Network pharmacodynamic models for customized cancer therapy

Liquid filled hard shell capsules: Current drug delivery influencing pharmaceutical technology

PURPOSE

Gastric absorption apparently is upfront route for drug delivery as it is convenient, economic and mostly suitable for getting the desired systemic effects. Unfortunately, many traditional and newer generation drugs suffer from poor solubility and thereby have lower bioavailability. With a perspective of bringing a novel delivery system in such condition for old/existing/new drugs, liquid filled hard capsules hold promise as delivery system.

METHODS

An organized state-of-the-art literature review including patents was done to accommodate information on the innovations in technology, processes and applications in the field of liquid filling in hard shell capsules.

RESULTS

The review findings revealed the importance of understanding the impact of liquid filled hard shell capsules would have in use of complex drug molecules specially the ones sensitive to light and moisture. This technology can have diverse functions to be used for both immediate and delayed drug release. Technology point of view the band sealing in such hard-shell capsules helps in providing protection against the tampering of the filled capsule.

CONCLUSION

The review gives an insight to the understanding of progression in the technology forefront related to formulation development of liquid formulations to be filled in hard shell capsules for better therapeutic potentials and convenience to the patients.

Toward Personalized Computer Simulation of Breast Cancer Treatment: A Multiscale Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model Informed by Multitype Patient Data

The usefulness of mechanistic models to disentangle complex multiscale cancer processes, such as treatment response, has been widely acknowledged. However, a major barrier for multiscale models to predict treatment outcomes in individual patients lies in their initialization and parametrization, which needs to reflect individual cancer characteristics accurately. In this study, we use multitype measurements acquired routinely on a single breast tumor, including histopathology, MRI, and molecular profiling, to personalize parts of a complex multiscale model of breast cancer treated with chemotherapeutic and antiangiogenic agents. The model accounts for drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We developed an open-source computer program that simulates cross-sections of tumors under 12-week therapy regimens and used it to individually reproduce and elucidate treatment outcomes of 4 patients. Two of the tumors did not respond to therapy, and model simulations were used to suggest alternative regimens with improved outcomes dependent on the tumor's individual characteristics. It was determined that more frequent and lower doses of chemotherapy reduce tumor burden in a low proliferative tumor while lower doses of antiangiogenic agents improve drug penetration in a poorly perfused tumor. Furthermore, using this model, we were able to correctly predict the outcome in another patient after 12 weeks of treatment. In summary, our model bridges multitype clinical data to shed light on individual treatment outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: Mathematical modeling is used to validate possible mechanisms of tumor growth, resistance, and treatment outcome.

Emerging roles for clinical pharmacometrics in cancer precision medicine

Purpose of review

Although significant progress has been made in cancer research, there exist unmet needs in patient care as reflected by the 'Cancer Moonshot' goals. This review appreciates the potential utility of quantitative pharmacology in cancer precision medicine.

Recent findings

Precision oncology has received federal funding largely due to 'The Precision Medicine Initiative'. Precision medicine takes into account the inter-individual variability, and allows for tailoring the right medication or the right dose of drug to the best subpopulation of patients who will likely respond to the intervention, thus enhancing therapeutic success and reducing "financial toxicity" to patients, families and caregivers. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) committed US$ 70 million from its fiscal year 2016 budget to advance precision oncology research. Through the 'Critical Path Initiative', pharmacometrics has gained an important role in drug development; however, it is yet to find widespread clinical applicability.

Summary

Stakeholders including clinicians and pharmacometricians need to work in concert to ensure that benefits of model-based approaches are harnessed to personalize cancer care to the individual needs of the patient via better dosing strategies, companion diagnostics, and predictive biomarkers. In medical oncology, where immediate patient care is the clinician's primary concern, pharmacometric approaches can be tailored to build models that rely on patient data already digitally available in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to facilitate quick collaboration and avoid additional funding needs. Taken together, we offer a roadmap for the future of precision oncology which is fraught with both challenges and opportunities for pharmacometricians and clinicians alike.

Integrating Transcriptomic Data with Mechanistic Systems Pharmacology Models for Virtual Drug Combination Trials

