Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?

Reliability of the sonographic evaluation for cervical length and elastography with pelvic parameters in term pregnancy by experienced operators with varying levels of experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of sonographic measurements of six cervical and pelvic parameters by three sonographers with varying levels of experience.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in pregnant women with a gestational age of ≥39 weeks. Each pregnant woman was examined by two sonographers with different levels of experience. Six parameters were measured: cervical length (CL), cervical strain elastography (extrinsic type), posterior cervical angle (PCA), fetal head-to-perineum distance (FHPD), fetal head-to-pubic symphysis distance (FHSD), and angle of progression (AOP). Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient with a 95% confidence interval. Pearson pairwise correlation coefficients were used to analyze the correlation between the parameter values.

RESULTS

In all, 66 pregnant women were enrolled in this study. We found excellent intraobserver reliability for measurements of CL, PCA, FHPD, FHSD, and AOP and good-to-excellent intraobserver reliability for cervical strain values in the cross-sectional view of the endocervix in the internal os area and cross-sectional view of the entire cervix in the internal os area. Interobserver reliability was excellent for all pelvic parameters, except for the FHPD. Strain values were moderate to excellent in the area of the internal os. A significant negative correlation between CL and strain values at the internal os was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic parameters, except for FHPD, have excellent intra- and interobserver reliabilities. The high reproducibility of CL and cervical strain elastography at the internal os level, with a negative correlation between these two parameters, may play an important role in predicting successful induction of labor.

Visual biofeedback for shortening second stage of labor: randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether visual biofeedback can be used during labor as an effective tool for shortening the second stage of labor and reducing the need for instrumental delivery.

METHODS

This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. Nulliparous women under epidural anesthesia were randomized at the point of full dilation into the biofeedback group (n = 50) or the control group (n = 50). Both groups received coached maternal pushing during four consecutive contractions, while an experienced obstetrician performed transperineal ultrasound. Only women in the biofeedback group observed the ultrasound display screen. Following this intervention, labor was managed routinely by the obstetric team. Angle of progression (AOP) was measured at rest and while pushing, before and during the first and fourth contractions. Second-stage duration and delivery outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Visual biofeedback did not affect the duration of the second stage, which lasted for a median of 2.28 (interquartile range (IQR), 1.25-3.10) h in the biofeedback group vs 2.08 (IQR, 1.58-3.02) h in the control group (P = 0.981). AOP was significantly higher in the biofeedback group compared with the control group, both at rest before the fourth contraction (mean ± SD, 142.6° ± 15.9° vs 136.8° ± 13.1°; P = 0.049) and while pushing during the fourth contraction (mean ± SD, 159.3° ± 19.2° vs 149.4° ± 15.1°; P = 0.005). The increase in AOP was significantly higher in the biofeedback compared with the control group between rest and pushing at the last push (mean ± SD, 16.6° ± 11.0° vs 12.6° ± 8.3°; P = 0.041) and between the first rest and last push (mean ± SD, 24.4° ± 13.6° vs 17.9° ± 11.3°; P = 0.011). The rate of intact perineum was similar between groups (12% vs 8%; P = 0.505).

CONCLUSIONS

Visual biofeedback during the second stage of labor may facilitate descent of fetal head during maternal pushing without affecting second-stage duration, possibly due to the short duration of the intervention. Future studies should focus on continuous intervention throughout the second stage of labor. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The sonopartogram

The assessment of labor progress from digital vaginal examination has remained largely unchanged for at least a century, despite the current major advances in maternal and perinatal care. Although inconsistently reproducible, the findings from digital vaginal examination are customarily plotted manually on a partogram, which is composed of a graphical representation of labor, together with maternal and fetal observations. The partogram has been developed to aid recognition of failure to labor progress and guide management-specific obstetrical intervention. In the last decade, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room has increased with the advent of more powerful, portable ultrasound machines that have become more readily available for use. Although ultrasound in intrapartum practice is predominantly used for acute management, an ultrasound-based partogram, a sonopartogram, might represent an objective tool for the graphical representation of labor. Demonstrating greater accuracy for fetal head position and more objectivity in the assessment of fetal head station, it could be considered complementary to traditional clinical assessment. The development of the sonopartogram concept would require further undertaking of serial measurements. Advocates of ultrasound will concede that its use has yet to demonstrate a difference in obstetrical and neonatal morbidity in the context of the management of labor and delivery. Taking a step beyond the descriptive graphical representation of labor progress is the question of whether a specific combination of clinical and demographic parameters might be used to inform knowledge of labor outcomes. Intrapartum cesarean deliveries and deliveries assisted by forceps and vacuum are all associated with a heightened risk of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Although these outcomes cannot be precisely predicted, many known risk factors exist. Malposition and high station of the fetal head, short maternal stature, and other factors, such as caput succedaneum, are all implicated in operative delivery; however, the contribution of individual parameters based on clinical and ultrasound assessments has not been quantified. Individualized risk prediction models, including maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings, are increasingly used in women's health-for example, in preeclampsia or trisomy screening. Similarly, intrapartum cesarean delivery models have been developed with good prognostic ability in specifically selected populations. For intrapartum ultrasound to be of prognostic value, robust, externally validated prediction models for labor outcome would inform delivery management and allow shared decision-making with parents.

Nomogram based on the final antepartum ultrasound features before delivery for predicting failed spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women

Background

Accurate identification of nulliparous women with failed spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) is crucial to minimize the hazards associated with obstetrical intervention (OI). While abnormal labor progression can be identified with intrapartum ultrasonography, labor-related complications may be unavoidable due to the limited time window left to the obstetrician. Antepartum ultrasound enables sufficient obstetric planning. However, there is typically a longer gap between ultrasound assessment and delivery that often lowers the prediction accuracy compared to intrapartum ultrasonography.

Objective

In this study, antepartum ultrasound assessment was included to each fetal ultrasound examination after 36 weeks of gestation until the onset of labor. We aim to establish a nomogram to predict the likelihood of failed SVD in nulliparous women using the last antepartum ultrasound findings before labor beginning.

Methods

Of the 2,143 nulliparous women recruited, 1,373 were included in a training cohort and 770 in a validation cohort, based on their delivery date. Maternal and perinatal characteristics, as well as perinatal ultrasound parameters were collected. In the training cohort, the screened correlates of SVD failure were used to develop a nomogram for determining whether a nulliparous woman would experience SVD failure. This model was validated in both training and validation cohorts.

