Expression of co-factors (SMRT and Trip-1) for retinoic acid receptors in human neuroectodermal cell lines

eIF3i regulation of protein synthesis, cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and tumorigenesis

eIF3i, a 36-kDa protein, is a putative subunit of the eIF3 complex important for translation initiation of mRNAs. It is a WD40 domain-containing protein with seven WD40 repeats that forms a β-propeller structure with an important function in pre-initiation complex formation and mRNA translation initiation. In addition to participating in the eIF3 complex formation for global translational control, eIF3i may bind to specific mRNAs and regulate their translation individually. Furthermore, eIF3i has been shown to bind to TGF-β type II receptor and participate in TGF-β signaling. It may also participate in and regulate other signaling pathways including Wnt/β-catenin pathway via translational regulation of COX-2 synthesis. These multiple canonical and noncanonical functions of eIF3i in translational control and in regulating signal transduction pathways may be responsible for its role in cell differentiation, cell cycle regulation, proliferation, and tumorigenesis. In this review, we will critically evaluate recent progresses and assess future prospects in studying eIF3i.

Translation regulation in skin cancer from a tRNA point of view

Protein synthesis is a central and dynamic process, frequently deregulated in cancer through aberrant activation or expression of translation initiation factors and tRNAs. The discovery of tRNA-derived fragments, a new class of abundant and, in some cases stress-induced, small Noncoding RNAs has perplexed the epigenomics landscape and highlights the emerging regulatory role of tRNAs in translation and beyond. Skin is the biggest organ in human body, which maintains homeostasis of its multilayers through regulatory networks that induce translational reprogramming, and modulate tRNA transcription, modification and fragmentation, in response to various stress signals, like UV irradiation. In this review, we summarize recent knowledge on the role of translation regulation and tRNA biology in the alarming prevalence of skin cancer.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factors and cancer

Recent technological advancements have shown tremendous mechanistic accomplishments in our understanding of the mechanism of messenger RNA translation in eukaryotic cells. Eukaryotic messenger RNA translation is very complex process that includes four phases (initiation, elongation, termination, and ribosome recycling) and diverse mechanisms involving protein and non-protein molecules. Translation regulation is principally achieved during initiation step of translation, which is organized by multiple eukaryotic translation initiation factors. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor proteins help in stabilizing the formation of the functional ribosome around the start codon and provide regulatory mechanisms in translation initiation. Dysregulated messenger RNA translation is a common feature of tumorigenesis. Various oncogenic and tumor suppressive genes affect/are affected by the translation machinery, making the components of the translation apparatus promising therapeutic targets for the novel anticancer drug. This review provides details on the role of eukaryotic translation initiation factors in messenger RNA translation initiation, their contribution to onset and progression of tumor, and how dysregulated eukaryotic translation initiation factors can be used as a target to treat carcinogenesis.

The role of eIF3 and its individual subunits in cancer

Specific individual subunits of eIF3 are elevated or reduced in numerous human tumors, and their ectopic overexpression in immortal cells can result in malignant transformation. The structure and assembly of eIF3 and its role in promoting mRNA and methionyl-tRNAi binding to the ribosome during the initiation phase of protein synthesis are described. Methods employed to detect altered levels of eIF3 subunits in cancers are critically evaluated in order to conclude rigorously that such subunits may cause malignant transformation. Strong evidence is presented that the individual overexpression of eIF3 subunits 3a, 3b, 3c, 3h, 3i and 3m may cause malignant transformation, whereas underexpression of subunits 3e and 3f may cause a similar outcome. Possible mechanisms to explain the malignant phenotypes are examined. The involvement of eIF3 in cancer reinforces the view that translational control plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, and provides new targets for the development of therapeutic agents. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Translation and Cancer.

EIF3i promotes colon oncogenesis by regulating COX-2 protein synthesis and β-catenin activation

Translational control of gene expression has recently been recognized as an important mechanism controlling cell proliferation and oncogenesis, and it mainly occurs in the initiation step of protein synthesis that involves multiple eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). Many eIFs have been found to have aberrant expression in human tumors and the aberrant expression may contribute to oncogenesis. However, how these previously considered house-keeping proteins are potentially oncogenic remains elusive. In this study, we investigated the expression of eIF3i in human colon cancers, tested its contribution to colon oncogenesis and determined the mechanism of eIF3i action in colon oncogenesis. We found that eIF3i expression was upregulated in both human colon adenocarcinoma and adenoma polyps as well as in model inducible colon tumorigenic cell lines. Overexpression of ectopic eIF3i in intestinal epithelial cells causes oncogenesis by directly upregulating the synthesis of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein and activates the β-catenin/T-cell factor 4 signaling pathway that mediates the oncogenic function of eIF3i. Together, we conclude that eIF3i is a proto-oncogene that drives colon oncogenesis by translationally upregulating COX-2 and activating the β-catenin signaling pathway. These findings imply that proto-oncogenic eIFs likely exert their tumorigenic function by regulating/altering the synthesis level of downstream tumor suppressor or oncogenes.

miR-7 and miR-214 are specifically expressed during neuroblastoma differentiation, cortical development and embryonic stem cells differentiation, and control neurite outgrowth in vitro

The mammalian nervous system exerts essential control on many physiological processes in the organism and is itself controlled extensively by a variety of genetic regulatory mechanisms. microRNA (miR), an abundant class of small non-coding RNA, are emerging as important post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression in the brain. Increasing evidence indicates that miR regulate both the development and function of the nervous system. Moreover, deficiency in miR function has also been implicated in a number of neurological disorders. Expression profile analysis of miR is necessary to understand their complex role in the regulation of gene expression during the development and differentiation of cells. Here we present a comparative study of miR expression profiles in neuroblastoma, in cortical development, and in neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells. By microarray profiling in combination with real time PCR we show that miR-7 and miR-214 are modulated in neuronal differentiation (as compared to miR-1, -16 and -133a), and control neurite outgrowth in vitro. These findings provide an important step toward further elucidation of miR function and miR-related gene regulatory networks in the mammalian central nervous system.

