Ultrasound is the future diagnostic tool in active labor

Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound

Fetal head descent can be expressed as fetal station and engagement. Station is traditionally based on clinical vaginal examination of the distal part of the fetal skull and related to the level of the ischial spines. Engagement is based on a transabdominal examination of the proximal part of the fetal head above the pelvic inlet. Clinical examinations are subjective, and objective measurements of descent are warranted. Ultrasound is a feasible diagnostic tool in labor, and fetal lie, station, position, presentation, and attitude can be examined. This review presents an overview of fetal descent examined with ultrasound. Ultrasound was first introduced for examining fetal descent in 1977. The distance from the sacral tip to the fetal skull was measured with A-mode ultrasound, but more convenient transperineal methods have since been published. Of those, progression distance, angle of progression, and head-symphysis distance are examined in the sagittal plane, using the inferior part of the symphysis pubis as reference point. Head-perineum distance is measured in the frontal plane (transverse transperineal scan) as the shortest distance from perineum to the fetal skull, representing the remaining part of the birth canal for the fetus to pass. At high stations, the fetal head is directed downward, followed with a horizontal and then an upward direction when the fetus descends in the birth canal and deflexes the head. Head descent may be assessed transabdominally with ultrasound and measured as the suprapubic descent angle. Many observational studies have shown that fetal descent assessed with ultrasound can predict labor outcome before induction of labor, as an admission test, and during the first and second stage of labor. Labor progress can also be examined longitudinally. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends using ultrasound in women with prolonged or arrested first or second stage of labor, when malpositions or malpresentations are suspected, and before an operative vaginal delivery. One single ultrasound parameter cannot tell for sure whether an instrumental delivery is going to be successful. Information about station and position is a prerequisite, but head direction, presentation, and attitude also should be considered.

Sonographic Evaluation of the Mechanism of Active Labor (SonoLabor Study): observational study protocol regarding the implementation of the sonopartogram

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decades, a large body of literature has shown that intrapartum clinical digital pelvic estimations of fetal head position, station and progression in the pelvic canal are less accurate, compared with ultrasound (US) scan. Given the increasing evidence regarding the advantages of using US to evaluate the mechanism of labour, our study protocol aims to develop sonopartograms for fetal cephalic presentations. They will allow for a more objective evaluation of labour progression than the traditional labour monitoring, which could enable more rapid decisions regarding the mode of delivery.

METHODS/ANALYSIS

This is a prospective observational study performed in three university hospitals, with an unselected population of women admitted in labour at term. Both clinical and US evaluations will be performed assessing fetal head position, descent and rotation. Specific US parameters regarding fetal head position, progression and rotation will be recorded to develop nomograms in a similar way that partograms were developed. The primary outcome is to develop nomograms for the longitudinal US assessment of labour in unselected nulliparous and multiparous women with fetal cephalic presentation. The secondary aims are to assess the sonopartogram differences in occiput anterior and posterior deliveries, to compare the labour trend from our research with the classic and other recent partogram models and to investigate the capability of the US labour monitoring to predict the outcome of spontaneous vaginal delivery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All protocols and the informed consent form comply with the Ministry of Health and the professional society ethics guidelines. University ethics committees approved the study protocol. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at the conference presentations. The study will be implemented and reported in line with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02326077).

Advanced midwifery practice: intrapartum ultrasonography to assess fetal head station and comparison with vaginal digital examination

BACKGROUND

Vaginal digital examination is considered the gold standard to evaluate patients during labor and delivery. However, transperineal ultrasound has been suggested as an effective tool in determining fetal head station during labor. Angle of progression (AOP), head-perineal distance (HPD) and head-symphysis distance (HSD) are reliable parameters to assess fetal head station during labor. The study aims were to evaluate how midwives can use AOP, HSD, HPD to assess the accuracy of digital vaginal exploration limited to the fetal head station.

METHODS

Trained midwives for ultrasound analyses performed transperineal ultrasounds during the first stage of labor with 2D-convex probe in 62 pregnant women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation. Immediately before the intrapartum ultrasound, the birth attendant performed a digital examination to assess cervical dilatation and head station. The ultrasound scans were compared to the digital vaginal examination through the Tutschek's formula.

