1
|
Heikkinen J, Kärkkäinen H, Eloranta ML, Anttila M. Postoperative Complications of Upfront Ovarian Cancer Surgery and Their Effects on Chemotherapy Delay. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:5630-5642. [PMID: 39330045 PMCID: PMC11430809 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31090417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive surgery on advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with increased postoperative morbidity, which may cause a delay in or omission of chemotherapy. We examined postoperative complications and their effects on adjuvant treatment in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS Stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients who underwent PDS between January 2013 and December 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the radicality of the operation, i.e., extensive or standard surgery, and their outcomes were compared. RESULTS In total, 172 patients were included; 119 underwent extensive surgery, and 53 had standard surgery. Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5 (CDC 3+) complications were detected in 41.2% of patients after extensive operations and in 17% after standard surgery (p = 0.002). The most common CDC 3+ complication was pleural effusion. Despite the difference in the complication rates, the delay in chemotherapy did not differ between the extensive and standard groups (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS Complications are common after PDS. Extensive surgery increases the complication rate, but most complications can be treated effectively; therefore, a delay in adjuvant treatment is rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Heikkinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland; (H.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Henna Kärkkäinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland; (H.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Marja-Liisa Eloranta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Finland’s Hospital Nova, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland;
| | - Maarit Anttila
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland; (H.K.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zugni F, Mariani L, Lambregts DMJ, Maggioni R, Summers PE, Granata V, Pecchi A, Di Costanzo G, De Muzio F, Cardobi N, Giovagnoni A, Petralia G. Whole-body MRI in oncology: acquisition protocols, current guidelines, and beyond. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:1352-1368. [PMID: 38990426 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01851-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
Acknowledging the increasing use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in the oncological setting, we conducted a narrative review focusing on practical aspects of the examination and providing a synthesis of various acquisition protocols described in the literature. Firstly, we addressed the topic of patient preparation, emphasizing methods to enhance examination acceptance. This included strategies for reducing anxiety and patient distress, improving staff-patient interactions, and increasing overall patient comfort. Secondly, we analysed WB-MRI acquisition protocols recommended in existing imaging guidelines, such as MET-RADS-P, MY-RADS, and ONCO-RADS, and provided an overview of acquisition protocols reported in the literature regarding other expanding applications of WB-MRI in oncology, in patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma, colorectal and lung cancer, lymphoma, and cancers of unknown primary. Finally, we suggested possible acquisition parameters for whole-body images across MR systems from three different vendors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Leonardo Mariani
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roberta Maggioni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul E Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Radiology, Pineta Grande Hospital, Via Domitiana Km 30, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Nicolò Cardobi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Delle Marche", Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moro F, Pinto P, Chiappa V, Testa AC, Alcázar JL, Franchi D, Benesova K, Jarkovsky J, Frühauf F, Borčinová M, Burgetova A, Masek M, Lambert L, Altmanova D, Avesani G, Panico C, Alessi S, Pricolo P, Vara García J, Palladino S, Vigorito R, Calareso G, Kocian R, Slama J, Vidal Urbinati AM, Raspagliesi F, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Cibula D, Fischerová D. Prediction of nonresectability using the updated Predictive Index value model assessed by imaging and surgery in tubo-ovarian cancer: a prospective multicenter ISAAC study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00740-3. [PMID: 38969200 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A laparoscopy-based scoring system was developed by Fagotti et al (Fagotti or Predictive Index value (PIV)score) based on the intraoperative presence or absence of carcinomatosis on predefined sites. Later, the authors updated the PIV score calculated only in the absence of one or both absolute criteria of nonresectability (mesenteric retraction and miliary carcinomatosis of the small bowel) (updated PIV model). OBJECTIVE The aim was to demonstrate the noninferiority of ultrasound to other imaging methods (contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI)/MRI) in predicting nonresectable tumor (defined as residual disease >1 cm) using the updated PIV model in patients with tubo-ovarian cancer. The agreement between imaging and intraoperative findings as a