1
|
Patel-Lippmann KK, Gupta A, Martin MF, Phillips CH, Maturen KE, Jha P, Sadowski EA, Stein EB. The Roles of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI in the Evaluation of Adnexal Lesions. Radiology 2024; 312:e233332. [PMID: 39162630 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krupa K Patel-Lippmann
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Akshya Gupta
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Marisa F Martin
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Catherine H Phillips
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Priyanka Jha
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Elizabeth A Sadowski
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Erica B Stein
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232 (K.K.P.L., C.H.P.); Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (A.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.F.M., K.E.M., E.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moradi B, Rahmani M, Aghasi M, Yarandi F, Malek M, Hosseini A, Ghafouri K, Hasan Zadeh Tabatabaei MS, Shirali E, Riahi Samani P, Firouznia S. Modified MR scoring system for assessment of sonographically indeterminate ovarian and adnexal masses in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:150-158. [PMID: 38263830 PMCID: PMC11027275 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is not available in all imaging centres to investigate adnexal masses. We proposed modified magnetic resonance (MR) scoring system based on an assessment of the enhancement of the solid tissue on early phase postcontrast series and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map and investigated the validity of this protocols in the current study. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this cross-sectional retrospective study, pelvic MRI of a total of 245 patients with 340 adnexal masses were studied based on the proposed modified scoring system and ADNEX MR scoring system. RESULTS Modified scoring system with the sensitivity of 87.3% and specificity of 94.6% has an accuracy of 92.1%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ADNEX MR scoring system is 96.6%, 91%, and 92.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the modified scoring system and ADNEX MR scoring system is 0.909 (with 0.870-0.938 95% confidence interval [CI]) and 0.938 (with 0.907-0.961 95% CI), respectively. Pairwise comparison of these area under the curves showed no significant difference (P = .053). CONCLUSIONS Modified scoring system is less sensitive than the ADNEX MR scoring system and more specific but the accuracy is not significantly different. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE According to our study, MR scoring system based on subjective assessment of the enhancement of the solid tissue on early phase postcontrast series and DWI with ADC map could be applicable in imaging centres that DCE is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behnaz Moradi
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Maryam Rahmani
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Maryam Aghasi
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, 141973141, Iran
| | - Fariba Yarandi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahrooz Malek
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Ashrafsadat Hosseini
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Kimia Ghafouri
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Mahgol Sadat Hasan Zadeh Tabatabaei
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Elham Shirali
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Payam Riahi Samani
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
| | - Sina Firouznia
- Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, 116 36, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fujii S, Gonda T, Yunaga H. Clinical Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Gynecological Imaging: Revisited. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:78-91. [PMID: 37493356 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an increasingly valuable sequence in daily clinical practice, providing both functional and morphological information. The use of DWI can help quantify diffusion using the apparent diffusion coefficient, which reflects the physiological features of the tissue and tumor microcirculation. This knowledge is crucial for understanding and interpreting gynecological imaging. This article reviews the clinical utility of DWI for gynecological imaging, highlighting its ability to aid in the detection of endometrial and cervical cancers, as well as tumor extension and metastasis. In addition, DWI can easily detect the solid components of ovarian cancer (including dissemination), assist in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion, and potentially show bone marrow status. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement is useful for differentiating between endometrial lesions, uterine leiomyomas, and sarcomas, and may provide important information for predicting the prognosis of gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Fujii
- From the Division of Radiology, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thomassin-Naggara I, Razakamanantsoa L, Rockall A. O-RADS MRI: where are we and where we are going? Eur Radiol 2023; 33:8155-8156. [PMID: 37178201 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09732-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées, APHP - Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
- Inserm NSERM U938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - Leo Razakamanantsoa
- Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées, APHP - Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Inserm NSERM U938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nougaret S, Lakhman Y, Bahadir S, Sadowski EA, Thomassin-Naggara I, Reinhold C. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): Genesis and Future Directions. Can Assoc Radiol J 2023; 74:370-381. [PMID: 36250435 PMCID: PMC11058407 DOI: 10.1177/08465371221121738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays an important role in characterizing and risk-stratifying commonly encountered adnexal lesions. Recently, the American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for ultrasound and subsequently for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The goal of the recently developed ACR O-RADS MRI risk stratification system is to improve the quality of imaging reports as well as the reproducibility of evaluating adnexal lesions on MRI. This review focuses on exploring this new system and its future refinements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier, France
