Body position does not influence muscle oxygenation during submaximal cycling

Cycling position optimisation - a systematic review of the impact of positional changes on biomechanical and physiological factors in cycling

Bike positional configuration changes strongly affect cycling performance. While consensus has emerged on saddle height optimisation, there is none for the relationship between other bike positional variables and cycling performance. Accordingly, this systematic review examines the effect of all major positional variables on performance in cycling, assessing differences between cycling disciplines and sex where possible. The systematic review, conducted per PRISMA guidelines, searched databases including Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and CINAHL, screening 16,578 studies. Of these, 47 were fully analysed. Study quality assessment using the NIH tool revealed none rated "good", 5 "fair" and 33 "poor". The analysis involved 724 participants (90 female, 454 male, 180 sex unstated). Studies focused on trunk angle/upper body position, handlebar height, Q factor, foot position, saddle fore-aft/height, seat tube angle and crank length. Participant cycling disciplines were often unspecified and few papers address women cyclists specifically. Key findings were associated with changing saddle height, trunk angle and saddle fore-aft. For trunk angle, accounting for the biomechanical and physiological effects as well as aerodynamic changes is important. Saddle fore-aft affects the hip angle and trunk angle. There are no clear recommendations for crank length, handlebar height, Q factor or cleat position.

Evaluating Arterial Blood Flow Limitation Using Muscle Oxygenation and Cycling Power

OBJECTIVE

To explore the combination of measuring muscle oxygenation with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and cycling power during provocative incremental exercise for the detection of iliac arterial blood flow limitation (IAFL) in an otherwise healthy, well-trained cyclist.

DESIGN

Case report and methodological pilot study.

SETTING

University research setting.

PATIENT

A well-trained amateur competitive male cyclist, aged 31 years, presenting with symptoms consistent with IAFL, but in whom diagnostic imaging was equivocal.

INTERVENTIONS

Four ramp incremental cycling tests performed on separate days to exercise intolerance, in a randomized order, in either typical race position (RP) or modified upright position (UP).

MAIN OUTCOME

A novel ratio of unilateral cycling power to NIRS-derived muscle oxygenation termed "power-deoxygenation factor" was measured during provocative incremental exercise and compared with other NIRS-derived measures of vascular responsiveness and performance outcomes across the 2 body position conditions.

RESULTS

The power-deoxygenation factor was able to show clinically important, progressive differences between the affected and unaffected limbs, coinciding with worsening performance impairments related to the body position that were not detected with traditional measures of vascular responsiveness taken after exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

This method was used to detect bilateral differences consistent with IAFL in a cyclist where traditional diagnostic criteria were equivocal, but subsequent intraoperative findings confirmed the diagnosis. A similar screening test could be performed noninvasively and without requiring specialized medical care. Future work should investigate the validity and sensitivity of this methodology to improve the ability to identify and monitor athletes with IAFL.