Blood stem cell transplantation: from preclinical to clinical models

Evolution of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood-derived progenitors have become the predominant source of hematopoietic stem cells for clinical transplantation. The main advantages compared to the bone marrow are as follows: harvesting blood stem cells is less painful for the donor, utilizes much less resources such as operating theater time and general anesthesia, and, above all, is associated with significantly accelerated reconstitution. The latter has ultimately improved patient safety as a consequence of significantly shortened aplastic phase and hence reduced morbidity and mortality after transplantation. Basic and translational research efforts in the 1960s to the mid-1980s have made the first blood stem cell transplantation in Heidelberg in 1985 possible. Diverse groups around the world have contributed to incremental knowledge that culminated in the first successful attempts in blood stem cell transplantation. These efforts have spawned modern research into stem cell biology and the immune modulatory effects of allogeneic transplantations.

The thrombopoietin mimetic romiplostim leads to the complete rescue of mice exposed to lethal ionizing radiation

For the primary treatment of emergency exposure to high-dose radiation, such as in the event of a radiation accident, the top priority is the reconstitution and restoration of haematopoiesis. In most radiation accidents, drug therapy is chosen as the most suitable treatment; the chosen drug should already be approved domestically, stably supplied and regularly stockpiled. In the present study, a single administration of romiplostim (RP), an approved thrombopoietin receptor agonist, produced a 100% survival rate in C57BL/6 J mice exposed to a lethal dose (7 Gy) of ¹³⁷Cs γ-rays, and all irradiated mice survived for more than 30 days with both 3- and 5-day consecutive administrations. By day 30, the peripheral blood cells, bone marrow cells and haematopoietic progenitor cells of the RP-administered irradiated mice had all recovered to a level that was not significantly different from that in non-irradiated mice. In contrast to myelosuppression, which did not fully recover until day 30, the expression of several bone marrow cell surface antigens recovered sooner, and DNA repair concurrently increased in haematopoietic cells, speeding the resolution of double strand breaks and reducing the rates of apoptosis. These findings suggest that RP may be a clinic-ready countermeasure to treat victims of radiation accidents.

The hematologist and radiation casualties

Since the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, preparation by the health care system for an act of terrorism has been mandated by leaders of governments. Scenarios for terrorist acts involving radioactive material have been identified, and approaches to management (based on past experience from atomic weapons detonations and radiation accidents) have been developed. Because of their experience in managing patients with profound cytopenia and/or marrow aplasia, hematologists will be asked to play a significant role in evaluating and treating victims of mass accidental or deliberate exposure to radiation. This review provides a framework for understanding how radiation levels are quantified, how radiation alters the function of hematopoietic (and nonhematopoietic) cells and tissues, and how victims receiving a significant radiation dose can be identified and managed. In Section I, Dr. Nicholas Dainiak reviews four components of the Acute Radiation Syndrome: the hematopoietic, neurovascular, gastrointestinal and cutaneous subsyndromes. Clinical signs and symptoms are discussed for exposed individuals at the time of initial presentation (the prodromal phase) and during their course of disease (the manifest illness). In Section II, he presents clinical and laboratory methods to assess radiation doses, including time to onset and severity of vomiting, rate of decline in absolute blood lymphocyte count and the appearance of chromosome aberrations such as dicentrics and ring forms. Potential scenarios of a radiation terrorist event are reviewed, and methods for initial clinical assessment, triage, and early management of the acute radiation syndrome and its component subsyndromes are summarized. In Section III, Dr. Jamie Waselenko reviews the hematopoietic syndrome, and presents guidelines for the use of cytokine therapy, antibiotics, and supportive care that have been developed by the Strategic National Pharmaceutical Stockpile Working Group. Results of preclinical and clinical growth factor therapy studies with G-CSF, GM-CSF, pegylated G-CSF, SCF, and IL-3 are summarized. When and how potassium iodide should be used after exposure to radioiodines is also reviewed. In Section IV, Dr. James Armitage describes a narrow "window" of 7 to 10 Gy where therapy with stem cell transplantation may be appropriate. Victims who are candidates for allotransplantation should not have major trauma or significant injury to other (nonhematopoietic) tissues. Rarely, victims may have an identical sibling or autologous stored marrow or blood stem cells, in which case the threshold for transplantation is 4 Gy. In Section V, Dr. Thomas MacVittie describes new directions for therapy, using cytokines such as IL-7, keratinocyte growth factor, and FLT-3. The potential for combinations of cytokines to enhance hematopoietic recovery is also reviewed.

Therapeutic relevance of CD34 cell dose in blood cell transplantation for cancer therapy

PURPOSE

To review recent advances in peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) transplantation in order to define the optimal cell dose required for autologous and allogeneic transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE was conducted to identify relevant publications. Their bibliographies were also used to identify further articles and abstracts for critical review.

RESULTS

The CD34(+) cell content of a graft is regarded as an accurate predictor of engraftment success. Postchemotherapy autologous PBPC transplantation with >/= 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg body weight leads to more rapid engraftment than does transplantation of lower cell doses. Further increases in transplant cell dose further accelerate platelet but not neutrophil engraftment. Evidence that long-term hematopoietic recovery may be more accurately predicted by the subpopulation of primitive progenitors transplanted suggests that the content of CD34(+)CD33(-) and long-term culture-initiating cells in cell collection samples may be important for predicting successful engraftment, particularly in patients with poor mobilization. Allogeneic transplantation has been limited by concerns regarding graft-versus-host disease and the use of hematopoietic growth factors in donors. The risk of graft rejection and engraftment failure after HLA-mismatched allogeneic transplantation may be overcome by intensive chemoradiotherapy and the infusion of large numbers of T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cells.

CONCLUSION

An optimal cell dose of >/= 8 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg seems to be recommended for autologous PBPC transplantation. This dose facilitates the administration of scheduled chemotherapy on time and reduces the demand for other supportive therapies. A combination of growth factors may enable patients with poor mobilization to achieve a collection sufficient to allow transplantation. The optimum PBPC dose for allogeneic transplantation remains to be defined.