- Montpellier Cancer Research institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Departments of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Suzan Bahadir
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Elizabeth A. Sadowski
- Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- Service d’Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Reinhold
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC)
- Co-Director Augmented Intelligence Precision Laboratory (AIPHL), MUHC Research Institute, Department of Radiology, 1001 Decarie Boul.Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chacon E, Arraiza M, Manzour N, Benito A, Mínguez JÁ, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Chiva L, Alcazar JL. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004253. [PMID: 37055169 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the best second-step approach for discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses classified as inconclusive by International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Simple Rules (IOTA-SR). METHODS Single-center prospective study comprising a consecutive series of patients diagnosed as having an adnexal mass classified as inconclusive according to IOTA-SR. All women underwent Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) analysis, MRI interpreted by a radiologist, and ultrasound examination by a gynecological sonologist. Cases were clinically managed according to the result of the ultrasound expert examination by either serial follow-up for at least 1 year or surgery. Reference standard was histology (patient was submitted to surgery if any of the tests was suspicious) or follow-up (masses with no signs of malignancy after 12 months were considered benign). Diagnostic performance of all three approaches was calculated and compared. Direct cost analysis of the test used was also performed. RESULTS Eighty-two adnexal masses in 80 women (median age 47.6 years, range 16 to 73 years) were included. Seventeen patients (17 masses) were managed expectantly (none had diagnosis of ovarian cancer after at least 12 months of follow-up) and 63 patients (65 masses) underwent surgery and tumor removal (40 benign and 25 malignant tumors). Sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound, MRI, and ROMA were 96% and 93%, 100% and 81%, and 24% and 93%, respectively. The specificity of ultrasound was better than that for MRI (p=0.021), and the sensitivity of ultrasound was better than that for ROMA (p<0.001), sensitivity was better for MRI than for ROMA (p<0.001) and the specificity of ROMA was better than that for MRI (p<0.001). Ultrasound evaluation was the most effective and least costly method as compared with MRI and ROMA. CONCLUSION In this study, ultrasound examination was the best second-step approach in inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA-SR, but the findings require confirmation in multicenter prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Chacon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Maria Arraiza
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Ángel Mínguez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Castellanos
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rizzo S, Cozzi A, Dolciami M, Del Grande F, Scarano AL, Papadia A, Gui B, Gandolfo N, Catalano C, Manganaro L. O-RADS MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Category-wise Malignancy Rates. Radiology 2022; 307:e220795. [PMID: 36413127 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background US-indeterminate adnexal lesions remain an important indication for gynecologic surgery. MRI can serve as a problem-solving tool through the use of the Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI lexicon, which is based on the ADNEX MR scoring system. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of pelvic MRI interpreted using the ADNEX or O-RADS MRI stratification systems to characterize US-indeterminate adnexal lesions and of the category-wise malignancy rates. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search from May 2013 (publication of the ADNEX MR score) to September 2022 was performed. Studies reporting the use of pelvic MRI interpreted with the ADNEX or O-RADS MRI systems to characterize US-indeterminate adnexal lesions, with pathologic examination and/or follow-up as the reference standard, were included. Summary estimates of diagnostic performance were obtained with the bivariate random-effects model, while category-wise summary malignancy rates of O-RADS MRI 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were obtained with a random-effects model. Effects of covariates on heterogeneity and diagnostic performance were investigated through meta-regression. Results Thirteen study parts from 12 studies (3731 women, 4520 adnexal lesions) met the inclusion criteria. Diagnostic performance meta-analysis for 4012 lesions found a 92% summary sensitivity (95% CI: 88, 95) and a 91% summary specificity (95% CI: 89, 93). The meta-analysis of malignancy rates for 3641 lesions showed summary malignancy rates of 0.1% (95% CI: 0, 1) among O-RADS MRI 2 lesions, 6% (95% CI: 3, 9) among O-RADS MRI 3 lesions, 60% (95% CI: 52, 67) among O-RADS MRI 4 lesions, and 96% (95% CI: 92, 99) among O-RADS MRI 5 lesions. Conclusion Pelvic MRI interpreted with the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI lexicon had high diagnostic performance for the characterization of US-indeterminate adnexal lesions. Summary estimates of malignancy rates in the O-RADS MRI 4 and O-RADS MRI 5 categories were higher than predicted ones. © RSNA, 2022 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lee and Kang in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Rizzo
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Andrea Cozzi
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Miriam Dolciami
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Filippo Del Grande
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Angela L Scarano
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Andrea Papadia
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Benedetta Gui
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Carlo Catalano
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| | - Lucia Manganaro
- From the Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.L.S.) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (A.P.), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (S.R., F.D.G., A.P.); Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (A.C.); Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (M.D., C.C., L.M.); Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (B.G.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL 3, Genoa, Italy (N.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohamadian A, Moradi B. Simplified Approach for Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI Risk Stratification System. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1115-1117. [PMID: 36305050 PMCID: PMC9614288 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Mohamadian