Results

SVD failure affected 217 nulliparous women (10.13%). In the training cohort, SVD failure was independently associated with BMI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.636], FHC (OR = 1.194), CL (OR = 1.398), and PCA (OR = 0.824) (all P < 0.05). They constituted a nomogram to estimate the individual risk of SVD failure. The model obtained clinical net benefits in both the training and validation cohorts and was validated to present strong discrimination and calibration.

Conclusion

The developed nomogram based on the last antepartum ultrasound findings may be helpful in avoiding OI and its related complications by assessing the likelihood of a failed SVD in nulliparous women.

Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton multiparous women: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Universal elective induction of labor (IOL) in singleton parous pregnancies has been advocated to reduce the rate of cesarean section (CD), without impacting on maternal outcome. However, about 50% of women deliver after 40 weeks; therefore, an accurate estimation of the time of delivery might avoid unnecessary early IOL. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in predicting delivery ≥40 weeks of gestation in singleton parous women.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of singleton parous women undergoing a dedicated ultrasound assessment at 36-38 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was spontaneous vaginal delivery ≥40 weeks of gestation. Cervical length (CL), posterior cervical angle (PCA), sonoelastographic hardness ratio (HR), angle of progression (AoP) and head perineal distance (HPD) were measured. Multivariate logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to test the diagnostic accuracy of different maternal and ultrasound characteristics in predicting delivery ≥40 weeks.

RESULTS

518 singleton pregnancies were included in the analysis and 235 (45.4%) delivered ≥40 weeks. CL (29 vs 19 mm; p ≤ .0001) and HPD (50 vs 47 mm; p = .001) were longer, HR higher (38.9 vs 35.5; p = .04), while PCA (98° vs 104°; p ≤ .0001) and AOP narrower (93° vs 98°; p = .029) in pregnancies delivered compared to those not delivered after 40 weeks of gestation. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, CL (aOR 1.206; 95% CI 1.164-1.250), HPD (aOR 1.127; 95% CI 1.066-1.191) and HR (aOR 1.022; 95% CI 1.003-1.041 were the only variables independently associated with delivery ≥40 weeks. CL showed had an AUC of 0.863 in predicting delivery ≥40 weeks of gestation, with an optimal cutoff of 23.5 mm. Integration of HPD and HR did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance of CL alone to predict delivery ≥40 weeks (AUC 0.870; p = .472).

CONCLUSION

Cervical length at 36-38 weeks has a good diagnostic accuracy to predict spontaneous vaginal delivery at ≥40 weeks. Universal assessment of CL in the third trimester of pregnancy may help in identifying those women who may benefit of elective IOL at 39 weeks.

Prediction of labor outcome pilot study: evaluation of primiparous women at term

BACKGROUND

Emergency operative delivery is associated with high fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. It is of high importance to find means to predict the delivery mode before the onset of labor.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the potential of combined sonographic and clinical determination to predict the mode of delivery at term.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational prospective cohort study was deployed in a tertiary maternity hospital (Emergency County Hospital Craiova). Unselected low-risk primiparous pregnant women were evaluated weekly at term for ultrasound determinations (estimated fetal weight, head descent parameters, occiput posterior, cervical length), Bishop score, and maternal characteristics (age, height, weight). A thorough statistical analysis determined which variables were significantly correlated with the delivery mode.

RESULTS

Data from 276 term primiparous women were analyzed. Head descent parameters were strongly and significantly correlated with each other, but only progression distance was correlated with the delivery mode (gestational weeks 37, 38, 41, and the week before delivery). In the week before delivery, measurements of head-to-perineum distance and angle of progression reached almost significant P levels of.055 and.07, respectively. The following variables were significantly correlated with the delivery mode: body mass index in all term evaluations; progression distance for weeks 37 and 38; maternal age for week 39; Bishop score, estimated fetal weight, and occiput posterior for week 40; and body mass index, estimated fetal weight, and progression distance for the week before delivery. We also provided logistic regression equations for each week with correct delivery mode prediction, except for week 38. Cutoff values were established for each significant parameter per week. The cutoff values must be read in conjunction with the area under the curve, which ranged from 0.55 to 0.73, depending on the variable.

CONCLUSION

There are strong and significant correlations among the "head descent" ultrasound measurements at term. Body mass index is predictive of labor outcomes throughout term evaluations. Progression distance and body mass index measured at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation correlate with the delivery mode and apparently can be used to forecast the delivery mode when the pregnancy reaches term. For the week before delivery, measurements of estimated fetal weight and progression distance can be used to forecast the delivery mode, perhaps as part of a policy for pregnant women with prelabor clinical signs. Larger studies with more data, particularly better-balanced data, are needed.

The Value of Fetal Head Station as a Delivery Mode Predictor in Primiparous Women at Term before the Onset of Labor

Objective: Our objective was to demonstrate the role of the clinical determination of fetal head station (FHS) at term to predict the delivery mode in primiparous women before the onset of labor. Methods: This prospective study included unselected primiparous women at term who presented at our tertiary maternity. We excluded multiparous patients, pregnancies with a planned Cesarean section, non-cephalic presentations, and multiple pregnancies. The protocol included weekly clinical examinations to assess the FHS. The results were used to describe the clinical fetal head descent at term. We correlated the fetal head station determinations at each week with labor outcome, including the evaluations performed within the week before delivery. Results: The data show no significant differences between vaginal (VD) and Cesarean section delivery (CS) cases regarding FHS determined at each week at term. The median determinations at the gestational ages (GW) from 37 to 41 were −2 and −3, similar between the two groups, with a more consistent difference at 41 GW: station -1 for VD compared to −3 for CS. There were significant differences between the “week before delivery” evaluations of the two groups. The determinations showed for both groups similar minimum (−5), maximum (+1), and median (−2) FHS values. Most vaginal deliveries cases presented at weekly examinations with increasing rates toward more advanced stations: from 10% at station −4 to 35% at station −1. Although we investigated a low-risk group, we found significant differences between the vaginal and Cesarean groups in terms of age, weight, and BMI. We provided a multiple logistic regression equation that considered the predictive clinical variables at term: the fetal head situation, age, weight, height, and BMI. Conclusion: The clinical evaluation of fetal head station in primiparous before labor onset has a limited value regarding the prediction of the delivery mode. There is a potential benefit for the determinations performed within the week before delivery, but such a policy would require weekly assessments of the FHS at term, which is unlikely to be implemented. Another potential benefit would involve estimating labor outcomes in late-term or prolonged pregnancy. The fine tuning of the logistic prediction should be achieved by increasing the studied population and the number of centers involved before counseling primiparous women at term based on the clinical fetal engagement data.

