Clinical and research contributions of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure to neuropsychology

Homotopic organization of essential language sites in right and bilateral cerebral hemispheric dominance

Object

Language dominance in the right hemisphere is rare. Therefore, the organization of essential language sites in the dominant right hemisphere is unclear, especially compared with cases involving the more prevalent left dominant hemisphere.

Methods

The authors reviewed the medical records of 15 patients who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor or epilepsy surgery and speech mapping of right hemisphere perisylvian language areas at the University of California, San Francisco. All patients were determined to have either complete right-sided or bilateral language dominance by preoperative Wada testing.

Results

All patients but one were left-handed. Of more than 331 total stimulation sites, 27 total sites were identified as essential for language function (14 sites for speech arrest/anarthria; 12 for anomia; and 1 for alexia). While significant interindividual variability was observed, the general pattern of language organization was similar to classic descriptions of frontal language production and posterior temporal language integration for the left hemisphere. Speech arrest sites were clustered in the ventral precentral gyrus and pars opercularis. Anomia sites were more widely distributed, but were focused in the posterior superior and middle temporal gyri as well as the inferior parietal gyrus. One alexia site was found over the superior temporal gyrus. Face sensory and motor cortical sites were also identified along the ventral sensorimotor strip. The prevalence and specificity of essential language sites were greater in unilateral right hemisphere–dominant patients, compared with those with bilateral dominance by Wada testing.

Conclusions

The authors' results suggest that the organization of language in right hemisphere dominance mirrors that of left hemisphere dominance. Awake speech mapping is a safe and reliable surgical adjunct in these rare clinical cases and should be done in the setting of right hemisphere dominance to avoid preventable postoperative aphasia.

The Wada test in Austrian, Dutch, German, and Swiss epilepsy centers from 2000 to 2005: a review of 1421 procedures

Twenty-six Austrian, Dutch, German, and Swiss epilepsy centers were asked to report on use of the Wada test (intracarotid amobarbital procedure, IAP) from 2000 to 2005 and to give their opinion regarding its role in the presurgical diagnosis of epilepsy. Sixteen of the 23 centers providing information had performed 1421 Wada tests, predominantly the classic bilateral procedure (73%). A slight nonsignificant decrease over time in Wada test frequency, despite slightly increasing numbers of resective procedures, could be observed. Complication rates were relatively low (1.09%; 0.36% with permanent deficit). Test protocols were similar even though no universal standard protocol exists. Clinicians rated the Wada test as having good reliability and validity for language determination, whereas they questioned its reliability and validity for memory lateralization. Several noninvasive functional imaging techniques are already in use. However, clinicians currently do not want to rely solely on noninvasive functional imaging in all patients.

Reduced anesthetization during the intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) test in patients taking carbonic anhydrase-inhibiting medications

PURPOSE

Failure to show adequate anesthetization during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP or "Wada test") is a rare complication. After an unusually high rate of recent anesthetization failures, we sought to determine the frequency of reduced anesthetization and any common factors underlying these failures.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent IAP tests through the UCLA Seizure Disorder Center between September 1999 and May 2002. Age, date, epileptogenic focus, radiologist, and current medications were all considered.

RESULTS

Of a total of 56 patients who underwent our intracarotid amobarbital examination, 11 (19.6%) showed either very rapid recovery (<or=1 min) or anesthetization failure. Of these, 10 (91%) of 11 were taking a medication with some carbonic anhydrase-inhibiting (CAI) properties (topiramate (TPM), n=7; zonisamide (ZNS), n=2; hydrochlorothiazide and furosemide, n=1 each). The only patient of 40 (2.5%) who was not taking any CAI drugs and showed an early IAP recovery (55 s) had recently discontinued TPM. IAPs performed on patients after weaning from TPM showed a correlation between length of drug discontinuation and duration of anesthesia effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data strongly suggest that recent failures of anesthetization during the IAP are associated with a possible interaction between amobarbital and medications possessing CAI properties. We suggest that the IAP be performed only after >/=8 weeks after discontinuation of such medications.

