Brillas E, Peralta-Hernandez JM. The recent development of innovative photoelectro-Fenton processes for the effective and cost-effective remediation of organic pollutants in waters.
CHEMOSPHERE 2024;
366:143465. [PMID:
39369749 DOI:
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143465]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Revised: 10/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
Wastewaters with toxic and recalcitrant organic contaminants are poorly remediated in conventional wastewater treatment plants. So, powerful processes need to be developed to destroy such organic pollutants to preserve the quality of the aquatic environment. This critical and comprehensive review presents the recent innovative development of photoelectro-Fenton (PEF) covering the period 2019-September 2024. This emerging photo-assisted Fenton-based electrochemical advanced oxidation process (EAOP) is an efficient and cost-effective treatment for water remediation. It possesses a great oxidation power because the in-situ generated hydroxyl radical as oxidant is combined with the photolysis of the organic by-products under UV or sunlight irradiation. The review is initiated by a brief description of the characteristics of the PEF process to stand out in the role of generated oxidizing agents. Further, the homogeneous PEF. PEF-like, solar PEF (SPEF), and SPEF-like processes with iron catalysts are discussed, taking examples of their application to the removal and mineralization of solutions of industrial chemicals, herbicides, dyes, pharmaceuticals, and direct real wastewaters. Novel heterogeneous PEF treatments of such pollutants with solid iron catalysts or functionalized cathodes are analyzed. Finally, novel hybrid processes including PEF/photocatalysis and PEF/photoelectrocatalysis, followed by novel and potent sequential processes like electrocoagulation-PEF and persulfate-PEF, are discussed. Throughout the manuscript, special attention was made to the total operating cost of PEF, which is more expensive than conventional electro-Fenton due to the high electric cost of the UV lamp, pointing to consider the much more cost-effective SPEF as a preferable alternative in practice.
Collapse