A prospective evaluation of rivaroxaban on haemostatic parameters in apparently healthy dogs

Case report: Severe hepatopathy following rivaroxaban administration in a dog

Rivaroxaban, a specific factor Xa inhibitor and commonly utilized anticoagulant, has been known to cause hepatotoxicity and liver failure in humans. Although rivaroxaban is frequently used in veterinary medicine, hepatotoxicity has not been previously reported in dogs. The current case report describes a dog that developed severe hepatopathy following rivaroxaban administration for a large right pulmonary artery thrombus. An estimated 6-year-old spayed female mixed-breed dog developed anorexia and lethargy 9 days after rivaroxaban administration began. Subsequent labwork revealed severe hepatocellular hepatopathy, and rivaroxaban was discontinued. Additional diagnostics did not reveal an underlying etiology, although hepatic cytology could be consistent with a toxic injury. The hepatopathy and clinical signs improved after rivaroxaban was discontinued. The time to onset, type of hepatopathy, and time to resolution were all similar to those reported for human cases. This case provides precedence to advocate for improved and closer monitoring of dogs receiving factor Xa inhibitors. In cases of suspected hepatotoxicity with no other identifiable cause, a risk-benefit analysis should be performed, and discontinuation of rivaroxaban administration or alternative anticoagulant medications should be considered.

Clinical features and posttreatment monitoring of dogs administered rivaroxaban (2018-2020): 19 cases

OBJECTIVE

To describe a population of sick dogs administered rivaroxaban monitored with a rivaroxaban-calibrated anti-Xa activity assay (aXa).

DESIGN

Descriptive retrospective study.

SETTING

Two veterinary teaching hospitals.

ANIMALS

Client-owned dogs administered rivaroxaban and monitored with aXa from January 2018 to January 2020 were eligible for study.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Medical records were reviewed and 19 dogs with a variety of underlying disease processes were identified. Rivaroxaban was administered to 12 of 19 dogs (63%) with confirmed thrombosis, 4 of 19 dogs (21%) with a strong clinical suspicion of thrombosis, and in 3 of 19 dogs (16%) with no current evidence of thrombosis. The median rivaroxaban dose administered was 0.96 mg/kg/day (0.62-1.58 mg/kg/day), with 15 of 19 dogs (79%) receiving rivaroxaban once daily. Clopidogrel was concurrently administered to 11 of 19 dogs (58%). Complete or partial thrombus resolution was identified in 5 of 12 (42%) and 3 of 12 (25%) dogs, respectively. Rivaroxaban appeared safe, with only 1 of 19 dogs (5%), concurrently administered clopidogrel, developing evidence of mild hematuria. Posttreatment monitoring revealed that 8 of 19 dogs (42%) had aXa below the target (aXa range of 150-250 ng/ml associated with effective treatment and prevention of venous thrombosis in people). The remaining 3 to 19 dogs (16%) achieved this range, and 8 of 19 dogs (42%) exceeded the range. No significant relationship between the initial rivaroxaban dose administered and the corresponding aXa result was identified. There were also no significant differences in baseline clinicopathological variables in dogs in which aXa fell within or outside this range.

CONCLUSIONS

aXa was most commonly measured in dogs receiving rivaroxaban with confirmed or suspected thrombosis. Dogs in this study received a range of rivaroxaban dosages and attained variable aXa values that were not directly correlated with dosage.