reference was also calculated. STUDY DESIGN This was a European prospective multicenter observational study. We included patients with suspected tubo-ovarian carcinoma who underwent preoperative staging and prediction of nonresectability at ultrasound, CT, WB-DWI/MRI, and surgical exploration. Ultrasound and CT were mandatory index tests, while WB-DWI/MRI was an optional test (non-available in all centers). The predictors of nonresectability were suspicious mesenteric retraction and/or miliary carcinomatosis of the small bowel or if absent, a PIV >8 (updated PIV model). The PIV score ranges from 0 to 12 according to the presence of disease in 6 predefined intra-abdominal sites (great omentum, liver surface, lesser omentum/stomach/spleen, parietal peritoneum, diaphragms, bowel serosa/mesentery). The reference standard was surgical outcome, in terms of residual disease >1 cm, assessed by laparoscopy and/or laparotomy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess the performance of the methods in predicting nonresectability was reported. Concordance between index tests at the detection of disease at 6 predefined sites and intraoperative exploration as reference standard was also calculated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS The study was between 2018 and 2022 in 5 European gynecological oncology centers. Data from 242 patients having both mandatory index tests (ultrasound and CT) were analyzed. 145/242 (59.9%) patients had no macroscopic residual tumor after surgery (R0) (5/145 laparoscopy and 140/145 laparotomy) and 17/242 (7.0%) had residual tumor ≤1 cm (R1) (laparotomy). In 80/242 patients (33.1%), the residual tumor was>1 cm (R2), 30 of them underwent laparotomy and maximum surgery was carried out, and 50/80 underwent laparoscopy only, because cytoreduction was not feasible in all of them. After excluding 18/242 (7.4%) patients operated on but not eligible for extensive surgery, the predictive performance of 3 imaging methods was analyzed in 167 women. The AUCs of all methods in discriminating between resectable and nonresectable tumor was 0.80 for ultrasound, 0.76 for CT, 0.71 for WB-DWI/MRI, and 0.90 for surgical exploration. Ultrasound had the highest agreement (Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.59 to 0.79) than CT and WB-DWI/MRI to assess all parameters included in the updated PIV model. CONCLUSION Ultrasound showed noninferiority to CT and to WB-DWI/MRI in discriminating between resectable and nonresectable tumor using the updated PIV model. Ultrasound had the best agreement between imaging and intraoperative findings in the assessment of parameters included in the updated PIV model. Ultrasound is an acceptable method to assess abdominal disease and predict nonresectability in patients with tubo-ovarian cancer in the hands of specially trained ultrasound examiners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrícia Pinto
- Department of Gynecology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Juan Luis Alcázar
- QuironSalud Hospital, Málaga, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Klára Benesova
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Filip Frühauf
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Borčinová
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Burgetova
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Masek
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Lambert
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dagmar Altmanova
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Giacomo Avesani
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Panico
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Julio Vara García
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Simona Palladino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Vigorito
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roman Kocian
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Slama
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniela Fischerová
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pinto P, Valentin L, Borčinová M, Wiesnerová M, Filip F, Burgetova A, Masek M, Lambert L, Chiappa V, Franchi D, Testa AC, Moro F, Avesani G, Panico C, Alessi S, Pricolo P, Vigorito R, Calareso G, Kocian R, Slama J, Fagotti A, Urbinati AMV, Signorelli M, Bertolina F, Cibula D, Fischerova D. Patient satisfaction with ultrasound, whole-body CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative ovarian cancer staging: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional survey. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:871-878. [PMID: 38531539 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In addition to the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods, patient-reported satisfaction with imaging methods is important. OBJECTIVE To report a secondary outcome of the prospective international multicenter Imaging Study in Advanced ovArian Cancer (ISAAC Study), detailing patients' experience with abdomino-pelvic ultrasound, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) for pre-operative ovarian cancer work-up. METHODS In total, 144 patients with suspected ovarian cancer at four institutions in two countries (Italy, Czech Republic) underwent ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI for pre-operative work-up between January 2020 and November 2022. After having undergone all three examinations, the patients filled in a questionnaire evaluating their overall experience and experience in five domains: preparation before the examination, duration of examination, noise during the procedure, radiation load of CT, and surrounding space. Pain