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Behnaz Moradi
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiology, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hottat NA, Badr DA, Van Pachterbeke C, Vanden Houte K, Denolin V, Jani JC, Cannie MM. Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 56:158-170. [PMID: 34797013 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system-magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS-MRI) score decreases the incidence of indeterminate adnexal masses from 18% to 31% with ultrasound till 10.8% to 12.5% with MRI. Further improvement of this score may be useful to improve patients' management. PURPOSE To evaluate the added value of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of adnexal masses classified according to the O-RADS-MRI score. STUDY TYPE Prospective cohort study with retrospective DWI analysis. POPULATION Among 402 recruited patients, surgery was done only in 163 women (median-age: 51 years) with 201 indeterminate adnexal masses, which were included in the final analysis. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE Standardized MRI (1.5 and 3-T) including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging) were used. ASSESSMENT Two radiologists classified the adnexal masses according to O-RADS-MRI and they were blinded to the pathology report. Two methods of quantitative analysis were applied using region-of-interest apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ROI-ADC) and whole-lesion ADC-histogram (WL-ADC). STATISTICAL TESTS Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to compare variables among malignant and benign lesions. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to examine the sensitivity/specificity of each parameter. ROI-ADC and WL-ADC of lesions with O-RADS-MRI score-4 were plotted to identify thresholds of malignant lesions. The improvement of the O-RADS-MRI score after adding these thresholds was assessed by two ROC-curves. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS Fifty-eight of the 201 lesions (28.9%) were malignant. The ROI-ADC and the WL-ADC means of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions. Forty-two lesions (20.9%) had an O-RADS-MRI score-4. In this subgroup, 76% of lesions with ROI-ADC < 1.7 × 10-3 mm2 /sec and WL-ADC < 2.6 × 10-3 mm2 /sec were malignant, whereas only 11.8% with ROI-ADC ≥ 1.7 × 10-3 mm2 /sec or a WL-ADC ≥ 2.6 × 10-3 mm2 /sec were malignant. The overall performance of the O-RADS-MRI score combined with these thresholds was improved. DATA CONCLUSION Integrating ADC-thresholds in O-RADS-MRI score-4 may discriminate low-to-intermediate and intermediate-to-high malignancy risk groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie A Hottat
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| | - Dominique A Badr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Van Pachterbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Katherina Vanden Houte
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Jacques C Jani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mieke M Cannie
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thomassin-Naggara I, Belghitti M, Milon A, Abdel Wahab C, Sadowski E, Rockall AG. O-RADS MRI score: analysis of misclassified cases in a prospective multicentric European cohort. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:9588-9599. [PMID: 34041567 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08054-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To retrospectively review the causes of categorization errors using O-RADS-MRI score and to determine the presumptive causes of these misclassifications. METHODS EURAD database was retrospectively queried to identify misclassified lesions. In this cohort, 1194 evaluable patients with 1502 pelvic masses (277 malignant / 1225 benign lesions) underwent standardized MRI to characterize adnexal masses with histology or 2 years' follow-up as a reference standard. An expert radiologist reviewed cases with two junior radiologists and lesions termed misclassified if malignant lesion was scored ≤ 3, a benign lesion was scored ≥ 4, the site of origin was incorrect, or a non-adnexal mass was incorrectly categorized as benign or malignant. RESULTS There were 139 / 1502 (9.2%) misclassified masses in 116 women including 109 adnexal and 30 non-adnexal masses. False-negative cases corresponded to 16 borderline or invasive malignant adnexal masses rated score ≤ 3 (16 / 139, 11.5%). False-positive cases corresponded to 88 benign masses were rated score 4 (67 / 139, 48.2%) or 5 (18 / 139,12.9%) or considered suspicious non-adnexal lesions (3 / 139, 2.2%). Misclassifications were only due to origin error in 12 adnexal masses (8 benign, 4 malignant) (8.6%, 12 / 139) and 23 non-adnexal masses (18 benign, 5 malignant,16.5%, 23 / 139) perceived respectively as non-adnexal and adnexal masses. Interpretive error (n = 104), failure to recognize technical insufficient exams (n = 9), and perceptual errors (n = 4) were found. Most interpretive was due to misinterpretation of solid tissue or incorrect assignment of mass origin. Eighty-four out of 139 cases were correctly reclassified by the readers with strict adherence to the score rules. CONCLUSION Most errors were due to misinterpretation of solid tissue or incorrect assignment of mass origin. KEY POINTS • Prospective assignment of O-RADS-MRI score resulted in misclassification of 9.25% of sonographically indeterminate pelvic masses. • Most errors were interpretive (74.8%) due to misinterpretation of solid tissue as defined by the lexicon or incorrect assignment of mass origin. • Pelvic inflammatory disease is a common source of misclassification (8.9%) (12 / 139).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 58 avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France. .,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 75020, Paris, France.
| | - M Belghitti
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 58 avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 75020, Paris, France
| | - A Milon
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 58 avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 75020, Paris, France
| | - C Abdel Wahab
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 58 avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de radiologie, 75020, Paris, France
| | - E Sadowski
- Departments of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
| | - A G Rockall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|