Can assessing the angle of progression before labor onset assist to predict vaginal birth after cesarean?: A prospective cohort observational study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether pre-labor measurement of the angle of progression (AOP) can assist in predicting a successful vaginal birth after cesarean in women without a previous vaginal birth.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study performed in a single tertiary center including women at term with a single previous cesarean delivery (CD), without prior vaginal births, who desire a trial of labor. Transperineal ultrasound was used to measure the AOP before the onset of labor. The managing staff in the delivery suite was blinded to the ultrasound measurements. Clinical data and delivery outcome were retrieved from medical records. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (KMC 0117-10).

RESULTS

Of the 111 women included in the study, 67 (60.4%) had a successful vaginal birth after CD. Women were sonographically assessed at a median of 3 days [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3 days] prior to delivery. The median AOP was significantly narrower in women who eventually underwent a CD than in those who delivered vaginally (88°, IQR 78-96° vs. 99°, IQR 89-107°, respectively; p < .001). An AOP >98° (derived from a receiver operating characteristic curve) was associated with a successful vaginal birth after CD in 87.5% of women. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that each additional 1° in the AOP increases the chance for a successful vaginal birth after CD by 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-labor AOP may be a useful sonographic tool for predicting vaginal birth after CD and can assist in consulting primiparous women with a prior CD opting for a trial of labor.

Sonographic risk assessment for an unplanned operative delivery: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To assess the value of pre-labor maternal and fetal sonographic variables to predict an unplanned operative delivery.

METHODS

In this prospective study, nulliparous women were recruited at 37.0-42.0 weeks of gestation. Sonographic measurements included estimated fetal weight, maternal pubic arch angle, and the angle of progression. We performed a descriptive and comparative analysis between two outcome groups: spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and unplanned operative delivery (UOD) (vacuum-assisted, forceps-assisted and cesarean deliveries). Multivariate logistic regression with ROC analysis was used to create discriminatory models for UOD.

RESULTS

Among 234 patients in the study group, 175 had a spontaneous vaginal delivery and 59 an unplanned operative delivery. Maternal height and pubic arch angle (PAA) significantly correlated with UOD. Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates revealed a multivariate model for the prediction of UOD, including the parameters of maternal age, maternal height, sonographic PAA, angle of progression (AOP), and estimated fetal weight, with an area under the curve of 0.7118.

CONCLUSION

Sonographic parameters representing maternal pelvic configuration (PAA) and maternal-fetal interface (AOP) improve the prediction ability of pre-labor models for a UOD. These data may aid the obstetrician in the counseling process before delivery.

Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of transperineal ultrasound-measured angles of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies with cephalic presentation.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a predefined systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to February 5, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Prospective cohort studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of transperineal ultrasound-measured angles of progression (index test) at the onset of the second stage of labor (ie, when complete cervical dilation is diagnosed) for the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery (reference standard) were eligible for inclusion. Eligible studies were limited to those published as full-text articles in the English language and those that included only parturients with a singleton healthy fetus at term with cephalic presentation.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves, pooled sensitivities and specificities, area under the curve, and summary likelihood ratios were calculated using the Stata software. Subgroup analyses were done based on angle of progression ranges of 108° to 119°, 120° to 140°, and 141° to 153°.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies reporting on 887 pregnancies were included. Summary estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of transperineal ultrasound-measured angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for predicting spontaneous vaginal delivery were 94% (95% confidence interval, 88%-97%) and 47% (95% confidence interval, 18%-78%), respectively, for an angle of progression of 108° to 119°, 81% (95% confidence interval, 70%-89%) and 73% (95% confidence interval, 57%-85%), respectively, for an angle of progression of 120° to 140°, and 66% (95% confidence interval, 56%-74%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 66%-92%), respectively, for an angle of progression of 141° to 153°. Likelihood ratio syntheses gave overall positive likelihood ratios of 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 1-3.3), 3 (95% confidence interval, 2-4.7), and 3.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-8.1) and negative likelihood ratios of 0.13 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.22), 0.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.38), and 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.60) for angle of progression ranges of 108° to 119°, 120° to 140°, and 141° to 153°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Angle of progression measured by transperineal ultrasound at the onset of the second stage of labor may predict spontaneous vaginal delivery in singleton, term, cephalic presenting pregnancies and has the potential to be used along with physical examinations and other clinical factors in the management of labor and delivery.

Fetal head progression and regression on maternal pushing at term and labor outcome

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was two-fold. First, to evaluate the association between the change in the angle of progression (AoP) on maternal pushing and labor outcome. Second, to assess the incidence and clinical significance of the reduction of AoP on maternal pushing.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy at term. AoP was measured at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver before the onset of labor, and the difference between AoP on maximum Valsalva and that at rest (ΔAoP) was calculated for each woman. Following delivery and data collection, we assessed the association between ΔAoP and various labor outcomes, including Cesarean section (CS), duration of the first, second and active second stages of labor, Apgar score and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The prevalence of women with reduction of AoP on maximum Valsalva maneuver (AoP-regression group) was calculated and its association with the mode of delivery and duration of different stages of labor was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 469 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 273 (58.2%) had spontaneous vaginal birth, 65 (13.9%) had instrumental delivery and 131 (27.9%) underwent CS. Women in the CS group were older, had narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva, higher rate of epidural administration and lower 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores in comparison with the vaginal-delivery group. ΔAoP was comparable between the two groups. On Pearson's correlation analysis, AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver had a significant negative correlation with the duration of the first stage of labor. ΔAoP showed a significant negative correlation with the duration of the active second stage of labor (Pearson's r, -0.125; P = 0.02). Cox regression model analysis showed that ΔAoP was associated independently with the duration of the active second stage (hazard ratio, 1.014 (95% CI, 1.003-1.025); P = 0.012) after adjusting for maternal age and body mass index. AoP reduction on maximum Valsalva was found in 73 (15.6%) women. In comparison with women who showed no change or an increase in AoP on maximum Valsalva, the AoP-regression group did not demonstrate significant difference in maternal characteristics, mode of delivery, rate of epidural analgesia, duration of the different stages of labor or rate of NICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor, narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva, reflecting fetal head engagement, is associated with a higher risk of Cesarean delivery. The increase in AoP from rest to Valsalva, reflecting more efficient maternal pushing, is associated with a shorter active second stage of labor. Fetal head regression on maternal pushing is present in about 16% of women and does not appear to have clinical significance. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The usefulness of ultrasound before induction of labor

The indications for induction of labor have been consistently on the rise. These indications are mainly medical (maternal or fetal) or social or related to convenience or maternal preferences. With the increase in the prevalence of these indications, the incidence rates of induction of labor are expected to rise continuously. This poses a substantial workload and financial burden on maternity healthcare systems. Failure rates of induction of labor are relatively high, especially when considering the maternal, fetal, and neonatal risks associated with emergency cesarean deliveries in cases of failure. Therefore, it is essential for obstetricians to carefully select women who are eligible for induction of labor, particularly those with no clinical contraindication and who have a reasonable chance of ending up with a successful noncomplicated vaginal delivery. Ultrasound has an established role in the various areas of obstetrical care. It is available, accessible, easy to perform, and acceptable to the patient. In addition, the learning curve for skillful obstetrical ultrasound scanning is rather easy to fulfill. Ultrasound has always had an important role in the assessment of maternal and fetal well-being. Indeed, it has been extensively explored as a reliable, reproducible, and objective tool in the management of labor. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the different applications and uses of ultrasound before induction of labor for the prediction of its success and the potential improvement of its health-related maternal and fetal outcomes.

Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor is one of the most common interventions in modern obstetrics, and its frequency is expected to continue to increase. There is inconsistency as to how failed induction of labor is defined; however, the majority of studies define success as the achievement of vaginal delivery. Induction of labor in nulliparous women poses an additional challenge with a 15% to 20% incidence of failure, ending in emergency operative deliveries. The Bishop score has been traditionally used before decisions for induction of labor. Nonetheless, it is subjective and prone to marked interobserver variation. Several studies have been conducted to find alternative predictors, yet a reliable, objective method still remains to be introduced and validated. Hence, there is still a need for the development of new predictive tools to facilitate informed decision making, optimization of resources, and minimization of potential risks of failure. Furthermore, a peripartum transperineal ultrasound scan has been proven to provide objective, noninvasive assessment of labor.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of developing and validating an objective and reproducible model for the prediction of cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in Cairo University Hospitals and University of Bologna Hospitals between November 2018 and November 2019. We recruited 382 primigravidae with singleton term pregnancies in cephalic presentation. All patients had baseline Bishop scoring together with various transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessments of the fetus, maternal cervix, and pelvic floor. The managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound scan findings. The method and indication of induction of labor, the total duration of stages of labor, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes were all recorded. Women who had operative delivery for fetal distress or indications other than failure to progress in labor were excluded from the final analysis, leaving a total of 344 participants who were randomly divided into 243 and 101 pregnancies that constituted the model development and cross-validation groups, respectively.

RESULTS

It was possible to perform transabdominal and transperineal scans and assess all the required parameters on all study participants. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for selection of potential predictors and model fitting. The independent predictive variables for cesarean delivery included maternal age (odds ratio, 1.12; P=.003), cervical length (odds ratio, 1.08; P=.04), angle of progression at rest (odds ratio, 0.9; P=.001), and occiput posterior position (odds ratio, 5.7; P=.006). We tested the performance of the prediction model on our cross-validation group. The calculated areas under the curve for the ability of the model to predict cesarean delivery were 0.7969 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.87) and 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.97) for the developed and validated models, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age and sonographic fetal occiput position, angle of progression at rest, and cervical length before labor induction are very good predictors of induction outcome in nulliparous women at term.

Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?

BACKGROUND

Identifying predictive factors for a normal outcome at admission in the labor ward would be of value for planning labor care, timing interventions, and preventing labor dystocia. Clinical assessments of fetal head station and position at the start of labor have some predictive value, but the value of ultrasound methods for this purpose has not been investigated. Studies using transperineal ultrasound before labor onset show possibilities of using these methods to predict outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether ultrasound measurements during the first examination in the active phase of labor were associated with the duration of labor phases and the need for operative delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study at Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland. Nulliparous women at ≥37 weeks' gestation with a single fetus in cephalic presentation and in active spontaneous labor were eligible for the study. The recruitment period was from January 2016 to April 2018. Women were examined by a midwife on admission and included in the study if they were in active labor, which was defined as regular contractions with a fully effaced cervix, dilatation of ≥4 cm. An ultrasound examination was performed by a separate examiner within 15 minutes; both examiners were blinded to the other's results. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examinations were used to assess fetal head position, cervical dilatation, and fetal head station, expressed as head-perineum distance and angle of progression. Duration of labor was estimated as the hazard ratio for spontaneous delivery using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. The hazard ratios were adjusted for maternal age and body mass index. The associations between study parameters and mode of delivery were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Median times to spontaneous delivery were 490 minutes for a head-perineum distance of ≤45 mm and 682 minutes for a head-perineum distance of >45 mm (log-rank test, P=.009; adjusted hazard ratio for a shorter head-perineum distance, 1.47 [95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.60]). The median durations were 506 minutes for an angle of progression of ≥93° and 732 minutes for an angle of progression of <93° (log-rank test, P=.008; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.07 [95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.72]). The median times to delivery were 506 minutes for nonocciput posterior positions and 677 minutes for occiput posterior positions (log-rank test, P=.07; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.52 [95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.38]) Median times to delivery were 429 minutes for a dilatation of ≥6 cm and 704 minutes for a dilatation of 4 to 5 cm (log-rank test, P=.002; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.11 [95% confidence interval, 1.68-5.77]). Overall, there were 75 spontaneous deliveries; among those deliveries, 16 were instrumental vaginal deliveries (1 forceps delivery and 15 ventouse deliveries), and 8 were cesarean deliveries. Head-perineum distance and angle of progression were associated with a spontaneous delivery with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.80) and 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.80), respectively. Ultrasound measurement of cervical dilatation or position at inclusion was not significantly associated with spontaneous delivery.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound examinations showed that fetal head station and cervical dilatation were associated with the duration of labor; however, measurements of fetal head station were the variables best associated with operative deliveries.

Advanced midwifery practice: intrapartum ultrasonography to assess fetal head station and comparison with vaginal digital examination

BACKGROUND

Vaginal digital examination is considered the gold standard to evaluate patients during labor and delivery. However, transperineal ultrasound has been suggested as an effective tool in determining fetal head station during labor. Angle of progression (AOP), head-perineal distance (HPD) and head-symphysis distance (HSD) are reliable parameters to assess fetal head station during labor. The study aims were to evaluate how midwives can use AOP, HSD, HPD to assess the accuracy of digital vaginal exploration limited to the fetal head station.

METHODS

Trained midwives for ultrasound analyses performed transperineal ultrasounds during the first stage of labor with 2D-convex probe in 62 pregnant women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation. Immediately before the intrapartum ultrasound, the birth attendant performed a digital examination to assess cervical dilatation and head station. The ultrasound scans were compared to the digital vaginal examination through the Tutschek's formula.