perception, examination-related patient-perceived unexpected, unpleasant, or dangerous events ('adverse events'), and preferred method were also noted. RESULTS Ultrasound was the preferred method by 49% (70/144) of responders, followed by CT (38%, 55/144), and WB-DWI/MRI (13%, 19/144) (p<0.001). The poorest experience in all domains was reported for WB-DWI/MRI, which was also associated with the largest number of patients who reported adverse events (eg, dyspnea). Patients reported higher levels of pain during the ultrasound examination than during CT and WB-DWI/MRI (p<0.001): 78% (112/144) reported no pain or mild pain, 19% (27/144) moderate pain, and 3% (5/144) reported severe pain (pain score >7 of 10) during the ultrasound examination. We did not identify any factors related to patients' preferred method. CONCLUSION Ultrasound was the imaging method preferred by most patients despite being associated with more pain during the examination in comparison with CT and WB-DWI/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03808792.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia Pinto
- Department of Gynecology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal
- First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martina Borčinová
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Markéta Wiesnerová
- Masaryk University Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Fruhauf Filip
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Burgetova
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Masek
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Lambert
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Francesca Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Giacomo Avesani
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Camilla Panico
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Vigorito
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roman Kocian
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Slama
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Signorelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Bertolina
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsili AC, Alexiou G, Tzoumpa M, Siempis T, Argyropoulou MI. Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1467. [PMID: 38672549 PMCID: PMC11048266 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina C. Tsili
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (M.T.); (M.I.A.)
| | - George Alexiou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Martha Tzoumpa
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (M.T.); (M.I.A.)
| | - Timoleon Siempis
- ENT Department, Ulster Hospital, Upper Newtownards Rd., Dundonald, Belfast BT16 1RH, UK;
| | - Maria I. Argyropoulou
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (M.T.); (M.I.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fischerova D, Smet C, Scovazzi U, Sousa DN, Hundarova K, Haldorsen IS. Staging by imaging in gynecologic cancer and the role of ultrasound: an update of European joint consensus statements. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:363-378. [PMID: 38438175 PMCID: PMC10958454 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years the role of diagnostic imaging by pelvic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of gynecological cancers has been growing exponentially. Evidence from recent prospective multicenter studies has demonstrated high accuracy for pre-operative locoregional ultrasound staging in gynecological cancers. Therefore, in many leading gynecologic oncology units, ultrasound is implemented next to pelvic MRI as the first-line imaging modality for gynecological cancer. The work herein is a consensus statement on the role of pre-operative imaging by ultrasound and other imaging modalities in gynecological cancer, following European Society guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Carolina Smet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, São Francisco de Xavier Hospital in Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Umberto Scovazzi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Kristina Hundarova
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics A, Hospital and University Centre of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ingfrid Salvesen Haldorsen
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology and Department of Clinical Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital and the University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wen XT, Qiu HF, Ying LL, Huang M, Xiao YZ, Fan CC. Diagnostic efficacy of combining diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with serum Mucin 1, Mucin 13, and Mucin 16 in distinguishing borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38221766 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To enhance ovarian tumor diagnosis beyond conventional methods, this study explored combining diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) and serum biomarkers (Mucin 1 [MUC1], MUC13, and MUC16) for distinguishing borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. METHODS A total of 126 patients, including 71 diagnosed with borderline (BEOTs) and 55 with malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (MEOTs), underwent preoperative DWI-MRI. Region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn along the solid component's boundary of the largest tumor, focusing on areas with potentially the lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). For entirely cystic tumors, a free-form ROI enclosed the maximum number of septa while targeting the lowest ADC. Serum biomarkers