Element-Element-Bindungen. XI Kettenbildung bei kristallinen Dimethyldichalkogenanen

Geometrical and energetic characteristics of Se⋯Se interactions in crystal structures of organoselenium molecules

Combined crystallographic and quantum chemical study was performed to reveal the nature of selenium–selenium interactions in the crystal structures of organoselenium compounds.

From Noncovalent Chalcogen-Chalcogen Interactions to Supramolecular Aggregates: Experiments and Calculations

This review considers noncovalent bonds between divalent chalcogen centers. In the first part we present X-ray data taken from the solid state structures of dimethyl- and diphenyl-dichalcogenides as well as oligoalkynes kept by alkyl-sulfur, -selenium, and -tellurium groups. Furthermore, we analyzed the solid state structures of medium sized (12-24 ring size) selenium coronands and medium to large rings with alkyne and alkene units between two chalcogen centers. The crystal structures of the cyclic structures revealed columnar stacks with close contacts between neighboring rings via noncovalent interactions between the chalcogen centers. To get larger space within the cavities, rings with diyne units between the chalcogen centers were used. These molecules showed channel-like structures in the solid state. The flexibility of the rings permits inclusion of guest molecules such as five-membered heterocycles and aromatic six-membered rings. In the second part we discuss the results of quantum chemical calculations. To treat properly the noncovalent bonding between chalcogens, we use diffuse augmented split valence basis sets in combination with electron correlation methods. Our model substances were 16 dimers consisting of two Me-X-Me (X = O, S, Se, Te) pairs and dimers of Me-X-Me/Me-X-CN (X = O, S, Se, Te) pairs. The calculations show the anticipated increase of the interaction energy from (Me-O-Me)₂ (-2.15 kcal/mol) to (Me-O-Me/Me-Te-CN) (-6.59 kcal/mol). An analysis by the NBO method reveals that in the case of the chalcogen centers O and S the hydrogen bridges between the molecules dominate. However, in the case of Se and Te the major bonding between the pairs originates from dispersion forces between the chalcogen centers. It varies between -1.7 and -4.0 kcal/mol.

Chiral dialkyl ditellurides: Conformation of chiral chromophore by circular dichroism and DFT calculation

The twisted structure of ditellurides, in a similar way as in other dichalcogenes, leads to different absorption of circularly polarized light by quasi-enantiomeric chiral orbitals. Chiral optically active ditellurides are not common compounds and this phenomenon is not widely reported. As chiral ditellurides found an application in asymmetric synthesis, their molecular structure, understood as their conformation, became an important factor for understanding their reactivity. Until now there are few examples of chiral ditellurides known and their structure was not analyzed in details. This article presents the results of our most recent research on the structure of chiral ditellurides investigated by electronic circular spectroscopy (ECD) supported by quantum-chemical calculation. This enables us to suggest a relationship between chirality of alkyl substituent and chirality (conformation) of ditelluride.

Experimental and Computational (77)Se NMR Investigations of the Cyclic Eight-Membered Selenium Imides 1,3,5,7-Se4(NR)4 (R = Me, (t)Bu) and 1,5-Se6(NMe)2

The cyclocondensation reaction of equimolar amounts of SeCl2 and (Me3Si)2NMe in THF affords 1,3,5,7-Se4(NMe)4 (5b) [δ((77)Se) = 1585 ppm] in excellent yield. An X-ray structural determination showed that 5b consists of cyclic, puckered crown-shaped molecules with a mean Se-N bond length of 1.841 Å typical of single bonds. A minor product of this reaction was isolated as unstable orange-red crystals, which were identified by X-ray analysis as the adduct 1,5-Se6(NMe)2·(1)/2Se8 (1b·(1)/2Se8), composed of cyclic 1,5-Se6(NMe)2 and disordered cyclo-Se8 molecules. A detailed reinvestigation of the cyclocondensation reaction of SeCl2 and (t)BuNH2 as a function of molar ratio and time by multinuclear ((1)H, (13)C, and (77)Se) NMR spectroscopy revealed that the final product exhibits one (77)Se resonance at 1486 ppm and equivalent N(t)Bu groups. The shielding tensors of 28 selenium-containing molecules, for which the (77)Se chemical shifts are unambiguously known, were calculated at the PBE0/def2-TZVPP level of theory to assist the spectral assignment of new cyclic selenium imides. The good agreement between the observed and calculated chemical shifts enabled the assignment of the resonance at 1486 ppm to 1,3,5,7-Se4(N(t)Bu)4 (5a). Those at 1028 and 399 ppm (intensity ratio 2:1) could be attributed to 1,5-Se6(NMe)2 (1b).