RESULTS

AOP was wider in women who delivered vaginally without any complication if compared to "complicated delivery" group. HPD and HSD were greater in women who underwent an operative vaginal delivery or caesarean section. The vaginal exploration accuracy was 34%, but when ±1 cm was considered as tolerated, the overall accuracy was 74.19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Midwives may include ultrasounds in their clinical practice after adequate training or under the supervision of an ultrasound professional as an adjunct tool during labor to evaluate its progress and prevent any deviation from physiology.

Can We Use the Bishop Score as a Prediction Tool for the Mode of Delivery in Primiparous Women at Term Before the Onset of Labor?

The Bishop score serves as an evaluation system performed by digital vaginal examination (DVE) to determine cervical ripening. The scoring system includes cervical dilatation, position, effacement and consistency of the cervix and fetal head station1. Nowadays, the Bishop score is frequently used as an important parameter for the prediction of successful induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to demonstrate the role of the Bishop scoring system in prediction of the mode of delivery in primiparous women at term before the onset of labor.

METHOD

We included in this study unselected primiparous women at term, after 37 weeks of gestation, who presented to the Prenatal Diagnostic Unit (PDU) of the University Emergency County Hospital of Craiova. We excluded from the study multiparous patients, pregnancies with a planned Caesarean section delivery (CD), non-cephalic presentations and multiple pregnancies, twin pregnancies and those with detected fetal anomalies. The protocol included weekly DVEs until delivery for all patients, to determine the evolution of the Bishop score at term and in the week before delivery, and potential correlations with delivery outcome. To reduce clinical bias, the DVEs were performed by three experienced obstetricians involved in the research.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis yielded a 4 to 6 Bishop score in all weekly examinations. At 37 weeks of gestation, the majority of primiparous women had a Bishop score of 4, with no significant differences between the primiparous who delivered vaginally and the ones where Caesarean section was necessary. During the following weekly evaluations, we noted a slight turn to a Bishop score of 6 for most of them, without any significant differences between the two groups. However, at 41 weeks of gestation, there was a significant higher Bishop score in the group of primiparous women who delivered vaginally.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the use of the Bishop score failed as a prediction tool for the mode of delivery in primiparous women at term before the onset of labor, at a gestational age less than 40 weeks. Therefore, Bishop score should not be used to counsel regarding the probability of an uncomplicated vaginal delivery (VD) before the onset of labor.

Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation is associated with better maternal and perinatal outcomes than expectant management. However, a policy of induction of labor implies the identification of women who will deliver after 40 weeks, who are at higher risk of adverse outcome.

OBJECTIVE

This study primarily aimed to elucidate the role of antepartum ultrasound in predicting the onset of spontaneous labor in a cohort of low-risk singleton pregnancies, and secondarily to compare its diagnostic performance with that of other ultrasonographic and clinical parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective study including singleton nulliparous women undergoing a dedicated ultrasound assessment at 36 to 38 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was delivery ≥40 weeks of gestation. The ultrasound parameters explored were cervical length, posterior cervical angle, angle of progression, and head-perineum distance. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and area under the curve analyses were used to test the strength of association and diagnostic performance of variables considered in predicting delivery ≥40 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 457 women were included, and 49.2% delivered ≥40 weeks. Cervical length was longer (30 vs 19 mm; P≤.0001) and posterior cervical angle wider (105° vs 98°, P≤.0001) in women delivering ≥40 weeks than those delivering <40 weeks. Similarly, head-perineum distance was longer (48 vs 40 mm; P=.001) and angle of progression narrower (93° vs 95°; P=.04) in pregnancies delivering after 40 weeks. Conversely, there was no difference in the modified Bishop score between the 2 study groups (P=.689). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, cervical length (adjusted odds ratio, 1.307) and head-perineum distance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.227) were independently associated with delivery ≥40 weeks. Cervical length showed an area under the curve of 0.896 in predicting a delivery after 40 weeks. Integration of head-perineum distance in the diagnostic algorithm did not increase the performance of the model. A cervical length of 24 mm at 36 to 37 weeks of gestation showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity in predicting delivery ≥40 weeks, with a shorter latency between ultrasound assessment and birth.

CONCLUSION

Antepartum ultrasound can reliably identify a subset of nulliparous women at higher risk of delivering beyond 40 weeks. A cervical length >24 mm at 36 to 37 weeks of gestation shows the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity in predicting delivery ≥40 weeks. The findings from this study can help in identifying those women for whom elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation would be beneficial in reducing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to follow the birth process with transperineal ultrasonography (TPU) and predict the delivery method using angle of progression (AOP).

METHODS

The study included 134 patients. The AOP was examined with TPU in the lithotomy position applied at 4-h intervals, not at a time of straining or contractions. The relationship was examined between AOP and those who continued with vaginal delivery, and those who underwent caesarean section delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 122 (91%) patients had vaginal delivery and 12 (9%) patients had cesarean delivery. In patients giving vaginal delivery, progress in AOP was observed in every 4-h measurement, but not in patients with cesarean section. In the ROC analysis, if 70% sensitivity and 75% specificity with AOP degree >132.5°, the patient was expected to have vaginal delivery with a probability of 77.5% (95% CI 0.62-0.93; p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than repeating digital examinations, the labour process can be monitored with serial TPU and the type of delivery can be predicted. There is a need for further studies for the measurement of AOP with TPU to become a part of clinical practice in the monitoring of the whole labour process.

Feasibility, Reliability, and Agreement of Transperineal Ultrasound Measurement: Results from a Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and agreement of serial transperineal ultrasound (TPU) assessment of fetal head station (parasagittal angle of progression [psAOP], head-perineum distance [HPD], and head-symphysis distance [HSD]) and sonographic cervical dilatation (SCD), compared to fetal head station and cervical dilatation determined by vaginal examination, respectively.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study in singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor at term. Paired assessment of fetal head station and cervical dilatation by vaginal examination, with TPU assessment of psAOP, HPD, HSD, and SCD was made serially. Feasibility, correlation, reliability, and agreement were determined.

RESULTS

1,139 paired measurements among 326 women were included. psAOP and HPD were achievable in all assessments. HSD was not achievable in 3.4% (11/326) due to high fetal head station. Fetal head station by vaginal examination was positively correlated with psAOP (rho = 0.70) but negatively correlated with HPD (rho = -0.57) and HSD (rho = -0.52). The feasibility to measure SCD reduced as cervical dilatation increased. Cervical dilatation and SCD were positively correlated (rho = 0.96) with strong agreement (concordant correlation coefficient = 0.925).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of psAOP and HPD are feasible and correlate significantly with fetal head station by vaginal examination. Measurement of HSD is not feasible when fetal head station is high. Measurement of SCD is feasible, but it is more difficult in the advanced stage of labor. The correlation, reliability, and agreement between SCD and cervical dilatation by vaginal examination are high.

