivity, nodal positivity, or tumor DNA content were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When necessary, segmental resection of the SMPV confluence may be performed safely during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignant tumors. Tumors invading the SMPV confluence are not associated with histologic parameters suggesting a poor prognosis. Our data suggest that venous involvement is a function of tumor location rather than an indicator of aggressive tumor biology.

Preoperative chemoradiation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and intraoperative radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence in the bed of the resected pancreas is the most common site of tumor recurrence following a standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. In an attempt to improve local and regional disease control and thereby enhance the quality and length of survival in patients undergoing potentially curative PD, we have used a protocol of preoperative multimodality therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients were treated with external-beam radiation (30.0 or 50.4 Gy) and concomitant 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day) prior to PD. Electron-beam intraoperative radiation therapy was given to the bed of the resected pancreas before reconstruction. Patients were assessed for recurrence by physical examination, chest roentgenography, and computed tomography scan performed at 3-month intervals following treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients completed all therapy; 1 perioperative death occurred. Thirty-eight tumor recurrences have been documented in 29 patients at a median of 11 months from the date of diagnosis; 23 patients died of disease. The liver was the most frequent site of recurrence, and liver metastases were a component of treatment failure in 53% of patients. Isolated local or peritoneal recurrences were documented in only 4 patients (11%). The only significant clinical or pathologic variable predictive of local-regional recurrence was a previous laparotomy and intraoperative biopsy. The median survival of all 39 patients was 19 months, and the 4-year actuarial survival rate was 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiation, PD, and electron-beam intraoperative radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head have resulted in improved local-regional tumor control, with distant metastatic disease becoming the predominant site of tumor recurrence. Future treatment strategies should incorporate effective multimodality therapy for local-regional disease as demonstrated in this study. Major improvements in overall survival will likely await the development of systemic or regional therapy for liver metastases.