were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS Basic morphological traits proved inadequate for malignancy diagnosis, warranting this investigation. BEOTs had an ADC mean of (1.670 ± 0.250) × 103 mm2 /s, while MEOTs had a lower ADC mean of (1.332 ± 0.481) × 103 mm2 /s, with a sensitivity of 63.6% and specificity of 90.1%. Median MUC1 (167.0 U/mL vs. 87.3 U/mL), MUC13 (12.44 ng/mL vs. 7.77 ng/mL), and MUC16 (180.6 U/mL vs. 36.1 U/mL) levels were higher in MEOTs patients. The biomarker performance was: MUC1, sensitivity 50.9%, specificity 100%; MUC13, sensitivity 56.4%, specificity 78.9%; MUC16, sensitivity 83.64%, specificity 100%. Combining serum biomarkers and ADC mean resulted in a sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION The integration of DWI-MRI with serum biomarkers (MUC1, MUC13, and MUC16) achieves exceptional diagnostic accuracy, offering a powerful tool for the precise differentiation between borderline and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Ting Wen
- Department of Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of PingYang, Wenzhou, China
| | - Hai-Feng Qiu
- Department of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou NO.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Ling-Ling Ying
- Department of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou NO.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Min Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of PingYang, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yun-Zhou Xiao
- Department of Radiology, The People's Hospital of PingYang, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chen-Chen Fan
- Department of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou NO.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luis Alcázar J, Ramón Pérez-Vidal J, Tameish S, Chacón E, Manzour N, Ángel Mínguez J. Ultrasound for assessing tumor spread in ovarian cancer. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:194-200. [PMID: 38042117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for assessing the tumor spread in the abdomen in women with ovarian cancer. A search for studies evaluating the role of ultrasound for assessing intrabdominal tumor spread in women with ovarian cancer compared to surgery from January 2011 to March 2023 was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 evaluated the quality of the studies (QUADAS-2). All analyses were performed using MIDAS and METANDI commands in STATA 12.0 software. We identified 1552 citations. After exclusions, five studies comprising 822 women were included. Quality of studies were considered as good, except for patient selection as all studies were considered as having high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity could be calculated for three anatomical areas (recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery) and the presence of ascites. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting disease in the recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery were 0.83 and 0.95, 0.87 and 0.87, and 0.29 and 0.99, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting ascites was 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. There is evidence that ultrasound offers good diagnostic performance for evaluating the intra-abdominal extent of disease in women with suspected ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Luis Alcázar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Juan Ramón Pérez-Vidal
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, 31120 El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Sarah Tameish
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacón
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Ángel Mínguez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miceli V, Gennarini M, Tomao F, Cupertino A, Lombardo D, Palaia I, Curti F, Riccardi S, Ninkova R, Maccioni F, Ricci P, Catalano C, Rizzo SMR, Manganaro L. Imaging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: CT, MRI, Radiomic Features and Resectability Criteria. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5827. [PMID: 38136373 PMCID: PMC10741537 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PC represents the most striking picture of the loco-regional spread of ovarian cancer, configuring stage III. In the last few years, many papers have evaluated the role of imaging and therapeutic management in patients with ovarian cancer and PC. This paper summed up the literature on traditional approaches to the imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer, presenting classification systems, most frequent patterns, routes of spread and sites that are difficult to identify. The role of imaging in diagnosis was investigated, with particular attention to the reported sensitivity and specificity data-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT)-and to the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). In addition, we explored the therapeutic possibilities and radiomics applications that can impact management of patients with ovarian cancer. Careful staging is mandatory, and patient selection is one of the most important factors influencing complete cytoreduction (CCR) outcome: an accurate pre-operative imaging may allow selection of patients that may benefit most from primary cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Miceli
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Marco Gennarini
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (F.T.); (I.P.)
| | - Angelica Cupertino
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Dario Lombardo
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (F.T.); (I.P.)