Predicting the Mode of Delivery by Angle of Progression (AOP) before the Onset of Labor by Transperineal Ultrasound in Nulliparous Women

Background:

Prediction of the mode of delivery is crucial for better labour outcome. Recent studies suggest that the angle of progression (AOP), measured using transperineal ultrasound, can substantially aid the assessment of fetal head descent during labor, thereby predicting the mode of delivery.

Objective:

To assess the ability of the AOP measured by transperineal ultrasound to predict the mode of delivery in nulliparous women before the onset of labor.

Methods:

A prospective observational study was conducted at our hospital, of nulliparous women who had presented to the antenatal clinic at ≥ 38 weeks of gestation but not in labor. AOP was measured using transperineal ultrasonography and compared among the women having Caesarean section (CS) due to labor dystocia and vaginal delivery (VD). Various other confounding factors which increase the risk of caesarean section were analyzed.

Results:

Among total 120 nulliparous women, the mean AOP was narrower in patients undergoing CS (n = 28) compared to those with VD (n = 92) (91.6 ± 6.1° vs. 100.7 ± 6.9°; P < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that narrow AOP values (OR 3.66; P < 0.001; 95% CI 1.7- 14.5) and occiput-posterior fetal position (OR 1.63; P = 0.04; 95% CI 1.0-7.5) were the independent risk factors for CS. An AOP ≥ 96° (calculated from the ROC curve) was associated with VD in 95% (76/80) of women and an AOP < 96° was observed among 60% (24/40) of women who underwent CS.

Conclusion:

Narrow AOP (< 96°) and occiput-posterior fetal position are at higher risk for CS due to labor dystocia. AOP measured at the antenatal period could accurately predict the mode of delivery, thereby modifying labor outcome.

Prediction of duration of labor based on biomechanical measurements of the cervix: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

Induction of labor is a common procedure in obstetrics. Predictability of duration of labor could facilitate planning as well as patient's satisfaction. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new biomechanical measurement of the cervix based on the aspiration technique for predicting the duration of labor after induction.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective single centre study. Inclusion criteria were term nulliparous pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix who needed an induction of labor. Digital (Bishop score), sonographic (cervical length and cervical consistency index (CCI)) as well as aspiration measurements (closure pressure) of the cervix were performed and compared to duration of labor. The technical feasibility and the acceptability of the measurements were explored.

RESULTS

There were no technical complications of the sonographic or aspiration measurements. Measuring the Bishop score was reported as most painful examination. Both the time to active phase of labor and the time to delivery is significantly correlated with the Bishop score, but not with the cervical length, CCI or closure pressure.

CONCLUSION

The new biomechanical measurement of the cervix, based on the aspiration technique, is technically feasible and acceptable. In our small cohort no correlation was found between the closure pressure and the duration of labor.

Can the Progression Angle before Labor Help to Predict Cesarean Section?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to predict cesarean section on a single visit at term using a combination of maternal history and ultrasound markers, including some new markers such as the progression angle used to assess intrapartum progress.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an observational prospective cohort study of singleton term pregnancies that included 575 women. The maternal history and ultrasound markers were obtained on a single visit at 37-38 weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was used for prediction of cesarean section.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seventy-five women were examined at a median gestational age of 38.3 weeks (range: 35.6-41.6) and a cesarean section was performed on 104 women (18%) - 24 for a fetal indication and 80 for a maternal indication. The risk of cesarean section increased with a previous cesarean section, assisted reproduction techniques, a higher estimated fetal weight, and a greater cervical length, and decreased with a greater maternal height, multiparity, and a wider progression angle. The detection rate for a 20% false positive rate was 69.9% for all cesarean sections, 54.2% for those with a fetal indication, and 77.2% for those with a maternal indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment at 37-38 weeks' gestation of ultrasound markers such as the cervical length, progression angle, and estimated fetal weight, in combination with the maternal history, can predict a cesarean section in labor. Cesarean section for a maternal indication is better predicted than cesarean section for a fetal indication.

Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of labor dystocia generally is determined by the deviation of labor progress, which is assessed by the use of a partogram. Recently, intrapartum transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of fetal head descent has been introduced to assess labor progress in the first stage of labor in a more objective and noninvasive way.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the differences in labor progress by the use of serial transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head descent between women having vaginal and cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy who were undergoing labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance were made serially after the commencement of labor induction. According to the hospital protocol, assessment was performed every 24 hours and 4 hours, respectively, during latent and active phases of labor. The researchers and the clinical team were blinded to each other's findings. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models. To determine the effect of mode of delivery on the association between parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation, the significance of the interaction term between each mode of delivery and fetal head station or cervical dilation was determined, which accounted for parity and obesity. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of serial intrapartum sonography in predicting women with cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

RESULTS

The total number of paired vaginal examination and ultrasound assessments was 1198, with a median of 3 per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range, 4.3-5.1 hours). Women who achieved vaginal delivery (n=261) had steeper slopes of parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation than those who achieved cesarean delivery (n=54). Objectively, an additional decrease of 5.11 and 1.37 degrees in parasagittal angle of progression was observed for an unit increase in fetal head station and cervical dilation, respectively, in women who required cesarean delivery (P<.01; P=.01), compared with women who achieved vaginal delivery, after taking account of repeated measures from individuals and confounding factors. The respective additional increases in head-perineum distance for a unit increase in fetal head station and cervical dilation were 0.27 cm (P<.01) and 0.12 cm (P<.01). A combination of maternal characteristics with the temporal changes of parasagittal angle of progression for an unit increase in fetal head station achieved an area under receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.94), with sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 80%, for the prediction of women who required cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

CONCLUSION

The differences in labor progress between vaginal and cesarean delivery have been illustrated objectively by serial intrapartum transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent. This tool is potentially predictive of women who will require cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relevance of the angle of progression (AOP) and head-perineum distance (HPD) for predicting the type of delivery and duration of the second stage of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.

METHODS

In total, 221 women in labor with a single gestational sac at ≥37 weeks of gestation and fetuses in cephalic presentation underwent two-dimensional ultrasonography by transperineal route for measurements of AOP and HPD. Correlations between the type of delivery (vaginal or surgical (cesarean section and forceps)), duration of the second stage of labor, and fetal and maternal characteristics were assessed. AOP and HPD variables were separately studied in the first and second stages of labor. Multivariate logistic regression was followed in stages to identify the predictors for the surgical delivery outcome - stepwise forward method.

