A question of angle of view

Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects

During the last decade, there has been a huge advancement in the use of transperineal ultrasound (TPU) in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Its main applications in obstetrics include the monitoring of fetal progression in labor and recently the assessment of maternal pelvic dimensions, whereas in gynecology, TPU is at present widely used for the evaluation of the female pelvic floor, opening new boundaries for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders. The association of volumetric three-dimensional techniques has largely contributed to the remarkable progress that has occurred in the use of TPU. The aim of this paper is to offer an overview of the advantages, challenges and future perspectives of the use of TPU for women’s imaging.

Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reproducibility of measurement of a new sonographic index of fetal head station in labor, the fetal head-symphysis distance (HSD), using three-dimensional ultrasound, and its correlation with digital assessment of fetal head descent and with the angle of progression (AoP).

METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes were acquired from 47 nulliparous women in active labor following assessment of fetal head station with digital examination. The HSD (the distance between the lower edge of the pubic symphysis and the nearest point of the fetal skull) was measured independently by two operators in order to evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility. The correlation between HSD, AoP and fetal head station was evaluated using regression analysis. Using 3D tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI), measurements of the HSD were obtained in different parasagittal planes to evaluate the influence of inaccurate alignment of the probe with the midline of the pelvis.

RESULTS

Measurement of HSD showed high intraobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.995; 95% CI, 0.991-0.997) and interobserver (ICC = 0.991; 95% CI, 0.984-0.995) reliability. In addition, a high correlation was demonstrated between mid-sagittal and parasagittal HSD measurements. HSD showed significant negative correlation with both fetal head station and AoP.

CONCLUSION

Fetal HSD is a simple and reliable method for the assessment of fetal head descent in labor.

Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

During labor, transperineal sonography is increasingly used to evaluate fetal head descent. The aim of this study was to compare the angle of progression assessed by open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs transperineal ultrasound.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 31 pregnant women at term (>37 weeks), who were not in labor, underwent MRI in an open 1.0-T system. A midsagittal plane of the maternal pelvis was stored. Immediately after, without changing the supine position, a transperineal ultrasound was performed. The angle of progression was measured offline by transperineal ultrasound and MRI.

RESULTS

The angles of progression measured by transperineal ultrasound (mean, 79.05 degrees; SD 11.44) and MRI (mean, 80.48 degrees; SD 11.06) correlated significantly (P < .001). The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The angle of progression measurements obtained by transperineal ultrasound and open MRI showed very good agreement.

Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements, obtained from stored ultrasound volumes, related to fetal head progression in the birth canal.

METHODS

From January to September 2009, serial ultrasound volumes were obtained from women in labor, stored and separately evaluated by two different operators using the SonoVCAD™ labor software. Volumes were aligned using the pubic bone and the urethra as references. In the sagittal plane of the pelvis, the following data were calculated: head progression distance (the distance between the infrapubic line and the lowest part of the fetal skull), head direction (the angle between the infrapubic line and the major longitudinal axis of the fetal head) and head progression angle (the angle between the longitudinal axis of the pubic bone and a line joining the lowest edge of the pubis to the lowest convexity of the fetal skull). In the transverse plane, the angle formed by the midline with the anteroposterior axis of the maternal pelvis (midline angle) was also measured. For each measurement, intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was determined.

RESULTS

We analyzed 30 ultrasound volumes. For all parameters, interobserver variation was significantly higher than intraobserver variation. Reproducibility was good for all parameters, except for the midline angle. Among the different ultrasound measurements, the progression angle presented the highest reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements obtained from stored ultrasound volumes to assess fetal head progression in the second stage of labor have good reproducibility, with progression distance and progression angle being the most reproducible parameters.