Chirality transfer through sulfur or selenium to chiral propellers

Steric and electronic effects to the structure of a trityl moiety due chirality transfer by ECD method and DFT calculation.

Magnetostructural characterization of copper(II) hydroxide dimers and coordination polymers coordinated to apical isothiocyanate and cyanide-based counteranions

Five Cu(II) hydroxo-bridged complexes of the type [Cu2(μ-OH)2(L)2][A]x·yH2O (where L = 1,10-phenanthroline, A = NCS–, x = 2, y = 2 (1); L = 2,2′-bipyridine, A = NCS–, x = 2, y = 1 (2); L = 2,2′-bipyridine, A = [Au(CN)4]–, x = 2, y = 0 (3) and 2 (4); L = N,N,N′,N′-teteramethylethylenediamine, A = [Pt(SCN)4]2–, x = 1, y = 0 (5)) have been prepared and have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR and Raman spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, and SQUID magnetometry. Complexes 1 and 2 consist of five-coordinate Cu(II) hydroxo-bridged dinuclear units bound to two NCS– anions in the apical positions, 3 and 4 are pseudo-polymorphs of a Cu(II) hydroxo-bridged dimer core with [Au(CN)4]– counteranions, and 5 is a coordination polymer of Cu(II) hydroxo-bridged dimers with trans-bridging [Pt(SCN)4]2– anions coordinated in the apical position of the five-coordinate Cu(II) centres. The magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for each system was measured, fit to obtain J-coupling values (which range from –0.37 to 17.8 cm−1), and qualitatively compared to known magnetostructural correlation parameters.

Tripodal Binding Units for Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold: A Comparison of Thiol and Thioether Headgroups

Whereas thiols and thioethers are frequently used as binding units of oligodentate precursor molecules to fabricate self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on coinage metal and semiconductor surfaces, their use for tridentate bonding configuration is still questionable. Against this background, novel tridentate thiol ligands, PhSi(CH(2)SH)(3) (PTT) and p-Ph-C(6)H(4)Si(CH(2)SH)(3) (BPTT), were synthesized and used as tripodal adsorbate molecules for the fabrication of SAMs on Au(111). These SAMs were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy. The PTT and BPTT films were compared with the analogous systems comprised of same tripodal ligands with thioether instead of thiol binding units (anchors). XPS and NEXAFS data suggest that the binding uniformity, packing density, and molecular alignment of the thiol-based ligands in the respective SAMs is superior to their thioether counterparts. In addition, the thiol-based films showed significantly lower levels of contamination. Significantly, the quality of the PTT SAMs on Au(111) was found to be even higher than that of the films formed from the respective monodentate counterpart, benzenethiol. The results obtained allow for making some general conclusions on the specific character of molecular self-assembly in the case of tridentate ligands.

Theoretical Investigations on Heteronuclear Chalcogen−Chalcogen Interactions: On the Nature of Weak Bonds between Chalcogen Centers

To understand the intermolecular interactions between chalcogen centers (O, S, Se, Te), quantum chemical calculations on model systems were carried out. These model systems were pairs of monomers of the composition (CH3)2X1 (X1 = O, S, Se, Te) as the donors and CH3X2Z (with X2 = O, S, Se, Te and Z = Me, CN) as the acceptors. The variation of X1, X2, and Z leads to 32 pairs with 8 homonuclear cases (X1 = X2 = O, S, Se, Te) and 24 heteronuclear cases (X1 not equal X2). The MP2/SDB-cc-pVTZ, 6-311G* level of theory was used to derive the geometrical parameters and the interaction energies of the model systems. The pairs with Z = CN (17-32) show a considerably higher interaction energy than the pairs with CH3 groups only (1-16). Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis revealed that the interaction of the dimers 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 21, 25, and 29 is mainly due to weak hydrogen bonding between methyl groups and chalcogen centers. These systems all contain hard chalcogen atoms as acceptors. For all other systems, the chalcogen-chalcogen interaction dominates. The one-electron picture of an interaction between the lone pair of the donor chalcogen atom and the chalcogen-carbon antibonding sigma* orbital serves as a model to qualitatively rationalize trends found in many of these systems. However, it has to be applied with some amount of skepticism. A detailed analysis based on symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) reveals that induction and dispersion forces dominate and contribute to the bonding in each case. Hydrogen-bonded compounds involve bonding electrostatic contributions. Compounds dominated by chalcogen-chalcogen interactions exhibit bonding due to electrostatic interactions only if one of the chalcogen atoms involved is sulfur or oxygen.