RESULTS

In total, 153 (69.2%) women underwent vaginal deliveries, 7 (3.2%) underwent forceps deliveries, and 61 (27.6%) underwent cesarean deliveries. AOP was a statistically significant parameter in first and second stages of labor (107.8 ± 12.1° versus 100.8 ± 13.7°; p = .017), with an inverse correlation with the occurrence of vaginal delivery. HPD was a statistically significant parameter in the second stage of labor (3.42 ± 0.84 cm versus 4.17 ± 0.54 cm; p < .003), with a direct correlation with the occurrence of surgical delivery. The value of AOP that optimized the curve was 129.9° with 85% specificity and 63% sensitivity for the vaginal delivery endpoint. The value of HPD that optimized the curve was 4.3 cm with 69% specificity and 89% sensitivity for the surgical delivery endpoint. In the first phase, the variables defining the type of delivery were the following: height, body mass index, and AOP. In the second phase, the variables defining were the following: height, labor analgesia, HPD, and position of the fetal occiput.

CONCLUSION

AOP and HPD determined by intrapartum ultrasonography were associated with duration of labor, which may aid in predicting the type of delivery in association with clinical parameters.

Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the dynamic changes of angle of progression (AoP) before the onset of labor and their correlation with labor outcome and to investigate the effect of visual feedback using transperineal ultrasound on maternal pushing.

METHODS

We recruited a group of low-risk nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy at term. We measured AoP at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and Valsalva maneuver (before and after visual feedback). We compared AoP between women who delivered vaginally (VD) and those who underwent a cesarean section (CS). We also assessed the correlation between AoP and labor durations.

RESULTS

Overall, 222 women were included in the study; 129 (58.1%) had spontaneous VD, 35 (15.8%) had instrumental delivery, and 58 (26.1%) underwent CS. In comparison with rest, AoP decreased at PFMC (p < .001) and increased at first Valsalva (p < .001). AoP increased further significantly at Valsalva after visual feedback (p < .001). Women with VD had wider AoP at rest (p = .020), during Valsalva maneuver before (p = .024), and after visual feedback (p = .037). At cox regression analysis, wider AoP was associated with shorter first, second, and active second stages.

CONCLUSION

Wider AoP at rest and under Valsalva is associated with vaginal delivery, the shorter interval to delivery, and shorter labor duration in nulliparous women at term. The accuracy of AoP in the prediction of cesarean delivery is modest and is unlikely to be clinically applicable in isolation for the prediction of the mode of delivery.

Novel simulations to determine the impact of superficial perineal structures on vaginal delivery

This study's aim was to determine whether the inclusion of superficial perineal structures in a finite-element simulation of vaginal delivery impacts the pubovisceral muscle and perineal body, two common sites of birth-related injury. The hypothesis, inferred from prevailing literature, was that these structures would have minimal influence (differences less than ±10%). Two models were made using the Visible Human Project's female cadaver to create a rigid, fixed pelvis, musculature held by spring attachments to that pelvis, and a rigid, ellipsoidal fetal head prescribed with an inferior displacement to simulate delivery. Injury site stretch ratios and fetal head and perineal body displacements and angles of progression were compared between the Omitted Model (which excluded the superficial perineal structures as is common practice) and the Included Model (which included them). Included Model stretch ratios were +107%, -9.84% and -14.6% compared to Omitted Model perineal body and right and left pubovisceral muscles, respectively. Included Model peak perineal body inferior displacement was +72.5% greater while similar anterior-posterior displacements took longer to reach. These results refute our hypothesis, suggesting superficial perineal structures impact simulations of vaginal delivery by inhibiting perineal body anterior-posterior displacement, which stretches and inferiorly displaces the perineal body.

Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor

BACKGROUND

The traditional approach to the assessment of labor progress is by digital vaginal examination; however, it is subjective and imprecise. Recent studies have investigated the role of transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent by measuring the angle of progression and head-perineum distance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate factors that affected labor progress, which were defined by the transperineal ultrasonographic parameters, in women who achieved vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy who underwent labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent (parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance) were made serially after the commencement of labor induction until full cervical dilation. The researchers were blinded to the findings of the clinical team's vaginal examination and vice versa. The repeated measure data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors (age ≥35 years, obesity, parity, methods of labor induction, and epidural anesthesia) that affected the relationship between parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation.

RESULTS

The total number of paired vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessments among the 261 women (82.9%) with vaginal delivery was 945, with a median of 3 per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range, 4.3-5.2). Multiparity and mechanical methods of labor induction were associated with a faster rate of fetal head descent, which was determined by head-perineum distance against fetal head station, than nulliparity and the use of a slow-release vaginal pessary, respectively. An additional increase of 0.10 cm in head-perineum distance was observed, for an unit increase in fetal head station in nulliparous women (P=.03) and women who had a slow-release vaginal pessary (P=.02), compared with multiparous women and those who had mechanical methods for labor induction. The use of epidural anesthesia was associated with a slower rate of fetal head descent, which was determined by both parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance, against fetal head station. An additional decrease of 3.66 degrees in parasagittal angle of progression (P=.04) and an additional increase in 0.33 cm in head-perineum distance (P≤.001) were observed for a unit increase in fetal head station in women with the use of epidural anesthesia, compared with those without. Obese women had higher head-perineum distance overall, compared with normal weight women; at different cross-sections of time periods, obesity appeared to be associated with a slower rate of change between head-perineum distance and cervical dilation. Advanced maternal age did not affect transperineal ultrasound-determined labor progress (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

Parity, methods of labor induction, the use of epidural anesthesia, and obesity affect labor progress, which has been illustrated objectively by serial transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent.

Head progression distance during the first stage of labor as a predictor for delivery outcome

Objectives: To assess if measurement of the head progression distance (PD) during the first stage of labor in nulliparous women can predict the delivery method.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on consecutive nulliparous women beyond 37 week's gestation during the first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound was performed to assess the PD. Analysis was performed on the relationships between PD during rest and during voluntary pushing and the fetal and maternal characteristics, delivery mode, and immediate postnatal outcomes.Results: Eighty seven suitable nulliparous women were suitable for analysis. PD was found to be significantly longer in women who delivered vaginally (VD) compared to those who underwent a cesarean section (CS) for obstructed labor: PD at rest was 2.51 ± 1.71 cm in women who delivered vaginally compared to 1.48 ± 1.9 cm in women who delivered by CS (p = .01). The PD during pushing was 3.43 ± 1.8 cm for a VD compared to 1.5 ± 2.1 cm for CS (p = .015). Logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated a moderate predictive value of PD with respect to the mode of delivery (area under the curve was 0.67 during both resting and pushing period).Conclusion: PD measurements during the first stage of labor among nulliparous women differ significantly both in rest and during pushing between patients who delivered vaginally compared to CS and can therefore assist in predicting the mode of delivery.

