Kristall- und Molek�lstruktur von SbI3 � 9S3 (9S3 = 1,4,7-Trithiacyclononan)

The Stibium Bond or the Antimony-Centered Pnictogen Bond: The Covalently Bound Antimony Atom in Molecular Entities in Crystal Lattices as a Pnictogen Bond Donor

A stibium bond, i.e., a non-covalent interaction formed by covalently or coordinately bound antimony, occurs in chemical systems when there is evidence of a net attractive interaction between the electrophilic region associated with an antimony atom and a nucleophile in another, or the same molecular entity. This is a pnictogen bond and are likely formed by the elements of the pnictogen family, Group 15, of the periodic table, and is an inter- or intra-molecular non-covalent interaction. This overview describes a set of illustrative crystal systems that were stabilized (at least partially) by means of stibium bonds, together with other non-covalent interactions (such as hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds), retrieved from either the Cambridge Structure Database (CSD) or the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). We demonstrate that these databases contain hundreds of crystal structures of various dimensions in which covalently or coordinately bound antimony atoms in molecular entities feature positive sites that productively interact with various Lewis bases containing O, N, F, Cl, Br, and I atoms in the same or different molecular entities, leading to the formation of stibium bonds, and hence, being partially responsible for the stability of the crystals. The geometric features, pro-molecular charge density isosurface topologies, and extrema of the molecular electrostatic potential model were collectively examined in some instances to illustrate the presence of Sb-centered pnictogen bonding in the representative crystal systems considered.

Triple-Pnictogen Bonding as a Tool for Supramolecular Assembly

Supramolecular assembly utilizing simultaneous formation of three pnictogen bonds around a single antimony vertex was explored via X-ray crystallography, solution NMR, and computational chemistry. An arylethynyl (AE) ligand was designed to complement the three electrophilic regions around the Sb compound. Though solution studies reveal large binding constants for individual pyridyl units with the Sb donor, the rigidity and prearrangement of the AE acceptor proved necessary to achieve simultaneous binding of three acceptors to the Sb-centered pnictogen-bond donor. Calculations and X-ray structures suggest that negative cooperativity upon sequential binding of three acceptors to a Sb center limits the utility of triple-pnictogen bonding pyridyl acceptors. These limitations can be negated, however, when positive cooperativity is designed into a complementary acceptor ligand.

Arsenic(III) halide complexes with acyclic and macrocyclic thio- and selenoether coligands: synthesis and structural properties

The preparations of the new complexes [AsBr(3)[MeS(CH(2))(2)SMe]], [AsX(3)([9]aneS(3))] (X = Cl, Br or I; [9]aneS(3) = 1,4,7-trithiacyclononane), [AsCl(3)([14]aneS(4))] ([14]aneS(4) = 1,4,8,11-tetrathiacyclotetradecane), [AsX(3)([8]aneSe(2))] ([8]aneSe(2) = 1,5-diselenacyclooctane), [(AsX(3))(2)([16]aneSe(4))] ([16]aneSe(4) = 1,5,9,13-tetraselenacyclohexadecane), and [(AsBr(3))(2)([24]aneSe(6))] ([24]aneSe(6) = 1,5,9,13,17,21-hexaselenacyclotetracosane) are described. These are obtained from direct reaction of the appropriate AsX(3) and 1 mol equiv of the thio- or selenoether ligand in anhydrous CH(2)Cl(2) (or thf for X = I) solution. The products have been characterized by microanalysis and IR and (1)H NMR spectroscopy. In solution they are extensively dissociated, reflecting the weak Lewis acidity of AsX(3). Reaction of AsX(3) with MeSe(CH(2))(2)SeMe or MeC(CH(2)EMe)(3) (E = S or Se) gave only oils. Treatment of PCl(3) or PBr(3) with Me(2)S, MeE(CH(2))(2)EMe, or [9]aneS(3) failed to give solid complexes, and there was no evidence from NMR spectroscopy for any adduct formation in solution. The crystal structures of the first series of thioether and selenoether complexes of As(III) are described: [AsBr(3)[MeS(CH(2))(2)SMe]], C(4)H(10)AsBr(3)S(2), a = 10.2818(6) A, b = 7.8014(5) A, c = 14.503(1) A, beta = 102.9330(2) degrees, monoclinic, P2(1)/c, Z = 4; [AsI(3)[MeS(CH(2))(2)SMe]], C(4)H(10)AsI(3)S(2), a = 9.1528(1) A, b = 11.5622(2) A, c = 12.0939(2) A, beta = 93.863(1) degrees, monoclinic, P2(1)()/n, Z = 4; [AsCl(3)([9]aneS(3))], C(6)H(12)AsCl(3)S(3), a = 17.520(4) A, b = 17.520(4) A, c = 16.790(7) A, tetragonal, I4(1)cd, Z = 16; [AsCl(3)([14]aneS(4))], C(10)H(20)AsCl(3)S(4), a = 13.5942(2) A, b = 7.7007(1) A, c = 18.1270(3) A, beta = 111.1662(5) degrees, monoclinic, P2(1)()/n, Z = 4; [(AsCl(3))(2)([16]aneSe(4))], C(12)H(24)As(2)Cl(6)Se(4), a = 9.764(3) A, b = 13.164(1) A, c = 10.627(2) A, beta = 114.90(1) degrees, monoclinic, P2(1)()/n, Z = 2; [(AsBr(3))(2)([16]aneSe(4))], C(12)H(24)As(2)Br(6)Se(4), a = 10.1220(1) A, b = 13.4494(2) A, c = 10.5125(2) A, beta = 113.49(2) degrees, monoclinic, P2(1)()/n, Z = 2. [AsBr(3)[MeS(CH(2))(2)SMe]] and [AsI(3)[MeS(CH(2))(2)SMe]] reveal discrete mu(2)-halo As(2)X(6) dimeric structures involving distorted octahedral As(III), with the dithioether ligand chelating. [AsCl(3)([9]aneS(3))] adopts a discrete molecular distorted octahedral geometry with the thioether behaving as a weakly coordinated fac-capping ligand. [AsCl(3)([14]aneS(4))] forms an infinite sheet involving two mu(2)-chloro ligands on each As but bridging to two distinct As centers. Each macrocycle coordinates to two adjacent As centers via one S atom, giving a cis-octahedral Cl(4)S(2) donor set at As(III). The structures of [(AsCl(3))(2)([16]aneSe(4))] and [(AsBr(3))(2)([16]aneSe(4))] adopt 2-dimensional sheet structures with mu(2)-dihalo As(2)X(6) dimers cross-linked by mu(4)-tetraselenoether macrocycles, giving a disorted cis-X(4)Se(2) donor set at each As center. These species are compared with their antimony(III) and bismuth(III) analogues where appropriate.