Selective alteration of gene expression in response to natural and synthetic retinoids

BACKGROUND

Retinoids are very potent inducers of cellular differentiation and apoptosis, and are efficient anti-tumoral agents. Synthetic retinoids are designed to restrict their toxicity and side effects, mostly by increasing their selectivity toward each isotype of retinoic acids receptors (RARalpha,beta, gamma and RXRalpha, beta, gamma). We however previously showed that retinoids displayed very different abilities to activate retinoid-inducible reporter genes, and that these differential properties were correlated to the ability of a given ligand to promote SRC-1 recruitment by DNA-bound RXR:RAR heterodimers. This suggested that gene-selective modulation could be achieved by structurally distinct retinoids.

RESULTS

Using the differential display mRNA technique, we identified several genes on the basis of their differential induction by natural or synthetic retinoids in human cervix adenocarcinoma cells. Furthermore, this differential ability to regulate promoter activities was also observed in murine P19 cells for the RARbeta2 and CRABPII gene, showing conclusively that retinoid structure has a dramatic impact on the regulation of endogenous genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings therefore show that some degree of selective induction or repression of gene expression may be achieved when using appropriately designed ligands for retinoic acid receptors, extending the concept of selective modulators from estrogen and peroxisome proliferator activated receptors to the class of retinoid receptors.

Differential gene regulation by 9-cis and all-trans retinoic acid in neuroblastoma cells

BACKGROUND

9-cis retinoic acid (RA) is more effective than all-trans RA at inducing neuroblastoma differentiation in vitro, and has distinct biological properties with respect to its ability to promote apoptosis in N-type neuroblastoma cells. The cellular effects of 9-cis RA may, in part, result from activation of retinoid X receptor (RXR) homodimers. If this hypothesis is correct, 9-cis RA may control the expression of a different subset of retinoid-regulated genes compared to all-trans RA.

PROCEDURE

We have therefore used differential mRNA display to identify genes differentially expressed in neuroblastoma cells in response to all-trans and 9-cis RA.

RESULTS

The majority of cDNAs differentially expressed in response to all-trans or 9-cis RA matched to nonredundant Genbank sequences or EST database sequences. Differential-display profiles were similar in SH SY 5Y and SH S EP cells, clonal derivatives of the mixed neuroblastoma cell line SK N SH, although there were apparent differences between these cell lines with respect to the retinoid-regulation of specific RT-PCR cDNA fragments.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the view that 9-cis and all-trans RA act via different receptor mechanisms.

Differential gene regulation by 9-cis and all-trans retinoic acid in neuroblastoma cells

BACKGROUND

9-cis retinoic acid (RA) is more effective than all-trans RA at inducing neuroblastoma differentiation in vitro, and has distinct biological properties with respect to its ability to promote apoptosis in N-type neuroblastoma cells. The cellular effects of 9-cis RA may, in part, result from activation of retinoid X receptor (RXR) homodimers. If this hypothesis is correct, 9-cis RA may control the expression of a different subset of retinoid-regulated genes compared to all-trans RA.

PROCEDURE

We have therefore used differential mRNA display to identify genes differentially expressed in neuroblastoma cells in response to all-trans and 9-cis RA.

RESULTS

The majority of cDNAs differentially expressed in response to all-trans or 9-cis RA matched to nonredundant Genbank sequences or EST database sequences. Differential-display profiles were similar in SH SY 5Y and SH S EP cells, clonal derivatives of the mixed neuroblastoma cell line SK N SH, although there were apparent differences between these cell lines with respect to the retinoid-regulation of specific RT-PCR cDNA fragments.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the view that 9-cis and all-trans RA act via different receptor mechanisms.

Differential effects of retinoic acid isomers on the expression of nuclear receptor co-regulators in neuroblastoma

Retinoic acid modulates growth and induces differentiation and apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells in vitro, with the all-trans and 9-cis isomers having different biological properties. Transcriptional activation in response to retinoic acid isomers is mediated by retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors. The differential expression of co-activators and co-repressors which preferentially interact with retinoic acid receptors or retinoid X receptors may be a mechanism leading to different cellular responses to 9-cis and all-trans retinoic acid. To test this hypothesis, we have studied the expression of the nuclear receptor co-regulators TIF1alpha, TIF1beta, SUG1 and SMRT in the N-type and S-type neuroblastoma cell lines SH SY 5Y and SH S EP. Transcripts for all four co-regulators were expressed in these neuroblastoma cells. The expression of TIF1alpha, TIF1beta and SUG1 did not change in response to retinoic acid; however, SMRT was induced in both neuroblastoma cell lines, but particularly by all-trans retinoic acid in SH S EP cells. An additional co-activator, Trip3, was isolated by differential mRNA display and shown to be preferentially induced by 9-cis retinoic acid in SH SY 5Y and SH S EP cells. These data suggest that retinoic acid isomer-specific induction of nuclear receptor co-regulators may determine, in part, the differential biological effects of retinoic acid isomers.