Intrapartum ultrasound: viewpoint of midwives and parturient women and reproducibility

Introduction

Vaginal examination (VE) is known to be subjective in interpretation and is considered uncomfortable by many women. Intrapartum ultrasound aims to be more objective and less invasive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of introducing intrapartum ultrasound to both midwives and parturients. Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate the reproducibility of different measurements when introduced de novo among operators without prior ultrasound experience.

Subjects and methods

This study determined intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum ultrasound in nulliparous women in labor. Ultrasound examinations were performed independently by a midwife and a gynecologist. The symphysis–head distance (SHD) and the angle of progression (AOP) were measured by translabial ultrasound. Structured questionnaires were given to midwives and parturients. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LA) were calculated to evaluate variability.

Results

A total of 33 patients were included; of whom, 28 filled in the questionnaire. A total of 19 midwives working on a delivery ward were asked to respond to the questionnaire, and 13 returned the forms. Midwives clearly continued to prefer VE over ultrasound, the majority evaluated translabial ultrasound as easy to use, but some declared to be unable to use it. The majority of patients, 71%, preferred ultrasound over VE. Reproducibility of intrapartum trans-labial ultrasound was good; ICC for interobserver variability was 0.603 (p=0.001) for SHD, and ICC for intraobserver variability was 0.844 (p<0.001) and 0.914 (p<0.001) for SHD and AOP, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients prefer ultrasound over VE; midwives tend to stick to trusted VE. Reproducibility of intrapartum ultrasound in non-experienced operators is good.

Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether measurement of the angle of progression (AOP) before induction of labor (IOL) can predict successful vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of nulliparous women with a singleton term pregnancy and an indication for IOL. Transperineal sonography was used to measure the AOP before cervical ripening. Since all women enrolled had a low Bishop score, 98.6% of them were induced with either intracervical extra-amniotic balloon catheter or vaginal prostaglandin E-2. The staff in the labor ward were blinded to the AOP measurements. Clinical data were retrieved from computerized medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 150 women included in the final analysis, 40 (26.7%) delivered by Cesarean section. The median AOP was narrower in women who had a Cesarean delivery than in those who delivered vaginally (90° (interquartile range (IQR), 84-94.5°) vs 98° (IQR, 90.8-105°); P < 0.001). When including only women who underwent Cesarean delivery for non-progression of labor (n = 27) in the analysis, an AOP of > 92° (derived from a receiver-operating characteristics curve) was associated with a successful vaginal delivery in 94.8% of women. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis including maternal age, body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, fetal head station, indication for IOL and AOP demonstrated that only AOP was independently associated with the prediction of a successful induction.

CONCLUSION

AOP may be a useful sonographic parameter for predicting successful vaginal delivery among nulliparous women at term undergoing IOL; an AOP wider than 92° is associated with a high rate of vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

Accurate prediction of whether a nulliparous woman will have a vaginal delivery would be a major advance in obstetrics. The objective of the study was to develop such a model based on maternal characteristics and the results of intrapartum ultrasound.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred twenty-two nulliparous women in the first stage of labor were included in a prospective observational 2-centre study. Labor was classified as prolonged according to the respective countries' national guidelines. Fetal head position was assessed with transabdominal ultrasound and cervical dilatation by digital examination, and transperineal ultrasound was used to determine head-perineum distance and the presence of caput succedaneum. The subjects were divided into a testing set (n = 61) and a validation set (n = 61) and a risk score derived using multivariable logistic regression with vaginal birth as the outcome, which was dichotomized into no/cesarean delivery and yes/vaginal birth. Covariates included head-perineum distance, caput succedaneum, and occiput posterior position, which were dichotomized respectively into the following: ≤40 mm, >40 mm, <10 mm, ≥10 mm, and no, yes. Maternal age, gestational age, and maternal body mass index were included as continuous covariates.

RESULTS

Dichotomized score is significantly associated with vaginal delivery (P = .03). Women with a score above the median had greater than 10 times the odds of having a vaginal delivery as compared with those with a score below the median. The receiver-operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.853 (95% confidence interval, 0.678-1.000).

CONCLUSION

A risk score based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum findings can predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women in the first stage of labor.

Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery

The last step of a successful pregnancy is the safe delivery of the fetus. An important question is if the delivery should vaginal or operative. In addition to the use of conventional antenatal ultrasound, the use of intrapartum ultrasound to evaluate fetal head station, position, cervical ripening, and placental separation is promising. This review evaluates and summarizes the usefulness of intrapartum ultrasound for the evaluation of labor progress and predicting successful operative vaginal delivery.

Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography

OBJECTIVE

To examine the potential value of preinduction cervical length, cervical elastography and angle of progression (AOP) in prediction of successful vaginal delivery and induction-to-delivery interval.

METHODS

This was a prospective study in 99 women with singleton pregnancy undergoing preinduction ultrasound assessment at 35-42 weeks' gestation. Cervical length, elastographic score at the internal os and AOP were determined. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between cervical length and both AOP and elastographic score. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which of the maternal characteristics (cervical length, AOP, elastographic score) were significant predictors of vaginal delivery and induction-to-delivery interval.

RESULTS

Vaginal delivery occurred in 66 (66.7%) cases and Cesarean delivery was performed in 33 (33.3%) cases. There were significant correlations between cervical length and both AOP (r = - 0.319) and elastographic score (r = 0.368). Significant independent prediction of vaginal delivery and induction-to-delivery interval was provided by nulliparity and cervical length, with no additional significant contribution from electrographic score or AOP.

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing induction of labor, AOP and elastographic score at the internal os are unlikely to be useful in prediction of vaginal delivery and induction-to-delivery interval.

Intrapartum sonographic assessment of labor

Fetal head progression during labor is difficult to assess. Digital examination has been shown to be an inaccurate method. Utilizing the ultrasound technology in the delivery room can standardize the way we assess head progression. Intrapartum ultrasound is applicable, for the assessment of the progression of labor and assists the obstetrician, in decision making regarding the need for an assisted delivery. This article summarizes the latest studies regarding the usage of ultrasound in the delivery room and the measurements that are used during delivery.