| | - Federica Curti
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Sandrine Riccardi
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Roberta Ninkova
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Francesca Maccioni
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Paolo Ricci
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo
- Clinica di Radiologia EOC, Istituto Imaging della Svizzera Italiana (IIMSI), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland;
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Lucia Manganaro
- Department of Radiological, Oncology and Patological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (M.G.); (A.C.); (D.L.); (F.C.); (S.R.); (R.N.); (F.M.); (P.R.); (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dumont S, Vandecaveye V, Dresen RC, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Baert T, Amant F, Broeckhoven V, Van Gorp T. Predicting resectable disease in relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer by using whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1890-1897. [PMID: 37597854 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) to predict resectable disease at the time of secondary cytoreductive surgery for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval of at least 6 months. METHODS A retrospective cohort study between January 2012 and December 2021 in a tertiary referral hospital. Inclusion criteria were: (a) first recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer; (b) platinum-free interval of ≥6 months; (c) intent to perform secondary cytoreductive surgery with complete macroscopic resection; and (d) WB-DWI/MRI was performed.Diagnostic tests of WB-DWI/MRI for predicting complete resection during secondary cytoreductive surgery are calculated as well as the progression-free and overall survival of the patients with a WB-DWI/MRI scan that showed resectable disease or not. RESULTS In total, 238 patients could be identified, of whom 123 (51.7%) underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery. WB-DWI/MRI predicted resectable disease with a sensitivity of 93.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.3% to 96.9%), specificity of 93.0% (95% CI 87.3% to 96.3%), and an accuracy of 93.3% (95% CI 89.3% to 96.1%). The positive predictive value was 91.9% (95% CI 85.3% to 95.7%).Prediction of resectable disease by WB-DWI/MRI correlated with improved progression-free survival (median 19 months vs 9 months; hazard ratio [HR] for progression 0.36; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50) and overall survival (median 75 months vs 28 months; HR for death 0.33; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.47). CONCLUSION WB-DWI/MRI accurately predicts resectable disease in patients with a platinum-free interval of ≥6 months at the time of secondary cytoreductive surgery and could be of complementary value to the currently used models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Dumont
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raphaëla Carmen Dresen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Toon Van Gorp
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen J, Xu K, Li C, Tian Y, Li L, Wen B, He C, Cai H, He Y. [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of epithelial ovarian cancer: comparison with [ 18F]F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:4064-4076. [PMID: 37526694 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06369-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in primary or recurrent tumors and metastatic lesions of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with that of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]F-FDG) PET/CT. METHODS Forty-nine patients (median age, 57 years; IQR, 51-66 years) with histologically proven primary or relapsed EOC were enrolled. Participants underwent [18F]F-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. The detection rate, diagnostic accuracy, semiquantitative parameters, tumor staging, and clinical management of the tracers were compared. The diagnostic performance of [18F]F-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was evaluated and compared using surgical pathology. Differences between methods regarding the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) using preoperative imaging, surgical PCI, and tumor markers (CA125, HE4) were also assessed regarding peritoneal metastases. RESULTS Among the 49 patients, 28 had primary EOC; 21 had relapsed EOC. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperformed [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in detecting peritoneal metastases (96.8% vs. 83.0%; p < 0.001), retroperitoneal (99.5% vs. 91.4%; p < 0.001), and supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastases (100% vs. 80.4%; p < 0.001). Compared with [18F]F-FDG, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 showed higher SUVmax for peritoneal metastases (17.31 vs. 13.68; p = 0.026) and retroperitoneal (8.72 vs. 6.56; p < 0.001) and supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastases (6.39 vs. 4.20; p < 0.001). Moreover, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity compared with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic lymph nodes (80.6% vs. 61.3%; p = 0.031) and peritoneal metastases (97.5% vs. 75.9%; p < 0.001), using surgical pathology as the gold standard. Compared with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT led to an upgrade in 14.3% and 33.3% of treatment-naive and relapse participants, resulting in management changes in 10.7% and 19.0% of the patients, respectively. The median PCIFAPI scores were significantly higher than PCIFDG (15 vs. 11; p < 0.001) and positively correlated with CA125 and HE4 levels and surgical PCI. CONCLUSION [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT achieved higher sensitivity than [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in the detection and diagnosis of lymph node and peritoneal metastases, suggesting advantages regarding the preoperative staging of patients with EOC and, thereby, improving treatment decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05034146. Registered February 23, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Kui Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Chongjiao Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Yueli Tian