RESULTS

AOP was wider in women who delivered vaginally without any complication if compared to "complicated delivery" group. HPD and HSD were greater in women who underwent an operative vaginal delivery or caesarean section. The vaginal exploration accuracy was 34%, but when ±1 cm was considered as tolerated, the overall accuracy was 74.19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Midwives may include ultrasounds in their clinical practice after adequate training or under the supervision of an ultrasound professional as an adjunct tool during labor to evaluate its progress and prevent any deviation from physiology.

Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery is associated with better outcomes compared to repeat caesarean section. Accurate antenatal risk stratification of women undergoing a trial of labor after caesarean section is crucial in order to maximize perinatal and maternal outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to explore the role of antepartum ultrasound in predicting the probability of vaginal birth in women attempting trial of labor; the secondary aim was to build a multiparametric prediction model including pregnancy and ultrasound characteristics able to predict vaginal birth and compare its diagnostic performance with previously developed models based exclusively upon clinical and pregnancy characteristics.

METHODS

Prospective study of consecutive singleton pregnancies scheduled for trial of labor undergoing a dedicated antepartum ultrasound assessment at 36-38 weeks of gestation. Head circumference, estimated fetal weight cervical length, sub-pubic angle were recorded before the onset of labour. The obstetricians and midwives attending the delivery suite were blinded to the ultrasound findings. Multivariate logistic regression and area under the curve analyses were used to explore the strength of association and test the diagnostic accuracy of different maternal and ultrasound characteristics in predicting vaginal birth. Comparison with previously reported clinical models developed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network (Grobman's models) was performed using De Long analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 161women who underwent trial of labor were included in the study. Among them 114 (70.8 %) women had successful vaginal birth. At multivariable logistic regression analysis maternal height (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):1.24;9 5% Confidence Interval (CI)1.17-1.33), previous C-section for arrest labor (aOR:0.77; 95 %CI0.66-0.93), cervical dilation at admission (aOR:1.35 ; 95 %CI1.12-1.74), fetal head circumference (aOR:0.77 ; 5%CI0.43-0.89), subpubic angle (aOR:1.39 95 %CI1.11-1.99) and cervical length (aOR:0.82 95 % CI0.54-0.98) were independently associated with VBAC. A model integrating these variables had an area under curve of 0.839(95 % CI 0.710-0.727) for the prediction of vaginal birth, significantly higher than those achieved with intake (0.694; 95 %CI0.549-0.815; p = 0.01) and admission (0.732: 95 % CI 0.590-0.84; p = 0.04) models reported by Grobman.

CONCLUSION

Antepartum prediction of vaginal birth after a caesarean section is feasible. Fetal head circumference, subpubic angle and cervical length are independently associated and predictive of vaginal birth. Adding these variables to a multiparametric model including maternal parameters improves the diagnostic accuracy of vaginal birth compared to those based only on maternal characteristic.

Fetal molding examined with transperineal ultrasound and associations with position and delivery mode

BACKGROUND

To accommodate passage through the birth canal, the fetal skull is compressed and reshaped, a phenomenon known as molding. The fetal skull bones are separated by membranous sutures that facilitate compression and overlap, resulting in a reduced diameter. This increases the probability of a successful vaginal delivery. Fetal position, presentation, station, and attitude can be examined with ultrasound, but fetal head molding has not been previously studied with ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe ultrasound-assessed fetal head molding in a population of nulliparous women with slow progress in the second stage of labor and to study associations with fetal position and delivery mode.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a population comprising 150 nulliparous women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, with slow progress in the active second stage with pushing. Women were eligible for the study when an operative intervention was considered by the clinician. Molding was examined in stored transperineal two-dimensional and three-dimensional acquisitions and differentiated into occipitoparietal molding along the lambdoidal sutures, frontoparietal molding along the coronal sutures, and parietoparietal molding at the sagittal suture (molding in the midline). Molding could not be classified if positions were unknown, and these cases were excluded. We measured the distance from the molding to the head midline, molding step, and overlap of skull bones and looked for associations with fetal position and delivery mode. The responsible clinicians were blinded to the ultrasound findings.