Monotherapy clinical trials with mutation-targeted kinase inhibitors, despite some success in other cancers, have yet to impact glioblastoma (GBM). Besides insufficient blood-brain barrier penetration, combinations are key to overcoming obstacles such as intratumoral heterogeneity, adaptive resistance, and the epistatic nature of tumor genomics that cause mutation-targeted therapies to fail. With now hundreds of potential drugs, exploring the combination space clinically and preclinically is daunting. We are building a simulation-based approach that integrates patient-specific data with a mechanistic computational model of pan-cancer driver pathways (receptor tyrosine kinases, RAS/RAF/ERK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA damage) to prioritize drug combinations by their simulated effects on tumor cell proliferation and death. Here we illustrate a first step, tailoring the model to 14 GBM patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas defined by an mRNA-seq transcriptome, and then simulating responses to three promiscuous FDA-approved kinase inhibitors (bosutinib, ibrutinib, and cabozantinib) with evidence for blood-brain barrier penetration. The model captures binding of the drug to primary targets and off-targets based on published affinity data and simulates responses of 100 heterogeneous tumor cells within a patient. Single drugs are marginally effective or even counterproductive. Common copy number alterations (PTEN loss, EGFR amplification, and NF1 loss) have a negligible correlation with single-drug or combination efficacy, reinforcing the importance of postgenetic approaches that account for kinase inhibitor promiscuity to match drugs to patients. Drug combinations tend to be either cytostatic or cytotoxic, but seldom both, highlighting the need for considering targeted and nontargeted therapy. Although we focus on GBM, the approach is generally applicable.

Analysis of copy number loss of the ErbB4 receptor tyrosine kinase in glioblastoma

Current treatments for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)-an aggressive form of brain cancer-are minimally effective and yield a median survival of 14.6 months and a two-year survival rate of 30%. Given the severity of GBM and the limitations of its treatment, there is a need for the discovery of novel drug targets for GBM and more personalized treatment approaches based on the characteristics of an individual's tumor. Most receptor tyrosine kinases-such as EGFR-act as oncogenes, but publicly available data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) indicates copy number loss in the ERBB4 RTK gene across dozens of GBM cell lines, suggesting a potential tumor suppressor role. This loss is mutually exclusive with loss of its cognate ligand NRG1 in CCLE as well, more strongly suggesting a functional role. The availability of higher resolution copy number data from clinical GBM patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed that a region in Intron 1 of the ERBB4 gene was deleted in 69.1% of tumor samples harboring ERBB4 copy number loss; however, it was also found to be deleted in the matched normal tissue samples from these GBM patients (n = 81). Using the DECIPHER Genome Browser, we also discovered that this mutation occurs at approximately the same frequency in the general population as it does in the disease population. We conclude from these results that this loss in Intron 1 of the ERBB4 gene is neither a de novo driver mutation nor a predisposing factor to GBM, despite the indications from CCLE. A biological role of this significantly occurring genetic alteration is still unknown. While this is a negative result, the broader conclusion is that while copy number data from large cell line-based data repositories may yield compelling hypotheses, careful follow up with higher resolution copy number assays, patient data, and general population analyses are essential to codify initial hypotheses prior to investing experimental resources.

Looking beyond the cancer cell for effective drug combinations

Combinations of therapies are being actively pursued to expand therapeutic options and deal with cancer’s pervasive resistance to treatment. Research efforts to discover effective combination treatments have focused on drugs targeting intracellular processes of the cancer cells and in particular on small molecules that target aberrant kinases. Accordingly, most of the computational methods used to study, predict, and develop drug combinations concentrate on these modes of action and signaling processes within the cancer cell. This focus on the cancer cell overlooks significant opportunities to tackle other components of tumor biology that may offer greater potential for improving patient survival. Many alternative strategies have been developed to combat cancer; for example, targeting different cancer cellular processes such as epigenetic control; modulating stromal cells that interact with the tumor; strengthening physical barriers that confine tumor growth; boosting the immune system to attack tumor cells; and even regulating the microbiome to support antitumor responses. We suggest that to fully exploit these treatment modalities using effective drug combinations it is necessary to develop multiscale computational approaches that take into account the full complexity underlying the biology of a tumor, its microenvironment, and a patient’s response to the drugs. In this Opinion article, we discuss preliminary work in this area and the needs—in terms of both computational and data requirements—that will truly empower such combinations.

Molecular mechanism matters: Benefits of mechanistic computational models for drug development

Making drug development a more efficient and cost-effective process will have a transformative effect on human health. A key, yet underutilized, tool to aid in this transformation is mechanistic computational modeling. By incorporating decades of hard-won prior knowledge of molecular interactions, cellular signaling, and cellular behavior, mechanistic models can achieve a level of predictiveness that is not feasible using solely empirical characterization of drug pharmacodynamics. These models can integrate diverse types of data from cell culture and animal experiments, including high-throughput systems biology experiments, and translate the results into the context of human disease. This provides a framework for identification of new drug targets, measurable biomarkers for drug action in target tissues, and patient populations for which a drug is likely to be effective or ineffective. Additionally, mechanistic models are valuable in virtual screening of new therapeutic strategies, such as gene or cell therapy and tissue regeneration, identifying the key requirements for these approaches to succeed in a heterogeneous patient population. These capabilities, which are distinct from and complementary to those of existing drug development strategies, demonstrate the opportunity to improve success rates in the drug development pipeline through the use of mechanistic computational models.