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Bing Wen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Can He
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Hongbing Cai
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| | - Yong He
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brincat MR, Mira AR, Lawrence A. Current and Emerging Strategies for Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3331. [PMID: 37958227 PMCID: PMC10647517 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. More than 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, which is associated with poorer overall survival. Symptoms at presentation are vague and non-specific, contributing to late diagnosis. Multimodal risk models have improved the diagnostic accuracy of adnexal mass assessment based on patient risk factors, coupled with findings on imaging and serum-based biomarker tests. Newly developed ultrasonographic assessment algorithms have standardised documentation and enable stratification of care between local hospitals and cancer centres. So far, no screening test has proven to reduce ovarian cancer mortality in the general population. This review is an update on the evidence behind ovarian cancer diagnostic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R. Brincat
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Ana Rita Mira
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Hospital Garcia de Orta, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Lawrence
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinto P, Burgetova A, Cibula D, Haldorsen IS, Indrielle-Kelly T, Fischerova D. Prediction of Surgical Outcome in Advanced Ovarian Cancer by Imaging and Laparoscopy: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061904. [PMID: 36980790 PMCID: PMC10047411 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Maximal-effort upfront or interval debulking surgery is the recommended approach for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The role of diagnostic imaging is to provide a systematic and structured report on tumour dissemination with emphasis on key sites for resectability. Imaging methods, such as pelvic and abdominal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, yield high diagnostic performance for diagnosing bulky disease, but they are less accurate for depicting small-volume carcinomatosis, which may lead to unnecessary explorative laparotomies. Diagnostic laparoscopy, on the other hand, may directly visualize intraperitoneal involvement but has limitations in detecting tumours beyond the gastrosplenic ligament, in the lesser sac, mesenteric root or in the retroperitoneum. Laparoscopy has its place in combination with imaging in cases where ima-ging results regarding resectability are unclear. Different imaging models predicting tumour resectability have been developed as an adjunctional objective tool. Incorporating results from tumour quantitative analyses (e.g., radiomics), preoperative biopsies and biomarkers into predictive models may allow for more precise selection of patients eligible for extensive surgery. This review will discuss the ability of imaging and laparoscopy to predict non-resectable disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia Pinto
- Department of Gynecology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Francisco Gentil, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal
- First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Burgetova
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ingfrid S Haldorsen
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Tereza Indrielle-Kelly
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Burton and Derby Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby DE13 0RB, UK
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, Mirandola M, Moro F, D'Alessandris N, De Felice F, Testa AC, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy in patients with suspicious primary advanced tubo-ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:236-242. [PMID: 36600533 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of pathological diagnosis by transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus surgery in patients with suspicious primary advanced tubo-ovarian carcinoma. The Feasibility, adequacy, and safety of the procedure were also evaluated. METHODS Consecutive women with pre-operative suspicious primary advanced tubo-ovarian carcinoma presenting between July 2019 and September 2021 were enrolled. Accuracy was calculated including only cases who underwent surgery. Feasibility was defined as the number of cases in which ultrasound-guided biopsy was possible according to tumor characteristics (morphology and site). Adequacy was defined as the number of conclusive diagnoses out of the samples collected. Safety was defined by the number of major complications which were defined as hospitalization, surgery, and/or blood transfusion. RESULTS A total of 278 patients were eligible for the study; 158 were enrolled, while 120 were excluded for logistic reasons or patient refusal. Ultrasound-guided biopsy was not feasible in 30 (19%) patients. The samples obtained in the remaining 128 patients were all adequate (100%), and no major complications were noted. A total of 26 (20%) patients started neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of the diagnosis obtained by ultrasound, whereas 102 (80%) patients underwent surgery. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided biopsy versus surgery was 94% (96/102), with six false negative cases at ultrasound (6%). Site (prevesical peritoneum) and size (<8 mm) of the nodules resulted as major predictive factors for ultrasound-guided biopsy failure (false negative). Ultrasound-guided biopsy correctly identified 86 primary invasive tubo-ovarian carcinomas and 10 metastatic tumors. CONCLUSION Ultrasound-guided biopsy is a feasible, safe, and accurate method to provide histological diagnosis in suspicious advanced tubo-ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriana Mascilini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Lorena Quagliozzi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Mirandola