RESULTS

Six cases with unknown position were excluded, leaving 144 women in the study population. Fetal position was anterior in 117 cases, transverse in 12 cases, and posterior in 15 cases. Molding was observed in 79 of 144 (55%) fetuses. Molding was seen significantly more often in occiput anterior positions than in non-occiput anterior positions (69 of 117 [59%] vs 10 of 27 [37%]; P=.04). In occiput anterior positions, the molding was seen as occipitoparietal molding in 68 of 69 cases and as parietoparietal molding in 1 case with deflexed attitude. Molding was seen in 19 of 38 (50%) of occiput anterior positions ending with spontaneous delivery, 42 of 71(59%) ending with vacuum extraction, and in 7 of 8 (88%) with failed vacuum extraction (P=.13). In 4 fetuses with occiput posterior positions, parietoparietal molding was diagnosed, and successful vacuum extraction occurred in 3 cases and failed extraction in 1. Frontoparietal molding was seen in 2 transverse positions and 4 posterior positions. One delivered spontaneously; vacuum extraction failed in 3 cases and was successful in 2. Only 1 of 11 fetuses with either parietoparietal or frontoparietal molding was delivered spontaneously.

CONCLUSION

The different types of molding can be classified with ultrasound. Occipitoparietal molding was commonly seen in occiput anterior positions and not significantly associated with delivery mode. Frontoparietal and parietoparietal moldings were less frequent than reported in old studies and should be studied in larger populations with mixed ethnicities.

Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Safe management of the second stage of labor is of great importance. Unnecessary interventions should be avoided and correct timing of interventions should be focused. Ultrasound assessment of fetal position and station has a potential to improve the precision in diagnosing and managing prolonged or arrested labors. The decision to perform vacuum delivery is traditionally based on subjective assessment by digital vaginal examination and clinical expertise and there is currently no method of objectively quantifying the likelihood of successful delivery. Prolonged attempts at vacuum delivery are associated with neonatal morbidity and maternal trauma, especially so if the procedure is unsuccessful and a cesarean is performed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess if ultrasound measurements of fetal position and station can predict duration of vacuum extractions, mode of delivery, and fetal outcome in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a prospective cohort study in nulliparous women at term with prolonged second stage of labor in 7 European maternity units from 2013 through 2016. Fetal head position and station were determined using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound, respectively. Our preliminary clinical experience assessing head-perineum distance prior to vacuum delivery suggested that we should set 25 mm for the power calculation, a level corresponding roughly to +2 below the ischial spines. The main outcome was duration of vacuum extraction in relation to ultrasound measured head-perineum distance with a predefined cut-off of 25 mm, and 220 women were needed to discriminate between groups using a hazard ratio of 1.5 with 80% power and alpha 5%. Secondary outcomes were delivery mode and umbilical artery cord blood samples after birth. The time interval was evaluated using survival analyses, and the outcomes of delivery were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and descriptive statistics. Results were analyzed according to intention to treat.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 222 women. The duration of vacuum extraction was shorter in women with head-perineum distance ≤25 mm (log rank test <0.01). The estimated median duration in women with head-perineum distance ≤25 mm was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-6.8) minutes vs 8.0 (95% confidence interval, 7.1-8.9) minutes in women with head-perineum distance >25 mm. The head-perineum distance was associated with spontaneous delivery with area under the curve 83% (95% confidence interval, 77-89%) and associated with cesarean with area under the curve 83% (95% confidence interval, 74-92%). In women with head-perineum distance ≤35 mm, 7/181 (3.9%) were delivered by cesarean vs 9/41 (22.0%) in women with head-perineum distance >35 mm (P <.01). Ultrasound-assessed position was occiput anterior in 73%. Only 3/138 (2.2%) fetuses in occiput anterior position and head-perineum distance ≤35 mm vs 6/17 (35.3%) with nonocciput anterior position and head-perineum distance >35 mm were delivered by cesarean. Umbilical cord arterial pH <7.10 occurred in 2/144 (1.4%) women with head-perineum distance ≤35 mm compared to 8/40 (20.0%) with head-perineum distance >35 mm (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound has the potential to predict labor outcome in women with prolonged second stage of labor. The information obtained could guide whether vacuum delivery should be attempted or if cesarean is preferable, whether senior staff should be in attendance, and if the vacuum attempt should be performed in the operating theater.

The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in measuring cervical dilatation, head station and position. Electronic literature searches were carried out of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Knowledge, plus manual reference list checks of all relevant articles. All published prospective studies comparing intrapartum ultrasonography with digital VE in the determination of cervical dilatation, head station and position were then evaluated for the success rate and level of agreement between ultrasonography and digital VE. Ultrasonography had higher success rate than digital VE in the determination of fetal head position, with a statistically significant difference in the first stage of labour. Second, although the successful determination of cervical dilatation was in favour of digital VE, the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, there was high agreement between ultrasound and digital VE findings on cervical dilatation. Lastly, a significant but moderate correlation between digital VE and ultrasound methods was found in the assessment of fetal head station. However, no meta-analysis could be done for the fetal head station due to the methodological differences between ultrasound anatomical landmarks and that of digital VE. The findings suggest that ultrasonography is superior to digital VE in the assessment of fetal head position, but has moderate correlation with digital VE in the assessment of head station. It also showed high agreement with digital VE in the assessment of cervical dilatation with no statistically significant difference in terms of success rate.

Acceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound Monitoring - Experience from a Romanian Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS) labor monitoring in unselected Romanian women attending a tertiary maternity unit and the patients' experience of the examination (i.e. the perceived difficulty regarding the evaluation protocol).

METHODS

The research was a prospective longitudinal observational study on unselected low-risk women that delivered in our unit. IPUS monitoring of active labor was proposed for observational purposes in low-risk population. Transabdominal and transperineal scans were performed hourly in the first stage of labor and at every 15 minutes in the second stage. The second day after birth, consenting women were invited to take part in a questionnaire survey with features regarding the patient's impression about the ultrasound monitoring scans during labor, and the acceptability of having an IPUS protocol for labor monitoring in the future.

RESULTS

From 200 parturient women questioned, 98% of them agreed to IPUS investigation protocol. The demographic characteristics did not influence the acceptance. However, due to the small number of women declining IPUS we were not able to compare the characteristics and perceptions of women who declined the scan with those who accepted it. Most of the women (93% of accepters and 75% of decliners) had little difficulty deciding whether or not to have the scan protocol. All laboring women who had the IPUS scan found it an acceptable experience; 21% of women without epidural anesthesia rated the perceived difficulty as "mild" or "discomforting". Women rated having the IPUS scan as being significantly less difficult than having a cervical smear, transvaginal scan or having a digital clinical evaluation. 67% of the studied patients expressed increased confidence while being able to follow along the medical personnel the progression of the labor on the ultrasound screen. 97% of the consenting women who had the IPUS scans and all the 4 decliners said they would definitely or probably agree such ultrasound monitoring in a future labor, if this technique is proven useful for the labor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

IPUS protocol for labor monitoring was overwhelmingly acceptable in our population of women, despite the fact that they were learning about the procedure for the first time. The demographic characteristics did not influence acceptance, but due to the high rate of acceptance, predictors of acceptance could not be analyzed. More than two thirds of the patients expressed increased confidence while being able to follow along the medical personnel the progression of the labor on the ultrasound screen and almost all the participants were willing to have the procedure again in future, further reinforcing their favorable attitude to the procedure.

Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether head-perineum distance (HPD) measured by transperineal ultrasound is predictive of vaginal delivery and time remaining in labor in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor and to compare the predictive value with that of angle of progression (AoP).

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK from January 2012 to April 2013, of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation at term with prolonged first stage of labor. We used transperineal ultrasound to measure HPD (shortest distance between the outer bony limit of the fetal skull and the perineum) and AoP (angle between a line through the long axis of the symphysis and the tangent to the fetal head) and transabdominal ultrasound to classify fetal head position. The main outcomes were vaginal delivery and time remaining in labor.

RESULTS

Of 150 women enrolled, 39 underwent delivery by Cesarean section. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for the prediction of vaginal delivery was 81% (95% CI, 73-89%) using HPD as the test variable and 72% (95% CI, 63-82%) using AoP. HPD was ≤ 40 mm in 84 (56%) women, of whom 77 (92%; 95% CI, 84-96%) delivered vaginally. HPD was > 40 mm in the other 66 (44%) women, of whom 34 (52%; 95% CI, 40-63%) delivered vaginally. AoP was ≥ 110° in 84 of the 145 (58%) in whom this was available and, of these, 74 (88%; 95% CI, 79-93%) delivered vaginally. AoP was < 110° in the other 61 (42%) women, of whom 35 (57%; 95% CI, 45-69%) delivered vaginally. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HPD ≤ 40 mm (odds ratio (OR), 4.92; 95% CI, 1.54-15.80), AoP ≥ 110° (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.01-9.56), non-occiput posterior position (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.24-9.12) and spontaneous onset of labor (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.42-13.89) were independent predictors for vaginal delivery. Both ultrasound methods were predictive for the time remaining in labor.

CONCLUSION

Transperineal ultrasound measurement of HPD and AoP provide important information about the likelihood of vaginal delivery and the time remaining in labor in nulliparous women with prolonged labor.