Neuropsychological assessment for temporal lobe epilepsy surgery

Neuropsychological assessment consists of a comprehensive evaluation of cognitive functioning and most often some evaluation of motor skills and sensory status also. Cognitive functions sampled typically include "intelligence" (IQ tests), attention, language skills, visuospatial abilities, "executive skills" and other abilities associated with frontal-lobe function, and learning and memory. Thus, the assessment samples vary widely among a variety of functions, providing a comprehensive picture of an individual's strengths and weaknesses. The resulting pattern points to the probable site of epileptic focus. Neuropsychological findings also serve to predict the risk for postsurgical cognitive decline and, when performance before and after operation is compared, they provide data on the impact of surgery upon cognitive functioning. Comprehensive evaluation of learning and memory is particularly important in this context, because of the frequency of temporal lobe epilepsy and the prominence of memory dysfunction associated with it. In addition, patients slated for elective surgery may also undergo an intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP), which is performed to determine the side of cerebral dominance for language and to test the memory capabilities of each hemisphere alone. All of these specialized neuropsychological tools are discussed in this paper.

Criterion-based validity of an intracarotid amobarbital recognition-memory protocol

PURPOSE

We tested whether the behavioral components of an Intracarotid Amobarbital Protocol (IAP) had criterion validity. It was hypothesized that a recognition-memory test designed for intracarotid injections and used to predict the risk of global amnesia before an elective temporal lobectomy should also identify persons who are severely amnesic due to other neurologic causes. Divergent validity predicts that speech tasks would be unaffected by amnesia. Test-retest reliability also was measured.

METHODS

Fifteen persons with severe amnesia were administered four alternate forms of a yes/no recognition-memory protocol and a speech protocol. No drug injection occurred. Standardized neuropsychological tests were used to divide the amnesic group into those with Global Amnesia (i.e., retain no ongoing memories), Severe Amnesia (i.e., memory impaired), and Amnesia Plus (severe amnesia plus other neuropsychologic deficits).

RESULTS

Two persons with Global Amnesia obtained scores at or below chance (i.e., failed) on the memory protocol. Unexpectedly, 12 of 13 severely amnesic persons obtained near-perfect memory scores. Amnesia had no impact on the speech protocol. Pass/Fail outcomes were highly correlated across all four sets.

CONCLUSIONS

A four-item IAP memory protocol showed good reliability and criterion validity in identifying the rare condition of Global Amnesia, but it was insensitive to other disabling, severe amnesic disorders. This IAP memory protocol might have validity in predicting a postsurgical Global Amnesic disorder, but it did not identify and therefore could not predict other more common severe amnesic disorders.

Physiology of somatosensory perception: cerebral lateralization and extinction

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the effects of cerebral lateralization and temporal dynamics on somatosensory perception.

BACKGROUND

We postulated that perceptual thresholds for simple somatosensory stimuli would be less in the left than the right hand, and that a left/right asymmetry in extinction would exist in healthy right-handed subjects (but not in left-handed subjects). During the course of these experiments we also examined the controversy concerning the temporal dynamics of somatosensory perception.

METHODS

A total of 126 healthy subjects (age range, 6 to 73 years) participated in the study. Effects of handedness, age, vigilance, gaze, and temporal interval on somatosensory perception were examined in a series of experiments. Brief electric pulses were applied to the index finger of one or both hands.

RESULTS

Perceptual thresholds are lower in the left than the right hand of healthy right-handed subjects in a large cohort across a wide age range. Left-handed subjects have no overall asymmetry. Even after compensation for baseline threshold differences, single stimuli in right-handed subjects are perceived more readily in the left than the right hand, and left-hand targets are more difficult to mask. Leftward eye/head gaze lowers thresholds in both hands of right-handed subjects (compared with right or straight gaze). Extinction was consistently maximal when the mask followed the target by 50 to 100 msec.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate clearly that left/right perceptual thresholds for simple somatosensory stimuli are asymmetric in healthy right-handed subjects. Both central and peripheral asymmetries exist. The central asymmetry and gaze effects are consistent with right cerebral dominance for externally directed attention. Access of somatosensory stimuli to conscious awareness is delayed and particularly vulnerable to disruption at 50 to 100 msec after onset of the stimulus.