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta D'Alessandris
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy .,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moruzzi MC, Bolomini G, Esposito R, Mascilini F, Ciccarone F, Quagliozzi L, Giudice MT, Beneduce G, Ficarelli S, Moroni R, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC, Moro F. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in assessing the extension of disease in advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:601.e1-601.e20. [PMID: 35752305 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical exploration remains the gold standard to evaluate the extension of disease and predict resectability. A laparoscopy-based scoring model was developed by Fagotti and colleagues in 2006 and updated in 2015, based on the intraoperative presence or absence of some specific cancer features. The model proved an overall accuracy rate of 77-100% and is considered the reference test to assess resectability in our Institution. OBJECTIVES The primary aim of the study was to analyze the agreement between preoperative ultrasound examination and laparoscopic findings in assessing the extension of intra-abdominal disease using six parameters described by Fagotti's score. STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective single-center observational study. Between January 2019 and June 2020, consecutive patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of ovarian/peritoneal cancer were assessed with preoperative ultrasound examination and assigned a score based on the six Fagotti's score parameters (great omentum, liver surface, lesser omentum/stomach/spleen, parietal peritoneum, diaphragms, bowel disease). Presence of mesenteral retraction of the small bowel and miliaric carcinomatosis on the serosa were also evaluated. Each parameter was correlated with laparoscopic findings. Concordance was calculated between ultrasound and laparoscopic parameters using Cohen's kappa(κ). RESULTS Cohen's κ ranged from 0.70 to 0.90 for carcinomatosis on the small/large bowel, supracolic omentum, liver surface and diaphragms. Cohen's κ test was lower for carcinomatosis on the parietal peritoneum (k=0.63) and on the lesser omentum/lesser curvature of the stomach/spleen (k=0.54). The agreement between ultrasound and surgical predictive index value (score) was κ=0.74. For the evaluation of mesenteral retraction and miliaric carcinomatosis, the agreement was low (k=0.57 and k=0.36 respectively). CONCLUSIONS The results of ultrasound and laparoscopy in the assessment of intra-abdominal tumor spread were in substantial agreement for almost all the parameters. Ultrasound examination can play a useful role in the preoperative management of patients with ovarian cancer when used in dedicated referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Moruzzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bolomini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosanna Esposito
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorena Quagliozzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana Beneduce
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Ficarelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Direzione Scientifica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ambrosio M, Virgilio A, Raffone A, Arena A, Raimondo D, Alletto A, Seracchioli R, Casadio P. Malignant epithelioid neoplasm of the ileum with ACTB-GLI1 fusion mimicking an adnexal mass. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:104. [PMID: 35387638 PMCID: PMC8988409 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01679-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant epithelioid neoplasm with ACTB-GLI1 fusion are considered different from the more common pericytic lesions, such myopericytoma, because they have a spectrum of different genetic abnormalities. They appear to pursue a benign clinical course in young adults, although in sporadic cases lymph node metastasis were described. The categorization of this new type of tumor may also lead to new therapeutic strategies, because they might be sensitive to SHH pathway inhibitors. CASE PRESENTATION The case involves a 72-years-old multiparous woman who accessed our department after an incidental finding of a right adnexal mass of 43 mm with contrast-enhancement on a control computed tomography scan made for suspected diverticulitis. Our intervention was a detailed ultrasound description of the suspected neoplasm; a diagnostic laparoscopy and the contextual laparotomic removal of abdominal mass; its histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Our main outcome measure is the definition and future recognition of new pathologic entity called malignant epithelioid neoplasm with ACTB-GLI1 fusion. CONCLUSIONS We described for the first time the ultrasound characteristic of this type of lesion using standardized terminology and we believe that it may be the first step to improve the acknowledgement of this novel pathologic entity defined as malignant epithelioid neoplasm with GLI-1 fusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ambrosio
- Mother-Child Department, Ospedale Maggiore, Azienda USL di Bologna, 40100, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agnese Virgilio
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy.,Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Alletto
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|